Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:56:06.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La trahison des clercs: British intellectuals and the first home–rule crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Tom Dunne
Tom Dunne*
Affiliation:
University College, Cork
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the early months of 1882 two of the writers who were to be prominent four years later in opposing Gladstone’s first Irish home-rule bill made similar complaints to correspondents about the state of British public opinion. ‘Less is thought of the Irish question than of the Australian cricketers’, wrote Goldwin Smith; while in characteristic vein, James Fitzjames Stephen waxed choleric about the ‘extravagant idiocy’ of a public obsessed with ‘Jumbo the elephant’, while ignoring ‘one of the most disgusting and brutally dangerous civil wars ever known in these islands’. Each had a particular reason to be preoccupied about Ireland. Smith’s pique was, in part at least, that of the ‘expert’ whose warnings and admonitions had gone unheeded, while Stephen lived part of each year on his small estate in County Louth. However, they also reflected a general concern among politicians and intellectuals which historians have tended to ignore or underestimate — a belief that trends and events in Ireland and the British response to them had serious implications for the future of Britain itself. The recent major study of the home-rule crisis of 1885-6 by Alistair Cooke and John Vincent is remarkable in British historiographical treatment of the Irish question only in the way in which the normal presuppositions are made explicit. Cooke and Vincent argue with admirable clarity, and in remarkable detail, that virtually none of the politicians involved in the crisis were concerned with the ostensible issues of the home-rule policy, each being exclusively concerned instead with exploiting the political crisis which Gladstone’s adoption of the policy (also purely for tactical political reasons) had created. This denial of any importance to ideological differences in political crises is a characteristic of the so-called ‘high politics’ school of historiography, and constitutes perhaps its most serious defect. It is reinforced in the case of the Irish home-rule crisis by theview that, as it was undoubtedly true that few among the political élite cared about Ireland as such, they were equally indifferent to the issues it raised. However, not alone can it be argued that there were important ideological dimensions to most political crises in late nineteenth-century Britain, there is considerable evidence to show that this was particularly true of those involving Irish questions, and of home rule above all.

Type
Articles
Information
Irish Historical Studies , Volume 23 , Issue 90 , 1982 , pp. 134 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The title of this article is taken, in part, from Benda, Julien, La trahison des clercs (Paris, 1927)Google Scholar. I am indebted to Oliver MacDonagh, Michael Laffan, Clare O’Halloran and the late Jack Gallagher for criticism and suggestions.

2 Haultain, Arnold (ed.), A selection from Goldwin Smith’s correspondence, 1846-1910 (London, 1913), pp 103-4Google Scholar; Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 16 Mar. 1882 (James Fitzjames Stephen papers, Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/13).

3 Cooke, A. B. and Vincent, J. R., The governing passion: cabinet government and party politics in Britain, 1885-6 (Brighton, 1974).Google Scholar

4 Morley, John, ‘Old parties and new policies’ in Fortnightly Review, x (July-Dec. 1868), p. 237.Google Scholar

5 Arthur, and Sidgwick, Eleanor (eds), Henry Sidgwick: a memoir (London, 1906), p. 443.Google Scholar

6 Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 9 June 1886 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/13).

7 Edwards, Owen Dudley, ‘Tennyson and Ireland’ in New Edinburgh Review, nos 38-9 (1977), pp 43–54.Google Scholar

8 Hyde, H. Montgomery (ed.), A Victorian historian: private letters of W. E. H. Lecky, 1859-78 (London, 1947), p. 86.Google Scholar

9 Bentley, Michael, The liberal mind, 1914-29 (Cambridge, 1977), p. 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Annan, Noel, ‘The intellectual aristocracy’ in Plumb, J. H. (ed.), Studies in social history: a tribute to G. M. Trevelyan (London, 1955)Google Scholar; Annan, Noel, Leslie Stephen: his thought and character in relation to his time (London, 1951).Google Scholar

11 Harvie, Christopher, The lights of liberalism: university liberals and the challenge of democracy, 1860-1886 (London, 1976).Google Scholar

12 Cf.Collini, Stefan, ‘Political theory and the “science of society” in Victorian Britain’ in Hist. Jn., xxiii (1980), pp 230-31Google Scholar, for an interesting recent contribution to this.

13 Roach, John, ‘Liberalism and the Victorian intelligentsia’ in Hist. Jn., xiii (1957), pp 58–81.Google Scholar

14 Stephen, J. F., Liberty, equality, fraternity (London, 1873)Google Scholar; Maine, H. S., Popular government (London, 1885)Google Scholar; Lecky, W. E. H., Democracy and liberty (2 vols, London, 1896)Google Scholar. The second (1874) edition of Stephen has been reprinted, ed. R. J. White (Cambridge, 1967), and is the edition referred to hereafter.

15 Dicey, A. V., England’s case against home rule (London, 1886).Google Scholar

16 James Fitzjames Stephen to Lord Lytton, 8 Aug. 1886 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/14).

17 Rait, R. S. (ed.), Memorials of Albert Venn Dicey (London, 1925), pp 99–102.Google Scholar

18 Dunne, T. J., ‘Ireland, England and empire, 1868-1886’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1975), chap. 6.Google Scholar

19 Hammond, J. L., Gladstone and the Irish nation (London, 1938), p. 532.Google Scholar

20 Ibid.; Roach, ‘Liberalism and the Victorian intelligentsia’; Harvie, Lights of liberalism.

21 Harvie, Lights of liberalism, ch. 9.

22 Cf. above, n. 14.

23 Seeley, J. R., The expansion of England (London, 1883)Google Scholar. This has been reprinted, ed. John Gross (Chicago, 1971).

24 Froude, J. A., The English in Ireland in the eighteenth century (3 vols, London, 1872-4).Google Scholar

25 Cartney, Donal Mc, ‘James Anthony Froude and Ireland: a historiographical controversy of the nineteenth century’ in Williams, T. D. (ed.), Hist. Studies VIII (Dublin, 1971), pp 171-90 at p. 187.Google Scholar

26 Collini, ‘Political theory’, p. 221.

27 Cosgrove, R. A., The rule of law: Albert Venn Dicey, Victorian jurist (London, 1980), chaps 4, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Harvie, Lights of liberalism, esp. chaps 2, 5, 6.

29 Ibid., p. 141.

30 Quoted in ibid., p. 140.

31 J. F. Stephen, Liberty, equality, fraternity (1967 reprint). The quotations are from pp 81, 44, 226, 52, 85, 168, 288, 219, 32.

32 Ibid., p. 24.

33 Roach, ‘Liberalism and the Victorian intelligentsia’, p. 59.

34 Maine, Popular government, p. 207.

35 Lecky, W. E. H., History of the rise and influence of the spirit of rationalism in Europe (2 vols, London, 1864)Google Scholar; History of European morals from Augustus to Charlemagne (2 vols, London, 1868); Leaders of public opinion in Ireland (London, 1861; 2nd ed., 1871).

36 Lecky’s influence was particularly important for Gladstone’s view of Grattan’s parliament, e.g. Hansard 3, ccciv, 1054 (8 Apr. 1886); cccvi, 1238 (7 June 1886).

37 Lecky, Democracy and liberty, i, 370.

38 Paul, Herbert (ed.), Letters of Lord Acton to Mary, daughter of the Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone (London, 1904), p. 107.Google Scholar

39 Stephen to Lytton, 23 Mar. 1885 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/14).

40 Steele, E. D., ‘J.S. Mill and the Irish question: the principles of political economy, 1848-1865’ in Hist. Jn., xiii (1970), pp 216-36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘J.S. Mill and the Irish question: reform and the integrity of the empire, 186–70’ in ibid., xiii (1970), pp 419–50.

41 Steele, ‘Reform and the integrity of the empire’, p. 436. See also Mill, J. S., Chapters and speeches on the Irish land question (London, 1870), p. 110.Google Scholar

42 Mill, J. S., England and Ireland (London, 1868), pp 24, 7.Google Scholar

43 Dicey, Edward, ‘The plea of a malcontent liberal’ in Fortnightly Review, xxxviii (July-Dec, 1885), pp 467-8.Google Scholar

44 Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 4 Mar. 1886 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/13).

45 Stephen to Lytton, 23 Feb. 1885 (ibid., MS 7349/14).

46 A. V. Dicey, England’s case, p. 43.

47 Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 25 June 1886 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/13).

48 Froude, J. A., ‘Ireland’ in Nineteenth Century, viii (July-Dec. 1880), p. 368.Google Scholar

49 This was stressed particularly by Lecky, who quoted Gladstone in The Times, 5 May 1886, p. 10.

50 Bryce, James, England and Ireland: an introductory statement (London, 1884), p. 43.Google Scholar

51 Sidgwick, Memoir, p. 524.

52 ‘Sir James Stephen on the Irish question’ in The Times, 21 Jan. 1886, p. 8.

53 Gladstone, W. E., Speeches on the Irish question in 1886 (London, 1887), pp 176-7, 236-7, 294.Google Scholar

54 E.g. Bryce, England & Ireland, p. 33; Goldwin Smith corr., pp 132–3; 150–51.

55 Dunne, ‘Ireland, England & empire’, ch. 5.

56 Smith, Goldwin, ‘The administration of Ireland’ in Contemporary Review, xlviii (July-Dec. 1885), p. 9 Google Scholar; Dicey, Edward, ‘The vote of a moderate liberal’ in Nineteenth Century, xviii (July-Dec. 1885), pp 840-48Google Scholar; J. F. Stephen in The Times, 5 Jan. 1886, p. 12; Meredith, George, ‘Concession to the Celt’ in Fortnightly Review, xl (July-Dec. 1886), pp 448-51.Google Scholar

57 Smith to Grey, 30 Mar. 1886, in Goldwin Smith corr., pp 184–6.

58 Sidgwick, Memoir, p. 442.

59 Ibid., p. 438.

60 Stephen, Liberty, equality, fraternity, p. 212; and see also Goldwin Smith corr., pp 160-62; Dunne, W. H., James Anthony Froude: a biography (2 vols, Oxford, 1961-3), ii, 568Google Scholar; Sidgwick, Memoir, pp 391–3.

61 John Morley in The Times, 1 Jan. 1886, p. 9; Bryce, James, ‘Alternative policies in Ireland’ in Nineteenth Century, xix (Jan.-June 1886), pp 312-28Google Scholar; Sidgwick, Memoir, p. 473.

62 Steele, ‘Reform and the integrity of the empire’, p. 436, and see Sidgwick, Memoir, p. 432, for a similar statement by Trevelyan.

63 Gladstone, Speeches on the Irish question, p. 180.

64 Fasnacht, G. E., Acton’s political philosophy: an analysis (London, 1952), p. 140.Google Scholar

65 Seeley, J. R., The impartial study of politics (London, 1886), p. 7.Google Scholar

66 R. J. White (ed.), introduction to J. F. Stephen, Liberty, equality, fraternity (1967 reprint), p. 10.

67 Stephen, Liberty, equality, fraternity, p. 165.

68 A. V. Dicey, England’s case, pp 28–9.

69 Stephen, Liberty, equality, fraternity, p. 85.

70 Edward Dicey, ‘Plea of a malcontent liberal’, pp 469–70.

71 Dunne, , Froude, ii, 370.Google Scholar

72 Ibid., ii, 549.

73 Goldwin Smith, ‘The administration of Ireland’, p. 7; Dismemberment no remedy (London, 1886), p. 20; Goldwin Smith con., pp 184–6.

74 Lecky, Democracy and liberty, i, 216 ff; The Times, 13 Jan. 1886, p. 12.

75 Sidgwick, Memoir, p. 488.

76 Lecky, Democracy and liberty, i, chaps 3, 4.

77 Smith, Goldwin, ‘The organisation of democracy’ in Contemporary Review, xlvii (Jan.-June 1885), p. 327.Google Scholar

78 Paul, Letters of Acton to Mary Gladstone, p. 89.

79 Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 18 May 1883 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/13).

80 Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 30 Apr. 1886 (ibid., MS 7349/13).

81 Roach, ‘Liberalism and the intelligentsia’, p. 80.

82 Sidgwick, Memoir, 21 Feb. 1886, p. 439.

83 Reeve, Henry, ‘Popular government’ in Edinburgh Review, clxiii (Jan.-Apr. 1886), pp 277, 284Google Scholar. This is a review of Maine’s book.

84 Reeve, Henry, ‘England’s duty to Ireland’ in Edinburgh Review, clxiii (Jan.-Apr. 1886), pp 564-5.Google Scholar

85 Mulvey, Helen, ‘The historian Lecky: opponent of Irish home rule’ in Victorian Studies, i (1958), p. 347.Google Scholar

86 A. V. Dicey, England’s case, p. 283.

87 Sidgwick, Henry, The elements of politics (London, 1891).Google Scholar

88 Collini, ‘Political theory and the “science of society”’, p. 222.

89 Sidgwick, Elements of politics, esp. chap. 14.

90 Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution (London, 1885).Google Scholar

91 A. V. Dicey, England’s case, p. 2.

92 Ford, Trowbridge H., ‘Dicey’s conversion to unionism’ in I.H.S., xviii, no. 72 (Sept. 1973), pp 552-82Google Scholar; ‘Dicey as a political journalist’ in Political Studies, xviii (1970), pp 220–35. Harvie has described them as ‘monumentally inaccurate’ (Lights of liberalism, p. 321, fn.).

93 A. V. Dicey, England’s case, chs VI and VII.

94 Ibid., preface and pp 13, 170.

95 Ibid., p. 73.

96 Ibid., p. 140.

97 Ibid., p. 106.

98 Ibid., pp 28–9.

99 Ibid., p. 289.

100 Ibid., p. 43.

101 Ibid., pp 28–9.

102 Ibid., p. 290.

103 Ibid., pp 84-5.

104 Lecky, W. E. H., A history of Ireland in the eighteenth century, ed. Curtis, L. P. Jr, (London, 1972), pp xxxiv–xxxv.Google Scholar

105 Lecky, , Democracy and liberty, i, 212.Google Scholar

106 Ibid., i, 27, 29.

107 Ibid., i, 138 ff.

108 Ibid., ii, 322.

109 Ibid., i, 190 ff.

110 Ibid., i, 204–07.

111 Ibid., i, 370.

112 Arnold, Matthew, ‘The nadir of liberalism’ in Nineteenth Century, xix (Jan.-June 1886), pp 645-63.Google Scholar

113 E.g. Bodelsen, C. A., Studies in mid Victorian imperialism (London, 1924).Google Scholar

114 Robinson, Ronald and Gallagher, John, Africa and the Victorians: the official mind of imperialism (London, 1961)Google Scholar. For a recent survey of the debate that has followed, see Louis, W. R. (ed.), Imperialism: the Robinson and Gallagher controversy (London, 1976).Google Scholar

115 Robinson, & Gallagher, , Africa and the Victorians; Schreuder, D. M., Gladstone and Kruger: liberal government and colonial home rule, 1880-85 (London, 1969)Google Scholar; Dunne, ‘England, Ireland and empire’.

116 Harrison, Frederic, ‘Empire and humanity’ in Fortnightly Review, xxvii (Jan.-June 1880), pp 288–308, at p. 296.Google Scholar

117 Smith, Goldwin, The conduct of England to Ireland (London, 1882), p. 28 Google Scholar, and also, ‘The Irish question’ in Contemporary Review, xxi (Dec. 1872-Mar. 1873), p. 518.

118 Smith, Goldwin, ‘The expansion of England’ in Contemporary Review, xlv (Jan.-June 1884), p. 524.Google Scholar

119 Goldwin Smith, ‘The Irish question’, p. 518; Wallace, Elizabeth, Goldwin Smith: Victorian liberal (Toronto, 1957), p. 184.Google Scholar

120 For a discussion of Morley’s imperialism, see Hamer, D. A., John Morley, liberal intellectual in politics (Oxford, 1968), ch. 9Google Scholar. Morley’s journalism is also revealing of his humane liberal imperialism, e.g. ‘The plain story of the Zulu war’ in Fortnightly Review, xxv (Jan.-June 1879), pp 329–52.

121 Paul, Letters of Acton to Mary Gladstone, p. 169; Fasnacht, Acton’s political philosophy, p. 133.

122 Freeman, E. A., Greater Greece and greater Britain (London, 1885), pp 142-3Google Scholar; Stephens, W. R. W., The life and letters of Edward A. Freeman (2 vols, London, 1895), ii, 259-60.Google Scholar

123 Freeman, E. A., ‘Prospects of home rule’ in Fortnightly Review, xl (July-Dec. 1886), pp 317-33.Google Scholar

124 Gwynn, Stephen and Tuckwell, Gertrude, The life of the Right Hon. Sir Charles W. Dilke (2 vols, London, 1917), i, 68.Google Scholar

125 Sidgwick, Elements of politics, ch. 26.

126 E.g. Senior, Nassau, Ireland: journals, conversations and essays (2 vols, London, 1868), i, 89, 126Google Scholar; Cobden, Richard, Political writings (2 vols, London, 1867), i, 69Google Scholar; Mill, J. S., England and Ireland (London, 1868), pp 8–9 Google Scholar; Edward Dicey, ‘Plea of a malcontent liberal’, pp 467–8; Reeve, Henry, ‘England’s duty to Ireland’ in Fortnightly Review, clxiii (Jan.-June 1886), p. 589 Google Scholar; A. V. Dicey, England’s case, pp 82–6.

127 Freeman, ‘Prospects of home rule’, p. 319.

128 Bryce, James, England and Ireland: an introductory statement (London, 1884).Google Scholar

129 James Bryce, in introduction to O’Brien, R. Barry (ed.), Two centuries of Irish history, 1691-1870 (London, 1888), p. xxvi Google Scholar; Bryce, James, ‘Alternative policies in Ireland’ in Nineteenth Century, xix (Jan.-June 1886), pp 312-28.Google Scholar

130 Freeman, E. A., ‘Prospects of home rule’ in Fortnightly Review, xl (July-Dec. 1886), pp 317-33Google Scholar; ‘Home rule and its analogies’ in New Princeton Review, vi, pp 172–95.

131 Hansard 3, ccciv, 1543, 1047, 1080–1 (8 and 13 Apr. 1886); cccvi, 1229, 1244 (7 June 1886); cccv, 585–7 (10 May 1886).

132 Smith to Earl Grey, 30 Mar. 1886 (Goldwin Smith corr., pp 184–6). See also A. V. Dicey, England’s case, pp 206–15; Froude, , English in Ireland, iii, 494-5Google Scholar; J. F. Stephen, The Times, 5 Jan. 1886, p. 12.

133 Campbell, George, ‘Home rule in several countries’ in Fortnightly Review, xxvii (Jan.-June 1880), p. 654.Google Scholar

134 Paul, Letters of Acton to Mary Gladstone, p. 17.

135 Fasnacht, Acton’s political philosophy, p. 26.

136 Stephen to Lady Egerton, 27 Nov. 1872 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/8).

137 Stephen to Lytton, 2 May 1876 (ibid., MS 7349/14).

138 Stephen, Liberty, equality, fraternity, p. 16. The contemporary was Sir Thomas Farrer, and the definition of ‘Fitzjames-Stephenism’ by the editor R. J. White.

139 Stephen, J. F., ‘Foundations of the government of India’ in Nineteenth Century, xiv (July-Dec. 1883), p. 542.Google Scholar

140 Ibid., p. 554.

141 Feaver, George, From status to contract: a biography of Sir Henry Maine, 1822-1888 (London, 1969), ch. 15Google Scholar; Maine, H. S., The effects of the observation of India on modern European thought (London, 1875).Google Scholar

142 Seeley, J. R., The expansion of England (London, 1883), pt ii.Google Scholar

143 See John Gross’s introduction to the 1971 reprint of The expansion of England, p. xxv, for a discussion of the reception of the book.

144 Seeley, Expansion of England, p. 164.

145 Harrison, ‘Empire and humanity’, p. 290.

146 Goldwin Smith, ‘The Irish question’, p. 250.

147 Mill, England and Ireland, pp. 22–4.

148 E. D. Steele, articles on Mill and Ireland cited above (n. 40); Dewey, Clive, ‘Celtic agrarian legislation and the Celtic revival: historicist implications of Gladstone’s Irish and Scottish land acts, 1870-1886’ in Past & Present, no. 64 (1974), pp 30–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

149 Maine, H. S., Lectures on the early history of institutions (London, 1875), esp. pp 19, 96–8, 188.Google Scholar

150 Cecil, Robert, ‘The position of parties’ in Quarterly Review, cxxxiii (Oct.-Dec. 1872), p. 572.Google Scholar

151 Stephen to Lady Egerton, 15 May 1874 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/13).

152 Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 17 Nov. 1881 (ibid., MS 7349/13).

153 Dunne, , Froude, ii, 370 Google Scholar; Froude, J. A., ‘Ireland’ in Nineteenth Century, viii (July-Dec. 1880), p. 344.Google Scholar

154 E.g. Dicey, Edward, ‘England’s intervention in Egypt’ in Nineteenth Century, xii (July-Dec. 1882), pp 164, 171Google Scholar; Campbell, George, ‘Our dealings with Egypt and the possible results’ in Fortnightly Review, xix (Jan.-June 1876), pp 171-2.Google Scholar

155 Smith, Goldwin, Dismemberment no remedy (London, 1886), p. 30.Google Scholar

156 Smith, Goldwin, ‘The moral of the late crisis’ in Nineteenth Century, xx (July-Dec. 1886), p. 311.Google Scholar

157 E.g. Lecky, W. E. H., ‘A nationalist parliament’ in Nineteenth Century, xix (Jan.-June 1886), p. 639 Google Scholar; J. F. Stephen, The Times, 4 Jan. 1886, p. 8; Sellar, A. C., ‘The contest for the union’ in Edinburgh Review, clxv (Apr.-June 1887), p. 585.Google Scholar

158 Lecky, ‘A nationalist parliament’, p. 639.

159 Grover, B. L., A documentary study of British policy towards Indian nationalism, 1885-1909 (Delhi, 1967), p. 171.Google Scholar

160 Ibid., pp 174–8.

161 Ibid., pp 179.

162 The most interesting expansion on this theme was by James Fitzjames Stephen in The Times, 1 May 1886, p. 12, where he pointed out that the word ‘empire’ was ‘susceptible to many different meanings … either the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom and the colonies or the United Kingdom, India and the colonies’, and that home rule for Ireland was incompatible with ‘any and every sense of the word’.

163 Lecky, ‘A nationalist parliament’, p. 639; A. V. Dicey, England’s case, p. 134.

164 Kebbel, T. E. (ed.), Selected speeches of the late Right Hon. the earl of Beaconsfield (2 vols, London, 1882), ii, 523–5.Google Scholar

165 Burrow, J. W., A liberal descent: Victorian historians and the English past (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

166 Seeley, Expansion of England, p. 16.

167 Ibid., p. 51.

168 lbid., p. 46.

169 lbid., p. 75.

170 lbid., p. 11.

171 Froude, J. A., Oceana, or England and her colonies (London, 1886).Google Scholar

172 McCartney, ‘James Anthony Froude and Ireland’, p. 187.

173 Froude, The English in Ireland, i, ch. 1.

174 See Cosgrove, Albert Venn Dicey, pp 258–9 for a discussion of Dicey’s nationalism.

175 Dicey, England’s case, pp 12, 212.

176 Cosgrove, Albert Venn Dicey, pp 156–7.

177 Stephen in The Times, 5 Jan. 1886, p. 12; Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 20 Mar. 1886 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/13).

178 Reeve, Henry, ‘Plain truths and popular fallacies’ in Edinburgh Review, clxii (Oct.-Dec. 1885), pp. 570-71.Google Scholar

179 A. V. Dicey, England’s case, p. 137, also p. 66.

180 Lecky, , Democracy and liberty, i, 399–400 Google Scholar; ‘A nationalist parliament’, p. 638.

181 A. V. Dicey, England’s case, esp. ch. 7.

182 Sellar, A. C., ‘The contest for the union’ in Edinburgh Review, clxv (Apr.-June 1887), p. 580.Google Scholar

183 Hill, F. H., ‘Mr Gladstone and the Liberal party’ in Edinburgh Review, clxvi (July-Oct. 1887), p. 270.Google Scholar

184 A. V. Dicey to Lord Hartington, 23 Dec. 1886, in Cosgrove, Albert Venn Dicey, pp 137–8.

185 Brodrick, G. C., Unionism, the basis of a national party (Oxford, 1888).Google Scholar

186 Edward Dicey, ‘Plea of a malcontent liberal’, p. 476.

187 Lecky, ‘A nationalist parliament’, p. 644.

188 E.g. Dicey, Edward, ‘The unionist vote’ in Nineteenth Century, xx (July-Dec. 1886), p. 7 Google Scholar; Smith, Goldwin, ‘Parliament and the rebellion in Ireland’ in Contemporary Review, xli (Jan.-June 1882), p. 896 Google Scholar; Dismemberment no remedy, p. 9.

189 E.g. Reeve, H., ‘England and Ireland’ in Edinburgh Review, cliii (Jan.-Apr. 1881), p. 279 Google Scholar; Lecky, ‘A nationalist parliament’, p. 643; Goldwin Smith, Dismemberment no remedy, p. 13; J. F. Stephen in The Times, 21 Jan. 1886, p. 8.

190 E.g. Goldwin Smith, Dismemberment no remedy, p. 5; Lecky, ‘A nationalist parliament’, p. 643; J. F. Stephen in The Times, 29 Apr. 1886, p. 8.

191 E.g. Campbell, ‘Home rule in several countries’, p. 654; Lecky, ‘A nationalist parliament’, p. 637; J. F. Stephen to Lytton, 13 Oct. 1886 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/14).

192 A. V. Dicey, England’s case, pp. 145 ff.; Goldwin Smith, Dismemberment no remedy, pp 31–2; Reeve, ‘Popular government’, p. 287; Grey, Earl, Ireland (London, 1888), p. 160 etc.Google Scholar

193 Bryce, James, England and Ireland (London, 1884), pp 9–10 Google Scholar; Marquis of Blandford, ‘Home Rule’ in Nineteenth Century, xi (Jan.-June 1882), p. 410.Google Scholar

194 JrCurtis, L. P., Anglo-Saxons and Celts: a study of anti-Irish prejudice in Victorian England (Bridgeport, Conn., 1968), p. 103.Google Scholar

195 Dunne, ‘Ireland, England and empire’, pp 292–3.

196 Fasnacht, Acton’s political philosophy, p. 57.

197 Dilke, C. W., Greater Britain (London, 1868), p. 188, etc.Google Scholar

198 Burrow, A liberal descent, p. 192.

199 Freeman, E. A., ‘Race and language’ in Contemporary Review, xxix (Dec. 1876 -May 1877), pp 711-42.Google Scholar

200 Smith, Goldwin, ‘The ninety year agony of France’ in Contemporary Review, xxxi (Dec. 1877 - Mar. 1878), p. 104.Google Scholar

201 Maine, H. S., Lectures on the early history of institutions (London, 1875), pp 96-7.Google Scholar

202 Gwynn, & Tuckwell, , Life of Dilke, i, 71.Google Scholar

203 Dilke, Greater Britain, pp 31, 218.

204 Ibid., p. 209.

205 Freeman, E. A., ‘Some impressions of the United States — I’ in Fortnightly Review, xxxii (July-Dec. 1882), p. 137.Google Scholar

206 Stephens, W. R. W., The life and letters of Edward A. Freeman (2 vols, London, 1895), ii, 234-7.Google Scholar

207 lbid., ii, 242. He repeated this in ‘Some impressions of the United States — 11’ in Fortnightly Review, xxxii (July-Dec. 1882), p. 327.

208 Stephens, , Life and letters of Freeman, ii, 230-31.Google Scholar

209 Freeman, ‘Race and language’, pp 711–42.

210 E. A. Freeman to James Bryce, 17 Apr. 1886, in Stephens, , Life and letters of Freeman, i, 345-6Google Scholar; ‘Prospects of home rule’, p. 329.

211 Smith, Goldwin, Irish history and Irish character (London, 1862), pp 5–6.Google Scholar

212 Ibid., p. 1; ‘The Irish question’, p. 506.

213 Smith, Goldwin, ‘The greatness of England’ in Contemporary Review, xxxiv (Dec. 1878 — Mar. 1879), p. 9.Google Scholar

214 Goldwin Smith, Dismemberment no remedy, pp 10, 29.

215 Froude, , The English in Ireland, i, 2, 3, 12.Google Scholar

216 Ibid., ii, 127.

217 Burrow, A liberal descent, p. 262.

218 E.g. Curtin, P. de A., The image of Africa: British ideas and actions, 1780-1850 (London, 1965), p. 480 Google Scholar; Greenberger, A. J., The British image of India (London, 1968), pp 6–7.Google Scholar

219 Froude, , The English in Ireland, i, 22, 138.Google Scholar

220 Smith, Goldwin, The conduct of England to Ireland (London, 1882), p. 11.Google Scholar

221 Goldwin Smith, ‘The greatness of England’, p. 9.

222 Smith, Goldwin, ‘The administration of Ireland’ in Contemporary Review, xlviii (July-Dec. 1885), p. 7.Google Scholar

223 Goldwin Smith, Irish history and Irish character, pp 17–18; ‘The Irish question’, p. 515.

224 Goldwin Smith, Dismemberment no remedy, p. 19.

225 Greg, W. R., ‘Realities of Irish life’ in Quarterly Review, cxxvi (1869), p. 72.Google Scholar

226 Gopal, Sarvepalli, British policy in India, 1858-1905 (Cambridge, 1965), p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

227 Grey, Earl, ‘Ireland and the empire’ in Nineteenth Century, xiv (1883), p. 364.Google Scholar

228 Warner, W. Lee, ‘Agrarian distress and discontent in India’ in Quarterly Review, cxlvii (Apr.-June 1879), p. 394.Google Scholar

229 Lecky, , Democracy and liberty, i, 370.Google Scholar

230 Dicey, A. V., ‘Home Rule from an English point of view’ in Contemporary Review, xlii (July-Dec. 1882), p. 68 Google Scholar; England’s case, p. 145; Sidgwick, Memoir, p. 524; Brodrick, Unionism, the basis of a national party, p. 5.

231 Stephen to Lady Grant Duff, 4 Mar. 1886 (Cambridge Univ. Lib., MS 7349/13).