Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:17:41.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Irish Jurist. New series, vol. i, pts 1 and 2 (Summer and Winter 1966). Pp iv, 406. Dublin: University College. Annual subscription, £4.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Jocelyn Otway-Ruthven
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews and short notices
Information
Irish Historical Studies , Volume 16 , Issue 61 , March 1968 , pp. 103 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Plucknett, T.F.T., Legislation of Edward I, pp. 5, 105–6, 108–9.Google Scholar

2 He accepts the view that in 1277-80 there was a general demand from Irish laymen for English law : I am now rather inclined to hold that the movement, led as it was by ecclesiastics, was a manifestation of the reform movement in the church, directed against such things as the Brehon law of marriage.

3 There is no evidence that I know of that any chief besides O’Neill was involved in the Remonstrance and cf. H. Wood, ‘Letter from Domnal O’Neill to Fineen MacCarthy, 1317’ (R.I.A. Proc, xxxvii, c, pp. 141–8).

4 See Lapsley, G.T., Crown, community and parliament, p. 323.Google Scholar This theory of course applied to the lands of the church as well as to those of laymen, and care was taken in Ireland to see that churches had confirmations of their lands. See Chartul. St Mary’s, Dublin, i. 138.

5 Pipe roll 14 John, pp. 7, 20, 32, 38, 62.

6 P.R.I, rep. D.K. 35, p. 29; Cal. doc. Ire., 1171–1251, no. 2295. See also Crede mihi, p. 63. In de Lacy’s grant the word is bochani, which might suggest a derivation from bothach. I have not found this form elsewhere.

7 Cal. doc. Ire., 1252–84, nos 52, 717.

8 See The pipe roll of Cloyne, pp 8, 26.

9 Ibid., p. 8; Cal. pat. rolls, 1317–21, p. 563.

10 Cal. doc. Ire., 1302–1307, no. 670; Red Book of Ormond, p. 25.

11 Cal. rot. pat. Hib., p. 79, no. 123.

12 Cal. Ormond deeds, ii, no. 374, and cf. Pipe roll of Cloyne, pp 38–9.

13 See Cam, H.M. Liberties and communities in medieval England, pp 134–5.Google Scholar