Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T09:48:41.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dublin Philosophical Society and the New Learning in Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

K. Theodore Hoppen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study of the history of science has only within the last few decades attained the rank of an important field of enquiry for both scientist and historian. It was thus almost inevitable that, at first, attention should have been focused on the great and original thinkers like Boyle, Newton, Descartes, and Leibniz. But this type of approach frequently results in the presentation of a distorted picture, for few men are geniuses, and these are not truly representative of their age. The Irish scientists of the late seventeenth Century, who ranged from the very able to the pedantically dull, are far more typical examples of contemporary natural philosophers than are Newton or Boyle.

In 1680, science in Ireland was still a rare and infrequent study, and it must be admitted that the country had fallen behind the rest of Europe not only in the natural sciences but also in almost all other intellectual disciplines.

Type
Articles
Information
Irish Historical Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 54 , September 1964 , pp. 99 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Turnbull, G. H., Hartlib, Drury, and Comenius (Liverpool 1947), p. 204.Google Scholar

2 Ibid.

3 D.N.B. (1908-9 edition), ‘ Nathanial Carpenter ’, by W. P. Gourtney.

4 Emery, F. V., ‘ Irish Geography in the seventeenth Century ’, in Irish Geography, iii. 264 (1958).Google Scholar

5 Turnbull, , Hartlib, Drury, and Comenius, p. 58.Google Scholar

6 DNB ‘ Robert Boyle’, by A. M. Clerke.

7 Hartlib to Boyle, 8 May 1654 (The works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, ed. Birch, T, London 1772, vi. 88).Google Scholar

8 Cf. Fleetwood, J., A history of medicine in Ireland (Dublin 1951), pp. 42–4.Google Scholar

9 Marsh was in fact English, although living in Ireland.

10 Molyneux had a sheet of geographical queries printed, and these were distributed around Ireland. One is reproduced in K. T. Hoppen, ‘ Some queries for a seventeenth Century natural history of Ireland ’, (The Irish Book, ii. 60–61 (1963)). Eventually only four of the projected eleven volumes of Pitt's Atlas appeared, and the Irish material was never used.

11 B.M., Add MS 4223, f. 34. This is a short anonymous account of the life of William Molyneux, most probably written by his son about 1728.

12 Capel Molyneux, An account of the family and descendants of Sir Thomas Molyneux Kt. (Evesham 1820), p. 60. This work contains (PP. 51–78) a ‘Memorial of the life of Wm Molyneux by himself. July 1694 ’, the manuscript of which has since been lost. For an account of Molyneux's scientific interests see K. T. Hoppen, ‘ the Royal Society and Ireland’, in Notes and Records of the Royal Society, xviii. 125–35(1963)

13 C. Molyneux, Account of the family of Molyneux, pp. 63–4.

14 The membership list for 28 Jan. 1683-4 is in B.M. Add. MS 4811, f. 160. This is the minute book of the society.

15 William to Thomas Molyneux, 10 May 1684, (Dublin University Magazine, xviii. 481 (1841)). The Originals of this correspondence are no longer extant.Google Scholar

16 In 1687 the society made an attempt to establish a correspondence with Pierre Bayle (cf. B.M. Add. MS 4811, f. 141), but as it ceased to meet in the April of that year, the scheme came to nothing.

17 For the membership list of 27 Dec. 1684 cf. William Molyneux to Francis Aston (secretary to the Royal Society), 27 Dec. 1684 (Royal Society Library, MS Early Letters M.1.88). The relevant part of this letter is printed in T. Birch, History of the Royal Society (London, 1756–7), iv 353.

18 In the society's transactions he features as ‘ Mr Patterson’. I have identified him as Josias Patterson, Cf. H. F. Berry, ‘The ancient Corporation of barber-surgeons, or Gild of St Mary Magdalene, Dublin’, in R. S. A. I. Jn., xxxiii. 231 (1903).

19 F. S. Taylor, ‘An early satirical poem on the Royal Society’, Notes and Records, v. 38 (1947).

20 Ashe to William Musgrave (secretary to the Oxford Society), l5 July 1687 (Royal Society Library MS Early Letters A.39).

21 ‘St George Ashe's speech to Lord Clarendon’, T.G.D. MS I.4.17 No. 2. This was delivered when Clarendon attended a meeting of the society in January 1685–6. It is printed in I. Ehrenpreis, Swift, the man, his works, and the age (London, 1962), pp. 275–8.

22 Membership of the Dublin Society did not necessarily imply scientific eminence, but only an interest in natural philosophy

23 Ashe to Musgrave, 15 July 1687 (Royal Society Library MS Early Letters A.39).

24 Willoughby to William King, 10 Mar. 1692–3, T.C.D.. Lyon MS no. 224.

25 This version of the problem is taken from J. W. Davis, ‘The Molyneux problem’, in Journal of the History of Ideas, xxi. 392 (1960).Google Scholar

26 Molyneux to John Flamsteed, 19 May 1688, A general dictionary, historical and critical in which a new and accurate translation of that of the celebrated Mr Bayle … is included (London, 1734-41), viii. 611. This prints some letters from Molyneux to Flamsteed no longer in Southampton Civic Archives, MS D/M 1/1; see next note,

27 Samuel Molyneux to Ashe, 6 Dec. 1707, in Southampton Civic Centre Archives, MS D/M 1/2 p. 23. This is Samuel Molyneux's letter-book for the period from 1706 to 1710.

28 B.M., Add. MS 4812, ff. 30-31. Printed in The works of George Berkeley, ed. Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E. (London, 1947–57), iv. 235–8, from a copy in the Molyneux Papers at T.G.D.Google Scholar

29 Samuel Molyneux to Domvile, 5 Mar. 1708–9, in Southampton Civic Archives, MS D/M 1/2 p. 119.

30 Petty, W., The advice of W.P. to Mr Samuel Hartlib for the advancement of some particular parts of learning (London, 1648), p. 2.Google Scholar

31 King's Inns Dublin Library, MS no. 33 p. 12. This MS contains a number of articles by Loftus on the Dublin Society.

32 Ibid., p. 218.

33 Ibid., pp. 222-3.

34 Ibid., p. 61.

35 Molyneux, W., Sciothericum telescopicum; or a new contrivance of adapting a telescope to an horizontal dial for observing the moment of time by day or night (Dublin, 1686). From the epistle, which is not paginated.Google Scholar

36 Molyneux, W., Dioptrica nova, a treatise of dioptricks in two parts (London, 1692). From the dedication, which is not paginated.Google Scholar

37 From the preface to his Political arithmetick, quoted by Masson, and Youngson, , ‘ Sir William Petty', in The Royal Society, its origins and founders ed. Hartley, H. (London, 1960), p. 87.Google Scholar

38 Sciothericum telescopicum, the epistle.

39 Dioptrica nova, the dedication.

40 Ibid.

41 Ibid.

42 Thomas to William Molyneux, 11 Oct. 1690, in Dublin University Magazine, xviii. 611.Google Scholar

43 Thomas to William Molyneux, 2 June 1684 (ibid., pp. 482–3).

44 T.C.D., MS 1.4.17, no. 2.

45 Petty, W., A discourse made before the Royal Society, the 26 of November 1674 concerning the use of duplicate Proportion (London, 1674), p. 1.Google Scholar

46 Molyneux, G., Account of the family of Molyneux, p. 67.Google Scholar

47 Marsh's Library, MS Z2.2.3b, p. 30. This is a corrected typescript of a contemporary copy of Marsh's diary (MS Z2.2.3) the original of which has been lost.

48 Marsh's diary, ibid., pp. 12, 13, 15.

49 Petty, W., A declaration concerning the newly invented art of double writing (London, 1648), p. 4.Google Scholar

50 Petty to Robert Southwell, 14 Nov. 1676, in The Petty-Southwell correspondence, ed. marquis of Lansdowne (London, 1928), p. 9.Google ScholarPubMed

51 Westfall, R. S., Science and religion in seventeenth-century England (New Haven, 1958), p. 133. Petty's general attitude towards religion makes one wonder how seriously he took his own scheme.Google Scholar

52 D.N.B., ‘ John Keogh', by T. Seccombe. Isaac Newton is said to have approved ‘ mighty well’ of Keogh's undertaking.

53 Molyneux, W. (ed. and trans.), Six Metaphysical meditations wherein it is proved that there is a God (London, 1680). From the preface, which is not paginated.Google Scholar

54 Sprat, T., History of the Royal Society (London, 1667), P- 349 Google Scholar

55 Molyneux to Flamsteed, 19 May 1688, in A general dictionary … of the celebrated Mr Bayle, viii. 611.

56 Dioptriea nova, p.195.

57 Molyneux, C., Account of the family of Molyneux, p. 67M.Google Scholar

58 Quoted by Toulmin, S. and Goodfield, J., The fabric of the heavens (London, 1961), p. 251.Google Scholar

59 The works of the honourable Robert Boyle (1772), v. 515.Google Scholar