Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-l9twb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:09:13.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-writing the late prehistory of south-eastern Arabia: a reply to Jocelyn Orchard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

D. T. Potts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a pair of recent articles Jocelyn Orchard has presented what is arguably the most radical interpretation of late fourth and third millennium BC cultural development in the Oman peninsula to appear since archaeological excavations began in this region during the 1950s. Her theses challenge many aspects of current thinking and as such deserve to be scrutinised by all scholars working in East and South Arabian archaeology. Moreover, given the fact that Orchard has reviewed the status of the Jamdat Nasr pottery found in the Hafit-type graves of Oman and the United Arab Emirates, it is important that Mesopotamian specialists examine what she has said about relations between Jamdat Nasr Mesopotamia and the Oman peninsula.

In an effort to extract the salient points from Orchard's 1994 and 1995 articles I shall both quote directly and paraphrase her theses in point form. In this way I believe it will be easier to see how her argument is constructed out of a series of interlocking propositions.

1. In 1994 Orchard coined the term “Al-Hajar oasis towns”, asserting that these differed from so-called “Umm an-Nar settlements”. The two settlement types, she maintained, had been conflated erroneously by scholars working in the area in part because of “the fact that on a number of sites Umm an-Nar tombs are found intermingled with al-Hajar buildings”. Orchard, however, argued that “these two types of third millennium settlement are very different in style” (Orchard 1994: 63). She characterised the Umm an-Nar buildings — in actual fact she only means tombs — as being “built wholly or in part of white limestone”, which differed from the “al-Hajar form of masonry-revetted platform construction”. “Indeed”, she wrote, speaking of the ceramic evidence for such a partitioning of third millennium culture in the Oman peninsula, “the general assumption that all third millennium wares found in the al-Hajar region represent a single culture is curious in view of the fact that three groups of wares can be distinguished, each of which is firmly associated with a different milieu (viz. Umm an-Nar tombs, settlements on Umm an-Nar and Ghanadha islands and al-Hajar settlements)” (Orchard 1994: 64).

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 59 , 1997 , pp. 63 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

School of Archaeology, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

References

Adams, R. McC. and Nissen, H. J. 1972. The Uruk Countryside. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Benton, J. N., and Potts, D. T. n.d. Excavations at Jabal al-Emalah. ABIEL 3. Turnhout: Brepols, in press.Google Scholar
Biagi, P., and Nisbet, R. 1992. Environmental history and plant exploitation at the aceramic sites of RH5 and RH6 near the mangrove swamp of Qurm (Muscat-Oman). Bulletin de la Société botanique de France 139, 571–8.Google Scholar
Boucharlat, R. 1989. Cairns et pseudo-cairns du Fars. L'utilisation des tombes de surface au 1er millénaire de notre ère. In de Meyer, L., and Haerinck, E., eds. Archaeologia Iranica et Orientalis, Miscellanea in Honorem Louis Vanden Berghe. Gent: Peeters, 675–712.Google Scholar
Finster, B., and Schmidt, J. 1982. Antike Grabbauten im sabäischen Gebiet. ABADY 1, 171–5.Google Scholar
Gerig, M. 1982. Beiträge zur Erforschung der antiken und mittelalterlichen Oase von Marib. ABADY 1, 33–55.Google Scholar
Glennie, K. W., Pugh, J. M., and Goodall, T. M. 1994. Late Quaternary Arabian desert models of Permian Rotliegend reservoirs. Exploration Bulletin 274, 1–19.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. P. 1971. Gulf of Oman: The original home of Indian megaliths. Puratattva 4, 4–18.Google Scholar
Ingraham, M. L., Johnson, T. D., Rihani, B., and Shatla, I. 1981. Preliminary report on a reconnaissance survey of the Northwestern Province (with a note on a brief survey of the Northern Province). Atlal 5, 59–84.Google Scholar
Magee, P. n.d. Recalibrating the chronology of prehistoric settlement in southeastern Arabia. Arabian Archaeology & Epigraphy, in press.Google Scholar
Méry, S. 1991. Origine et production des récipients de terre cuite dans la péninsule d'Oman à l'Âge du Bronze. Paléorient 17, 51–78.Google Scholar
Nayeem, M. A. 1990. Prehistory and Protohistory of the Arabian peninsula 1. Saudi Arabia. Hyderabad: Hyderabad Publishers.Google Scholar
Nissen, H. J. 1972. The city wall of Uruk. In Ucko, P. J., Tringham, R., and Dimbleby, G. W., eds. Man, Settlement and Urbanism. London: Duckworth, 794–8.Google Scholar
Orchard, J. 1995. The origins of agricultural settlement in the al-Hajar region. Iraq 57, 145–58.Google Scholar
Orchard, J., and Stanger, G. 1994. Third millennium oasis towns and environmental constraints on settlement in the Al-Hajar region. Iraq 56, 63–100.Google Scholar
Parr, P. J., Zarins, J., Ibrahim, M., Waechter, J., Garrard, A., Clarke, C., Bidmead, M., and al-Badr, H. 1978. Preliminary report on the second phase of the Northern Province Survey 1397/1977. Atlal 2, 29–50.Google Scholar
Potts, D. T. 1986. Eastern Arabia and the Oman peninsula during the late fourth and early third millennium BC. In Finkbeiner, U., and Röllig, W., eds. Ǧamdat Nasr: Period or Regional Style? Wiesbaden: Beihefte zum TAVO Reihe B 62, 121–70.Google Scholar
Potts, D. T. 1994. Contributions to the agrarian history of eastern Arabia II. The cultivars. Arabian Archaeology & Epigraphy 5, 236–75.Google Scholar
Ramachandaran, K. S. 1973. Gulf of Oman: Original home of Indian megaliths, a reappraisal. Puratattva 6, 20–6.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., and Reimer, P. J. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35, 215–30.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, H.-P., and Uerpmann, M. 1996. ‘Ubaid pottery in the eastern Gulf — new evidence from Umm al-Qaiwain (U.A.E.). Arabian Archaeology & Epigraphy, 125–39.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. C. 1983. The origins of the aflaj of Oman. JOS 6/1, 177–94.Google Scholar
Zarins, J., Ibrahim, M., Potts, D., and Edens, C. 1979. The preliminary report on the third phase of the Comprehensive Archaeological Survey Program — the Central Province. Atlal 3, 9–42.Google Scholar