Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-7lvjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:55:13.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aššurnaṣirpal I and the White Obelisk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

J. E. Reade
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is usually possible to date an inscribed Assyrian sculpture without hesitation to the reign of a specific king, but there are two, both found about the same time in the centre of ancient Nineveh, which have aroused considerable controversy. One of them, the Broken Obelisk, after various adventures, now seems to have settled down in the reign of Aššur-bel-kala. The other is BM 118807, the White Obelisk (hereafter WO).

Pinches originally ascribed the WO to the reign of Aššurnaṣirpal II, and this view seems to have prevailed until Unger, in a 1928 lecture and afterwards in the first full publication of the monument, opted for Aššurnaṣirpal I. Forrer accepted this, but Assyriologists generally were not convinced: while Gadd reserved judgement, Landsberger came out firmly for Aššurnaṣirpal II; he was followed by Borger and, more tentatively, by Guterbock and Schramm. Most archaeologists with an interest in iconography, however, including Hrouda, Nagel, Moortgat, Boehmer, and Madhloom, while not necessarily insisting on the ascription to Assurnasirpal I in person, refused to accept that a king as late as Aššurnaṣirpal II could possibly have been responsible for it. Of those who were willing to follow Landsberger, only Frankfort, who probably would not have claimed any great familiarity with Assyrian work, did so without reservation. Akurgal admitted to doubts, and Mallowan argued that the WO might have been produced by a distinctively old-fashioned school of sculptors at Nineveh, not otherwise attested. I myself attempted to reconcile the conflicting parties by suggesting that the sculptures were considerably older than the inscription, and I am told that the same idea had occurred independently to Calmeyer. Other scholars, both Assyriologists and archaeologists, doubtless expressed their opinions here and there, before 1974, and will forgive me for failing to mention them.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1975 , pp. 129 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 EAK I, 138–42Google Scholar.

2 Guide to the Kuyunjik Gallery (1883), 112–21Google Scholar, written by T. G. Pinches. This and footnotes 3–20 will be treated as an adequate means of reference to the work of various scholars whose names occur repeatedly throughout the text of this article.

3 Unger, E., Der Obelisk des Königs Assumassirpal I. aus Ninive (MAOG 6/1-2 (1932)), passimGoogle Scholar.

4 RIA I (1928), 288Google Scholar.

5 Gadd, C. J., The Stones of Assyria (1936), 124Google Scholar.

6 Landsberger, B., Sam'al I (1948), 57–8, n. 144Google Scholar.

7 EAK I (1961), 146Google Scholar; HKL (1967), 579Google Scholar.

8 AJA 61 (1957), 67Google Scholar: “probably” Aššurnaṣirpal II.

9 EAK II (1973), 48–9Google Scholar: “die historischen Fakten sprechen also eher für als gegen eine Zuweisung an Anp. II”.

10 Hrouda, B., Iraq 25 (1963), 155–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Die Kulturgeschichte des assyrischen Flachbildes (1965), 43, 114Google Scholar; Vorderasien I, Mesopotamien, Babylonien, Iran und Anatolien (1971), 239, n. 10Google Scholar: “Zuweisung nicht ganz sicher”.

11 Nagel, W., Der mesopotamische Streitwagen und seine Entwicklung im ostmediterranen Bereich (1966), 49, 72–3Google Scholar.

12 Moortgat, A., The Art of Ancient Mesopotamia (1969; original German 1967), 123–5, pl. 251 = “Ashurnasirpal I (?)Google Scholar.”

13 BJVF 8 (1968), 208Google Scholar.

14 Madhloom, T. A., The Chronology of Neo-Assyrian Art (1970), 10–11, 84Google Scholar.

15 Frankfort, H., The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient (1954), 243, n. 16Google Scholar. Many chronological and other mistakes in the section on Assyria are corrected in the paperback edition (1970), edited by H. J. Kantor.

16 Akurgal, E., The Birthof Greek Art (1968; original German 1966), 28–9Google Scholar.

17 An St 20 (1972), 66–7Google Scholar.

18 Iraq 34 (1972), 88Google Scholar.

19 A glance through some obvious sources produces the following. For Aššurnaṣirpal I or the eleventh century: Parrot, A, Nineveh and Babylon (1961), 35Google Scholar; Strommenger, E., The Art of Mesopotamia (1964; original German 1962), 43Google Scholar; North, R., Or NS 37 (1968), 229Google Scholar; Barnett, R. D., Assyrian Palace Reliefs (British Museum guide, 1970), 41Google Scholar; and Orthmann, W., Untersuchungen zur späthethitischen Kunst (1971), 158–9Google Scholar. For ASSurnasirpal II: Parpola, S., Neo-Assyrian Toponyms (1970), xviiiGoogle Scholar; Munn-Rankin, J. M., Iraq 36 (1974), 170, n. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Postgate, J. N., Taxation and Conscription in the Assyrian Empire (1974), 170Google Scholar. Uncommitted: Pritchard, J. B., The Ancient Near East in Pictures (1954), 324Google Scholar; and Tadmor, H., JCS 12 (1958), 30, n. 69Google Scholar. In Iraq 34 (1972), 88Google Scholar, I referred to what I thought was Weidner's view; on checking the reference, however, I regret to say that I can find no mention of the White Obelisk at all. See also Calmeyer, P., Reliefbronzen in babylonischem Stil, 12, n. 4Google Scholar, and Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, N.F. 7 (1974), 76 f. and n. 126 f.Google Scholar; Dr. Calmeyer, who kindly read this article in typescript, regards the White Obelisk sculptures as earlier than Aššurnaṣirpal II. Ellis, R. S., JAOS 95 (1975), 90 ff.Google Scholar, reserves judgement. My own article was written in July, 1974. The most important contribution since that date has been the paper read at the Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale (Göttingen, 1975) by W. von Soden. I understand that von Soden, in criticizing the Assurnasirpal II ascription, relied mainly on epigraphic details of the kind to which Unger also called attention. See the section below, entitled “The Text: Miscellaneous Criteria”. See also below, p. 150.

20 Iraq 36 (1974), 231–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Plates XLI-XLVIII.

21 Sollberger's translation, which he emphasises is “only tentative”, is reproduced without change from Iraq 36 (1974), 235–6Google Scholar, but I have separated the sections on different sides of the WO, and corrected one error in the bracketing.

22 The word is šu-a-tu; it is the first in the line. The end of the previous line is chipped, and there might perhaps have been space for a governing noun.

23 Pinches did, however, wish to detach lines 29–33 (or more probably 30–33) from the remainder of side D, and put them after line 8.

24 Pinches describes the apex of the WO as having three steps, and says that the inscription began “seemingly” on the second step of side D; if this is what he meant, he too must have thought there might be traces of writing above line 12 on side D.

25 The following paragraph is accordingly controversial. The meanings of the dating formulas mentioned below have been discussed at length elsewhere, but mostly in rather different contexts; see especially Tadmor, H., JCS 12 (1958), 26–33Google Scholar; AS 16 (1965), 352–3Google Scholar; and Iraq 35 (1973), 147, n. 30Google Scholar, which gives additional references. I feel that my interpretation, whether right or wrong, is compatible with the available evidence, and that it speaks for itself without further exposition.

26 Luckenbill, D. D., Ancient Records I, § 557–8, 598–9Google Scholar.

27 EAK I, 136Google Scholar.

28 All the dates used in this article are based on the list given by Brinkman, J. A., apud Oppenheim, A. L., Ancient Mesopotamia, Portrait of a Dead Civilization, 346–7Google Scholar.

29 JCS 12 (1958), 28, n. 53Google Scholar.

30 RIA I, 214Google Scholar.

31 EAK II, 94Google Scholar; not, apparently, to be confused with Šarrat-nipḫi (see AHw, 791).

32 Luckenbill, , Ancient Records I, § 221–45, 602Google Scholar.

33 AfO 6 (1930–1931), 81–87Google Scholar; Luckenbill, , Ancient Records I, § 388–91Google Scholar; Iraq 32 (1970), 169Google Scholar.

34 AfO 3 (1926), 157Google Scholar; RIA I, 222, 291Google Scholar.

35 Luckenbill, , Ancient Records I, § 602Google Scholar.

36 MAOG 3, 1-2 (1927), 8–9Google Scholar. The MAOG text was dated to the twelfth century by Borger, (EAK I, 106)Google Scholar and Millard, (Iraq 32 (1970), 173 n. 17)Google Scholar; both scholars have since informed me that they had no reason to question Nassouhi's original tenth-century dating. This relationship apparendy survived into the ninth century.

37 Luckenbill, , Ancient Records I, § 366Google Scholar. The Sinjar plain would seem an appropriate position for these Aramean settlements, and their names are suggestive, but they may really have been much further west.

38 Luckenbill, , Ancient Records I, § 390Google Scholar.

39 AfO 3 (1926), 157Google Scholar.

39 EAK II, 55, 57Google Scholar. See below, p. 150, note on p. 190.

41 Luckenbill, , Ancient Records I, § 440–7Google Scholar.

42 Luckenbill, , Ancient Records I, § 490Google Scholar; EAK II, 19Google Scholar.

43 E.g. a fragmentary Aššurnaṣirpal II monument from Kalhu, C. J. Gadd, The Stones of Assyria, Pl. 6.

44 Barnett, R. D. and Falkner, M., The Sculptures of Tiglath-pileser III, 2, Fig. 3Google Scholar.

45 Rassam, H., Asshur and the Land of Nimrod, 8–9Google Scholar.

46 H. Frankfort, Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient, Pl. 73 A.

47 H. Frankfort, Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient, Pl. 93.

48 C. J. Gadd. The Stones of Assyria, Pl. 6.

49 Listed by Goossens, , BMAH 28 (1956), 38Google Scholar.

50 RIA I, Taf. 34 a.

51 W. Andrae, Coloured Ceramics from Ashur, Pls. 7–8.

52 L. W. King, Bronze Reliefs from the Gates of Shalmaneser, Pl. XV.

53 A. Moortgat, The Art of Ancient Mesopotamia, Pl. 244.

54 L. W. King, Bronze Reliefs from the Gates of Shalmaneser, Pl. XLI.

55 A. H. Layard, The Monuments of Nineveh, second series, Pl. 55, no. 6.

56 B. Hrouda, Die Kulturgeschichte des assyrischen Flachbildes, Taf. 50, no. 1.