No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Zoroastrian Doctrine of Formation of Heavenly Bodies in Pahlavi Texts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Abstract
This article is about the doctrine of the formation of celestial bodies in Pahlavi texts. The doctrine is peculiar. It clashes not only with the accounts of the Gāϑā and the Younger Avesta but also with the general cosmology of Pahlavi literature. Nonetheless it must be authoritative since it is found in our main sources of Zoroastrian (Pahlavi) cosmogony and there does not seem to be an alternative account of the formation of celestial bodies. It thus prompts us to look for its background. This article presents and discusses the texts that contain the Pahlavi doctrine, examines its Avestan roots, and shows the influence of Presocratic cosmogonic speculations on the doctrine. Further, comparative material allows us to propose a conceptual genealogy of the basic constituents of the doctrine.
Keywords
- Type
- Hermeneutics and Religious Texts
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2021
Footnotes
The author wishes to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers of Iranian Studies for their helpful comments, suggestions, and criticisms on an earlier version of this article.
References
Ahmadi, Amir. The Daēva Cult in the Gāthās: An Ideological Archaeology of Zoroastrianism. London: Routledge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan, ed. The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Beck, Roger. The Religion of the Mithras Cult in the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, Mary. A Reader in Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian: Texts with Notes. Leiden: Brill, 1975.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Jan. “Descents to Hell and Ascents to Heaven in Apocalyptic Literature.” In The Oxford Handbook of Apocalyptic Literature, ed. Collins, John J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 340–357.Google Scholar
Brunner, Christopher. A Syntax of Western Middle Iranian. New York: Caravan Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. Babylon, Memphis, Persepolis: Eastern Contexts of Greek Culture: Eastern Contexts of Greek Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, Walter. “Prehistory of Presocratic Philosophy in an Orientalizing Context.” In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, Patricia and Graham, D. W., 55–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Clauss, Manfred. The Roman Cult of Mithras. Trans. Gordon, Richard. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Collard, Christopher, trans. Aeschylus: Persians and Other Plays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
De Blois, François. “The Concept of Iran in Zoroastrianism and Other Traditions.” https://www.academia.edu/28561291/Google Scholar
Delaini, Paolo. “The Image of Cosmos Reflected in the Body: The Theory of Microcosm-Macrocosm and Its Spread in Sasanian Iran.” In Indo-Iranica et Orientalia, ed. Panaino, Antonio and Sadovski, Velizar, 113–135. Milan: Mimesis, 2014.Google Scholar
De Menasce, Pierre Jean, ed. Škand-gumānīk Vičār. La solution décisive des doutes: une apologétique mazdéenne du XIe siècle. Fribourg: Librairie de l’université, 1945.Google Scholar
De Menasce, Pierre Jean, trans. Le troisième livre du Denkard. Paris: C. Klincksieck, 1973.Google Scholar
Fazilat, Freydoon, ed. Dinkard. Book III (113–194). Tehran: Enteshārāt-e Mehrāyīn, 2004.Google Scholar
Gantz, Timothy. Early Greek Myth. 2 vols. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Geldner, Karl Friedrich, ed. Avesta. The Sacred Books of the Parsis. 3 vols. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer1886–1896.Google Scholar
Gershevitch, Ilya. The Avestan Hymn to Mithra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Gignoux, Philippe. Man and Cosmos in Ancient Iran. Rome: Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente, 2001.Google Scholar
Gignoux, Philippe, and Tafazzoli, Ahmad, eds. Anthologie de Zādspram. Leuven: Peeters, 1993.Google Scholar
Gnoli, Gherardo. “Un particolare aspetto del simbolismo della luce nel Mazdeismo e nel Manicheismo.” AION 12 (1962): 95–128.Google Scholar
Gordon, Richard. “Reality, Evocation and Boundary in the Mystery of Mithras.” Journal of Mithraic Studies 3 (1980): 19–99.Google Scholar
Grenet, Franz. “An Archeologist’s Approach to Avestan Geography.” In The Idea of Iran. Volume 1: Birth of the Persian Empire, ed. Curtis, Vesta Sarkhosh and Stewart, Sarah, 29–51. London: Tauris, 2005.Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey, ed. Herodotus: The Persian Wars. Trans. Godley, A.D.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey, ed. and trans. Aristophanes: Clouds. Wasps. Peace. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hintze, Almut. “The Cow That Came from the Moon: The Avestan Expression māh- gaociϑra-.” Bulletin of Asia Institute 19 (2005): 57–66.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl. “Mārtāṇḍa and Gayōmard.” In German Scholars on India: Contributions to Indian Studies. Vol. 2, 100–117. Bombay: Nachiketa, 1976.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl, and Forssman, Bernhard. Avestische Laut- und Flexionslehre. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, 2004.Google Scholar
Huyse, Philip. “Some Further Thoughts on the Bisitun Monument and the Genesis of the Old Persian Cuneiform Script.” Bulletin of the Asia Institute 13 (1999): 45–66.Google Scholar
Kellens, Jean. “Commentaire sur les premiers chapitres du Yasna.” Journal Asiatique 284 (1996): 37–108. doi: 10.2143/JA.284.1.556543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellens, Jean. Études avestiques et mazdéennes vol. 2. Le Hōm Stōm et la zone des déclarations. Paris: De Boccard, 2007.Google Scholar
Kellens, Jean. Études avestiques et mazdéenes vol. 3. Le long préambule du sacrifice. Paris: De Boccard, 2010.Google Scholar
Kellens, Jean. Études avestiques et mazdéennes vol. 4. L'acmé du sacrifice. Paris: De Boccard, 2011.Google Scholar
Kellens, Jean. Cinq cours sur les Yašts de l’Avesta. Paris: Association pour l’avancement des études iraniennes, 2016.Google Scholar
Kent, Roland Grubb. Old Persian: Grammar, Texts, Lexicon. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society, 1953.Google Scholar
Kirk, Geoffrey S., Raven, J.E., and Schofield, M., eds. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kovacs, David, ed. and trans. Euripides: Suppliant Women. Electra. Heracles. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lecoq, Pierre. “Le problème de l’écriture cunéiforme vieux-perse.” In Commémoration Cyrus. Hommage universel, 25–107. Tehran: Bibliothèque Pahlavi, 1974.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce. Myth, Cosmos, and Society: Indo-European Themes of Creation and Destruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce. “Anomaly, Science, and Religion: Treatment of the Planets in Medieval Zoroastrianism.” History of Religions 48 (2009): 270–283. doi: 10.1086/599560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E.R. Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E.R. “The Invention of Nature.” In Methods and Problems in Greek Science, 417–434. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Malandra, William W., ed. Frawardīn Yašt. Introduction, Text, Commentary, Glossary. Irvine, CA: UCI Jordan Center for Persian Studies, 2018. doi: 10.1163/9789004460683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malandra, William W., and Ichaporia, Pallan, eds. The Pahlavi Yasna of the Gāthās and Yasna Haptaŋhāiti. Wiesbaden, Reichert Verlag: Ahura Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P., and Adams, Douglas Q.. The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Molé, Marijan. La legende de Zoroastre selon les textes pehlevis. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck, 1967.Google Scholar
Nock, Arthur D. “The Genius of Mithraism.” In Essays on Religion and the Ancient World, 452–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Oryan, Saeed. Rāhnamā-ye Katībeh-hā-ye Iranī-e Miyāneh: Pahlavi-Pārtī. Tehran: Enteshārāt e Elmi, 2012.Google Scholar
Pakzad, Fazlollah, ed. Bundahišn: Zoroastrische Kosmogonie und Kosmologie. Tehran: Centre for the Great Islamic Encyclopaedia, 2005.Google Scholar
Panaino, Antonio. “Philologia Avestica I. ahuraδāta-/mazdaδāta-.” Aula Orientalis 10 (1992): 199–209.Google Scholar
Panaino, Antonio. “Pahlavi gwcyhl: gōzihr o gawčihr?” In Scritti in onore di Giovanni M. D’Erme, ed. Bernardini, M. and Tornesello, N.L., 795–826. Naples: Università degli Studi di Napoli, 2005.Google Scholar
Panaino, Antonio. “Pre-Islamic Iranian Calendrical Systems in the Context of Iranian Religious and Scientific History.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran, ed. Potts, Daniel T., 953–974. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Panaino, Antonio. “Cosmologies and Astrology.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Zoroastrianism, ed. Stausberg, M., Vevaina, Y.S.D., and Tessmann, A., 235–258. Chichester: John Wiley, 2015.Google Scholar
Pirart, Éric. “Le mazdéisme politique de Darius Ier.” Indo-Iranian Journal 45 (2002): 121–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, Enrico G. “Astrology and Religion in the Zoroastrian Pahlavi Texts.” Journal Asiatique 305, no. 2 (2017): 171–190.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. Wörterbuch der altpersischen Königsinschriften. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Malcolmn ed. Plato: The Laws. Trans. T. Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Sedley, David, ed. Plato: Meno and Phaedo. Trans. A. Long. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Shaked, Shaul. “The Notions ‘mēnōg’ and ‘gētīg’ in the Pahlavi Texts and Their Relation to Eschatology.” Acta Orientalia 33 (1971): 59–107.Google Scholar
Shayegan, Rahim M. Aspects of History and Epic in Ancient Iran. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, 2012.Google Scholar
Sheffield, Frisbee C.C., ed. Plato: The Symposium. Trans. Howatson, M.C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Stausberg, Michael. Die Religion Zarathushtras. Geschichte—Gegenwart—Rituale. Vol. 1. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2002.Google Scholar
Tavernier, Jan. “The Case of Elamite tep-/tip- and Akkadian ṭuppu.” Iran 44 (2007): 57–69. doi: 10.1080/05786967.2007.11864718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuplin, Christopher. “Darius’ Accession in (the) Media.” In Writing and Ancient Near Eastern Society, ed. Bienkowski, P., Mee, C., and Slater, E., 217–244. New York: T & T Clark., 2010.Google Scholar
Turcan, Robert. “Le sacrifice mithriaque: innovations de sens et de modalités.” In Le sacrifice dans l'antiquité, ed. Rudhardt, Jean and Reverdin, Olivier, 341–380. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1981.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob, and Debrunner, Albert. Altindische Grammatik. Vol. II.2 Die Nominalsuffixe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1954.Google Scholar
Williams, Alan, ed. and trans. The Pahlavi Rivāyat Accompanying the Dādestān ī Dēnig. 2 vols. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1990.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Stefan. “The Etymology of Avestan 2ciϑra- ‘Descent, Progeny’.” Bulletin of the Asia Institute 27 (2013): 143–148.Google Scholar