Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T10:15:01.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ibn al-Malāḥimī on Zoroastrianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2022

Yoones Dehghani Farsani  and
Kianoosh Rezania
Yoones Dehghani Farsani
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages of Peking University
Kianoosh Rezania
Affiliation:
Center for Religious Studies, Ruhr University Bochum and International Research Consortium Käte-Hamburger-Kolleg “Dynamics in the History of Religions between Asia and Europe.”
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Kitāb al-muʿtamad fī uṣūl al-dīn by Maḥmūd b. Muḥammad Ibn al-Malāḥimī al-Khwārazmī (d. 536/1141) belongs to the Muʿtazilī theological works that present valuable insight into the intricate history of religions and their contacts. Recently, scholars have identified other manuscripts of this book which comprise passages absent in previously known manuscripts. The enlarged edition of 2012 now comprises the complete chapter on Zoroastrianism, of which only a short part was extant in the first edition. This article translates the whole chapter on Zoroastrianism, along with the vocalized Arabic original text, to make it more accessible to historians of Iranian religions. This translation is then followed by a discussion of the implications of this piece for the history of Zoroastrianism after Islam. After discussing the inner-textual structure of the text the inter-textual relations of this text are examined, along with al-Shahristānī’s account on Zoroastrianism. Through this comparison, it is shown that the major part of both texts most probably originates from the Radd ʿalā l-Majūs (Refutation of Zoroastrians) by Abū ʿĪsā al-Warrāq. In this way, the article shows that both al-Shahristānī’s and Ibn al-Malāḥimī’s texts are relevant for the history of Zoroastrianism in ninth-century Baghdad.

Keywords

Ibn al-Malāḥimīal-Muʿtamadal-Shahristānī/al-ShahrastānīAbū ʿĪsāIslamic heresiographyZoroastrianismIran and Islamreligious contact
Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 5-6 , December 2020 , pp. 703 - 739
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ʿAbd al-Jabbār, b. Aḥmad al-Hamadānī. al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-tawḥīd wa-l-ʿadl. Vol. 5. Qāhira: al-Muʾassasa al-Miṣrīya al-ʿĀmma li-l-Taʾlīf wa-l-Anbāʾ wa-l-Nashr, 1965.Google Scholar
Abolqāsemī, Moḥsen, Dīn-hā va kīsh-hāye īrānī dar dawrān-e bāstān be ravāyat-e Shahrestānī. Tehran: Sepīdrūd, 1386.Google Scholar
Abū ʿĪsā al-Warrāq, Muḥammad ibn Hārūn, Anti-Christian Polemic in Early Islam: Abū ʻĪsā al-Warrāq’s “Against the Trinity.” Ed. Thomas, David. University of Cambridge Oriental Publications, no. 45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Abū ʿĪsā al-Warrāq, Muḥammad ibn Hārūn, Early Muslim Polemic against Christianity: Abū ʿĪsā al-Warrāq’s “Against the Incarnation.” Ed. Thomas, David. University of Cambridge Oriental Publications, no. 59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Āqāyī, Seyyed Mojtabā. “Dīdgāh-e sevvom dar khelqat-e kherafstarān va hījdah peymān kē ahrīman be hormozd dar-āyīd.” Pazhūheshhā-ye adyānī 11 (1397): 63–84.Google Scholar
al-Malāḥimī, al-Khwārazmī. Kitāb al-fā'iq fī ʾuṣūl al-dīn. Ed. Madelung, Wilferd, and McDermott, Martin. Silsilah-'i mutūn va muṭāliʻāt-i falsafī va kalāmī 3. Tehran; Berlin: Mu'assisi-yi Pizhūhishī-yi Ḥikmat va Falsafi-yi Īrān, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Malāḥimī, al-Khwārazmī. Kitāb al-muʿtamad fī ʾuṣūl al-dīn. Ed. McDermott, Martin, and Madelung, Wilferd. London: Al-Hoda, 1991.Google Scholar
al-Malāḥimī, al-Khwārazmī. Kitāb al-muʿtamad fī ʾuṣūl al-dīn. Ed. Madelung, Wilferd. Classical Muslim Heritage Series 1. Tehran: Mīras_-e Maktoob, 2012.10.1163/9789004405974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baghdādī, al-, ʾAbū Manṣūr ʿAbd-al-Qāhir b. Ṭāhir b. Muḥammad al-. al-Farq bayn al-firaq wa-bayān al-firqa al-nājīya minhum. Ed. Badr, Muḥammad. Qāhira: al-Maʿārif, 1328.Google Scholar
Boyce, Mary, “Some Further Reflections on Zurvanism.” In Acta Iranica 30 (Papers in Honor of Professor Ehsan Yarshater), 20–29. Leiden: Brill, 1990.Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia, The Nativist Prophets of Early Islamic Iran: Rural Revolt and Local Zoroastrianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Albert, “The Dēnkard and the Zoroastrian of Baghdad.” In The Zoroastrian Flame: Exploring Religion, History and Tradition, ed. Williams, Alan, Stewart, Sarah, and Hintze, Almut, 223–238. Library of Modern Religion 51. London: I.B. Tauris, 2016.Google Scholar
de Jong, Albert, “Zurvan.” In EIr, 2014. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/zurvanismGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Albert, “Zurvanism.” In EIr, 2014. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/zurvanismGoogle Scholar
de Menasce, Jean Pierre, “Le témoignage de Jayhānī sur le mazdéisme.” In Donum natalicium H.S. Nyberg oblatum, ed. Gren, Erik, 50–59. Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksell, 1954.Google Scholar
de Menasce, Jean Pierre, “Zoroastrian Literature after the Muslim Conquest.” In CHI, 5:543–565, 1975.Google Scholar
Dresden, M.J., Dēnkart: A Pahlavi Text; Facsimile Edition of the Manuscript B of the K.R. Cama Oriental Institute Bombay. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1966.Google Scholar
Fück, J.W., “Ibn Al-Nadīm.” In EI2, 3:895–6, 1986.Google Scholar
Gignoux, P., and Tafazzoli, A.. Anthologie de Zādspram: édition critique du texte pehlevi traduit et commenté. Paris: Association pour l'Avancement des Études Iraniennes, 1993.Google Scholar
Gnoli, Gherardo, “Einige Bemerkungen zum altiranischen Dualismus.” In Proceedings of the Second European Conference of Iranian Studies, ed. Fragner, Bert G., 213–231. Roma: istituto italiano, 1995.Google Scholar
Hämeen-Anttila, Jaakko, The Khwadāynāmag: The Middle Persian Book of Kings. Leiden: Brill, 2018.10.1163/9789004277649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heemskerk, Margaretha T., “ʿAbd al-Jabbār b. Aḥmad al-Hamadhānī.” In EI3, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_0102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Thomas, Veterum Persarum et Parthorum et Medorum Religionis Historia. Oxford: Theatrum Sheldonianum, 1700.Google Scholar
al-Nadīm, Ibn. al-Fihrist. Ed. Tajaddud, Reżā. Tehran: ʾAsāṭīr, 1348.Google Scholar
Ḥazm, Ibn, Aḥmad, ʿAlī b. al- Faṣl fi-l-milal wa-l-ʾahwāʾ wa-l-niḥal. Ed. Naṣr, Muḥammad Ibrāhīm, and ʿUmaira, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Bairūt: Dār al-Jīl, 1985.Google Scholar
Isfarāʾinī, ʾAbū al-Muẓaffar al-. al-Tabṣīr fī al-dīn wa-tamyīz al-firqa al-nājīya ʿan al-firaq al-hālik. Ed. Zāhid, Muḥammad, b. al-Kawtharī, Ḥasan. Qāhira: al-Khānjī, 1374.Google Scholar
Jaafari-Dehaghi, Mahmoud, Dādestān ī Dēnīg. Part I, Transcription, Translation and Commentary. Studia Iranica 20. Paris: Association pour l'Avancement des Études Iraniennes, 1998.Google Scholar
Jamasp-Asana, J.D.M, Pahlavi Texts. Bombay: Fort, 1897.Google Scholar
Justi, Ferdinand, Iranisches Namenbuch. Marburg: Elwert, 1895.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip G., “Cosmogony and Cosmology i. in Zoroastrianism/Mazdaism.” In EIr, 5:303–307, 1993.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip G., “Mithra and Ahreman, Binyāmīn and Malak Ṭāwūs: Traces of an Ancient Myth in the Cosmogonies of Two Modern Sects.” In Recurrent Patterns in Iranian Religions: From Mazdaism to Sufism, ed. Gignoux, Philippe, 57–79. Paris: Association pour l'Avancement des Études Iraniennes, 1992.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip G., “Mithra and Ahreman in Iranian Cosmogonies.” In Studies in Mithraism: Papers Associated with the Mithraic Panel Organized on the Occasion of the XVIth Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, Rome 1990, ed. Hinnells, John R., 173–182. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, 1994.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip G., “On Spenta Mainyu’s Role in the Zoroastrian Cosmogony.” BAI 7 (1993): 97–103.Google Scholar
Lane, Edward William, Arabic–English Lexicon. 7 vols. New York: Frederick Ungar, 1956.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, David N., A Concise Pahlavi Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Madan, Dhanjishah Meherjibhai, The Complete Text of the Pahlavi Dinkard. Bombay: Fort, 1911.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd, “Abū ‘Īsā al-Warrāq über die Bardesaniten, Marcioniten und Kantäer.” In Studien zur Geschichte und Kultur des Vorderen Orients. Festschrift für Bertold Spuler zum siebzigsten Geburtstag, ed. Roemer, Hans R., and Noth, Albrecht, 210–224. Leiden: Brill, 1981.Google Scholar
Maqdisī, Muḥammad b. Aḥmad al-. Aḥsan al-taqāsīm fī maʿrifa al-aqālīm. Ed. de Goeje, M.J.. Leiden: Brill, 1906.Google Scholar
Monnot, Guy, Penseurs musulmans et religions iraniennes: ‘Abd al-Jabbār et ses devanciers. Paris: Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar
Mourad, Suleiman A., “Abū L-Hudhayl.” In EI3, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_SIM_0289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, H.S., “Abu ‘l-Hud_h_ayl al-ʿAllāf.” In EI2, 127–29, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_0203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakzad, Fazlollah, Bundahišn. Zoroastrische Kosmogonie und Kosmologie. Band I: Kritische Edition. Ancient Iranian Studies 2. Tehran: Centre for the Great Islamic Encyclopaedia, 2005.Google Scholar
Pellat, C., “Al-Djayhānī.” In EI2, 12:265–266, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_8505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellat, C., “Al-Masʿūdī.” In EI2, 784–789, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reizenstein, R., and Schaeder, H.H.. Studien zum Antiken Synkretismus aus Iran und Griechenland. Leipzig: Teubner, 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezania, Kianoosh, Die zoroastrische Zeitvorstellung: eine Untersuchung über Zeit- und Ewigkeitskonzepte und die Frage des Zurvanismus. GOF III / NF 2 7. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2010.Google Scholar
Rezania, Kianoosh, “Hū-Dēnān Pēšōbāy: A Newly Founded Zoroastrian Priestly Office at the Abbasid Court,” forthcoming.Google Scholar
Rezania, Kianoosh, Raumkonzeptionen im früheren Zoroastrismus. Kosmische, kultische und soziale Räume. GOF III / NF 2 14. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2017.Google Scholar
Rezania, Kianoosh, “Reforming Cosmologies in Contrast: The Zurwān Myth as a Zoroastrian Reaction to Manichaean Dualism and Islamic Monotheism.” Entangled Religions, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Rezania, Kianoosh, “The Dēnkard against Its Islamic Discourse.” Der Islam 94, no. 2 (2017): 336–362. https://doi.org/10.1515/islam-2017-0023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanjana, Peshotanji Behramji, ed. Vajarkard Dīnī. Bombay: Jā m-e Jamśed, 1848.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Hanns-Peter, “The Non-Existence of Ahreman and the Mixture (Gumēzišn) of Good and Evil.” In K.R. Cama Oriental Institute: Second International Congress Proceedings, ed. Desai, H.J.M, and Modi, H.N., 79–95. Bombay: Jenaz, 1996.Google Scholar
Schmidtke, Sabine, “Neuere Forschungen zur Muʿtazila unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der späteren Muʿtazila ab dem 4./10. Jahrhundert.” Arabica 45, no. 3 (1998): 379–408. doi: 10.1163/157005898774230419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke, Sabine, “The Karaites’ Encounter with the Thought of Abū l-Ḥusain al-Baṣrī (D. 436/1044). A Survey of the Relevant Materials in the Firkovitch-Collection, St. Petersburg.” Arabica 53, no. 1 (2006): 108–142. doi: 10.1163/157005806775143524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahristānī, Abu-’l-Fatḥ Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm al-. al-Milal wa-l-niḥal. Ed. Kīlānī, Muḥammad. Vol. 2. Bairūt: Dār al-Maʿrifa, 1961.Google Scholar
Shahristānī, Abu-’l-Fatḥ Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm al-. Livre des religions et des sectes. Ed. Gimaret, Daniel, and Monnot, Guy. Leuven: Peeters, 1986.Google Scholar
Shahristānī, Abu-’l-Fatḥ Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm al-. Religionspartheien und Philosophen-Schulen. Zum ersten Male vollständig aus dem Arabischen übersetzt und mit erklärenden Anmerkungen versehen von Dr. Theodor Haarbrücker. Hildesheim: Olms, 1969.Google Scholar
Shaked, Shaul, Dualism in Transformation: Varieties of Religion in Sasanian Iran. London: SOAS, 1994.Google Scholar
Shaked, Shaul, From Zoroastrian Iran to Islam. Studies in Religious History and Intercultural Contacts. Aldershot, Brookfield: Variorum, 1995.Google Scholar
Shaked, Shaul, “Mihr the Judge.” JSAI 2 (1980): 1–31.Google Scholar
Shaked, Shaul, “Some Islamic Reports Concerning Zoroastrianism.” JSAI 17 (1994): 43–84.Google Scholar
Shaked, Shaul, “Some Notes on Ahreman, the Evil Spirit, and His Creation.” In Studies in Mysticism and Religion Presented to Gershom G. Scholem, ed. Urbach, E.E., Zwi Werblowsky, R.J., and Wirszubski, C.H., 227–234. Jerusalem: Mognes, 1967.Google Scholar
Shaked, Shaul, “The Myth of Zurvan: Cosmogony and Eschatology.” In Messiah and Christos: Studies in the Jewish Origins of Christianity Presented to David Flusser, ed. Gruenwald, Ithamar, Shaked, Shaul, and Stroumsa, G., 219–240. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992.Google Scholar
Sheffield, Daniel J., “The Wizirgerd ī Dēnīg and the Evil Spirit: Questions of Authenticity in Post-Classical Zoroastrianism.” Bulletin of the Asia Institute 19 (2005): 181–189.Google Scholar
Stausberg, Michael, “Monotheismus, Polytheismus und Dualismus im alten Iran.” In Polytheismus und Monotheismus in den Religionen des Vorderen Orients, ed. Krebernik, Manfred, and Oorschot, Jürgen van, 91–111. Münster: Ugarit, 2002.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Guy G., “Dualismus, I. Religionswissenschaftlich.” In RGG4, 2:1004–1005. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah, Freethinkers of Medieval Islam: Ibn al-Rāwandī, Abū Bakr al-Rāzī and Their Impact on Islamic Thought. Islamic Philosophy, Theology, and Science 35. Leiden: Brill, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, David, “Abū ʿĪsā Al-Warrāq.” In EI3, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_SIM_0290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ess, Josef, “Abu’l-Hoḏayl al-ʿAllāf.” In EIr, 1:318–322, 1982. http://www.iranicaonline.org/Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef, Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra: eine Geschichte des religiösen Denkens im frühen Islam. 6 vols. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1991–97.Google Scholar
Williams, Alan, “Later Zoroastrianism.” In Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, ed. Carr, Brian, and Mahalingam, Indira, 24–45. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Williams, Alan, The Pahlavi Rivāyat Accompanying the Dādestān ī Dēnīg. 2 vols. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1990.Google Scholar
Zaehner, R.C., Zurvan: A Zoroastrian Dilemma. Oxford: Clarendon, 1955.Google Scholar
Zaryāb Khuyī, ʿAbbās, “Abū ʿĪsa al-Warrāq.” In Dāʾirat-ul-maʿārif-i buzurg-i islāmī, 6:82–88, 1994.Google Scholar