Article contents
The Establishment of the Position of Marja'iyyt-i Taqlid in the Twelver-Shi'i Community
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Extract
Nineteenth-century Iran witnessed the advent of a new socioreligious institution. While the theory of a divinely appointed Imam (Imām al-Manṣūb) increasingly became eschatological in nature, a highly centralized religious position came into being whose source of power was not to be found in the classical Shi'i doctrine. The position of marjaᶜ-i taqlīd is a product of several religious developments that characterized the nineteenth-century Shi'i community. The prevalence of the Uṣūlī school and the formulation of two important doctrines, i.e., aᶜlamiyyat (more knowledgeability) and vilāyat-i faqīh (the governance of the jurist) are held as three major juridical impetuses underlying the birth of the institution of marjaᶜiyyat-i taqlīd. Therefore, we will first deal with the Uṣūlī process, then the doctrines of aᶜlamiyyat and vilāyat-i faqīh, then with the qualifications of a marjᶜ, and the question of who the first marjaᶜ of the Twelver-Shi'i community was, and finally the place of marjaᶜ-i taqlīd in the political life of Shi'i Iran.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 1985
References
Notes
1. Shibābī, Maḥmūd, Taqrirīt-i Uṣūl (Tehran: Farbud, 1965), pp. 114–4.Google Scholar
2. Ibid., pp. 117-20.
3. Murtaā Muṭahharī, “Ilhāmī az Shaykh aṭ-Ṭā'ifa,” Hizāra-yi Shaykh-i Tūsī (Qum: Dār at-Tablīgh, 1970), Vol. II, p. 45.Google Scholar
4. See Muḥammad Ibn Ya'qūb Kulaynī, al-Uṣūl min al-Kāfī, ed. Kamara'ī, M. B. (Tehran: Islamiyya, 1963), Vol. 1, Introduction and pp. 12–14.Google Scholar Also see Sachedina, Abdulaziz, Islamic Messianism (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1981), pp. 30–35.Google Scholar
5. See aṭ-Ṭā'ifa Tūsī, Shaykh, ᶜuddat al-Uṣūl (Tehran, 1894), pp. 53–54.Google Scholar Also see Murtaa Muṭahharī, “Ilhāmī az Shaykh aṭ-Ṭā'ifa,” Hizāra-yi Shaykh-i Tūsī (Qum: Dār at-Tablīgh, 1970), ed. Alī Davānī, Vol. 2, p. 44.Google Scholar
6. See ᶜAbd aj-Jalīl Qazvīnī, Kitāb an-Naqḍ (Tehran, 1952), ed. Muḥaddith, , pp. 12Google Scholar, 256, 291, 304 and 492.
7. Muṭahharī, , “Ijtihād dar Islām,” Marjaᶜiyyat va Rūhāniyyat (Tehran: Intishārāt, 1962), p. 42.Google Scholar
8. Shaykh-i Tūsī, ᶜUddat al-Uṣūl, Vol. II, pp. 109-110.
9. See Ibn al-Muṭahhar al-Ḥillī, Tahdhīb al-Wuṣūl ilā ᶜIlm al-Uṣūl (Tehran: Dār ai-Khilāfa, 1890).Google Scholar
10. Gurjī, Abu'l-Qāsim, “Nigāhī bi Taḥavvulāt-i ᶜIlm-i Uṣūl,” Majalla-yi Dānishkada-yi Adbiyyāt (Tehran, 1973), p. 39.Google Scholar
11. Ibn al-Muṭahhar al-Ḥillī, al-Alfayn (Najaf: Ḥaydariyya, 1969), ed. M. M. Khursān, pp. 9, 40, 82, 285 and 290.
12. Shaykh Ḥasan ᶜĀmilī, Maᶜālim al-Uṣūl (Tehran: Shāfiᶜī, 1959), p. 416.Google Scholar
13. Āqā Bir Bihbihānī, Risālat al-Ijtihād wa'l Akhbār (Tabᶜ-i Maḥallī, 1895), pp. 1-20.
14. Ibid., p. 16.
15. Consult Murtaā. Jazā'irī, “Taqlīd Aᶜlam yā Shūrā-yi,” Marjaᶜiyyat va Rūhāniyyat, pp. 216-231.
16. Consult the following sources: al-Muṭahhar al-Ḥillī, Ibn, Kashf al-Murād (Mashhad: Muhammadiyya, n.d.), p. 240Google Scholar; ad-Dīn Tūsī, Naṣīr, Talkhīs al-Muḥaṣṣal (Tehran, 1980), ed. Nūrī, A., p. 206Google Scholar; Suyūrī, Fāḍil Miqdād, Kitāb al-Nāfi Fī Sharh Bāb al-Ḥādī-ᶜashar (Tehran: Muṣṭafavī, 1979), p. 66.Google Scholar
17. Shushtarī, Nūrullah, Iḥqāq al-Ḥaqq (Tehran: Islāmiyya, n.d.), Vol. II, p. 319.Google Scholar
18. See A. Narāqī, Manāhij al-Aḥkām (Tabᶜ-i Mahallī, 1896), pp. 275-7.
19. See Ḥasan ᶜāmilī, Maᶜālim al-Uṣūl (Tehran: Shafīᶜī, 1959), p. 435.Google Scholar
20. Murtaā Anṣārā, zandiqā-yi Shaykh-i Anṣārī (Ahvāz: Ittihād, 1960), pp. 72–5.Google Scholar
21. Shaykh Murtaā Anṣārī, al-Ijtihād wat-Taqlīd (Egypt: Bulaq), p. 35.Google Scholar
22. Muḥammad Kāzim Ṭabaṭabā'ī Yazdī, ᶜUrwat al-Wuthqā (Tehran: Dār ai-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, n.d.), p. 4.Google Scholar
23. Ibid.
24. See ᶜĀmilī, Maᶜālim al-Uṣūl , pp. 425-43.
25. See Narāqī, ᶜAwā'id al Ayyām (Qum: Maktaba Basīratī, 1903), pp. 185–205.Google Scholar
26. al-Muṭahhar al-Ḥillī, Ibn, Tadhkirat al-Fuqahā', Vol. I (Tehran: Murtaavī, 1955), pp. 452–3.Google Scholar
27. ath-Thānī, Shahīd, Sharḥ al-Lumᶜa, Vol. I (Tehran: ᶜIlmiyy, 1929), pp. 255–65.Google Scholar
28. Muḥammad Bāqir Bihbihānī, Risālat al-Akhbār wa'l Ijtihād, p. 9.
29. Narāqī, ᶜAwāid al-Ayyām, p. 185.
30. Ibid., pp. 187 and 188.
31. Ibid., p. 186.
32. Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn Ālbānī, Silsilat al-Aḥādīth aḍ-Ḍaᶜīfa (Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1979), pp. 247–9.Google Scholar
33. See Khomeini, Ruhollah, vilāyat-i Faqīh (Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1979), pp. 74–81.Google Scholar
34. Muḥammad Ibn Yaᶜqūb Kulaynī, al-Uṣūl min al-Kāfī (Tehran: Islāmiyya, 1963), Vol. I, p. 113.Google Scholar
35. See Ṣādūq, Ibn Bābūya, Ikmāl ad-Dīn wa Itmām an-Niᶜma (Tehran: Islāmiyya, 1960), ed. Kamara'ī, , Vol. II, pp. 160–61.Google Scholar
36. Narāqī, ᶜAwā'id al-Ayyām, p. 188.
37. Shaykh Murtaā Anṣārī, al-Makāsib (Tabriz: Maṭhᶜat, Iṭṭilāᶜāt, 1955), pp. 153-5.
38. Narāqī, ᶜAwā'id al-Ayyām, p. 188.
39. Ṭabaṭabā'ī Yazdī, al-ᶜUrwat al-Wuthqā, p. 5.
40. For example, see Fischer, Michael, Iran, from Religious Dispute to Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980), pp. 251–4.Google Scholar Also see Abd al-Hadi Ḥa'iri, “Shīᶜism and Constitutionalism in Iran,” Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University (Montreal, 1973), pp. 124-8.
41. Consult Murtaa Mutahhari, Marjaᶜiyyat va Rūḥāniyyat.
42. See Lambton, Ann K. “A Reconsideration of the Position of the Marjaᶜ al-Taqlīd and the Religious Institution,” Studia Islamica 20 (1964), pp. 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. See Ḥa'iri, “Ansārī,” The Encyclopaedia of Islam, new edition, Supplement (1980), pp. 75-7.
44. Tihrānī, Shaykh Āqā Buzurg, Ṭabaqāt al-Aᶜlām (Najaf: ᶜIlmiyya, 1954), Vol. I, pp. 310–13.Google Scholar
45. Cases at point are Mīrzā Ḥasan Shīrāzī's (d. 1312/1894) fatva on prohibition of Tobaccos, Mīrzā Muḥammad Taqī Shīrāzī's (d. 1338/1919) jihād proclamation against British mandatory role in Iraq. Consult ᶜAlī Davānī Nihat-i Rūḥāniyyūn-i Iran (Tehran: Bunyād Imām Riā, 1979), Vols. I and II.Google Scholar
46. Cases at point are Akhūnd-i Khurāsānī and Mīrzā-yi Nā'inī's cooperation with Iranian constitutionalist. See Ḥa'iri, shi'ism and Constitutionalism in Iran.
47. For example, look at M. B. Bihbinānī, Risālat al-Akhbār, pp. 6-17; and Narāqī, Manāhij al-Uṣūl (Tehran: Ṭabᶜ-i Maḥallī, 1809), p. 277.Google Scholar
48. The Futuvvat-Nama-yi chitsāzān may symbolize the Sufi and Bazaar interrelationships. See Rasā'il-i Javānmardān, ed. Murtaā Ṣarrāf, intro. Henry Corbin (Tehran: Department d'Iranologie de l'Institut Franco-Iranien, 1973), pp. 226–239.Google Scholar
- 14
- Cited by