Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:17:39.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dialogical Tradition of Iranian Modernity: Monazereh, Simultaneity, and the Making of Modern Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Hamid Rezaeiyazdi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Iranian modernity has chiefly been examined in the context of a dialectical antagonism between “traditionalists” and “modernists”—main categories comprised of related sub-headings such as “Islamist” versus “secular,” “reactionary” versus “revolutionary,” and “regressive” versus “progressive.” Following this approach, Iranian adaptations of modernity have often been (de)historicized as a theater of national “awakening” resulting from the toils of secular intellectuals in overcoming the obstinate resistance of traditional reactionaries, a confrontation between two purportedly well-defined and mutually exclusive camps. Such reductionist dialectics has generally overwritten the dialogic narrative of Iranian modernity, a conflicted dialogue misrepresented as a conflicting dialectic. It has also silenced an important feature of Iranian modernity: the universally acknowledged premise of the simultaneity and commensurability of tradition with modernity. The monazereh (disputation or debate) is the account of the interaction between rival discourses that engaged in opposing, informing, and appropriating each other in the process of adapting modernity. Narrativizing the history of Iranian modernity as the conflict between mutually exclusive binaries overlooks its hyphenated, liminal1 identity—a narrative of adaptation rather than wholesale adoption, of heterogeneity rather than homogeneity, of dialogues rather than dialectics. The monazereh is the account of modern Iranian histories.

Keywords

Iranian ModernityMonazerehDialogic ModernityCritique of BinarismModern Iranian Literature
Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , May 2016 , pp. 327 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Iranian Studies 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abazari, Alireza. “Seh Resaleh-ye Naqd-e Sufīyyeh az Dowran-e Qajar” [Three treatises on the denunciation of Sufism from the Qajar era]. Payam-e Baharestan 2, no. 15 (Spring 1391/2012): 33–107.Google Scholar
Abrahamian, Ervand. Iran between Two Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Adamiyat, Fereydun. Fekr-e Azadi va Moqaddameh-ye Nehzat-e Mashrutiyat [The thought of freedom and the beginnings of the constitutional movement]. Tehran: Sokhan, 1340/1961.Google Scholar
Afary, Janet. The Iranian Constitutional Revolution, 1906–1911: Grassroots Democracy, Social Democracy, and the Origins of Feminism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Algar, Hamid. Mīrzā Makum Khān: A Biographical Study in Iranian Modernism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Aryanpour, Yahya. Az Saba ta Nima [From Saba to Nima]. 3 Vols. Tehran: Zavvar, 1387/2008.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. Translated and edited by Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Bamdad, Mehdi. Sharh-e Rejal-e Iran dar Qarn-e 12, 13, va 14 [History of Iranian dignitaries in the twelfth, thirteenth, and fourteenth centuries]. 6 vols. Tehran: Zavvar, 1347/1968.Google Scholar
Bayat, Mangol. “The Rowshanfekr in the Constitutional Period: An Overview.” In Iran’s Constitutional Revolution: Popular Politics, Cultural Transformations and Transnational Connections, edited by Chehabi, H. E. and Martin, Vanessa, 165–192. London: I. B. Tauris in association with Iran Heritage Foundation, 2010.Google Scholar
Behzadi, Mohammad Reza, “Payan Nameh-ye Doktor Tolozan Hakim Bashi-ye Naser al-Din Shāh” [Naser al-Din Shah’s royal physician Dr. Tholozan’s dissertation]. Payam-e Baharestan 2, no. 6 (Winter 1388/2010): 1121–1136.Google Scholar
Browne, Edward G. The Persian Revolution of 1905–1909. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Curzon, George N. Persia and the Persian Question. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1892.Google Scholar
Ebrahimnejad, Hormoz, “Religion and Medicine in Qajar Iran.” In Religion and Society in Qajar Iran, edited by Gleave, Robert, 401–428. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
E’temad al-Saltaneh, Mohammad Hasan. Ruznameh-ye Khaterat-e E’temad al-Saltaneh [The journal of E’temad al-Saltaneh’s memoirs]. Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1389/2010.Google Scholar
Floor, W. M. “The Lūtīs—A Social Phenomenon in Qājār Persia: A Reappraisal.” Die Welt des Islams, new series 13, no. 1/2 (1971): 103–120. doi: 10.2307/1570405Google Scholar
Hedayat, Mehdi Qoli. Khaterat va Khatarat [Memoirs and menaces]. Tehran: Zavvar, 1389/2010.Google Scholar
Kasravi, Ahmad. Tarikh-e Mashruteh-ye Iran [History of the Iranian constitutionalism]. Tehran: Seda-ye Mo‘aser, 1380/2001.Google Scholar
Keddie, Nikki R. Sayyid Jamāl ad-Dīn “al-Afghānī”: A Political Biography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Keddie, Nikki R. Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kermani, Nazem al-Islam. Tarikh-e Bidari-ye Iranian [The history of the awakening of Iranians]. 4 vols. Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1363/1984.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Translated by Keith Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Malekzadeh, Mehdi. Tarikh-e Enqelab-e Mashrutiyat-e Iran [The history of the Iranian constitutional revolution]. 3 vols. Tehran: ‘Elmi, 1371/1992.Google Scholar
Martin, Vanessa. Iran between Islamic Nationalism and Secularism: The Constitutional Revolution of 1906. London: I. B. Tauris, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, Charles, ed. Persian Historiography. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostowfi, ‘Abdullah. Sharh-e Zendegani-ye Man ya Tarikh-e Ejtema‘i va Edari-ye Dowreh-ye Qajar [An account of my life or the social and administrative history of the Qajar era). 3 vols. Tehran: Zavvar, 1384/2005.Google Scholar
Najmi, Naser. Tehran-e ‘Ahd-e Nāseri [Tehran during Naser (al-Din Shah’s) times]. Tehran: Attar, 1364/1985.Google Scholar
Nateq, Homa, and Adamiyat, Fereydun, eds. Afkar-e Siyasi va Ejtema‘i va Eqtesadi dar Asar-e Montasher Nashodeh-ye Dowran-e Qajar [Political, social, and economic thought in the unpublished works of the Qajar era). Tehran: Agah, 1356/1977.Google Scholar
Noruz Moradi, Kurosh. “Majles-e Shora-ye Dowlati (Dar ol-Shora-ye Kobra) dar Seh Pareh Yad Dasht” [The state senate (supreme consultative assembly) in three diaries]. Payam-e Baharestan 2, no. 7 (1389/2010): 969–977.Google Scholar
Rajabi, Mohammad Hasan, and Pouromid, Fatemeh Ruya, eds. Maktubat va Bayanat-e Siyasi va Ejtema‘i-ye ‘Olama-ye Shi‘eh: 1200–1323 [The political and social correspondence and speeches of Shiite clergy: 1786–1905). Vol. 1. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney, 1384/2005.Google Scholar
Rezvani, Mohamad Esma‘il. “Bist o do resaleh-ye tablighati az dowreh-ye enqelab-e mashrutiyyat” [22 propagandist treatises from the constitutional era]. Rahnama-ye Ketab 12, no. 5–6 (Mordad and Shahrivar 1348/1969): 229–240.Google Scholar
Ridgeon, Lloyd. Morals and Mysticism: A History of Sufi-futuwwat in Iran. New York: Routledge, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeon, Lloyd. “Revolution and a High Ranking Sufi: Zahir al-Dawleh’s Contribution to the Constitutional Movement.” In Iran’s Constitutional Revolution: Popular Politics, Cultural Transformations and Transnational Connections, edited by Chehabi, Houchang. E. and Martin, Vanessa. London: I. B. Tauris in association with Iran Heritage Foundation, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeon, Lloyd. “Kasravi, Ahmad vi. On Mysticism and Sufi Persian Poetry,” Encyclopedia Iranica Online [accessed July 17m 2014] http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kasravi-ahmad-viGoogle Scholar
Ringer, Monica M. Education, Religion, and the Discourse of Cultural Reform in Qajar Iran. Costa Mesa, Ca: Mazda Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
Seyed-Ghorab, A. A., and McGlinn, S., trans. The Essence of Modernity: Mirza Yusof Khan Mustashar ad-Dowla Tabrizi’s Treatise on Codified Law (Yak Kaleme). Amsterdam/West Lafayette, IN: Rozenberg Publishers/Purdue University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Talebof, ‘Abdolrahim: Ketab-e Ahmad [The book of Ahmad]. 2nd ed. Edited by Momeni, Bagher. Tehran: Farus, Summer 2536/1977.Google Scholar
Tavakoli-Targhi, Mohammad. “Early Persianate Modernity.” In Forms of Knowledge in Early Modern Asia: Explorations in the Intellectual History of India and Tibet, 1500–1800, edited by Pollock, Sheldon, 257–289. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli-Targhi, Mohammad. “From Patriotism to Matriotism: A Tropological Study of Iranian Nationalism, 1870–1909.” Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 34 (2002): 217–238.Google ScholarPubMed
Tavakoli-Targhi, Mohammad. “Tajaddod-i Ruzmarreh va ‘Ampul-i Tadayyon’” [Quotidian modernity and the “injection of religiosity”]. Iran Nameh 24, no. 4 (Winter 1387/2009): 41–76.Google Scholar
Zargarinejad, Gholam Hosein, and Ahmadzadeh, Muhammad Amir. “Taqabol-e Setareh Shenasi-ye Sonnati va Modern dar Jariyan-e Tarjomeh-ye ‘Olum-e Jadid (Dowreh-ye Naser al-Din Shah Qajar)” [The opposition between traditional and modern astronomy in the process of the translation of the new sciences (Naser al-Din Shah Qajar era)]. Iran History 66, no. 5 (Autumn 2010): 49–69.Google Scholar