Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:54:13.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DPg: Ahuramazdā and the Creation of Water, with a New Text Edition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Soheil Delshad
Soheil Delshad*
Affiliation:
Institut für Iranistik, Freie Universität Berlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Among the Achaemenid inscriptions, DPg has been the topic of several studies since the very beginning of cuneiform studies. The photographs prepared by the DARIOSH (Digital Achaemenid Royal Inscription Open Schema Hypertext) project at L’Orientale University of Naples shed light on some ambiguities of this specific inscription and led to the proposal of a new text edition of DPg. The purpose of this article is to follow the whole history of studies on DPg until today and then propose a new reading of the inscription and a discussion of related issues, including its unique creation formula and orthography.

Keywords

DPgDARIOSHAchaemenid BabylonianWater
Type
Regular Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 3-4: Special Section: Commercial, Confessional, and Military Encounters in Ottoman-Iranian Borderlands in the Early Modern Period , July 2019 , pp. 575 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Photographs used in this paper were taken by Gian Pietro Basello (“L’Orientale” University of Naples) in the framework of the DARIOSH Project directed by Adriano V. Rossi. Thanks are due to the Parseh-Pasargadae (now Parseh) Research Foundation which gave permission to take photographs and provided help in the process (a particular thank you to Hassan Rahsaz).

Special thanks are also due for the assistance of G. P. Basello and A. Rossi, who generously provided the author with the images of DPg kept in the DARIOSH data bank and gave valuable comments on the present paper. The author would like to add that without the help of C. W. Hess, the research assistant at the Institut für Altorientalistik (Freie Universität Berlin), he would not have been able to prepare the text edition. Finally, the author would like to thank Parsa Daneshmand, who gave him helpful suggestions regarding the text edition and commentaries, and Jahan Khalili who read the text carefully and made many corrections in both syntactical and technical aspects.

References

Basello, G.P. “Of Gods and Men in the Persepolis Bronze Plaque.” In Persian Religion in the Achaemenid Period / La religion perse à l’époque achéménide, ed. Henkelman, W.F.M. and Redard, C.347–84. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezold, C.Die Achämenideninschriften. Transcription des babylonischen Textes, nebst Übersetzung, textkritischen Anmerkungen und einem Wörter- und Eigennamenverzeichnisse. Leipzig: Hinrich, 1882.Google Scholar
Biggs, R. D., Brinkman, J. A., Civil, M., Farber, W., Gelb, I. J., Oppenheim, L. A., & Stolper, M. W. (Series Ed.) The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 1956 ff.Google Scholar
Cameron, G.G. “Darius, Egypt, and the ‘Lands Beyond the Sea’.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 2, no. 4 (Oct. 1943):307–13. doi: 10.1086/370691Google Scholar
Coste, P., and Flandin, E.. Voyage en Perse de Eugène Flandin et Pascal Coste pendant les années 1840 et 1841. Perse ancienne, Planches. Vol. 2. Paris: Gide et J. Baudry, 1851.Google Scholar
De Saulcy, F.Recherches sur l’écriture cunéiforme de système assyrienn. Inscriptions der Achéménides. 3e mémoire. Paris: impr. de Koeppelin, 1850.Google Scholar
Filippone, E.DPd/DPe and the Political Discourse of King Darius. In DARIOSH Studies II; Persepolis and its Settlements: Territorial System and Ideology in the Achaemenid State, ed. Basello, G.P. and Rossi, A., 101–20. Napoli: Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale,” 2012.Google Scholar
Hauri, C.Das pentathematische Schema der altpersischen Inschriften. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
Henkelman, W.F.M.The Other Gods Who Are. Studies in Elamite-Iranian Acculturation Based on the Persepolis Fortification Texts. Leiden: Nederlands Inst. voor het Nabije Oosten, 2008.Google Scholar
Horowitz, W.Mesopotamian Cosmic Geography. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1998.Google Scholar
Ker Porter, R.Travels into Georgia, Persia, Armenia, Ancient Babylon, &c. &c. during the Years 1817, 1818, 1819, and 1820. Vols. 1–2. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, 1821.Google Scholar
Kuhrt, A.The Persian Empire. A Corpus of Sources from the Achaemenid Period. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Malbran-Labat, F.La Version Akkadiene de l’Inscription Trilingue de Darius à Behistun. Roma: Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale, 1994.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, C.Reisebeschreibung nach Arabien und den umliegenden Ländern, zweiter Band (Vorwort zum Nachdruck von Dietmar Henze). Vols. 1–3. Graz-Austria: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, [1765] 1968.Google Scholar
Oppert, J.Expédition scientifique en Mésopotamie: Exécutée par ordre du gouvernement de 1851 à 1854 par MM. Fulgence Fresnel, Félix Thomas, et Jules Oppert (Cambridge Library Collection—Archaeology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1859] 2014.Google Scholar
Rössler, O.Untersuchungen über die akkadische Fassung der Achämenideninschriften. Berlin: Triltsch & Huther, 1938.Google Scholar
Scheil, V.Inscriptions des Achéménides a Suse (Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse XXI). Paris: Librairie Ernest Leroux, 1929.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. F.Persepolis I. Structures. Reliefs. Inscriptions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R.Beiträge zu altpersischen Inschriften. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1999.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R.The Old Persian Inscriptions of Naqsh-i Rustam and Persepolis. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, 2000.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R.Die altpersische Inschriften der Achaimeniden. Editio minor mit deutscher Übersetzung. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2009.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R.Stilistik der altpersischen Inschriften: Versuch einer Annährung. Wien: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2016.Google Scholar
Schrader, E. “Die assyrisch-babylonischen Keilinschriften. Kritische Untersuchung der Grundlagen ihrer Entzifferung.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft XXVI, Heft 1‒2 (1872):1–392.Google Scholar
Stolper, M.W.Achaemenid Royal Inscriptions Project (1998). https://oi.uchicago.edu/research/projects/achaemenid-royal-inscriptions-projectGoogle Scholar
Stolze, F., and Andreas, F.C.. Persepolis. Die achaemenidischen und sasanidischen Denkmäler und Inschriften von Persepolis, Istakhr, Pasargadae, Shâhpûr. Vol. 2. Berlin: Verlag von A. Asher.Google Scholar
Streck, M.P.Supplement to the Akkadian Dictionaries. Vol. 1: B, P. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2018.Google Scholar
Texier, C.Description de l’Arménie, la Perse et la Mésopotamie; géographie, géologie, monuments anciens et modernes, moeurs & coutumes. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1852.Google Scholar
Vallat, F.Table Accadienne de Darius Ier (DSaa). In Fragmenta Historiae Elamicae. Mélanges Offerts à M. J. Steve, ed. de Meyer, L., Gasche, H., and Vallat, F., 277–87. Paris: Ed. Recherche sur les Civilisations, 1986.Google Scholar
Weissbach, F.H.Die Keilinschriften der Achämeniden. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung, 1911.Google Scholar
Westergaard, N.L. “On the Deciphering of the Second Achaemenian or Median Species of Arrowheaded Writing.” In Mémoires de la Société Royale des Antiquaires du Nord, 271–439. Copenhague: Au Secrétariat de la Société. 1840‒44.Google Scholar
Wiesehöfer, J. “Englbert Kaempfer in Naqš-i Rustam und Persepolis.” In Achaemenid History VII: Through Travellers’ Eyes; European Travellers on the Iranian Monuments [Proceedings of the 1989 Groningen Achaemenid History Workshop], ed. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. and Drijvers, J.W., 71–85. Leiden: Nederlands Inst. voor het Nabije Oosten, 1991.Google Scholar