Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:52:01.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

White-tailed deer browse preference for an invasive shrub, Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii), depends on woody species composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2019

Gabrielle A. Wright
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA
Ieva Juska
Affiliation:
Undergraduate Student, Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA
David L. Gorchov*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: David L. Gorchov, Department of Biology, Miami University, 700 East High Street, Oxford, OH 45056. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Selective browsing by abundant, generalist herbivores on preferred species could allow less-preferred invasive species to flourish. We tested such an effect by examining rates at which white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus Zimmermann) consume Amur honeysuckle [Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder], an invasive shrub, relative to native woody species across eight forested sites in southwestern Ohio. We tested three hypotheses: (1) deer prefer to browse on L. maackii versus other woody plants; (2) L. maackii is not a preferred source of browse, but is consumed where preferred foods are scarce; and (3) L. maackii provides an important food resource for deer in early spring when other foods are scarce. We used counts of browsed and unbrowsed twigs of each species to calculate, for each site, both the proportion of each species’ twigs browsed and the degree to which deer selectively favor each species (“electivity”) during early to mid-growing season. Across the eight sites, electivity of L. maackii correlated with the proportion of its twigs browsed, and both measures were negatively associated with the density of L. maackii twigs. Lonicera maackii electivity was negative at most sites, indicating it is generally not preferred, undermining hypothesis 1. The hypothesis that deer consume L. maackii when more-preferred foods are depleted was not supported, as there was no negative relationship between L. maackii browse and the density of twigs of more-preferred species. We found a negative relationship between the proportion of L. maackii twigs browsed and the density of L. maackii among sites, which supports the third hypothesis. This finding, combined with seasonal patterns of deer browse on L. maackii, indicates that this invasive shrub is an important source of browse for deer during early spring, regardless of its abundance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alm Bergvall, U, Rautio, P, Kesti, K, Tuomi, J, Leimar, O (2005) Associational effects of plant defences in relation to within and between-patch food choice by a mammalian herbivore: neighbour contrast susceptibility and defence. Oecologia 147:253260 Google Scholar
Anderson, R (1994) Height of white-flowered trillium (Trillium grandiflorum) as an index of deer browsing intensity. Ecol Appl 4:104109 Google Scholar
Augustine, DJ, DeCalesta, D (2003) Defining deer overabundance and threats to forest communities: from individual plants to landscape structure. Ecoscience 10:472486 Google Scholar
Augustine, DJ, Frelich, LE (1998) Effects of white-tailed deer on populations of an understory forb in fragmented deciduous forests. Conserv Biol 12:9951004 Google Scholar
Augustine, DJ, Jordan, PA (1998) Predictors of white-tailed deer grazing intensity in fragmented deciduous forests. J Wildl Manag 62:10761085 Google Scholar
Augustine, DJ, McNaughton, SJ (1998) Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J Wildl Manag 62:11651183 Google Scholar
Averill, KM, Mortenson, DA, Smithwick, EA, Post, E (2016) Deer feeding selectivity for invasive plants. Biol Invasions 18:12471263 Google Scholar
Averill, KM, Mortenson, DA, Smithwick, EAH, Kalisz, S, McShea, WJ, Bourg, NA, Parker, JD, Royo, AA, Abrams, MD, Apsley, DK, Blossey, B, Boucher, DH, Caraher, KL, DiTommaso, A, Johnson, SE, Masson, R, Nuzzo, VA (2018) A regional assessment of white-tailed deer effects on plant invasion. AoB PLANTS 10:plx047 Google Scholar
Beaver, JT, Harper, CA, Kissell, RE, Muller, LL, Basinger, PS, Goode, MJ, Van Manen, FT, Kennedy, ML (2014) Aerial vertical-looking infrared imagery to evaluate bias of distance sampling techniques for white-tailed deer. Wildlife Soc B 38:419427 Google Scholar
Berteaux, D, Crête, M, Huot, J, Maltais, J, Ouellet, JP (1998) Food choice by white-tailed deer in relation to protein and energy content of the diet: a field experiment. Oecologia 115:8492 Google Scholar
Bradshaw, L, Waller, DM (2016) Impacts of white-tailed deer on regional patterns of forest tree recruitment. For Ecol Manage 375:111 Google Scholar
Cincinnati Park Board (2014) Aerial Infrared Deer Count Report. Cincinnati, OH. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Colautti, RI, Ricciardi, A, Grigorovich, IA, MacIsaac, HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721733 Google Scholar
Côté, SD, Rooney, TP, Tremblay, JP, Waller, DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113147 Google Scholar
Crawford, HS (1982) Seasonal food selection and digestibility by tame white-tailed deer in central Maine. J Wildl Manag 46:974982 Google Scholar
DeCalesta, DS (2013) Reliability and precision of pellet-group counts for estimating landscape-level deer density. Hum-Wildl Interact 7:6068 Google Scholar
Dostaler, S, Ouellet, JP, Therrien, JF, Côté, SD (2011) Are feeding preferences of white-tailed deer related to plant constituents? J Wildl Manag 75:913918 Google Scholar
EDDMapS (2017) Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii). Early Detection and Distribution Mapping System. Tifton, GA: Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, University of Georgia. http://www.eddmaps.org/Species/subject.cfm?sub=3040#list. Accessed: September 6, 2017Google Scholar
Eschtruth, AK, Battles, JJ (2008) Accelerated invasion of exotic plant invasion in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 23:388399 Google Scholar
Frelich, LE, Lorimer, CG (1985) Current and predicted long-term effects of deer browsing in hemlock forests in Michigan, USA. Biol Conserv 34:99120 Google Scholar
Fridley, JD (2012) Extended leaf phenology and the autumn niche in deciduous forest invasions. Nature 485:359364 Google Scholar
Great Parks of Hamilton County (2013) Deer Densities. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
Grömping, U (2006) Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J Stat Software 17:127 Google Scholar
Grömping, U (2007) Estimators of relative importance in linear regression based on variance decomposition. Am Statistician 61:139147 Google Scholar
Guiden, PW, Gorchov, DL, Nielsen, C, Schauber, E (2015) Seed dispersal of an invasive shrub, Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii), by white-tailed deer in a fragmented agricultural-forest matrix. Plant Ecol 216:939950 Google Scholar
Halls, LK, Crawford, HS Jr (1960) Deer-forest habitat relationship in north Arkansas. J Wildl Manag 24:387395 Google Scholar
Hewitt, DG, ed (2011) Biology and Management of White-tailed Deer. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 674 pGoogle Scholar
Homer, CG, Dewitz, JA, Yang, L, Jin, S, Danielson, P, Xian, G, Coulston, J, Herold, ND, Wickham, JD, Megown, K (2015) Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States—representing a decade of land cover changes information. Photogramm Eng Rem S 81:345435 Google Scholar
Horsley, SB, Stout, SL, DeCalesta, DS (2003) White-tailed deer impact on the vegetation dynamics of a northern hardwood forest. Ecol Appl 13:98118 Google Scholar
Hurley, PM, Webster, CR, Flaspohler, DJ, Parker, GR (2012) Untangling the landscape of deer overabundance: reserve size versus landscape context in the agricultural Midwest. Biol Conserv 146:6271 Google Scholar
Kalisz, SK, Spiglera, RB, Horvitz, CC (2014) In a long-term experimental demography study, excluding ungulates reversed invader’s explosive population growth rate and restored natives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:45014506 Google Scholar
Kie, JG, Lehmkuhl, JF (2001) Herbivory by wild and domestic ungulates in the Intermountain West. Northwest Sci 75:5561 Google Scholar
Knight, TM, Dunn, JL, Smith, LA, Davis, JA, Kalisz, S (2009) Deer facilitate invasive plant success in a Pennsylvania forest understory. Nat Area J 29:110116 Google Scholar
Kohn, B, Mooty, J (1971) Summer habitat of white-tailed deer in north-central Minnesota. J Wildl Manag 35:476487 Google Scholar
Kraft, LS, Crow, TR, Buckley, DS, Nuartz, EA, Zasada, JC (2004) Effects of harvesting and deer browsing on attributes of understory plants in northern hardwood forest, Upper Michigan, USA. For Ecol Manag 119:199230 Google Scholar
Lechowicz, MJ (1982) The sampling characteristics of electivity indices. Oecologia 52:2230 Google Scholar
Lieurance, D, Cipollini, D (2011) Damage levels from arthropod herbivores on Lonicera maackii suggest enemy release in its introduced range. Biol Invasions 14:863873 Google Scholar
Luken, JO, Thieret, JW (1996) Amur honeysuckle, its fall from grace. Bioscience 46:1824 Google Scholar
Martinod, K, Gorchov, DL (2017) White-tailed deer browse on an invasive shrub with extended leaf phenology meets assumptions of an apparent competition hypothesis. AoB PLANTS 9:plx006 Google Scholar
Mattson, WJ Jr (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:119161 Google Scholar
McCabe, TR, McCabe, RE (1997) Recounting whitetails past. Pages 1126 in McShea WJ, Underwood HB, Rappole JH, eds. The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press Google Scholar
McCullough, DR (1979) The George Reserve Deer Herd. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 271 pGoogle Scholar
McCullough, DR (1997) Irruptive behavior in ungulates. Pages 6998 in McShea WJ, Underwood HB, Rappole JH, eds. The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press Google Scholar
McEwan, RW, Birthfield, MK, Schoergendorfer, A, Arthur, MA (2009) Leaf phenology and freeze tolerance of the invasive shrub Amur honeysuckle and potential native competitors. J Torrey Bot Soc 136:212220 Google Scholar
McNeish, RE, McEwan, RW (2016) A review on the invasion ecology of Amur honeysuckle, a case study of ecological impacts at multiple scales. J Torrey Bot Soc 143:367385 Google Scholar
McShea, WJ (2012) Ecology and management of white-tailed deer in a changing world. Ann NY Acad Sci 245:4956 Google Scholar
Milchunas, DG, Noy-Meir, I (2002) Grazing refuges, external avoidance of herbivory and plant diversity. Oikos 99:113130 Google Scholar
Moen, AN (1978) Seasonal changes in heart rates, activity, metabolism, and forage intake of white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 42:715738 Google Scholar
Nixon, CM, Hansen, LP, Brewer, PA, Chesvig, JE (1991) Ecology of white-tailed deer in an intensively farmed region of Illinois. Wildlife Monogr 118:177 Google Scholar
Parker, JD, Burkepile, DE, Hay, ME (2006) Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311:14591461 Google Scholar
Peebles-Spencer, JR, Gorchov, DL (2017) Are native tree seedlings facilitated by an invasive shrub where white-tailed deer are abundant? Nat Area J 37:540548 Google Scholar
Peebles-Spencer, JR, Gorchov, DL, Crist, TO (2017) Effects of an invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, and a generalist herbivore, white-tailed deer, on forest floor plant community composition. For Ecol Manag 402:204212 Google Scholar
Perkins, PJ, Smith, KS, Mauts, WW (1998) The energy cost of gestation in white-tailed deer. Can J Zool 76:10911097 Google Scholar
Riggs, RA, Tiedemann, AR, Cook, JG, Ballard, TM, Edgerton, PJ, Vavra, M, Krueger, WC, Hall, FC, Bryant, LD, Irwin, LL, Delcurto, T (2000) Modification of Mixed-conifer Forests by Ruminant Herbivores in the Blue Mountains Ecological Province. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Station, Research Paper PNW-RP-527. 77 pGoogle Scholar
Ristau, T E, Royo, AA, Stout, SL, Stoleson, SH, Adams, MB, Moser, WK (2012) Deer Can Be Too Many, Too Few, or Just Enough for Healthy Forests. Delaware, OH: U.S. Forest Service Northern Research Station Research Review No. 16. 5 pGoogle Scholar
Rooney, TP, Waller, DM (2001) How experimental defoliation and leaf height affect growth and reproduction in Trillium grandiflorum . J Torrey Bot Soc 128:393399 Google Scholar
Royo, AA, Kramer, DW, Miller, KV, Nibbelink, NP, Stout, SL (2017) Spatio-temporal variation in foodscapes modifies deer browsing impact on vegetation. Landscape Ecol 32:22812295 Google Scholar
Runkle, JR (2013) Thirty-two years of change in an old-growth Ohio beech-maple forest. Ecology 94:11651175 Google Scholar
Schierenbeck, KA, Mack, RN, Sharitz, RR (1994) Effects on herbivory on growth and biomass allocation in native and introduced species of Lonicera maackii . Ecology 75:16611672 Google Scholar
Smith, LM (2013) Extended leaf phenology in deciduous forest invaders: mechanisms of impact on native communities. J Veg Sci 24:979987 Google Scholar
Smith, LM, Hall, S (2016) Extended leaf phenology may drive plant invasion through direct and apparent competition. Oikos 125:839848 Google Scholar
Swift, CE, Gross, MK (2008) Preventing Deer Damage. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University Extension Fact Sheet no. 6.520. 3 pGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, G, Iwata, T, Murakami, M (2009) Timescale hierarchy determines the indirect effects of fluctuating subsidy inputs on in situ resources. Am Nat 173:200211 Google Scholar
Tierson, WC, Mattfeld, GF, Sage, RW Jr, Behrend, DF (1985) Seasonal movements and home ranges of white-tailed deer in the Adirondacks. J Wildl Manag 49:760769 Google Scholar
Tonidandel, S, LeBreton, JM (2011) Relative importance analysis: a useful supplement to regression analysis. J Bus Psychol 26:19 Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey (2014) National Land Cover Database 2011. https://tdds.cr.usgs.gov/metadata/nlcd/2011/landcover/3x3/NLCD2011_LC_N33W096.htm Accessed: December 5, 2016Google Scholar
Van Clef, M (2008) Brightwood Park Stewardship Plan. Great Meadows, NJ: Ecological Solutions LLC. 35 pGoogle Scholar
Vanderploeg, HA, Scavia, D (1979) Two electivity indices for feeding with special reference to zooplankton grazing. J Fish Res Board Can 36:362365 Google Scholar
Vercauteren, KC, Hygnstrom, SE (1998) Effects of agricultural activities and hunting on home ranges of female white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 62:28285 Google Scholar
Walter, WD, VerCauteren, KC, Campa, H II, Clark, WR, Fischer, JW, Hygnstrom, SE, Mathews, NE, Nielsen, CK, Schauber, EM, Van Deelen, TR, Winterstein, SR (2009) Regional assessment on influence of landscape configuration and connectivity on range size of white-tailed deer. Landscape Ecol 24:14051420 Google Scholar
Webb, SL, Hewitt, DG, Hellickson, MW (2007) Scale of management for mature male white-tailed deer as influenced by home range and movements. J Wildl Manag 71:15071512 Google Scholar
Webster, CR, Jenkins, MA, Jose, S (2006) Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the eastern United States. J Forest 104:366374 Google Scholar
Weisberg, PJ, Coughenour, MB, Bugman, H (2006) Modeling of large herbivore vegetation interactions in a landscape context. Pages 348382 in Danell K, Duncan P, Bergstrom R, Pastor J, eds. Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Wilfong, B, Gorchov, DL, Henry, M (2009) Detecting an invasive shrub in deciduous forest understories using remote sensing. Weed Sci 57:512520 Google Scholar
Wright, GA (2017) White-tailed Deer Browse Preference for an Invasive Shrub, Amur Honeysuckle, Depends on Woody Species Composition. MS thesis. Oxford, OH: Miami University. 51 pGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Wright et al. supplementary material

Table A1

Download Wright et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wright et al. supplementary material

Table A2

Download Wright et al. supplementary material(File)
File 25.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wright et al. supplementary material

Table A3

Download Wright et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.8 KB