Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:06:53.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selective herbicides for control of hen’s eyes (Ardisia crenata) in forests and natural areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2019

Richard Cristan Open the ORCID record for Richard Cristan [Opens in a new window] ,
Patrick J. Minogue ,
Stephen F. Enloe ,
Brent Sellers Open the ORCID record for Brent Sellers [Opens in a new window]  and
Anna Osiecka
Richard Cristan*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Quincy, FL, USA; current: Assistant Research Professor, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY, USA
Patrick J. Minogue
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Quincy, FL, USA
Stephen F. Enloe
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Agronomy Department, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Brent Sellers
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Ona, FL, USA
Anna Osiecka
Affiliation:
Senior Biological Scientist, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Quincy, FL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Richard Cristan, Kentucky State University, 400 East Main Street, Frankfort, KY 40601. (Email: Richard. [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hen’s eyes (Ardisia crenata Sims) is a shade-tolerant invasive shrub displacing native understory in forests of the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. Few studies have explored herbicide effectiveness on A. crenata, with foliar applications of triclopyr amine or triclopyr ester typically referenced as the standard treatments. This study evaluated efficacy of eight foliar herbicide treatments and a nontreated check at three locations at 12 mo after the first treatment (12MAT1) and 12 mo after the second treatment (12MAT2) on established (greater than 8-cm high) and seedling (less than 8-cm high) A. crenata. Treatments were four triclopyr formulations: amine, ester, choline, and acid (all at 4.04 kg ae ha−1); imazamox (1.12 and 2.24 kg ae ha−1); flumioxazin (0.43 kg ai ha−1); and triclopyr amine plus flumioxazin (4.04 + 0.43 kg ae ha−1). At 12MAT1, triclopyr ester, the high rate of imazamox, and triclopyr acid resulted in greater control of established A. crenata than any other herbicide (68%, 66%, and 64%, respectively). At 12MAT2, all herbicides except flumioxazin resulted in some control of A. crenata. Triclopyr ester, triclopyr acid, and the high rate of imazamox provided 95%, 93%, and 92% control, respectively. Triclopyr choline did not perform as well as the acid or ester formulations, and the tank mix of flumioxazin and triclopyr amine did not improve control over triclopyr amine alone. This study identified triclopyr acid and imazamox (2.24 kg ae ha−1) as new options for A. crenata control and indicated variation in the performance among the four triclopyr formulations.

Keywords

Coral ardisiaflumioxazinimazamoxinvasive shrubpine–hardwood foresttriclopyr formulations
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 229 - 235
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Steven S. Seefeldt, Washington State University

References

Dias, J, Banu, A, Sperry, B, Enloe, S, Ferrell, J, Sellers, B (2017) Relative activity of four triclopyr formulations. Weed Technol 31:928–934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dozier, H (1999) Plant Introductions and Invasion: History, Public Awareness, and the Case of Ardisia crenata. Ph.D dissertation. Gainesville: University of Florida. 113 pGoogle Scholar
[EDDMapS] Early Detection & Distribution Mapping System (2019) Coral ardisia, Ardisia crenata Sims. University of Georgia Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. https://www.eddmaps.org/distribution/viewmap.cfm?sub=3008. Accessed: May 15, 2019Google Scholar
Enloe, S, Loewenstein, N, Streett, D, Lauer, D (2015) Herbicide treatment and application method influence root sprouting in Chinese tallowtree (Triadica sebifera). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 8:160–168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewe, SM, Overholt, WA, Kirton, LG, Lai, E-M, Ahmad, I, Ulaganathan, S (2006) Foreign exploration for biological control agents of three invasive plant species from Asia. Wildland Weeds 9:19–21 Google Scholar
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (2016) Introduction or Release of Plant Pests, Noxious Weeds, Arthropods, and Biological Control Agents. 5B-57.007 Noxious Weed List. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=5B-57. Accessed: May 15, 2019Google Scholar
Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (2019) List of Invasive Plant Species. www.fleppc.org. Accessed: May 15, 2019Google Scholar
Hutchinson, JT, Langeland, KA, Meisenburg, M (2011) Field trials for herbicide control of coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata) in natural areas of north-central Florida. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4: 234−238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, H, de Mejía, E (2005) The genus Ardisia: a novel source of health-promoting compounds and phytopharmaceuticals. J Ethnopharmacol 96: 347−354 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langeland, KA, Cherry, HM, McCormick, CM, Craddock Burks, KA (2008) Identification and biology of nonnative plants in Florida’s natural areas. Gainesville: IFAS Communication Services, University of Florida. 193 p Google Scholar
Langston, VB, Peterson, V, Burch, PL, Flynn, S, Cummings, C, Halvstedt, M, Nelson, J, Brinkworth, L (2015) Introduction of new triclopyr highload formulation by Dow AgroSciences. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 68:43 Google Scholar
Miller, JH, Manning, ST, Enloe, SF (2013) A Management Guide for Invasive Plants in Southern Forests. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–131. 120 p Google Scholar
[NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2019) Daily Summaries Station Details. National Centers For Envrionmental Information. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datasets/GHCND/stations/GHCND:US1FLST0009/detail. Accessed: October 16, 2019Google Scholar
Niu, HY, Long, L, Wang, ZF, Shen, H, Ye, WH, Mu, HP, Cao, HL, Wang, ZM, Bradshaw, CJ (2012) Inferring the invasion history of coral berry Ardisia crenata from China to the USA using molecular markers. Ecol Res 27: 809−818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2016) Using JMP 13. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. 628 p Google Scholar
Sellers, B, Langeland, K, Ferrell, J, Meisenburg, M, Walter, J (2007) Identification and control of coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata): a potentially poisonous plant. Gainesville: University of Florida IFAS Extension Publication SS-AGR-276. 2 pGoogle Scholar
Wunderlin, R (1982) Guide to the Vascular Plants of Central Florida. Tampa: University Presses of Florida. 475 p Google Scholar
Wunderlin, RP, Hansen, BF (2019) Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants. http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu. Accessed: May 15, 2019Google Scholar