Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:24:52.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Two Sagebrush Sites to Low-Disturbance, Mechanical Removal of Piñyon and Juniper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Carson Baughman ,
Tara A. Forbis  and
Louis Provencher
Carson Baughman
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, 1 East 1st Street, Suite 1007, Reno, NV 89501
Tara A. Forbis*
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, 1 East 1st Street, Suite 1007, Reno, NV 89501
Louis Provencher
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, 1 East 1st Street, Suite 1007, Reno, NV 89501
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Great Basin of the western United States, expansion of Pinus monophylla (singleleaf piñyon) and Juniperus osteosperma (Utah juniper) out of historic woodlands and into Artemisia spp. (sagebrush) shrubland communities can facilitate the invasion of exotic downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and lead to decreases in ecological and economic values of shrublands. This expansion has, therefore, been the focus of management efforts, including the thinning or removal of trees in areas that were historically shrubland. Our study examined the effects of tree thinning at two sites located in eastern Nevada, near the center of the Great Basin. Such projects can be controversial, so our goal was to estimate and document the ecological effects of low-disturbance tree thinning at these two sites. Both sites were mechanically thinned using a feller-buncher and were aerially seeded with native grasses. Aerial seeding had no apparent effect at either site. The site that had lower tree cover before treatment (Ely, NV) showed an increase in native forbs and a small increase in invasives. The site that initially had very high tree cover and low shrub cover (Mt. Wilson, NV) showed increases in native forbs and species diversity and a substantial increase in invasives. We conclude that low-disturbance methods for thinning encroaching trees can have positive ecological effects in shrublands but that the initial cover of both trees and native herbaceous species should be considered to determine the potential of the site to recover naturally from the seedbank and the risk of invasion by downy brome.

Keywords

Downy brome, Bromus tectorum L.singleleaf piñyon, Pinus monophylla Torr. & Frém. Utah juniper, Juniperus osteosperma (Torr.) Little IUPOSsagebrush, Artemisia spp.Fuelsrestorationinvasivesfire surrogatevegetation
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , August 2010 , pp. 122 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Research Ecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Exotic and Invasive Weeds Research Unit, 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV 89512

References

Literature Cited

Ansley, R. J. and Rasmussen, G. A. 2005. Managing native invasive juniper species using fire. Weed Technol 19:517–522.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. G. 1995. Descriptions of ecoregions of the United States. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 1391.Google Scholar
Baker, W. L. and Shinneman, D. J. 2004. Fire and restoration of piñyon and juniper woodlands in the western United States: a review. J. Arid Environ 72:207–227.Google Scholar
Bates, J. D., Miller, R. F., and Svejcar, T. J. 2000. Understory dynamics in cut and uncut western juniper woodlands. J. Range Manag 53:119–126.Google Scholar
Bates, J. D., Svejcar, T. J., and Miller, R. F. 2002. Effects of juniper cutting on nitrogen mineralization. J. Arid Environ 51:221–234.Google Scholar
Blackburn, W. H. and Tueller, P. T. 1970. Piñyon and Juniper invasion in black sagebrush communities in east-central Nevada. Ecology 51:841–848.Google Scholar
Brockway, D., Gatewood, R. G., and Paris, R. B. 2001. Restoring grassland savannas from degraded piñyon and juniper woodlands: effects of mechanical overstory reduction and slash treatment alternatives. J. Environ. Manag 64:179–197.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J. W. and Tisdale, E. W. 1976. Causes of juniper invasion in southwestern Idaho. Ecology 57:472–484.Google Scholar
Comer, P., Faber-Langendoen, D., Evans, R., et al. 2003. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems. Arlington, VA NatureServe. 75.Google Scholar
Elzinga, C. L., Salzer, D. W., and Willoughby, J. W. 1998. Measuring and Monitoring Plant Populations. Denver, CO Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1730–1.Google Scholar
Forbis, T. A., Provencher, L., Frid, L., and Medlyn, G. 2006. Great Basin land management planning using ecological modeling. Environ. Manag 38:62–83.Google Scholar
Forbis, T. A., Provencher, L., Turner, L., Medlyn, G., Thompson, J., and Jones, G. 2007. A method for landscape-scale vegetation assessment: application to Great Basin rangeland ecosystems. Range. Ecol. Manag 60:209–217.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Oxford, UK Academic. 892.Google Scholar
Herrick, J. E., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Archer, S., Tugel, A. J., and Brown, J. R. 2006a. An integrated framework for science-based arid land management. J. Arid Environ 65:319–335.Google Scholar
Herrick, J. E., Schuman, G. E., and Rango, A. 2006b. Monitoring ecological processes for restoration projects. J. Nature Conserv. (Jena) 14:161–171.Google Scholar
Huxman, T. E., Wilcox, B. P., Breshears, D. D., Scott, R. L., Snyder, K. A., Small, E. E., Hultine, K., Pockman, W. T., and Jackson, R. B. 2005. Ecohydrological implications of woody plant encroachment. Ecology 86:308–319.Google Scholar
Laughlin, D. C., Moore, M. M., Bakker, J. D., Casey, C. A., Springer, J. D., Fule, P. Z., and Covington, W. W. 2006. Assessing targets for the restoration of herbaceous vegetation in ponderosa pine forests. Restor. Ecol 14:548–560.Google Scholar
Lysne, C. R. and Pellant, M. 2004. Establishment of aerially seeded big sagebrush following southern Idaho fires. Washington, DC U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Technical Bulletin 2004-01.Google Scholar
Miller, R. F., Bates, J. D., Svejcar, A. J., Pierson, F. B. Jr, and Eddleman, L. E. 2005. Biology, ecology, and management of western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis). Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station. 77.Google Scholar
Monsen, S. B. and Meyer, S. E. 1990. Seeding equipment effects on establishment of big sagebrush on mine disturbances. Pages 192–199. in. Proceedings of the Fifth Billings Symposium on Disturbed Land Rehabilitation. Volume I. Bozeman, MT Montana State University Reclamation Research Unit Publication 9003.Google Scholar
Nachlinger, J., Sochi, K., Comer, P., Kiuel, G., and Dorfman, D. 2001. Great Basin: An Ecoregion-Based Conservation Blueprint. Reno, NV The Nature Conservancy.Google Scholar
[NRCS] Natural Resources Conservation Service 1997. National Range and Pasture Handbook. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Ott, J. E., McArthur, E. D., and Roundy, B. A. 2003. Vegetation of chained and non-chained seedings after wildfire in Utah. J. Range Manag 56:81–91.Google Scholar
Pierson, F. B., Bates, J. D., Svejcar, T. J., and Hardegree, S. P. 2007. Runoff and erosion after cutting western juniper. J. Range Manag 60 (3):285–292.Google Scholar
Prasse, R. and Bornkamm, R. 2000. Effect of microbiotic soil surface crusts on emergence of vascular plants. Plant Ecol 150:65–75.Google Scholar
Tausch, R. J., Chambers, J. C., Blank, R. R., and Nowak, R. S. 1995. Differential establishment of perennial grass and cheatgrass following fire on an ungrazed sagebrush-juniper site. Pages 252–257. in Roundy, B. A., McArthur, E. D., Haley, J. S., and Mann, D. K. Comps. 1995. Proceedings of the Wildland Shrub and Arid Land Restoration Symposium. Ogden, UT U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315.Google Scholar
Tausch, R. J., Miller, R. F., Roundy, B. A., and Chambers, J. C. 2009. Piñon and juniper field guide: asking the right questions to select appropriate management actions. U. S. Geol. Surv. Circ. 1335. 96.Google Scholar
Tausch, R. J. and Nowak, R. S. 1999. Fifty years of ecotone change between shrub and tree dominance in the Jack Springs Piñyon Research Natural Area. Pages 71–77. in McArthur, E. D., Ostler, W. K., and Wamboldt, C. L. comps. Proceedings: Shrubland Ecotones. Ogden, UT U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings RMRS-P-00.Google Scholar
Van Auken, O. W. 2000. Shrub invasion of North American semiarid grasslands. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 31:197–215.Google Scholar
Walters, C. J. and Holling, C. S. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068.Google Scholar
Walton, M., Herrick, J. E., Gibbens, R. P., and Remmenga, M. 2001. Persistence of biosolids in a Chihuahuan Desert rangeland 18 years after application. Arid Land Res. and Managet 15:223–232.Google Scholar
Wilhere, G. F. 2002. Adaptive management in habitat conservation plans. Conserv. Biol 16:20–29.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Rimbey, C. 1985. Weed control and revegetation following western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) control. Weed Sci 33:513–517.Google Scholar