Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:38:48.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconciling Seed Dispersal and Seed Bank Observations to Predict Smooth Brome (Bromus inermis) Invasions of a Northern Prairie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rafael Otfinowski ,
Norm C. Kenkel  and
Rene C. Van Acker
Rafael Otfinowski*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada
Norm C. Kenkel
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada
Rene C. Van Acker
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The importance of dispersal in the establishment and proliferation of exotic populations make this life history stage critical in the prediction and management of biological invasions. We observed the dispersal of seeds by patches of smooth brome invading northern fescue prairies and applied an inverse power function model to explore its potential invasion patterns. Based on our observations of two northern fescue prairies in Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba, Canada, patterns of potential invasion were contingent upon the dispersal of seeds as individual florets or aggregated within spikelets and panicles. For example, although the majority of dispersed seeds were intercepted within one meter, inside and outside the margins of invading patches, slopes of the log–log plots of seed number against their dispersal distance were steeper for seeds dispersed as spikelets than individual florets. Despite the observed aggregation of seeds along the margins of invading patches, the number of dispersed seeds was poorly correlated with that germinated from the seed bank. The shallow dispersal gradient of individual florets and spikelets, combined with the steeper gradient of panicles suggest that smooth brome is capable of simultaneously invading along dense fronts and by establishing isolated foci. Although low correlations between the number of dispersed seeds and their recruitment from the seed bank might suggest postdispersal transport of seeds, other mechanisms, including seed predation and pathogens, remain unexplored. Conservation and restoration of northern fescue prairies must include efforts to control the dispersal of smooth brome seeds and reduce opportunities for their establishment.

Keywords

Smooth bromeBromus inermis LeyssBiological invasionsplant dispersalinverse power functionspatial patternsnorthern fescue prairie
Type
Research Articles
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 279 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bergelson, J., Newman, J. A., and Floresroux, E. M. 1993. Rates of weed spread in spatially heterogeneous environments. Ecology 74:999–1011.Google Scholar
Bewley, J. D. and Black, M. 1982. Physiology and Biochemistry of Seeds in Relation to Germination. Vol. 2. Viability, Dormancy, and Environmental Control. New York Springer-Verlag. 375.Google Scholar
Blackburn, T. M. and Cassey, P. 2007. Patterns of non-randomness in the exotic avifauna of Florida. Divers. Distrib 13:519–526.Google Scholar
Blaney, C. S. and Kotanen, P. M. 2001. Post-dispersal losses to seed predators: an experimental comparison of native and exotic old field species. Can. J. Bot 79:284–292.Google Scholar
Blood, D. A. 1966. The Festuca scabrella association in Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba. Can. Field-Nat 80:24–32.Google Scholar
Buckling, A., Kassen, R., Bell, G., and Rainey, P. B. 2000. Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms. Nature 408:961–964.Google Scholar
Cassey, P., Blackburn, T. M., Sol, D., Duncan, R. P., and Lockwood, J. L. 2004. Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Biol. Lett 271:S405–S408.Google ScholarPubMed
Cavers, P. B., Groves, R. H., and Kaye, P. E. 1995. Seed population dynamics of Onopordum over 1 year in southern New South Wales. J. Appl. Ecol 32:425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cody, W. J. 1988. Plants of Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba. Ottawa, Canada Canadian Government Publishing Centre. 319.Google Scholar
Colautti, R. I., Grigorovich, I. A., and MacIsaac, H. J. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 8:1–15.Google Scholar
Cook, R. 1980. The biology of seeds in the soil. Pages 107–130. in Solbrig, O. T., editor. Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. Berkeley, CA University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, R. T. 1961. A reconsideration of grassland classification in the Northern Great Plains of North America. J. Ecol 49:135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, R. T. and Brayshaw, C. T. 1953. The fescue grasslands in Saskatchewan. Ecology 34:386–405.Google Scholar
Csontos, P. 2007. Seed banks: ecological definitions and sampling considerations. Community Ecol 8:75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarnecka, J. 2004. Microspatial structure of the seed bank of xerothermic grassland—intracommunity differentiation. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol 73:155–164.Google Scholar
Defossé, G. E., Robberecht, R., and Bertiller, M. B. 1997. Seedling dynamics of Festuca spp. in a grassland of patagonia, Argentina, as affected by competition, microsites, and grazing. J. Range Manag 50:73–79.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A. and Watson, P. R. 1998. Weed community composition in seedbanks, seedling, and mature plant communities in a multi-year trial in western Canada. Asp. Appl. Biol 51:43–50.Google Scholar
Dessaint, F., Chadoeuf, R., and Barralis, G. 1991. Spatial pattern analysis of weed seeds in the cultivated soil seed bank. J. Appl. Ecol 28:721–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, H. and Edwards, P. J. 2006. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasions helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87:1359–1367.Google Scholar
DiVittorio, C. T., Corbin, J. D., and D'Antonio, C. 2007. Spatial and temporal patterns of seed dispersal: an important determinant of grassland invasion. Ecol. Appl 17:311–316.Google Scholar
Duyck, P-F., David, P., and Quilici, S. 2007. Can more K-selected species be better invaders? A case study of fruit flies in La Réunion. Divers. Distrib 13:535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C. S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London, United Kingdom Methuen. 181.Google Scholar
Eriksson, O. and Kiviniemi, K. 1999. Evolution of plant dispersal. Pages 215–238 in Vourisalo, T. O. and Mutikainen, P. K., eds. Life history evolution in plants. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Frank, D. A. and McNaughton, S. J. 1992. The ecology of plants, large mammalian herbivores, and drought in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 73:2043–2058.Google Scholar
Greene, D. F. and Johnson, E. A. 1996. Wind dispersal of seeds from a forest into a clearing. Ecology 77:595–609.Google Scholar
Grilz, P. L. and Romo, J. T. 1995. Management considerations for controlling smooth brome in fescue prairie. Nat. Areas J 15:148–156.Google Scholar
Gross, K. L. 1990. A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil. J. Ecol 78:1079–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London, United Kingdom Academic Press. 892.Google Scholar
Harris, J. G. and Woolf Harris, M. 1994. Plant Identification Terminology: An Illustrated Glossary. Spring Lake, UT Spring Lake Publishing. 197.Google Scholar
Higgins, S. I. and Richardson, D. M. 1999. Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. Am. Nat 153:464–475.Google Scholar
Huenneke, L. F. and Vitousek, P. M. 1990. Seedling and clonal recruitment of the invasive tree Psidium cattleianum: implications for management of native Hawaiian forests. Biol. Conserv 53:199–211.Google Scholar
Jakobsson, A., Eriksson, O., and Bruun, H. H. 2006. Local seed rain and seed bank in a species-rich grassland: effects of plant abundance and seed size. Can. J. Bot 84:1870–1881.Google Scholar
Kjellsson, G. 1992. Seed banks in Danish deciduous forests: species composition, seed influx and distribution pattern in soil. Ecography 15:86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolar, C. and Lodge, D. M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol 16:199–204.Google Scholar
Lang, A. H. 1974. Guide to the Geology of Riding Mountain National Park and its Vicinity. History of Its Upland and Other Scenery. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada The Geological Survey of Canada. Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources. 68.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Hall, L. M., Brenzil, C. A., Andrews, T., Brown, K. R., and Van Acker, R. C. 2005. Prairie weed surveys of cereal, oilseed, and pulse crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 395.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M. and D'Antonio, C. M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, J. L., Cassey, P., and Blackburn, T. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol 20:223–228.Google Scholar
Lodge, D. M., Willams, S., MacIsaac, H. J., Hayes, K. R., Leung, B., Reichard, S., Mack, R. N., Moyle, P. B., Smith, M., Andow, D. A., Carlton, J. T., and McMichael, A. 2006. Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. Ecol. Appl 16:2035–2054.Google Scholar
MacDougall, A. S. and Turkington, R. 2006. Dispersal, competition, and shifting patterns of diversity in a degraded oak savanna. Ecology 87:1831–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIsaac, H. J., Grigorovich, I. A., and Ricciardi, A. 2001. Reassessment of species invasions concepts: the Great Lakes basin as a model. Biol. Invasions 3:405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R. N. 2003. Plant naturalizations and invasions in the eastern United States: 1634–1860. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard 90:77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlack, G. R. and Good, R. E. 1990. Spatial heterogeneity in the soil seed bank of mature Coastal Plain forest. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 117:143–152.Google Scholar
Moody, M. E. and Mack, R. N. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol 25:1009–1019.Google Scholar
Nathan, R. and Muller-Landau, H. C. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol. Evol 15:278–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okubo, A. and Levin, S. A. 1989. A theoretical framework for data analysis of wind dispersal of seeds and pollen. Ecology 70:329–338.Google Scholar
Otfinowski, R. and Kenkel, N. C. 2008. Clonal integration facilitates the proliferation of smooth brome clones invading northern fescue prairies. Plant Ecology 10.1007/s11258-008-9428-8.Google Scholar
Otfinowski, R., Kenkel, N. C., and Catling, P. M. 2007. The biology of Canadian weeds. 134. Bromus inermis Leyss. Can. J. Plant Sci 87:183–198.Google Scholar
Potyondi, B. 1995. In Palliser's triangle. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Purich Publishing. 143.Google Scholar
Puth, L. M. and Post, D. M. 2005. Studying invasion: have we missed the boat. Ecol. Lett 8:715–721.Google Scholar
Reichman, O. J., Bendix, J. H., and Seastedt, T. R. 1993. Distinct animal-generated edge effects in a tallgrass prairie community. Ecology 74:1281–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. M. and Pyšek, P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Prog. Phys. Geogr 30:409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., and West, C. J. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib 6:93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. 2001. The four questions: What does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity. Evol. Ecol. Res 3:361–367.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. S. 1972. Forest Regions of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Canadian Forestry Service. 172.Google Scholar
Schupp, E. W. and Fuentes, M. 1995. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal and the unification of plant population ecology. Écoscience 2:267–275.Google Scholar
Tassin, J., Rivière, J-N., and Clergeau, P. 2007. Reproductive versus vegetative recruitment of the invasive tree Schinus terebinthifolius: implications for restoration on Reunion Island. Restor. Ecol 15:412–419.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. 1986. Small-scale heterogeneity in the seed bank of an acidic grassland. J. Ecol 74:733–738.Google Scholar
Trottier, G. C. 1986. Disruption of rough fescue, Festuca hallii, grassland by livestock grazing in Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba. Can. Field-Nat 100:488–495.Google Scholar
van der Plank, J. E. 1960. Analysis of epidemics. Pages 229–289. in Horsfall, J. G. and Dimond, A. E., editors. Plant Pathology. An Advanced Treatise. New York Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Wall, S. B. and Joyner, J. W. 1998. Recaching of Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi) seeds by yellow pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus): potential effects on plant reproductive success. Can. J. Zool 76:154–162.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. and Fitter, A. 1996. The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666.Google Scholar
Willson, M. F. 1993. Dispersal mode, seed shadows, and colonization patterns. Veg 107/108:261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. R. U., Richardson, D. M., Rouget, M., Proches, S., Amis, M. A., Henderson, L., and Thuiller, W. 2007. Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modeling plant invasions. Diver. Distrib 13:11–22.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. D. and Belcher, J. W. 1989. Plant and bird communities of native prairie and introduced Eurasian vegetation in Manitoba, Canada. Conserv. Biol 3:39–44.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall. 663.Google Scholar