Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:08:20.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonchemical Methods for Managing Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

S. Luke Flory*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Department of Biology, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405
Jason Lewis
Affiliation:
Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge, 1661 West JPG Niblo Road, Madison, IN 47250
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Chemical, mechanical, and biological methods are used to manage invasive plants, but their effectiveness at removing specific plant invaders while preserving native communities varies widely. Chemical methods are used most extensively but the nontarget effects of some herbicides can have lasting effects on native plants. Nonchemical methods are needed for sites containing rare or threatened native species and where the cost of herbicides is prohibitive. Here we evaluate multiple nonchemical methods for removing Japanese stiltgrass, a nonnative annual grass that is rapidly invading eastern U.S. forests. We applied mowing, hand weeding, and spring and fall fire treatments to replicated plots at three forested sites in southern Indiana and compared the response of Japanese stiltgrass and native plants to untreated reference plots. Mowing and fall fires applied just before seed set were the most effective methods for removing Japanese stiltgrass. Mowing decreased invader cover by 70% and biomass by 95%, whereas fall fires reduced cover by 79% and biomass by 90% compared to reference plots. Spring fire reduced Japanese stiltgrass cover, but not biomass, and hand weeding did not significantly reduce invader cover or biomass compared to untreated plots. There were no significant differences in the response of the overall native plant community or of specific native plant functional groups to the removal treatments. In summary, mowing and properly timed fall fires may be effective nonchemical methods for managing Japanese stiltgrass invasions and restoring native communities. Future research should focus on evaluating the responses of Japanese stiltgrass, native species, and other plant invaders to removal treatments conducted over successive growing seasons across a range of invaded habitats.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abrams, M. D. 1992. Fire and the development of oak forests. Bioscience 42:346353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, M. E. and Cushman, J. H. 2002. Community-level consequences of a plant invasion: effects on three habitats in coastal California. Ecol. Appl 12:14341444.Google Scholar
Barden, L. S. 1987. Invasion of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an exotic, annual, shade-tolerant, C-4 grass, into a North-Carolina floodplain. Am. Midl. Nat 118:4045.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. L., D'Antonio, C. M., Richardson, D. M., Grace, J. B., Keeley, J. E., DiTomaso, J. M., Hobbs, R. J., Pellant, M., and Pyke, D. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54:677688.Google Scholar
Brose, P., Schuler, T., Van Lear, D., and Berst, J. 2001. Bringing fire back—the changing regimes of the Appalachian mixed-oak forests. J. For 99:3035.Google Scholar
Brys, R., Jacquemyn, H., and De Blust, G. 2005. Fire increases aboveground biomass, seed production and recruitment success of Molinia caerulea in dry heathland. Acta Oecol.-Int. J. Ecol 28:299305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, P. G. and Weltzin, J. F. 2004. Environmental correlates of the distribution and abundance of Microstegium vimineum, in east Tennessee. Southeast. Nat 3:545562.Google Scholar
Czarapata, E. 2005. Invasive Plants of the Upper Midwest: An illustrated guide to Their Identification and Control. Madison, WI The University of Wisconsin Press. 215 p.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. and Vitousek, P. M. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 23:6387.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Brooks, M. L., Allen, E. B., Minnich, R., Rice, P. M., and Kyser, G. B. 2006. Control of invasive weeds with prescribed burning. Weed Technol 20:535548.Google Scholar
Duncan, R. S., Anderson, C. B., Sellers, H. N., and Robbins, E. E. 2008. The effect of fire reintroduction on endemic and rare plants of a southeastern glade ecosystem. Restor. Ecol 16:3949.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, S. M. and Gross, K. L. 2005. Effects of timing of prescribed fire on the demography of an invasive plant, spotted knapweed Centaurea maculosa . J. Appl. Ecol 42:6069.Google Scholar
Fairbrothers, D. E. and Gray, J. R. 1972. Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Gramineae) in the United States. J. Torrey Bot. Soc 99:97100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flory, S. L. 2009. Management of Microstegium vimineum invasions and recovery of resident plant communities. Restor. Ecol. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flory, S. L. and Clay, K. 2009. Invasive plant removal method determines native plant community responses. J. Appl. Ecol 46:434442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flory, S. L., Rudgers, J. A., and Clay, K. 2007. Experimental light treatments affect invasion success and the impact of Microstegium vimineum on the resident community. Nat. Areas J 27:124132.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. J., Spyreas, G., and Benedict, J. 2002. Life history of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an invasive grass in southern Illinois. J. Torrey Bot. Soc 129:207219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, L. S. and Matlack, G. R. 2007. The effects of prescribed burning and canopy openness on establishment of two non-native plant species in a deciduous forest, southeast Ohio, USA. For. Ecol. Manag 238:319329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorchov, D. L. and Trisel, D. E. 2003. Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings. Plant Ecol 166:1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guynn, D. C., Guynn, S. T., Wigley, T. B., and Miller, D. A. 2004. Herbicides and forest biodiversity—what do we know and where do we go from here? Wildl. Soc. Bull 32:10851092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. and Humphries, S. E. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol 9:761770.Google Scholar
Hughes, F., Vitousek, P. M., and Tunison, T. 1991. Alien grass invasion and fire in the seasonal submontane zone of Hawaii. Ecology 72:743746.Google Scholar
Iverson, L. R., Hutchinson, T. F., Prasad, A. M., and Peters, M. P. 2008. Thinning, fire, and oak regeneration across a heterogeneous landscape in the eastern US: 7-year results. For. Ecol. Manag 255:30353050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquemyn, H., Brys, R., and Neubert, M. G. 2005. Fire increases invasive spread of Molinia caerulea mainly through changes in demographic parameters. Ecol. Appl 15:20972108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, C. A., Neal, J. C., and Derr, J. E. 2005a. Preemergence and postemergence control of Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum). Weed Technol 19:183189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, C. A., Neal, J. C., and Derr, J. F. 2005b. Response of Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) to application timing, rate, and frequency of postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 19:912917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, C. A., Neal, J. C., and Shear, T. H. 2008. Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) management for restoration of native plant communities. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 1:111119.Google Scholar
Lemmon, P. 1957. A new instrument for measuring forest overstory density. J. For 55:667668.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. M. and Buckley, D. S. 2008. Effects of microsites created by selective harvesting on growth of Microstegium vimineum in a central hardwood forest. For. Sci 54:534542.Google Scholar
Miller, K. V. and Miller, J. H. 2004. Forestry herbicide influences on biodiversity and wildlife habitat in southern forests. Wildl. Soc. Bull 32:10491060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, R. A., Wingard, R. C., and Ziegler, T. R. 1990. Soil survey of Brown County and part of Bartholomew County, Indiana. Washington, D.C. U.S. Departmen of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. 184 p.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, V. A. 1991. Experimental control of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara and Grande) in northern Illinois USA using fire, herbicide, and cutting. Nat. Areas J 11:158167.Google Scholar
Oswalt, C. M., Oswalt, S. N., and Clatterbuck, W. K. 2007. Effects of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus on native woody species density and diversity in a productive mixed-hardwood forest in Tennessee. For. Ecol. Manag 242:727732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D., Parker, I. M., and Windle, P. N. 2005. Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs. Front. Ecol. Environ 3:1220.Google Scholar
Tu, M. 2000. Element Stewardship Abstract for Microstegium vimineum. Arlington, VA The Nature Conservancy. 8 p.Google Scholar
[USDA and NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service 2005. The PLANTS Database. Data compiled from various sources by Mark W. Skinner. Version 3.5. Baton Rouge, LA National Plant Data Center http://plants.usda.gov/. Accessed: September 1, 2009.Google Scholar
Vila, M., Lloret, F., Ogheri, E., and Terradas, J. 2001. Positive fire-grass feedback in Mediterranean Basin woodlands. For. Ecol. Manag 147:314.Google Scholar