Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:24:58.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meadow Knapweed (Centaurea debeauxii) Response to Herbicides and Mechanical Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Timothy W. Miller  and
Cathy Lucero
Timothy W. Miller*
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Cathy Lucero
Affiliation:
Port Angeles, WA 98362
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Meadow knapweed is a fertile European hybrid between black and brown knapweed that has expanded its North American distribution to 27 of the United States and four provinces in Canada. Two experiments were conducted on meadow knapweed in northwestern Washington to determine (1) whether meadow knapweed is similarly sensitive to several herbicides commonly used to control related knapweeds, (2) if herbicide application timing plays a role in control of meadow knapweed, and (3) whether mowing before, after, or instead of herbicide treatment can aid in meadow knapweed control. In the first experiment, herbicides were applied to meadow knapweed at rosette or bolting stages of growth, and again with the same herbicides in the autumn. In the summer following treatment, clopyralid alone or with 2,4-D, dicamba + 2,4-D, and triclopyr ester + 2,4-D ester provided 81 to 100% meadow knapweed control; the only other treatment providing similar control was glyphosate + ammonium sulfate applied at bolting and in autumn in the 2004 to 2005 trial. In the second experiment, combinations of mowing and dicamba + 2,4-D were applied at rosette or early flowering stages of growth. In the 2002 to 2003 trial, control when dicamba + 2,4-D was used exceeded 90%, except when meadow knapweed was mowed at rosette and sprayed at early flowering (78% control). Mowing twice the previous year had only a slight effect on meadow knapweed (10% control). Grass biomass exceeded meadow knapweed biomass in all herbicide-treated plots. In the 2004 to 2005 trial, meadow knapweed control and grass biomass was maximized when plots were mowed at rosette and treated with dicamba + 2,4-D at early flowering or when treated twice with these herbicides; these were the only treatments where grass biomass exceeded meadow knapweed biomass.

Keywords

ClopyraliddicambaglyphosateimazapicMCPPtriclopyr2,4-Dmeadow knapweedCentaurea debeauxii Gren. & Godr. CEDE5Integrated weed managementinvasive speciesmowing
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 503 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andreas, JE, Coombs, EM, Milan, J, Piper, GL, Schwarzländer, M (2013) Current status of biological weed control agents in Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. Pages B-3 in Peachey, E, ed. 2013 Pacific Northwest Weed Management Handbook. Corvallis, OR Washington State University, Oregon State University, University of Idaho Google Scholar
Anonymous (1995) Written findings of the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board, Centaurea jacea × nigra . http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/. Accessed: August 14, 2013Google Scholar
Benefield, CB, DiTomaso, JM, Kyser, GB, Orloff, SB, Churches, KR, Marcum, DB, Nader, GA (1999) Success of mowing to control yellow starthistle depends on timing and plant's branching form. Cal Ag. 53(2):21 Google Scholar
Brown, ML, Duncan, CA, Halstvedt, MB, Christianson, K (1999) Spotted knapweed management with integrated methods. Proc West Soc Weed Sci 52:68–70 Google Scholar
Coombs, EM, Piper, GL, Roché, C (2004) Meadow knapweed. Pages 201–202 in Coombs, EM, Clark, JK, Piper, GL, Confrancesco, AF Jr, eds. Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the United States. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press Google Scholar
Derr, JF (2008) Common reed (Phragmites australis) response to mowing and herbicide application. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:12–16 Google Scholar
Henderson, SL, Mosley, TK, Mosley, JC, Kott, RW (2012) Spotted knapweed utilization by sequential cattle and sheep grazing. Rangeland Ecol Manage 65:286–291 Google Scholar
Miller, TW, D'Auria, DE (2011) Effects of herbicide, tillage, and grass seeding on wild chervil (Anthriscus sylvestris). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:326–331 Google Scholar
Mislevy, P, Mullahey, J, Martin, FG (1999) Preherbicide mowing and herbicide rate on tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum) control. Weed Technol 13:172–175 Google Scholar
Monteiro, A, Moreira, I, Sousa, E (1999) Effect of prior common reed (Phragmites australis) cutting on herbicide efficacy. Hydrobiologia 415:305–308 Google Scholar
Prather, T, Miller, T, Hulting, A (2013) Control of problem weeds. Pages W-18–19 in Peachey, E, ed. 2013 Pacific Northwest Weed Management Handbook. Corvallis, OR Washington State University, Oregon State University, University of Idaho Google Scholar
Renz, MJ, DiTomaso, JM (2006) Early season mowing improves the effectiveness of chlorsulfuron and glyphosate for control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium). Weed Technol 20:32–36 Google Scholar
Rinella, MJ, Jacobs, JS, Sheley, RL, Borkowski, JJ (2001) Spotted knapweed response to season and frequency of mowing. J Range Manag 54:52–56 Google Scholar
Roché, BF Jr, Roché, CT (1991) Identification, introduction, distribution, ecology, and economics of Centaurea species. Pages 369–388 in James, LF, Evans, JO, Ralphs, MH, Child, RD, eds. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, CO Westview Press Google Scholar
Roché, CT, Johnson, DE, Coombs, E (2003) Meadow knapweed (Centaurea × pratensis Thuill.). PNW 0566. Corvallis, OR Washington State University, Oregon State University, and University of Idaho. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, CD, Vayssieres, MP, Williams, WA (1997) Mowing and subclover plantings suppress yellow starthistle. Cal Ag 51:15–20 Google Scholar
Thomsen, CD, Williams, WA, Vayssieres, M, Bell, FL, George, MR (1993) Controlled grazing on annual grassland decreases yellow starthistle. Cal Ag 47:36–40 Google Scholar
USDA, NRCS (2012) The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed: August 14, 2013Google Scholar
Weldy, T, Werier, D (2013) New York Flora Atlas. Landry SM, Campbell KN (original application development), Florida Center for Community Design and Research, University of South Florida. Albany, NY New York Flora Association. http://www.newyork.plantatlas.usf.edu/. Accessed August 14, 2013Google Scholar
Western Regional Climate Center (2013) Cooperative Climatological Data Summaries. Reno, NV 89512-1095 USA. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu. Accessed August 14, 2013Google Scholar
Williams, S, Prather, T (2006) Goats: a tool for controlling spotted knapweed. J. Extension 22: Research in Brief, 5RIB6Google Scholar