Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:31:46.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land Use, Landscapes, and Biological Invasions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Karie L. Decker ,
Craig R. Allen ,
Leonardo Acosta ,
Michelle L. Hellman ,
Christopher F. Jorgensen ,
Ryan J. Stutzman ,
Kody M. Unstad ,
Amy Williams  and
Matthew Yans
Karie L. Decker*
Affiliation:
Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0984
Craig R. Allen
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0984
Leonardo Acosta
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Michelle L. Hellman
Affiliation:
Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0984
Christopher F. Jorgensen
Affiliation:
Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0984
Ryan J. Stutzman
Affiliation:
Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0984
Kody M. Unstad
Affiliation:
Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0984
Amy Williams
Affiliation:
Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0984
Matthew Yans
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The negative effect of invasive species on native species, communities, and ecosystems is widely recognized, and the economic effects in the United States are estimated to be billions of dollars annually. Studies often examine traits of nonnative species or examine what makes a particular habitat invasible. To better understand the factors governing invasions, we used the flora of Nebraska to characterize and compare native and nonnative plant occurrences throughout the state. In addition, we assessed four critical landscape predictors of nonnative plant richness: human population size and three land cover attributes that included percentage of grassland, percentage of agriculture, and percentage of public lands. Results indicated that individual plant species richness has increased by about 35% through invasions (primarily of annuals from the family Poaceae). In addition, human population density, percentage of agriculture, and percentage of public lands all show a positive association with nonnative plant richness. Successful plant invasions may change the composition of species communities, basic ecological functions, and the delivery of ecosystem services. Thus, identifying the factors that influence such variation in distribution patterns can be fundamental to recognizing the present and potential future extent of nonnative plant infestations and, in turn, developing appropriate management programs.

Keywords

Invasibilityinvasive speciesland-use typenonnative species richnessnonnative species traits
Type
Symposium
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 108 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, C. R. and Holling, C. 2010. Novelty, adaptive capacity, and resilience. Ecol. Soc. 15:24. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art24/. Accessed: April 15, 2011.Google Scholar
Allen, J. A., Brown, C. S., and Stohlgren, T. J. 2009. Non-native plant invasions of United States National Parks. Biol. Invasions 11:2195–2207.Google Scholar
Bakker, J. P. 1989. Nature management by grazing and cutting. London Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1986. Life history of colonizing plants: some demographic, genetic, and physiological features. Pages 96–110 in Baker, H. G., Mooney, H. A., and Drake, J. A., eds. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. New York Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bishop, A., Liske-Clark, J., and Grosse, R. 2009. Nebraska Land Cover Development. Grand Island, NE Great Plains Geographic Information Service Partnership, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Blossey, B. and Notzold, R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83:887–889.Google Scholar
Briske, D. D., Fuhlendorf, S. D., and Smeins, F. E. 2006. A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds. Range Ecol. Manag. 59:225–236.Google Scholar
Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. 2nd ed. New York Springer.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., Mack, M. C., and Diaz, S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242.Google Scholar
Charles, H. and Dukes, J. S. 2007. Impacts of invasive species on ecosystem services. Pages 217–237 in Nentwig, W., ed. Biological Invasions (Ecological Studies, Vol. 193). Berlin Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Christian, J. M. and Wilson, S. D. 1999. Long-term ecosystem impacts of an introduced grass in the northern Great Plains. Ecology 80:2397–2407.Google Scholar
Crawley, M. J. and Brown, S. L. 1995. Seed limitation and the dynamics of feral oilseed rape on the M25 motorway. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 259:49–54.Google Scholar
Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34:183–211.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. and Vitousek, P. M. 1992 Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:63–87.Google Scholar
Dyer, A. R. and Rice, K. J. 1999. Effects of competition on resource availability and growth of a California bunchgrass. Ecology 80:2697–2710.Google Scholar
Elton, C. S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London Methuen.Google Scholar
Forys, E. A. and Allen, C. R. 1999. Biological invasions and deletions: community change in south Florida. Biol. Conserv. 87:341–347.Google Scholar
Gavier-Pizarro, G., Radeloff, V., Stewart, S., Huebner, C., and Keuler, N. 2010. Housing is positively associated with invasive exotic plant species richness in New England, USA. Ecol. Appl. 20:1913–1925.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L., Allen, C. R., and Holling, C. S. 2009. Foundations of Resilience. New York Island.Google Scholar
Heger, T. and Trepl, L. 2003. Predicting biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 5:313–321.Google Scholar
Heywood, V. 1989. Patterns, extents and modes of invasions by terrestrial plants. Pages 31–60 in Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmánek, M., and Williamson, M., eds. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. New York J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Higgins, S. I., Richardson, D. M., and Cowling, R. M. 2000. Using a dynamic landscape model for planning the management of alien plant invasions. Ecol. Appl. 10:1833–1848.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, D. J. and Thompson, K. 1997. Plant dispersal: the role of man. J. Appl. Ecol. 34:1484–1496.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4:1–23.Google Scholar
Ibanez, I., Silander, J. A., Wilson, A. M., LaFleur, N., Tanaka, N., and Tsuyama, I. 2009. Multivariate forecasts of potential distributions of invasive plant species. Ecol. Appl. 19:359–375.Google Scholar
Kaul, R. B., Sutherland, D., and Rolfsmeier, S. 2006. The Flora of Nebraska. Lincoln, NE School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Kennedy, T. A., Naeem, S., Howe, K. M., Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., and Reich, P. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417:636–638.Google Scholar
Larson, D. L., Anderson, P. J., and Newton, W. 2001. Alien plant invasion in mixed-grass prairie: effects of vegetation type and anthropogenic disturbance. Ecol. Appl. 11:128–141.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M., Adler, P. B., and Yelenik, S. G. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7:975–989.Google Scholar
Lloret, F., Medail, F., Brundu, G., Camarda, I., Moragues, E., Rita, J., Lambdon, P., and Hulme, P. E. 2005. Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. J. Ecol. 93:512–520.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536.Google Scholar
Lundgren, M. R., Small, C. J., and Dreyer, G. D. 2004. Influence of land use and site characteristics on invasive plant abundance in the Quinebaugh Highlands of southern New England. Northeast. Nat. 11:313–332.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10:689–710.Google Scholar
Maskell, L. C., Bullock, J. M., Smart, S. M., Thompson, K., and Hulme, P. E. 2006. The distribution and habitat associations of non-native plant species in urban riparian habitats. J. Veg. Sci. 17:499–508.Google Scholar
McCanny, S. J. and Cavers, P. B. 1988. Spread of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in Ontario, Canada, II: dispersal by combines. Weed Res. 28:67–72.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 2001. Effects of human population, area and time on nonnative plant and fish diversity in the United States. Biol. Conserv. 100:243–252.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127:247–260.Google Scholar
Mooney, H. A. and Cleland, E. E. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:5446–5451.Google Scholar
Naeem, S., Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., Howe, K. M., Kennedy, T., and Gale, S. 2000. Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91:97–108.Google Scholar
Nebraska Department of Natural Resources. Data Bank Political Boundary Databases. http://www.dnr.ne.gov/databank/statewide.html Accessed April 8, 2010.Google Scholar
Orrock, J. L., Witter, M. S., and Reichman, O. J. 2008. Apparent competition with an exotic plant reduces native plant establishment. Ecology 89:1168–1174.Google Scholar
Pejchar, L. and Mooney, H. A. 2009. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:497–504.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. T., Papes, M., and Kluza, D. A. 2003. Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America. Weed Sci. 51:863–868.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52:273–288.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., and Kucera, T. 2002. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 104:13–24.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P. 1998. Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82:282–294.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P. and Richardson, D. M. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? Pages 97–125 in Nentwig, W., ed. Biological Invasions (Ecological Studies, Vol. 193). Berlin Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Chytrý, M., et al. 2010. Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19:317–331.Google Scholar
Radford, I. J. and Cousens, R. D. 2000. Invasiveness and comparative life-history traits of exotic and indigenous Senecio species in Australia. Oecologia 125:531–542.Google Scholar
Rejmanek, M. and Richardson, D. M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. 2003. The rich get richer—responses. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1(3):122–123.Google Scholar
Roy, D. B., Hill, M. O., and Rothery, P. 1999. Effects of urban land cover on the local species pool in Britain. Ecography 22:507–515.Google Scholar
Salisbury, E. J. 1961. Weeds and Aliens. London Collins.Google Scholar
Schneider, R., Humpert, M., Stoner, K., and Steinauer, G. 2005. The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project: A Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. Lincoln, NE Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Management Plan.Google Scholar
Smith, M. D. and Knapp, A. K. 2001. Physiological and morphological traits of exotic, invasive exotic, and native plant species in tallgrass prairie. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162:785–792.Google Scholar
Stohlgren, T. J., Binkley, D., Chong, G. W., Kalkhan, M. A., Schell, L. D., Bull, K. A., Otsuki, Y., Newman, G., Bashkin, M., and Son, Y. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol. Monogr. 69:25–46.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. R., Stohlgren, T. J., and Beck, K. G. 2007. Predicting yellow toadflax infestations in the Flat Tops Wilderness of Colorado. Biol. Invasions 9:783–793.Google Scholar
Tonkin, J. H. B. 1982. The presence of seed impurities in samples of cereal seed tested at the Official Seed Testing Station, Cambridge in the period of 1979–1981. Asp. Appl. Biol. 1:163–171.Google Scholar
Thompson, K., Hodgson, G., and Rich, T. C. G. 1995. Native and invasive plants: more of the same? Ecography 18:390–402.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service. 2010. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, NC National Plant Data Team. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed: July 6, 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey, National Biological Information Infrastructure, Gap Analysis Program (GAP). May 2010. Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) Version 1.1. Reston, VA USGS.Google Scholar
Van Clef, M. and Stiles, E. W. 2001. Seed longevity in three pairs of native and non-native congeners: assessing invasive potential. Northeast. Nat. 8:301–310.Google Scholar
Vicente, J., Alves, P., Randin, C., Guisan, A., and Honrado, J. 2010. What drives invisibility? A multi-model inference test and spatial modeling of alien plant species richness in northern Portugal. Ecography 33:1081–1092.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., D'Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., Rejmanek, M., and Westbrooks, R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol. 21:1–16.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., D'Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., and Westbrooks, R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84:468–78.Google Scholar
Whitney, K. D. and Gabler, C. A. 2008. Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential. Diversity Distrib. 14:569–580.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. H. and Fitter, A. 1996. The characters of successful invaders. Biol. Conserv. 78:163–170.Google Scholar