Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:27:23.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interspecific competitive potential of wavyleaf basketgrass (Oplismenus undulatifolius), a recent introduction to the mid-Atlantic United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2020

Cody Kepner  and
Vanessa B. Beauchamp Open the ORCID record for Vanessa B. Beauchamp [Opens in a new window]
Cody Kepner
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Towson University, Department of Biological Sciences, Towson, MD, USA
Vanessa B. Beauchamp*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Towson University, Department of Biological Sciences, Towson, MD, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Vanessa Beauchamp, Department of Biological Sciences, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Towson, MD, USA, 21252. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms by which an invasive plant species is able to colonize and successfully expand into native plant communities can help in estimating the potential threat posed by a new invader and predict impacts on community diversity, structure, and function. Wavyleaf basketgrass [Oplismenus undulatifolius (Ard.) P. Beauv.] is a perennial, shade-tolerant grass species that has been recently introduced to the mid-Atlantic United States. Areas invaded by O. undulatifolius typically have low species richness, but it is unknown whether O. undulatifoius actively outcompetes other species or simply thrives primarily in species-poor habitats. This study used a greenhouse experiment to quantify interspecific competition in shade and sun among seedlings of O. undulatifolius; Japanese stiltgrass [Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus], an invasive annual grass common in the region; and a mix of three native perennial grass species commonly used in restoring areas invaded by M. vimineum. In this experiment, shade did not significantly affect growth or competitive ability. Interspecific competition irrespective of shade had a negative effect on growth of all species, but O. undulatifolius was affected to a much greater degree than either M. vimineum or the native grass mix. These results suggest that, at least under these conditions, O. undulatifolius is a weak interspecific competitor and may be capable of forming dense monotypic stands only in areas that already have low species diversity. In the mid-Atlantic region, postagricultural legacies and overabundant deer populations, which lead to depauperate understories, may be a major facilitator of O. undulatifolius invasion in forests.

Keywords

Empty nicheforest understoryinterspecific competitionMicrostegium vimineumshade tolerance
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 23 - 29
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Jacob N. Barney, Virginia Tech

current: Molecular Biologist, USDA-APHIS, Plant Germplasm Quarantine Program, Beltsville, MD, USA

References

Adams, SN, Engelhardt, KAM (2009) Diversity declines in Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stiltgrass) patches. Biol Conserv 142:1003–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, MFJ, Handel, SN (2011) Deer and invasive plant species suppress forest herbaceous communities and canopy tree regeneration. Nat Areas J 31:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, DJ, DeCalesta, D (2003) Defining deer overabundance and threats to forest communities: from individual plants to landscape structure. Ecoscience 10:472–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barden, LS (1987) Invasion of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an exotic, annual, shade-tolerant, C4 grass, into a North Carolina floodplain. Am Midl Nat 118:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, VB, Koontz, SM, Suss, C, Hawkins, C, Kyde, KL, Schnase, JL (2013) An introduction to Oplismenus undulatifolius (Ard.) Roem. & Schult. (wavyleaf basketgrass), a recent invader in mid-Atlantic forest understories. J Torrey Bot Soc 140:391–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossey, B, Notzold, R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, A, Stevens, CJ, Peltzer, DA, Ostle, NJ, Orwin, KH (2018) Belowground competition drives invasive plant impact on native species regardless of nitrogen availability. Oecologia 186:577–587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, RN, Percivalle, C, Narkiewicz, S, DeCuollo, S (2010) Relative rooting depths of native grasses and amenity grasses with potential for use on roadsides in New England. HortScience 45:393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, JS, Yeakley, JA (2013) Functional morphology underlies performance differences among invasive and non-invasive ruderal Rubus species. Oecologia 173:363–374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheplick, GP (2010) Limits to local spatial spread in a highly invasive annual grass (Microstegium vimineum). Biol Invasions 12:1759–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheplick, GP, Fox, J (2011) Density-dependent growth and reproduction of Microstegium vimineum in contrasting light environments. J Torrey Bot Soc 138:62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, PG, Weltzin, JF (2004) Environmental correlates of the distribution and abundance of Microstegium vimineum, in east Tennessee. Southeast Nat 3:545–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, PG, Weltzin, JF (2005) Light limitation creates patchy distribution of an invasive grass in eastern deciduous forests. Biol Invasions 7:477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, SD, Rooney, TP, Tremblay, JP, Dussault, C, Waller, DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demmig-Adams, B, Adams, WW III. (1992) Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43:599–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbrothers, DE, Gray, JR (1972) Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Gramineae) in the United States. Bull Torrey Bot Club 99:97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinn, KM, Vellend, M (2005) Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 3:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, DJ, Spyreas, G, Benedict, J (2002) Life history of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an invasive grass in southern Illinois. J Torrey Bot Soc 129:207–219Google Scholar
Gorchov, DL, Trisel, DE (2003) Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings. Plant Ecol 166:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, CH, Smith, LM, Levey, DJ (2001) Fruit fate, seed germination and growth of an invasive vine—an experimental test of “sit and wait” strategy. Biol Invasions 3:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, LV, Gurevitch, J, Curtis, PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hejda, M, Pysek, P, Jarosik, V (2009) Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J Ecol 97:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzmueller, EJ, Jose, S (2011) Invasion success of cogongrass, an alien C-4 perennial grass, in the southeastern United States: exploration of the ecological basis. Biol Invasions 13:435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, JL, Neufeld, HS (1998) Photosynthetic responses of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus, a shade-tolerant, C-4 grass, to variable light environments. Oecologia 114:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, RM, Crawley, MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klironomos, JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowarik, I (1995) Clonal growth in Ailanthus altissima on a natural site in West Virginia. J Veg Sci 6:853–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuebbing, S, Rodriguez-Cabal, MA, Fowler, D, Breza, L, Schweitzer, JA, Bailey, JK (2012) Resource availability and plant diversity explain patterns of invasion of an exotic grass. J Plant Ecol 6:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leicht, SA, Silander, JA, Greenwood, K (2005) Assessing the competitive ability of Japanese stilt grass, Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:573–580Google Scholar
Levine, JM, Vilà, M, Antonio, CMD, Dukes, JS, Grigulis, K, Lavorel, S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc Lond, B 270:775–781CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, PH, Canham, CD, Marks, PL (2009) Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front Ecol Environ 7:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, PH, Marks, PL (2006) Intact forests provide only weak resistance to a shade-tolerant invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.). J Ecol 94:1070–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCary, MA, Mores, R, Farfan, MA, Wise, DH (2016) Invasive plants have different effects on trophic structure of green and brown food webs in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 19:328–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiners, SJ, Pickett, STA, Cadenasso, ML (2002) Exotic plant invasions over 40 years of old field successions: community patterns and associations. Ecography 25:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motard, E, Dusz, S, Geslin, B, Akpa-Vinceslas, M, Hignard, C, Babiar, O, Clair-Maczulajtys, D, Michel-Salzat, A (2015) How invasion by Ailanthus altissima transforms soil and litter communities in a temperate forest ecosystem. Biol Invasions 17:1817–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, PM, Terrell, EE, Patterson, HJ, Uebel, EC, Davis, CA, Scholz, H, Soreng, RJ (1999) Oplismenus hirtellus subspecies undulatifolius, a new record for North America. Castanea 64:201–202Google Scholar
Rauschert, ESJ, Mortensen, DA, Bjornstad, ON, Nord, AN, Peskin, N (2010) Slow spread of the aggressive invader, Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stiltgrass). Biol Invasions 12:563–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, KO, Callaway, RM (2006) Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytol 170:445–457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rooney, TP, Waller, DM (2003) Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 181:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, U (1981) Monographie der Gattung Oplismenus Gramineae. Vaduz: J. Cramer. 213 pGoogle Scholar
Schramm, JW, Ehrenfeld, JG (2010) Leaf litter and understory canopy shade limit the establishment, growth and reproduction of Microstegium vimineum. Biol Invasions 12:3195–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, K, Chesson, P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slattery, BE, Reshetiloff, K, Zwicker, SM (2003) Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping: Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Annapolis, MD: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. 82 pGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, AE (1986) Seed dispersal by adhesion. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinson, KA, Campbell, SA, Powell, JR, Wolfe, BE, Callaway, RM, Thelen, GC, Hallett, SG, Prati, D, Klironomos, JN (2006) Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol 4:727–731CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanentzap, AJ, Bazely, DR, Koh, S, Timciska, M, Haggith, EG, Carleton, TJ, Coomes, DA (2011) Seeing the forest for the deer: do reductions in deer-disturbance lead to forest recovery? Biol Conserv 144:376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tekiela, DR, Barney, JN (2017) Co-invasion of similar invaders results in analogous ecological impact niches and no synergies. Biol Invasions 19:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, AP, Lopez, RG (2010) Measuring Daily Light Integral in a Greenhouse. Purdue University. www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/HO/HO-238-W.pdf Accessed: February 6, 2020Google Scholar
Touchette, BW, Romanello, GA (2010) Growth and water relations in a central North Carolina population of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus. Biol Invasions 12:893–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-APHIS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (2012) Weed Risk Assessment for Oplismenus hirtellus (L.) P. Beauv. subsp. undulatifolius (Ard.) U. Scholz (Poaceae)—Wavyleaf basketgrass. Raleigh, NC: USDA-APHIS. 15 pGoogle Scholar
Vellend, M, Verheyen, K, Flinn, KM, Jacquemyn, H, Kolb, A, Van Calster, H, Peterken, G, Graae, BJ, Bellemare, J, Honnay, O, Brunet, J, Wulf, M, Gerhardt, F, Hermy, M (2007) Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species–environment relationships via agricultural land use. J Ecol 95:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilà, M, Weiner, J (2004) Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species?—evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, RJ, Wright, JP, Bradford, MA (2011) The putative niche requirements and landscape dynamics of Microstegium vimineum: an invasive Asian grass. Biol Invasions 13:471–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar