Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:29:43.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Intensity and Duration of Invasion by Amur Honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii) on Mixed Hardwood Forests of Indiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joshua M. Shields ,
Michael A. Jenkins ,
Michael R. Saunders ,
Kevin D. Gibson ,
Patrick A. Zollner  and
John B. Dunning Jr.
Joshua M. Shields*
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center (HTIRC), Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Michael A. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center (HTIRC), Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Michael R. Saunders
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center (HTIRC), Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Kevin D. Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Patrick A. Zollner
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
John B. Dunning Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The expansion of populations of invasive species continues to compromise the ecological and economic integrity of our natural resources. The negative effects of invasive species on native biota are widely reported. However, less is known about how the duration (i.e., age of oldest invaders) and intensity (i.e., density and percent cover) of an invasion influences native plant diversity and abundance at the microsite scale. We examined the influence of density, percent cover, and age of Amur honeysuckle (a nonnative invasive shrub), and several environmental factors on native plant taxa at 12 mixed hardwood forests in Indiana, USA. Overall, study sites with the greatest taxonomic diversity (Shannon's Diversity; H′), richness (S), percent cover, and density of native vegetation also had the lowest percent cover of Amur honeysuckle in the upper vertical stratum (1.01 to 5 m). Based on linear mixed model analyses, percent cover of Amur honeysuckle in the upper vertical stratum was consistently and negatively correlated with H′, S, total percent cover, and woody seedling density of native taxa at the microsite scale (P < 0.05). Duration of Amur honeysuckle at the microsite scale was not significant when percent cover of Amur honeysuckle in the upper vertical stratum was included in models. However, duration of Amur honeysuckle invasion was significantly correlated with dependent variables and with upper-stratum honeysuckle cover, suggesting that older Amur honeysuckle in a microsite resulted in greater light competition from above for native understory plant species. Beyond increased cover and shading, our results do not provide evidence of duration-related effects from long-term dominance of honeysuckle in our sampled mixed hardwood forest sites.

Keywords

Amur honeysuckle, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) HerderCentral Hardwoodsdiversityevennesslinear mixed effects modelnonnative shrubrichnessspring ephemerals
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 44 - 56
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America

References

Literature Cited

Akaike, H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723 Google Scholar
Barton, K (2013) MuMIn: Multi-model inference R package version 1.9.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn. Accessed August 1, 2013Google Scholar
Bennett, BM (2014) Model invasions and the development of national concerns over invasive introduced trees: insights from South African history. Biol Invasions 16:499–512 Google Scholar
Brooks, ML, D'Antonio, CM, Richardson, DM, Grace, JB, Keeley, JE, DiTomaso, JM, Hobbs, RJ, Pellant, M, Pyke, D (2004) Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. BioScience 54:677–688 Google Scholar
Callaway, RM, Ridenour, WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443 Google Scholar
Chornesky, EA, Randall, JM (2003) The threat of invasive alien species to biological diversity: setting a future course. Ann Mo Bot Gard 90:67–76 Google Scholar
Christen, D, Matlack, G (2006) The role of roadsides in plant invasions: a demographic approach. Conserv Biol 20:385–391 Google Scholar
Cipollini, KA, McClain, GY (2008) Separating above- and belowground effects of Alliaria petiolata and Lonicera maackii on the performance of Impatiens capensis . Am Midl Nat 160:117–128 Google Scholar
Collier, MH, Vankat, JL, Hughes, MR (2002) Diminished plant species richness and abundance below Lonicera maackii, an invasive shrub. Am Midl Nat 147:60–71 Google Scholar
Crawley, MJ (2013) The R Book. 2nd edn. The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, England Wiley & Sons. 1076 pGoogle Scholar
Davis, MA, Grime, JP, Thompson, K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534 Google Scholar
Deering, RH, Vankat, JL (1999) Forest colonization and development growth of the invasive shrub Lonicera maackii . Am Midl Nat 141:43–50 Google Scholar
Dukes, JS, Mooney, HA (2004) Disruption of ecosystem processes in western North America by invasive species. Rev Chil Hist Nat 77:411–437 Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, JG, Kourtev, P, Huang, W (2001) Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecol Appl 11:1287–1300 Google Scholar
Fagan, ME, Peart, DR (2004) Impact of the invasive shrub glossy buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula L.) on juvenile recruitment by canopy trees. Forest Ecol Manag 194:95–107 Google Scholar
Fan, Z, Moser, WK, Hansen, MH, Nelson, MD (2013) Regional patterns of major nonnative invasive plants and associated factors in upper midwest forests. Forest Sci 59:38–49 Google Scholar
Fox, J, Weisberg, S (2011) An {R} Companion to Applied Regression. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks CA Sage, http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion. Accessed August 1, 2013Google Scholar
Gorchov, DL, Trisel, DE (2003) Competitive effects of the invasive shrub Lonicera maackii . Plant Ecol 166:13–24 Google Scholar
Gould, AM, Gorchov, DL (2000) Effects of the exotic invasive shrub Lonicera maackii on the survival and fecundity of three species of native annuals. Am Midl Nat 144:36–50 Google Scholar
Hartman, KM, McCarthy, BC (2008) Changes in forest structure and species composition following invasion by a non-indigenous shrub, Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii). J Torrey Bot Soc 135:245–259 Google Scholar
Heimpel, GE, Frelich, LE, Landis, DA, Hopper, KR, Hoelmer, KA, Sezen, Z, Asplen, MK, Wu, K (2010) European buckthorn and Asian soybean aphid as components of an extensive invasional meltdown in North America. Biol Invasions 12:2913–2931 Google Scholar
Higgins, SI, Richardson, DM, Cowling, RM, Trinder-Smith, TH (1999) Predicting the landscape-scale distribution of alien plants and their threat to plant diversity. Conserv Biol 13:303–313 Google Scholar
Hutchinson, TF, Vankat, JL (1997) Invasibility and effects of Amur honeysuckle in Southwestern Ohio forests. Conserv Biol 11:1117–1124 Google Scholar
Hunter, JC, Mattice, JA (2002) The spread of woody exotics into forests of a northeastern landscape, 1938–1999. J Torrey Bot Soc 129:220–227 Google Scholar
Jose, S, Cox, J, Miller, DL, Shilling, DG, Merritt, S (2002) Alien plant invasions: the story of cogongrass in southeastern forests. J Forest 100:41–44 Google Scholar
Keane, RM, Crawley, MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170 Google Scholar
Laird, NM, Ware, JH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963–974 Google Scholar
Luken, JO, Thieret, JW (1996) Amur honeysuckle, its fall from grace: lessons from the introduction and spread of a shrub species may guide future plant introductions. BioScience 46:18–24 Google Scholar
Mack, RN, Simberloff, D, Lonsdale, WM, Evans, H, Clout, M, Bazzaz, FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710 Google Scholar
Martin, PH (1999) Norway maple (Acer platanoides) invasion of a natural forest stand: understory consequence and regeneration pattern. Biol Invasions 1:215–222 Google Scholar
McEwan, RW, Arthur-Paratley, LG, Rieske, LK, Arthur, MA (2010) A multi-assay comparison of seed germination inhibition by Lonicera maackii and co-occurring native shrubs. Flora 205:475–483 Google Scholar
McKinney, AM, Goodell, K (2010) Shading by invasive shrub reduces seed production and pollinator services in a native herb. Biol Invasions 12:2751–2763 Google Scholar
Meiners, SJ (2007) Apparent competition: an impact of exotic shrub invasion on tree regeneration. Biol Invasions 9:849–855 pGoogle Scholar
Miller, AJ (1984) Selection of subsets of regression variables. J R Stat Soc, Series A 147:389–425 Google Scholar
Miller, KE, Gorchov, DL (2004) The invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, reduces growth and fecundity of perennial forest herbs. Oecologia 139:359–375 Google Scholar
Mullin, BH, Anderson, LWJ, DiTomaso, JM, Eplee, RE, Getsinger, KD (2000) Invasive plant species. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST), Issue Paper 13 Google Scholar
Myers, JL, Well, AD (2003) Research Design and Statistical Analysis. 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum. 855 pGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, GF, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, Minchin, PR, O'Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, PM, Stevens, MHH, Wagner, H (2013) Vegan: Community Ecology. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed August 1, 2013Google Scholar
Peet, RK, Wentworth, TR, White, PS (1998) A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262–274 Google Scholar
Pielou, EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal Theor Biol 13:131–144 Google Scholar
Pimentel, D, Zuniga, R, Morrison, D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288 Google Scholar
Pinheiro, JC, Bates, DM (2000) Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus New York Springer-Verlag. 528 pGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J, Bates, D, DebRoy, S, Sarkar, D R Development Core Team (2012) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-105 Google Scholar
Pyšek, P, Jarošík, V, Hulme, PE, Pergl, J, Hejda, M, Schaffner, U, Vilà, M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment. Global Change Biol 18:1725–1737 Google Scholar
Sakai, AK, Allendorf, FW, Holt, JS, Lodge, DM, Molofsky, J, With, KA, Baughman, S, Cabin, RJ, Cohen, JE, Ellstrand, NC, McCauley, DE, O'Neil, P, Parker, IM, Thompson, JN, Weller, SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332 Google Scholar
Shannon, CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423 Google Scholar
Shields, JM, Jenkins, MA, Saunders, MR, Zhang, H, Jenkins, LH, Parks, AM (2014) Age distribution and spatial patterning of an invasive shrub in secondary hardwood forests. Forest Sci 60:830–840 Google Scholar
Simberloff, D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Ann Rev Ecol Evol S 40:81–102 Google Scholar
Simberloff, D, Martin, JL, Genovesi, P, Maris, V, Wardle, DA, Aronson, J, Courchamp, F, Galil, B, García-Berthou, E, Pascal, M, Pyšek, P, Sousa, R, Tabacchi, E, Vilà, M (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:58–66 Google Scholar
Simberloff, D, Von Holle, B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32 Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA (2013) Web Soil Survey http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed August 8, 2013Google Scholar
Stapanian, MA, Sundberg, SD, Baumgardner, GA, Liston, A (1998) Alien plant species composition and associations with anthropogenic disturbance in North American forests. Plant Ecol 139:49–62 Google Scholar
Sutherland, S, Nelson, CR (2010) Nonnative plant response to silvicultural treatments: A model based on disturbance, propagule pressure, and competitive abilities. West J Appl For 25:27–33 Google Scholar
USDA, NRCS (2013) The PLANTS Database, National Plant Data Team. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed August 8, 2013Google Scholar
Webster, CR, Jenkins, MA, Jose, S (2006) Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the Eastern United States. J Forest 104:366–374 Google Scholar
Wilson, GW, Hickman, KR, Williamson, MM (2012) Invasive warm-season grasses reduce mycorrhizal root colonization and biomass production of native prairie grasses. Mycorrhiza 22:327–336 Google Scholar
Wolfe, BE, Klironomos, JN (2005) Breaking new ground: Soil communities and exotic plant invasion. BioScience 55:477–487 Google Scholar
Yatskievych, K (2000) Field Guide to Indiana Wildflowers. Bloomington, IN Indiana University Press. 357 pGoogle Scholar
Zar, JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall. 663 pGoogle Scholar