Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:52:03.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of five herbicide treatments for control of Pyrus calleryana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2020

James T. Vogt Open the ORCID record for James T. Vogt [Opens in a new window] ,
David R. Coyle ,
David Jenkins ,
Chris Barnes ,
Christopher Crowe ,
Scott Horn ,
Chip Bates  and
Francis A. Roesch
James T. Vogt*
Affiliation:
Project Leader, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Athens, GA, USA
David R. Coyle
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Forest Health and Invasive Species, Clemson University, Forestry and Environmental Conservation Department, Clemson, SC, USA
David Jenkins
Affiliation:
Forest Health Program Coordinator, South Carolina Forestry Commission, Columbia, SC, USA
Chris Barnes
Affiliation:
Forest Health Specialist, Georgia Forestry Commission, Macon, GA, USA
Christopher Crowe
Affiliation:
Forestry Technician, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Athens, GA, USA
Scott Horn
Affiliation:
Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Athens, GA, USA
Chip Bates
Affiliation:
Forest Health Specialist, Georgia Forestry Commission, Macon, GA, USA
Francis A. Roesch
Affiliation:
Research Statistician, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: James T. Vogt, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Athens, GA30602. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana Decne.) is rapidly spreading in the United States, gaining attention in the last two decades as a serious invasive pest. Recommended control methods include foliar, basal bark, cut stump, and hack-and-squirt application of herbicides, but there are few published studies with replicated data on efficacy. Four readily available herbicidal active ingredients and a combination of two active ingredients were tested for control efficacy against P. calleryana in old-field areas and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) understory. Basal bark applications (triclopyr, triclopyr + aminopyralid), foliar applications (glyphosate, imazapyr), and a soil application (hexazinone) effectively killed P. calleryana with the exception of hexazinone at one site, where rainfall may not have been optimal. Foliar application of glyphosate provided the most consistent control. Our results demonstrate efficacy of registered herbicide formulations for P. calleryana control in two geographic locations and two habitat types. The need for development of integrated pest management programs for P. calleryana is discussed.

Keywords

Aminopyralidhexazinoneimazapyr-isopropylammoniuminvasive speciesmanagementtriclopyr
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 252 - 257
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America.
Copyright
© USDA Forest Service, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: James K. Leary, University of Florida

References

Bell, RL, Zimmerman, RH (1990) Combining ability analysis of juvenile period in pear. HortScience 25:1425–1427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clabo, DC, Clatterbuck, WK (2019) Establishment and early development of even-age shortleaf pine–hardwood mixtures using artificially regenerated shortleaf pine and various site preparation and release treatments. For Sci 66:351–360Google Scholar
Clarke, M, Ma, Z, Snyder, S, Floress, K (2019). What are family forest owners thinking and doing about invasive plants? Landsc Urban Plan 188:80–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creech, JL (1973) Ornamental plant introduction—building on the past. Arnoldia 33:13–25 Google Scholar
Culley, TM (2017) The rise and fall of the ornamental Callery pear tree. Arnoldia 74:2–11 Google Scholar
Culley, TM, Hardiman, NA (2007) The beginning of a new invasive plant: a history of the ornamental Callery pear in the United States. BioScience 57:956–964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culley, TM, Hardiman, NA, Hawks, J (2011) The role of horticulture in plant invasions: how grafting in cultivars of Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) can facilitate spread into natural areas. Biol Invasions 13:739–746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, IS (1984) Frank N. Meyer: Plant Hunter in Asia. Ames: Iowa State University Press. 317 p Google Scholar
[EDDMapS] Early Detection and Distribution Mapping System (2020) Callery pear (Bradford pear). University of Georgia–Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. http://www.eddmaps.org. Accessed: August 24, 2020Google Scholar
Elmore, D (2019) The Invasive Callery pear. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service L-469. http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-11314/L-469%20Callery%20Pear.pdf. Accessed: July 28, 2020.Google Scholar
Fischer, AP, Charnley, S (2012) Private forest owners and invasive plants: risk perception and management. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5:375–389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, RA, Brooks, RK, Lakoba, VT, Sharma, G, Heminger, AR, Dickinson, CC, Barney, JN (2019) Invasive plants negatively impact native, but not exotic, animals. Global Change Biol 25:3694–3705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S, Smeda, RJ, Page, C (2015) Control of Callery pear in pastures, rights-of-ways, and natural areas. Page 86 in Proceedings of the 70th Annual Meeting North Central Weed Science Society. Indianapolis, IN: North Central Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Miller, JH, Manning, ST, Enloe, SF (2010) A Management Guide for Invasive Plants in Southern Forests. General Technical Report SRS-131. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 120 pGoogle Scholar
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Environmental Information (2020) Climate at a Glance. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/county/mapping. Accessed: August 11, 2020Google Scholar
Oswalt, CM, Fei, S, Guo, W, Iannone, BV III, Oswalt, SN, Pijanowski, BC, Potter, KM (2015) A subcontinental view of forest plant invasions. NeoBiota 24:49–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, C, Flynn, ES, Smeda, R (2014) Management of callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) on urban roadsides. Pages 35–36 in Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the North Central Weed Science Society. Minneapolis, MN: North Central Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Pejchar, L, Mooney, HA (2009) Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol Evol 24:497–504 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimentel, D, Zuniga, R, Morrison, D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyšek, P, Jarošík, V, Hulme, PE, Pergl, J, Hejda, M, Schaffner, U, Vilà, M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Change Biol 18:1725–1737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, PK, Singh, JS (2020) Invasive alien plant species: their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health. Ecol Indic 111:106020 Google Scholar
R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
Reichard, SH, Chalker-Scott, L, Buchanan, S (2001) Interactions among non-native plants and birds. Pages 179–223 in Marzluff, JM, Bowman, R, Donnelly, R, eds. Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serota, TH, Culley, TM (2019) Seed germination and seedling survival of invasive Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana Decne.) 11 years after fruit collection. Castanea 84:47–52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundell, E, Thomas, RD, Amason, C, Stuckey, RL, Logan, J (1999) Noteworthy vascular plants from Arkansas. Sida 18:877–887 Google Scholar
Swearingen, J, Slattery, B, Reshetiloff, K, Zwicker, S (2014) Plant Invaders of Mid-Atlantic Natural Areas. 5th ed. Washington, DC: National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 168 p Google Scholar
Taylor, CES, MacGrath, LK, Folley, P, Buck, P, Carpenter, S (1996) Oklahoma vascular plants: additions and distributional comments. Proc Oklahoma Acad Sci 76:31–34 Google Scholar
Templeton, S, Gover, A, Jackson, D, Wurzbacher, S (2020) Callery Pear. Pennsylvania State University EE0390. https://extension.psu.edu/callery-pear. Accessed: July 28, 2020Google Scholar
Terry, MR (2018) Vegetation Management along Roadside and Railroad Right-of-Ways. M.S. thesis. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. 92 pGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2019) Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed: July 27, 2020Google Scholar
Vincent, MA (2005) On the spread and current distribution of Pyrus calleryana in the United States. Castanea 70:20–31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrix, AR, Myers, AL, Marshall, JM (2017) Estimating invading Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) age and flowering probability in an Indiana managed prairie. Proc Indiana Acad Sci 126:153–157 Google Scholar
Zielinski, QB (1965) Self-incompatibility of Pyrus species. Bull Torrey Bot Club 92:219–220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar