Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:31:12.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Herbicide Management Practices Used by Invasive Plant Managers on Berteroa incana (Hoary Alyssum) Seed Biology and Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2018

Uriel D. Menalled ,
Stacy C. Davis  and
Jane M. Mangold
Uriel D. Menalled*
Affiliation:
Undergraduate Research Assistant, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Stacy C. Davis
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Jane M. Mangold
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: Jane M. Mangold, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hoary alyssum [Berteroa incana (L.) DC.] is a nonnative invasive forb that is noxious in California, Idaho, Michigan, Montana, Oregon, Washington, Wyoming, Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan. Managing B. incana is difficult, because it has an extended flowering period, during which plants simultaneously flower and produce seeds. Consequently, poorly timed herbicide applications may kill B. incana flowers but not prevent viable seed production. We examined how different herbicide management practices used by invasive plant managers affected B. incana seed production and viability the year of application as well as population density 1 yr after application. Professional invasive plant managers sprayed B. incana with various herbicides as part of their current management practices at six sites in southwestern Montana in summer 2016. We collected B. incana plants at 4 wk postapplication for seed biology analyses. Across the six sites, nonsprayed B. incana produced 5 to 1,855 seeds plant−1 and averaged 429 seeds plant−1. Seed production was reduced by 64% to 99% with 7 of the 11 herbicide applications. Berteroa incana seed viability in nonsprayed areas averaged 53% and ranged from 36% to 73% across the sites. Nine of the 10 herbicide applications used by invasive plant managers reduced seed viability 49% to 100%. Few of the herbicide management practices reduced B. incana’s population density the following growing season, suggesting that managers should expect reoccurring infestations at least 1 yr after application. Our results show that invasive plant managers can reduce B. incana viable seed production even when spraying plants that have flowered and formed seed pods. However, sites may need to be monitored for additional years to treat reoccurring infestations.

Keywords

John Cardina, Ohio State UniversityApplication timingnoxious weedrangelandseed productionseed viability
Type
Note
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 101 - 106
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agresti, A (2013) Inference for two-way contingency tables. Pages 69–112 in Agresti AL, ed. Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Google Scholar
Asghari, JB, Evans, JO (1992) Effect of metsulfuron methyl on seed formation and viability of dyer’s woad (Isatis finctoria L.) in the field. Pages 178–179 in Research Progress Report of the Western Society of Weed Science. Salt Lake City, UT: Western Society of Weed ScienceGoogle Scholar
Derr, JF (2012) Broadleaf weed control with sulfonylurea herbicides in cool-season turfgrass. Weed Technol 26:582–586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, AJ, Barnett, AG (2008) Poisson regression and log-linear models. Pages 165–186 in Dobson AJ, Barnett AG, eds. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutt, TE, Harvey, RG, Fawcett, RS (1983) Influence of herbicides on yield and botanical composition of alfalfa hay. Agron J 75:229–233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Early Detection and Distribution Mapping System (2017) Hoary alyssum Berteroa incana (L.) DC. https://www.eddmaps.org/distribution/usstate.cfm?sub=5177. Accessed: September 20, 2017Google Scholar
Geor, RJ, Becker, RL, Kanara, EW, Hovda, LR, Sweeney, WH, Winter, TF, Rorick, JK, Ruth, GR, Hope, E, Murphy, MJ (1992) Toxicosis in horses after ingestion of hoary alyssum. J Am Vet Med Assoc 201:63–67 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hastings, RE, Kust, CA (1970) Reserve carbohydrate storage and utilization by yellow rocket, white cockle and hoary alyssum. Weed Sci 18:140–148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J, Mangold, J (2008) Plant Fact Sheet for Hoary Alyssum (Berteroa incana (L.) DC.). Bozeman, MT: USDA–Natural Resources Conservation Service Google Scholar
Jacobs, JS, Sheley, RL (1998) Life history of spotted knapweed. J Range Manage 51:665–673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kust, CA (1969) Selective control of hoary alyssum in alfalfa. Weed Sci 17:99–101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashhadi, HR, Evans, JO (1986) Effect of bloom application of metsulfuron on seed size, viability and seedling vigor of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.). Pages 36–39 in Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science. San Diego, CA: Western Society of Weed ScienceGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, KC, Wood, BL, Murray, L (2002) Broom snakeweed control and seed damage after herbicide applications. J Range Manage 55:604–611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, AL, ed (2010) Tetrazolium Testing Handbook. 10th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Seed Analysts and Society of Commercial Seed Technologists Google Scholar
Nurse, RE, Darbyshire, SJ, Simard, MJ (2015) Impact of post-anthesis glyphosate on wooly cupgrass seed production, seed weight and seed viability. Can J Plant Sci 95:1193–1197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, H, Mangold, J, Jacobs, J (2017) Biology, Ecology, and Management of Hoary Alyssum (Berteroa incana L). Bozeman, MT: Montana State Extension EB0194, 13 pGoogle Scholar
Prather, T, Miller, T, Hulting, A (2016) Control of problem weeds. In Pacific Northwest Pest Management Handbooks. https://pnwhandbooks.org/weed/problem-weeds/alyssum-hoary-berteroa-incana. Accessed: April 30, 2018Google Scholar
R Core, Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Google Scholar
Reichman, OJ (1988) Comparison of the effects of crowding and pocket gopher disturbance on mortality, growth and seed production of Berteroa incana . Am Midl Nat 120:58–69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, RJ, Zandstra, BH (2005) Hoary alyssum (Berteroa incana) control in Fraser fir (Abies fraseri) Christmas trees. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America. Honolulu, HI, February 7–10, 2005. Abstract 109Google Scholar
Stevens, OA (1932) The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. Am J Bot 19:784–794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopps, GJ (2012) Biology of the Rangeland Weed Hoary Alyssum (Berteroa incana (L.) DC.). M.S. dissertation. Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British Columbia, 97 pGoogle Scholar
Warwick, SI, Francis, A (2006) The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 6. Berteroa incana (L.) DC. Can J Plant Sci 86:1297–1309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar