Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:04:18.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a growing degree-day model to estimate Linaria vulgaris shoot emergence and prospects for improving biological control efforts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2022

Suzanne Blatt Open the ORCID record for Suzanne Blatt [Opens in a new window] ,
Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate Open the ORCID record for Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate [Opens in a new window]  and
Scott N. White Open the ORCID record for Scott N. White [Opens in a new window]
Suzanne Blatt*
Affiliation:
Research Entomologist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Kentville Research and Development Centre, Kentville, NS, Canada
Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Scott N. White
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University Faculty of Agriculture, NS, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Suzanne Blatt, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Kentville Research and Development Centre, 32 Main Street, Kentville, NSB4N 1J5, Canada. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris Mill.; Scrophulariaceae) is an invasive herbaceous perennial weed of agricultural and natural habitats throughout North America. In pastures or native rangelands, use of biological control is an attractive option, particularly if the agent can be established quickly. Rhinusa pilosa (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a stem-galling weevil, was first released in Canada in 2014 to evaluate its potential to control L. vulgaris. Rhinusa pilosa requires young, vigorously growing shoots to establish. Ability to estimate when adequate shoots will be available could inform release timing, thus improving establishment success. There is currently no growing degree-day (GDD) model for L. vulgaris. Our main objective was to develop a GDD model for the emergence of L. vulgaris shoots and discuss the utility of such a model in relation to the establishment of R. pilosa in Nova Scotia. Four sites containing five randomly placed 1-m2 quadrats were monitored for the emergence of L. vulgaris shoots twice weekly in spring to summer 2017 and 2018 by recording number of shoots and shoots with flower buds. A GDD (Tbase 2 C) model for shoot emergence of L. vulgaris was developed and validated using independent shoot emergence data. Shoots emerged in the spring between 124 and 244 GDD with 90% of all shoots emerged between 681 and 1,117 GDD. Model estimation for the initiation of shoot emergence was 74 GDD, with 10%, 50%, and 90% shoot emergence estimated to occur at 179, 409, and 811 GDD, respectively. Rhinusa pilosa adults were released in 2016 (three sites) and 2017 (one site), and number of shoots with galls was recorded. Galls were observed in all three sites in 2016 and in three of the four sites in 2017, with none found in 2018. Timing of release and soil moisture are discussed as factors affecting establishment of R. pilosa in Nova Scotia.

Keywords

Biocontrol agent establishmentplant emergence modelsoil moistureyellow toadflax
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 9 - 15
Check for updates
Copyright
© Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Darren J. Kriticos, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences

References

Almquist, TL, Wirt, KL, Adams, JA, Lym, RG (2015) Adaptive development of yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) chemical control recommendations. Invasive Plant Sci Manage 8:276–283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoyama, T, Akimoto, S, Hasegawa, E (2012) Gall distribution as a compromise between the optimal gall-site selection and the synchrony to host-plant phenology in the aphid Kaltenbachiella japonica . Arthropod-Plant Interact 6:461–469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baig, MN, Darwent, AL, Harker, KN, O’Donovan, JT (1999) Preharvest applications of glyphosate for yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) control. Weed Technol 13:777–782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnewall, EC (2011) Plant-Insect Interactions between Yellow Toadflax, Linaria vulgaris, and a Potential Biocontrol Agent, the Gall-forming Weevil, Rhinusa pilosa. MSc dissertation. Lethbridge, AB, Canada: University of Lethbridge. 177 pGoogle Scholar
Barnewall, EC, De Clerck-Floate, R (2012) A preliminary histological investigation of gall induction in an unconventional galling system. Arthropod-Plant Interact 6:449–459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, KG (2014) Biology and Management of the Toadflaxes. Fact Sheet No. 3.114. Fort Collins: Colorado State University Extension. 4 p Google Scholar
Bowley, SR (2008) A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Statistics in Plant Biology. 2nd ed. Guelph, ON, Canada: Any Old Subject Books. Pp 185–186 Google Scholar
Croy, JR, Pratt, JD, Sheng, D, Mooney, KA (2021) Climatic displacement exacerbates the negative impact of drought on plant performance and associated arthropod abundance. Ecology 102:e03462 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, CC, Willis, CG, Primack, RB, Miller-Rushing, AJ (2010) The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:3201–3213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Clerck-Floate, RA, McClay, AS (2013) Linaria vulgaris Mill., yellow toadflax (Plantaginaceae). Pages 354–362 in Mason PG, Gillespie DR, eds. Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012. Wallingford, UK: CABI PublishingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, WW (2000) A degree-day model of Cirsium arvense shoot emergence from adventitious root buds in spring. Weed Sci 48:333–341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassmann, A, De Clerck-Floate, R, Sing, S, Toševski, I, Mitrović, M, Krstić, O (2014) Biology and host specificity of Rhinusa pilosa, a recommended biological control agent of Linaria vulgaris . BioControl 59:473–483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grevstad, FS (1999) Factors influencing the chance of population establishment: implications for release strategies in biocontrol. Ecol Appl 9:1439–1447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, NE, Cronin, JT, Diaz, R, Winston, RL (2020) A review of the causes and consequences of geographical variability in weed biological control success. Biol Control 151:104398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P, Shorthouse, JD (1996) Effectiveness of gall inducers in weed biological control. Can Entomol 128:1021–1055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinz, HL, Müller-Schärer, H (2000) Influence of host condition on the performance of Rhopalomyia n. sp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), a biological control agent for scentless chamomile, Tripleurospermum perforatum . Biol Control 18:147–156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J, González-Andújar, JL, Bastida, F, Lezaún, JA, Sánchez del Arco, MJ (2009) A thermal time model to predict corn poppy (Papaver rhoeas) emergence in cereal fields. Weed Sci 57:660–664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, RD, Grovenburg, TW, Jenks, JA, Inselman, WM, Swanson, CC (2014) Evaluation of five herbicide treatments to control yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris). Ecol Restor 32:137–140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kock, VT (1966) Bionomische und öklogische Untersuchungen zur Entomofauna an Linaria vulgaris Miller (Scrophulariaceae). Z Angew Entomol 58:195–251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriticos, DJ, Ireland, KB, Morin, L, Kumaran, N, Rafter, MA, Ota, N, Raghu, S (2021) Integrating ecoclimatic niche modelling methods into classical biological control programmes. Biol Control 160:104667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, JY, Thomas, AG, Hall, LM, Brenzil, CA, Andrews, T, Brown, KR, Van Acker, RC (2005) Prairie Weed Survey. Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops 1970s to the 2000s. Weed Survey Series Publication 05-1. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 395 pGoogle Scholar
Lehnhoff, EA, Rew, LJ, Maxwell, BD, Taper, ML (2008) Quantifying invasiveness of plants: a test case with yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:319–325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lym, RG (2014) Comparison of aminocyclopyrachlor absorption and translocation in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) and yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris). Weed Sci 62:321–325 Google Scholar
McAllister, RS, Haderlie, LC (1985) Seasonal variations in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) root bud growth and root carbohydrate reserves. Weed Sci 33:44–49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishita, DW (1991) Dalmatian toadflax, yellow toadflax, black henbane and tansy mustard: importance, distribution, and control. Pages 399–408 in James, LF, Evans, JO, Ralphs, MH, Child, RD, eds. Noxious Range Weeds. San Francisco, CA: Westview Google Scholar
Nadeau, LB, Dale, MRT, King, JR (1991) The development of spatial pattern in shoots of Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae) growing on fallow land or in a barley crop. Can J Bot 69:2539–2544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saner, MA, Clements, DR, Hall, MR, Doohan, DJ, Crompton, CW (1995) The biology of Canadian weeds. 105. Linaria vulgaris Mill. Can J Plant Sci 75:525–537 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedlarević Zorić, A, Morina, F, Toševski, I, Tomislav, T, Jović, J, Krstić, O, Veljović-Jovanović, S (2019) Resource allocation in response to herbivory and gall formation in Linaria vulgaris . Plant Physiol Biochem 135:224–232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, DA (1988) A revision of the tribe Antirrhineae. London, UK: British Museum (Natural History). 575 pGoogle Scholar
Thomas, AG, Doohan, DJ, McCully, KV (1994) Weed survey of spring cereals in New Brunswick. Phytoprotection 75:113–124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, AG, Ivany, JA (1990) The weed flora of Prince Edward Island cereal fields. Weed Sci 38:119–124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2021) The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, NC: National Plant Data Team. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed: March 24, 2021Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Reid, SD, Harrington, J, Sutton, J, Beck, KG (2008) Genetic variation in invasive populations of yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) in the western United States. Weed Sci 56:394–399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Cardina, J (1999) Apocynum cannabinum seed germination and vegetative shoot emergence. Weed Sci 47:524–528 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, AE (2014) Gall insects and selection on plant vigor: can susceptibility compromise success in competition? Arthropod-Plant Interact 8:205–212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SN, Boyd, NS, Van Acker, RC (2015) Temperature thresholds and growing-degree-day models for red sorrel (Rumex acetosella) ramet sprouting, emergence, and flowering in wild blueberry. Weed Sci 63:254–263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willden, SA, Evans, EW (2018) Phenology of Dalmatian toadflax biological control agent Mecinus janthiniformis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Utah. Environ Entomol 47:1–7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, L, Boyd, NS, Cutler, GC, Olson, AR (2013) Spreading dogbane (Apocynum androsaemifolium) development in wild blueberry fields. Weed Sci 61:422–427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukawa, J, Nakagawa, K, Saigou, T, Awa, T, Fukuda, T, Higashi, M (2013) Adult behavior of an ambrosia gall midge Illiciomyia yukawai (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and synchronization between its emergence and host plant phenology. Entomol Sci 16:400–412 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Blatt et al. supplementary material

Blatt et al. supplementary material

Download Blatt et al. supplementary material(File)
File 25 KB