Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:03:50.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultivar and Site-Specific Variation Affect Establishment Potential of the Cleomes Roughseed Clammyweed (Polanisia dodecandra) and Spiderflower (Cleome hassleriana)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nadilia N. Gómez Raboteaux  and
Neil O. Anderson
Nadilia N. Gómez Raboteaux
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, 1970 Folwell Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108
Neil O. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, 1970 Folwell Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Establishment potential is one of the primary components of invasive species risk assessment. Models that predict establishment of potentially invasive ornamental crops often ignore differences among cultivars and the variability in plant response to site-specific factors. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which differences among cultivars and habitat characteristics affect establishment of 5 cultivars of ornamental cleome. Experiments were conducted to compare germination, survival, and growth of cultivars in cultivated (gardens) and noncultivated (roadsides and prairies) environments and, in prairies, the effects of competition (low, intermediate, and high). In the first experiment, germination, survival, and growth were recorded in gardens, prairies, and roadsides in four locations in Minnesota. In the second experiment, the effects of competition with resident species were studied in five seed lots from three cultivars in three prairie sites. Additionally, a quantitative description of germination and transplantable seedling quality, when grown under greenhouse production standards, was obtained and compared with results from the cultivated and noncultivated outdoor environments. Germination in greenhouse conditions was significantly greater (78%) than in garden, prairies, or roadsides (< 46%). Mortality was greater in noncultivated than in cultivated environments (3% wk−1 and 1.4% wk−1, respectively). Survival was affected by competition, which reduced population establishment. Cultivar differences were most pronounced at seedling emergence, whereas habitat characteristics were more influential at later stages of the life cycle. Germination and plant height were similar among noncultivated environments. Variability in seedling emergence, survival, and growth in response to cultivar, habitat, and competition are important determinants of establishment potential. Among the cultivars studied, the native cleome, roughseed clammyweed, has a greater establishment potential than the nonnative cleome, spiderflower.

Keywords

Roughseed clammyweed, Polanisia dodecandra (L.) DC. PONGRspiderflower, Cleome hassleriana Chod. CLEHABiological invasionscompetitiondisturbanceshabitat invasibility
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 102 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, N. O., Galatowitsch, S. M., , S. M., and Gómez, N. 2006a. Selection strategies to reduce invasive potential in introduced plants. Plant Breeding and Crop Domestication as Sources of New Invasive Species. Pages 203–216. 203–216. In Anderson, N. O. and Galatowitsch, S. M. eds. Euphytica 148.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. O., Gómez, N., and Galatowitsch, S. M. 2006b. A non-invasive crop ideotype to reduce invasive potential. Euphytica 148:185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, L. H. 1927. The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture. Volume 1. New York Macmillan. 1200 p.Google Scholar
Burke, M. J. W. and Grime, J. P. 1996. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? 429–451. In Gray, A. J., Crawley, M. J., and Edwards, P. J. eds. Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford, UK Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cutler, K. D. 1999. Ode to the ordinary. Am. Gardener 78 (4):32–39.Google Scholar
Eviner, V. T. and Chapin, F. S. III. 2003. Gopher–plant–fungal interactions affect establishment of an invasive grass. Ecology 84:120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelbard, J. L. and Belnap, J. 2003. Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv. Biol 17:420–432.Google Scholar
Gerlach, J. D. and Rice, K. J. 2003. Testing life history correlated of invasiveness using congeneric plant species. Ecol. Appl 13:167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez Raboteaux, N. N. and Anderson, N. O. 2010. Germination of Cleome hassleriana and Polanisia dodecandra seed lots in response to light, temperature and stratification. Res. J. Seed Sci 3:1–17.Google Scholar
Hall, J. C. 2008. Systematics of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using plastid DNA sequence data. Botany 86 (7):682–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, S. I., Richardson, D. M., and Cowling, R. M. 1996. Modeling invasive plant spread: the role of plant–environment interactions and model structure. Ecology 77:2043–2054.Google Scholar
Hofmann, M. and Isselstein, J. 2004. Seedling recruitment on agriculturally improved mesic grassland: the influence of disturbance and management schemes. Appl. Veg. Sci 7:193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmgren, M., Scheffer, M., and Houston, M. A. 1997. The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities. Ecology 78:1966–1975.Google Scholar
Kindscher, K. 1987. Edible Wild Plants of the Prairie: An Ethnobotanical Guide. Manhattan, KS University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kitajima, K. and Fenner, M. 2000. Ecology of seedling regeneration. Pages 331–359. In Fenner, M. ed. Seeds—The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, S., Dutroit, T., Alard, D., and Grevilliot, F. 1998. Restoration and rehabilitation of species-rich grassland ecosystems in France: a review. Restor. Ecol 6:94–101.Google Scholar
Nau, J. 1999. Ball Culture Guide: The Encyclopedia of Seed Germination. 3rd ed. Batavia, IL Ball Publishing. 244 p.Google Scholar
PanAmerican Seed Company 1999. 1999 Product Information Guide. West Chicago, IL PanAmerican Seed Company.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. A. 2003. Global Positioning System (GPS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) as Invasive Weed Species Monitoring Tools. St. Paul, MN Agricultural Capstone Project, Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota. Appendices A–F.Google Scholar
Radford, I. J., Nicholas, M., Tiver, F., Brown, J., and Kriticos, D. 2002. Seedling establishment, mortality, tree growth rates and vigour of Acacia nilotica in different Astrebla grassland habitats: implications for invasion. Aust. Ecol 27:258–268.Google Scholar
Randall, R. 2007. Global Compendium of Weeds. http://www.hear.org/gcw/. Accessed: June 2, 2010.Google Scholar
Riege, D. A. and Del Moral, R. 2004. Differential tree colonization of old fields in a temperate rain forest. Am. Midl. Nat 151:251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, A. B. and Frampton, C. M. 1999. Effects of microsite characteristics on Hieracium seedling establishment in tall- and short-tussock grasslands, Marlborough, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Bot 37:107–118.Google Scholar
Sans, F. X., Garcia-Serrano, H., and Afán, I. 2004. Life-history traits of alien and native Senecio species in the Mediterranean region. Acta Oecol 26:167–178.Google Scholar
Steffey, J. 1984. Strange relatives: the Caper family. Am. Hortic 63 (2):4–7.Google Scholar
Thébaud, C., Finzi, A. C., Affre, L., Debussche, M., and Escarre, J. 1996. Assessing why two introduced Conyza differ in their ability to invade Mediterranean oil fields. Ecology 77:791–804.Google Scholar
Trombulak, S. C. and Frissell, C. A. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv. Biol 14:18–30.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture 2010. PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov/java/nameSearch?keywordquery=Cleome+hassleriana&mode=sciname. Accessed: June 2, 2010.Google Scholar
White, B. 2001. 2002 AAS Fast track winners: another year of great plants. Seed World 139:10–30.Google Scholar
Whitson, T. D., Burrill, L. C., Dewey, S. A., Cudney, D. W., Nelson, B. E., Lee, R. D., and Parker, R. eds. 1991. Weeds of the West. Laramie, WY Western Society of Weed Science, University of Wyoming. 630 p.Google Scholar