Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:40:29.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Colonization and Effects of Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata), European Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), and Bell's Honeysuckle (Lonicera × bella) on Understory Plants After Five Decades in Southern Wisconsin Forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas P. Rooney*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435
David A. Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin, 900 Wood Road, P.O. Box 2000, Kenosha, WI 53141-2000
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Preinvasion baseline data on entire communities are absent for most taxa in most places, and this limits our ability to connect long-term ecological changes to particular invasive species or invasion events. We obtained data on forest understory composition from 94 stands in the 1950s and again the 2000s. We recorded within-stand frequency of occurrence for garlic mustard, European buckthorn, and Bell's honeysuckle and identified changes in native plant species density in 20, 1-m2 quadrats in invaded and noninvaded stands. All three invasive species were absent from all study sites 50 yr ago, yet at least one was present in 77.7% of the stands by the 2000s. All three species were present in 14.9% of the stands. Garlic mustard and European buckthorn were found at 47.9% of resurveyed sites, and Bell's honeysuckle was found in 40.4% of resurveyed sites. Native understory plant species density declined an average of 23.1% during the past 50 yr. Declines were not significantly different in stands with or without invasive plants. The absence of a measurable effect by invasive plant presence or frequency could be due to invasive plants being too few to have a measurable effect at the plot scale, species density being an insensitive response variable, time lags between invasions and effects, or regional factors like development pressure and fire suppression driving density declines in both invasives and native species.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. C., Anderson, M. R., Bauer, J. T., Slater, M., Herold, J., Baumhardt, P., and Borowicz, V. 2010. Effect of removal of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae) on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum potential in forest soils. Open Ecol. J. 3:4147.Google Scholar
Blossey, B. 1999. Before, during, and after: the need for long-term monitoring in invasive plant species management. Biol. Invasions 1:301311.Google Scholar
Bray, J. R. 1958. The distribution of savanna species in relation to light intensity. Can. J. Bot. 36:671681.Google Scholar
Bray, J. R. and Curtis, J. T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27:325–49.Google Scholar
Carlson, A. M. and Gorchov, D. L. 2004. Effects of herbicide on the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) and initial responses of native plants in a southwestern Ohio forest. Restor. Ecol. 12:559567.Google Scholar
Cottam, G. 1949. The phytosociology of an oak woods in southwestern Wisconsin. Ecology 30:271287.Google Scholar
Cottam, G. and Curtis, J. T. 1949. A method for making rapid surveys of woodlands by means of pairs of randomly selected trees. Ecology 30:101104.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. T. 1956. The modification of mid-latitude grasslands and forests by man. Pages 721736 in Sauer, C. O. Bates, M., and Mumford, L., eds. Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. Madison University of Wisconsin Press. 657 p.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. T. and McIntosh, R. P. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32:476–96.Google Scholar
Czarapata, E. J. 2005. Invasive plants of the upper Midwest: an illustrated guide to their identification and control. Madison, WI University of Wisconsin Press. 236 p.Google Scholar
Didham, R. K., Tylianakis, J. M., Hutchison, M. A., Ewers, R. M., and Gemmell, N. J. 2005. Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:470474.Google Scholar
Forrest, B. M. and Taylor, M. D. 2002. Assessing invasion impact: survey design considerations and implications for management of an invasive marine plant. Biol. Invasions 4:375386.Google Scholar
Heneghan, L., Faterni, R., Umek, L., Grady, K., Fagen, K., and Workman, M. 2006. The invasive shrub European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica L.) alters soil properties in midwestern U.S. woodlands. Appl. Soil Ecol. 32:142148.Google Scholar
Henegham, L., Steffen, J., and Fagen, K. 2007. Interactions of an introduced shrub and introduced earthworms in an Illinois urban woodlot: impact on leaf litter decomposition. Pedobiologia 50:543551.Google Scholar
Kraszewski, S. E. and Waller, D. M. 2008. Fifty-five year changes in species composition on dry prairie remnants in south-central Wisconsin. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 135:236244.Google Scholar
Lafferty, K. D. and Kuris, A. M. 1996. Biological control of marine pests. Ecology 77:19892000.Google Scholar
Leach, M. K. and Givnish, T. J. 1996. Ecological determinants of species loss in remnant prairies. Science 273:15551558.Google Scholar
MacDougall, A. S. and Turkington, R. 2005. Are invasive species drivers or passengers of change in degraded systems? Ecology 86:4255.Google Scholar
Madritch, M. D. and Lindroth, R. L. 2009. Removal of invasive shrubs reduces exotic earthworm populations. Biol. Invasions 11:663671.Google Scholar
McCarthy, B. C. 1997. Response of a forest understory community to experimental removal of an invasive nonindigenous plant (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae). Pages 117130 in Luken, J. O. and Thieret, J. W., eds. Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. New York Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
McCune, B. and Cottam, G. 1985. The successional status of a southern Wisconsin oak woods. Ecology 66:12701278.Google Scholar
Milbauer, M. L. and Leach, M. K. 2007. Influence of species pool, fire history, and woody canopy on plant species richness and composition in tallgrass prairie. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 134:5362.Google Scholar
Mudrak, E. L., Johnson, S. E., and Waller, D. M. 2009. Forty-seven year changes in vegetation at the Apostle Islands: effects of deer on the forest understory. Nat. Areas J. 29:167176.Google Scholar
Nicholls, K. H., Hopkins, G. J., and Standke, S. J. 1999. Reduced chlorophyll to phosphorus ratios in nearshore Great Lakes waters coincide with the establishment of dreissenid mussels. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56:153161.Google Scholar
Parker, I. M., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., et al. 1999. Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol. Invasions 1:319.Google Scholar
Peet, R. K. and Loucks, O. L. 1977. A gradient analysis of southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology 58:485499.Google Scholar
Prati, D. and Bossdorf, O. 2004. Allelopathic inhibition of germination by Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91:285288.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. J. and Anderson, R. C. 2001. Effect of garlic mustard [Alliaria petiolata (Beib. Cavara & Grande)] extracts on plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Am. Midl. Nat. 146:146152.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. A. 2006. Fifty years of change in southern Wisconsin forests: patterns of species loss and homogenization. Ph.D Thesis, Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. A., Rooney, T. P., Hawbaker, T. J., Radeloff, V. C., and Waller, D. M. 2009. Paying the extinction debt in southern Wisconsin forest understories. Conserv. Biol. 23:14971506.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. A., Rooney, T. P., Olson, D., and Waller, D. M. 2008. Fifty years of change in southern Wisconsin forests: shifts in canopy and understory richness, composition and heterogeneity. Ecology 89:24822492.Google Scholar
Rooney, T. P., Wiegmann, S. M., Rogers, D. A., and Waller, D. M. 2004. Biotic impoverishment and homogenization in unfragmented forest understory communities. Conserv. Biol. 18:787798.Google Scholar
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., and Klironomos, J. N. 2006. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol. 4:e140 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140.Google Scholar
Stinson, K. A., Kaufman, S., Durbin, L., and Lowenstein, F. 2007. Impacts of garlic mustard invasion on a forest understory community. Northeast. Nat. 14:7388.Google Scholar
Stuckey, R. L. 1980. Distributional history of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47:320.Google Scholar
Whitford, P. W. and Salamun, P. J. 1954. An upland forest survey of the Milwaukee area. Ecology 35:533540.Google Scholar
Woods, K. D. 1993. Effect of invasion by Lonicera tatarica L. on herb and tree seedlings in four New England forests. Am. Midl. Nat. 130:6274.Google Scholar