Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:50:38.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aminopyralid Effects on Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) and Native Plant Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Luke W. Samuel  and
Rodney G. Lym
Luke W. Samuel
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Rodney G. Lym*
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aminopyralid efficacy on Canada thistle and changes in species composition in both Canada thistle–infested and native plant communities were evaluated in Theodore Roosevelt National Park, ND. Aminopyralid at 120 g ae/ha was applied in September 2004 to one-half of 30 native or 30 Canada thistle–infested sites. Canada thistle density 10 mo after treatment (MAT) averaged 2 stems/m2 compared to 31 stems/m2 in the control and 22 MAT averaged 16 stems/m2 compared to 42 stems/m2. Although Canada thistle was reduced in treated sites, species richness was similar to the untreated control. Species evenness increased in treated subplots compared to the control as foliar cover of low- and high-seral forbs and high-seral monocot species increased. Species richness was reduced in native plant communities treated with aminopyralid from approximately 12 to 9 species but evenness was not affected. Plant species diversity was similar in Canada thistle–infested treated and nontreated subplots but was reduced by aminopyralid in native subplots. Despite the decrease in Canada thistle and increased foliar cover of native perennial plants, composition and structure 22 MAT in the Canada thistle–infested plant community did not resemble native plant communities. Native plant communities were composed of many perennial monocots and high-seral forbs, which had increased but were in lower relative abundance in the treated Canada thistle–infested subplots.

Keywords

AminopyralidCanada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. CIRARHerbicideinvasive speciesnative communitiesnontarget
Type
Research Articles
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 265 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, M. J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust. Ecol 26:32–46.Google Scholar
Carrithers, V. F., Bruch, P. L., Kline, W. N., Masters, R. A., Nelson, J. A., Halstvedt, M. B., Troth, J. L., and Breuninger, J. M. 2005. Aminopyralid: a new reduced risk active ingredient for control of broadleaf invasive and noxious weeds. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 58:19.Google Scholar
Great Plains Flora Association 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS University Press of Kansas. 1392.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432.Google Scholar
Jachetta, J. J., Havens, P. L., Dybowski, J. A., Kranzfelder, J. A., and Tiu, C. 2005. Aminopyralid: toxicology, ecotoxicology and environmental fate profile. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 58:61.Google Scholar
Juricek, C. J. 2006. Integrated pest management and vegetation impact using Aphthona spp. for leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) control. M.S. thesis. Fargo, ND North Dakota State University. 78.Google Scholar
Kenkel, N. C., Derksen, D. A., Thomas, A. G., and Watson, P. R. 2002. Multivariate analysis in weed science research. Weed Sci 50:281–292.Google Scholar
Kirby, D. R., Lym, R. G., Sterling, J. J., and Sieg, C. H. 2003. Observation: leafy spurge control in prairie fringed orchid habitat. J. Range Manag 56:466–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger-Mangold, J. M., Sheley, R. L., and Swejcar, T. J. 2006. Toward ecologically based invasive plant management on rangeland. Weed Sci 54:597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. 1964. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29:115–129.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Duncan, C. L. 2005. Canada thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Pages 69–83. in Duncan, C. L. and Clark, J. K., editors. Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and Their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Mather, P. M. 1976. Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. London J. Wiley. 532.Google Scholar
McArdle, B. H. and Anderson, M. J. 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B. and Grace, J. B. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Glenden Beach, OR MjM Software Design. 125–142.Google Scholar
National Cooperative Soil Survey 1975. Soil Survey of Bowman County, ND. United States Department of Agriculture 245.Google Scholar
Northern Great Plains Floristic Quality Assessment Panel 2001. Floristic Quality Assessment for Plant Communities of North Dakota, South Dakota (excluding the Black Hills), and adjacent grasslands. Jamestown, ND Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/plants/fqa/index.htm (Version 26JAN2001). Accessed: April 20, 2007.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. New York J. Wiley. 292.Google Scholar
Randall, J. M. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Technol 10:370–383.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service 2006. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, LA National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed: December 11, 2006.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service 2007. Electronic Field Office Technical Guide (eFOTG). http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/efotg/. Accessed: February 11, 2007.Google Scholar
[USDI NPS] U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service 1996. A Strategic Plan for Managing Invasive nonnative Plants on National Park System Lands. http://www.nature.nps.gov/biology/invasivespecies/strat_pl.htm. Accessed: January 28, 2005.Google Scholar
[USDI NPS] U. S. Department of the Interior National Park Service 2007. Theodore Roosevelt Administrative History Part 3: Resource Management Chapter 8: Terrestrial Research and Management. http://www.nps.gov/archive/thro/adhi/adhi8.htm. Accessed: February 22, 2007.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities, numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science 147:250–260.Google Scholar