Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:20:07.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural History Survey of the Ornamental Grass Miscanthus sinensis in the Introduced Range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ryan F. Dougherty ,
Lauren D. Quinn ,
A. Bryan Endres ,
Thomas B. Voigt  and
Jacob N. Barney
Ryan F. Dougherty
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Lauren D. Quinn
Affiliation:
Energy Biosciences Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
A. Bryan Endres
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Thomas B. Voigt
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Jacob N. Barney*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Miscanthus sinensis is a perennial grass native to Asia, but since its introduction to the United States in the late 19th century, it has become both a major ornamental crop and invasive species. Previous studies of the ecology of M. sinensis in both its introduced and native ranges have suggested that it may be occupying a novel ecological niche in the introduced range. Miscanthus sinensis and its daughter species, Miscanthus × giganteus, are under evaluation as bioenergy crops; therefore, characterization of the ecology and environmental niche of M. sinensis is essential to mitigate the risk of fostering future invasion in the United States. In July 2011, we surveyed 18 naturalized M. sinensis populations spanning the U.S. distribution, covering a 6° latitudinal gradient from North Carolina to Massachusetts. Miscanthus sinensis populations ranged in size from 3 to 181,763 m2 with densities between 0.0012 and 2.2 individuals m−2, and strongly favored highly disturbed and unmanaged habitats such as roadsides and forest edges. Population size and individual plant morphology (i.e., tiller height, basal diameter, and tiller number) were not affected by soil characteristics and nutrient availability, though increased tree canopy cover was associated with reduced population size (P < 0.0001). Plant size and vigor were not significantly affected by low light availability, which supports previous suggestions of shade tolerance of M. sinensis. In summary, M. sinensis can tolerate a broad range of climatic conditions, light availability, and nutrient availability in the eastern United States, suggesting risk of further invasion beyond its current distribution in the United States.

Keywords

Chinese silvergrassEulalia japonica Trin.Miscanthus sinensis Andersson (Poaceae)Biofuel (or bioenergy)invasiveroadside
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 113 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abella, SR, Chiquoine, LP, Backer, DM (2012) Ecological characteristics of sites invaded by buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare). Invas Plant Sci Manag 5:443–453 Google Scholar
Alexander, B (2007) The Biltmore Nursery: A Botanical Legacy. Charleston, SC Natural History Press. 288 pGoogle Scholar
Anon (1894) Horticulture and Arboriculture in the United States. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information. Royal Gardens, Kew. Pp. 37–66 Google Scholar
Bailey, LH (1909) Cyclopedia of American Horticulture, 6th ed. New York The MacMillan Company 1021 pGoogle Scholar
Barney, JN, DiTomaso, JM Invasive species biology, ecology, management and risk assessment: evaluating and mitigating the invasion risk of biofuel crops. Pages 263–284 in Mascia, PN, Scheffran, J, Widholm, JM, eds. (2010) Plant Biotechnology for Sustainable Production of Energy and Co-products Berlin Springer-Verlag Google Scholar
Barney, JN, DiTomaso, JM (2011) Global climate niche estimates for bioenergy crops and invasive species of agronomic origin: potential problems and opportunities. PLoS One 6:e17222 Google Scholar
Britton, N, Brown, A (1913) An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada and the British Possessions: From Newfound-land to the Parallel of the Southern Boundary of Virginia, and from the Atlantic Ocean Westward to the 102d Meridian. Vol. I. New York Charles Scribner's Sons. 662 pGoogle Scholar
Core, E (1941) Notes on some West Virginia plants. Castanea 6:86–88 Google Scholar
Darke, R (2007) The Encyclopedia of Grasses for Livable Landscapes. Portland, OR Timber Press. 484 pGoogle Scholar
Dick, J (1879) Trade List of Plants for the Spring of 1878. Philadelphia, PA Helensale Nursery Google Scholar
EDDMaps (2012) Early detection and distribution mapping system. http://www.eddmaps.org/. Accessed September 11, 2012Google Scholar
Ezaki, B, Nagao, E., Yamamoto, Y., Nakashima, S, Enomoto, T (2008) Wild plants, Andropogon virginicus L. and Miscanthus sinensis Anders, are tolerant to multiple stresses including aluminum, heavy metals and oxidative stresses. Plant Cell Rep 27:951–961 Google Scholar
Firn, J, Moore, JL, MacDougall, AS, Borer, ET, Seabloom, EW, HilleRisLambers, J, Harpole, WS, Cleland, EE, Brown, CS, Knops, JMH, Prober, SM, Pyke, DA, Farrell, KA, Bakker, JD, O'Halloran, LR, Adler, PB, Collins, SL, D'Antonio, CM, Crawley, MJ, Wolkovich, EM, La Pierre, KJ, Melbourne, BA, Hautier, Y, Morgan, JW, Leakey, ADB, Kay, A, McCulley, R, Davies, KF, Stevens, CJ, Chu, C, Holl, KD, Klein, JA, Fay, PA, Hagenah, N, Kirkman, KP, Buckley, YM (2011) Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities. Ecol Lett 14:274–281 Google Scholar
Horton, JL, Fortner, R, Goklany, M (2010) Photosynthetic characteristics of the C4 invasive exotic grass Miscanthus sinensis Andersson growing along gradients of light intensity in the southeastern United States. Castanea 75:52–6Google Scholar
Matlaga, DP, Quinn, LD, Davis, AS, Stewart, JR (2012) Light response of native and introduced Miscanthus sinensis seedlings. Invas Plant Sci Manage 5:363–374 Google Scholar
Maynard, B (2012) Ornamental Grasses. http://www.uri.edu/ce/factsheets/sheets/orngrasses.html. Accessed September 12, 2012Google Scholar
Meyer, MH, Tchida, CL (1999) Miscanthus Anderss. produces viable seed in four USDA hardiness zones. J Env Hort 17:137–140 Google Scholar
Osawa, T (2011) Management-mediated facilitation: Miscanthus sinensis functions as a nurse plant in Satoyama grassland. Grassl Sci 54:204–210 Google Scholar
Quinn, LD, Allen, DJ, Stewart, JR (2010) Invasiveness potential of Miscanthus sinensis: implications for bioenergy production in the United States. GCB Bioenergy 2:310–320 Google Scholar
Quinn, LD, Matlaga, DP, Stewart, JR, Davis, AS (2011) Empirical evidence of long-distance dispersal in Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus × giganteus . Invas. Plant Sci Manage 4:142–150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, LD, Stewart, JR, Yamada, T, Toma, Y, Saito, M, Shimoda, K, Fernández, FG (2012) Environmental tolerances of Miscanthus sinensis in invasive and native populations. BioEnergy Res 5:139–148 Google Scholar
Raghu, S, Anderson, RC, Daehler, CC, Davis, AS, Wiedenmann, RN, Simberloff, D, Mack, RN (2006) Ecology. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire? Science 313:1742 Google Scholar
Stewart, JR, Toma, YO, Fernandez, FG, Nishiwaka, AYA, Yamada, T, Bollero, G (2009) The ecology and agronomy of Miscanthus sinensis, a species important to bioenergy crop development, in its native range in Japan: a review. GCB Bioenergy 1:126–153 Google Scholar
Thébaud, C, Simberloff, D (2001) Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges? Am Nat 157:231–236 Google Scholar
Trueblood, CE (2009) An Invasive Species Assessment System for the North Carolina Horticultural Industry. M.S. thesis. Raleigh, NC North Carolina State University. 286 pGoogle Scholar
Yokomizo, H, Possingham, HP, Hulme, PE, Grice, AC, Buckley, YM (2012) Cost-benefit analysis for intentional plant introductions under uncertainty. Biol Inv 14:839–849 Google Scholar
Zub, HW, Arnoult, S, Younous, J, Lejeune-Hénaut, I, Brancourt-Hulmel, M (2012) The frost tolerance of Miscanthus at the juvenile stage: Differences between clones are influenced by leaf-stage and acclimation. Eur J Agron 36:32–40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zub, HW, Brancourt-Hulmel, M (2010) Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:201–214 Google Scholar