Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:38:43.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invasive White Sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis) Control with Herbicides, Cutting, and Flaming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeffery S. Conn  and
Steven S. Seefeldt
Jeffery S. Conn*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Subarctic Research Unit, 360 O'Neil Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775
Steven S. Seefeldt
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Subarctic Research Unit, 360 O'Neil Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

White sweetclover is invading the Alaska glacial river floodplains and roadsides adjacent to natural areas, and control methods are needed. Chlorsulfuron, 2,4-DB, clopyralid, triclopyr, and 2,4-D controlled white sweetclover seedlings below recommended rates in the greenhouse. Biomass of established plants in the field was reduced by chlorsulfuron at recommended (17.6 g ai/ha), 1/2, and 1/4 rates and was reduced by triclopyr and 2,4-D at recommended rates (1,260 and 1,600 g ai/ha). Herbicides were more effective at reducing white sweetclover viable seed production in 2007 than in 2006. Only chlorsulfuron at 17.6 g ai/ha (recommended rate) eliminated seed production in both years. Flaming killed first-year plants, but some second-year plants resprouted and produced viable seed. Cutting at the 2.5 or 10 cm height did not control first-year plants because of regrowth, and second-year plant density and seed production was reduced by cutting at 2.5 cm but not by cutting at 10 cm.

Keywords

Chlorsulfuronclopyralid2,4-D2,4-DBdicambatriclopyrwhite sweetclover, Melilotus officinalis (L.) LamInvasive specieschemical weed controlflamingburningcutting
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 270 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Conn, J. S. and Farris, M. L. 1987. Seed viability and dormancy of 17 weed species after 21 months in Alaska. Weed Sci 35:524–529.Google Scholar
Conn, J. S., Beattie, K. L., Shephard, M. A., Carlson, M. L., Lapina, I., Hebert, M., Gronquist, R., Densmore, R., and Rasy, M. 2008. Alaska Melilotus invasions: distribution, origin and susceptibility of plant communities. Arct. Alp. Res 40:298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conn, J. S., Koskinen, W. C., Werdin, N. R., and Graham, J. S. 1996. Persistence of metribuzin and metabolites in two subarctic soils. J. Environ. Qual 25:1048–1053.Google Scholar
Diggle, A. D., Neve, P. B., and Smith, F. P. Herbicides used in combination can reduce the probability of herbicide resistance in finite weed populations. Weed Res 43:371–382.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Brooks, M. L., Allen, E. B., Minnich, R., Rice, P. M., and Kyser, G. B. 2006. Control of invasive weeds with prescribed burning. Weed Technol 20:535–548.Google Scholar
Eckardt, N. 1987. The Nature Conservatory Element Stewardship for Melilotus alba, Melilotus officinalis. Arlington, VA Nature Conservancy. 10. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/melioff.rtf. Accessed: August 25, 2008.Google Scholar
Haas, H. and Streibig, J. C. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. Pages 57–79. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Irwin, D. L. 1945. Forty seven years of experimental work with grasses and legumes in Alaska. College, Alaska University of Alaska Fairbanks Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 12. 47.Google Scholar
Klebesadel, L. J. 1992. Morphological, physiological, and winter hardiness comparisons among latitudinal ecotypes of biennial sweetclover (Melilotus species) in subarctic Alaska. Fairbanks, AK University of Alaska Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Bulletin 91. 23.Google Scholar
Klebesadel, L. J. 1994. Responses of biennial sweetclovers of diverse latitudinal adaption to various management procedures in Alaska. Fairbanks, AK University of Alaska Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Bulletin 98. 19.Google Scholar
Kline, V. M. 1984. Response of sweetclover (Melilotus alba Desr.) and associated prairie vegetation to seven experimental burning and mowing treatments. Pages 149–152. in. Proceedings of the 9th North American Prairie Conference. Winona, MN Winona State University.Google Scholar
Macander, M., Hay, B., and Wurtz, T. L. 2007. Modeling the spread of Alaska's invasive plants one pixel at a time. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference for Noxious and Invasive Plant Management. Fairbanks, Alaska: Committee for Noxious and Invasive Plant Management. http://www.uaf.edu/ces/cnipm/docs/8thAnnual/1320-Macander-r.pdf. Accessed: September 2, 2008.Google Scholar
Martin, J. N. 1934. The relative growth rates and interdependence of tops and roots of the biennial white sweet clover, Melilotus alba Desr. Am. J. Bot 21:140–159.Google Scholar
Neve, P. and Powles, S. High survival frequencies at low herbicide use rates in populations of Lolium rigidum result in rapid evolution of herbicide resistance. Heredity 95:485–492.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. M. and Smith, D. G. 2003. Salt cedar: distribution, abundance, dispersal mechanisms, northern Montana, USA. Wetlands 23:215–228.Google Scholar
Polunin, N. 1959. Circumpolar arctic flora. London Oxford University Press. 514.Google Scholar
Prather, T. S., DiTomaso, J. M., and Holt, J. S. 2000. Herbicide resistance: definition and management strategies. Davis, CA University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 8012. 14.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M., Richardson, D. M., and Pyšek, P. 2005. Plant invasions and invisibility of plant communities. Pages 332–355. In van der Maarel, E. Vegetation Ecology. Oxford, UK Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., and West, C. J. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib 6:93–107.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Conn, J. S., Jackson, B. E., and Sparrow, S. D. 2007. Response of seedling bird vetch (Vicia cracca) to six herbicides. Weed Technol 21:692–694.Google Scholar
Spellman, B. T. 2008. The Impact of Invasive Sweetclover (Melilotus alba) in Early-Successional Floodplain Habitats of Alaska. M.S. thesis. Fairbanks, AK School of Natural Resource Management, University of Alaska. 86.Google Scholar
Stoa, T. E. 1933. Persistence of viability of sweet clover seed in a cultivated soil. J. Am. Soc. Agron 25:177–181.Google Scholar
Turkington, R. A., Cavers, P. B., and Empel, E. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds, 29: Melilotus alba Desr. and M. officinalis (L.) Lam. Can. J. Plant Sci 58:523–537.Google Scholar
[USDA NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2008. Plants Profile Melilotus alba Medikus: White Sweetclover. http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?Symbol=MEAL12. Accessed: September 1, 2008.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. and Walker, L. R. 1989. Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effect. Ecol. Monogr 59:247–265.Google Scholar
Wolf, J. J., Beatty, S. W., and Carey, G. 2003. Invasion by sweetclover in montane grasslands, Rocky Mountain National Park. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr 93:531–543.Google Scholar