Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rvxtl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-16T07:33:36.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The search for dialogue as a hindrance to understanding: practices as inter-paradigmatic research program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2014

Erik Ringmar
Erik Ringmar*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent article Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot argued that attention to ‘practices’ could help IR scholars overcome ontological gaps and provide a new basis, on which the discipline could be established. Four such dichotomies are particularly salient: between the material and the meaningful, the rational and the practical, between agencies and structures, and between the forces of stability and of change. By failing to provide a theoretical basis for a synthesis, however, this project will fail. What a ‘practice’ is, and how ontological gaps should be understood, cannot be determined outside of the context of a theory. The article reviews theoretical attempts to deal with the dichotomies Adler and Pouliot identified and investigates the role of practices in the study of international relations.

Keywords

practicespractice theorytacit knowledgePierre Bourdieuontologyparadigm
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 1 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abrahamsen, Rita, and Williams, Michael C. 2011. “Privatization in Practice: Power and Capital in the Field of Global Security.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 310–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3(3):319–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel—— 2010. “Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t, ‘Performative Power,’ and the Strategy of Conventional and Nuclear Defusing.” Security Studies 19(2):199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011a. “International Practices: Introduction and Framework.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 3–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent—— 2011b. “International Practices.” International Theory 3(1):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2008. “The Diplomacy of Opting Out: A Bourdieudian Approach to National Integration Strategies.” Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3):663–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1995. “The Reality of Reduction: The Failed Synthesis of Pierre Bourdieu.” In Fin de Siècle Social Theory: Relativism, Reduction, and the Problem of Reason, 128–194. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C.—— 2006a. “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy.” In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen and Jason L. Mast, 29–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C.—— 2006b. “From the Depths of Despair: Performance, Counterperformance, and September 11.” In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen and Jason L. Mast, 91–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Morten Skumsrud, and Neumann, Iver B. 2012. “Practices as Models: A Methodology with an Illustration Concerning Wampum Diplomacy.” Millennium 40(3):457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1996. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Berling, Trine Villumsen. 2012. “Bourdieu, International Relations, and European Security.” Theory and Society 41(5):451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1971. “The Question of Machiavelli.” The New York Review of Books, November 4.Google Scholar
Bialasiewicz, Luiza, Campbell, David, Elden, Stuart, Graham, Stephen, Jeffrey, Alex, and Williams, Alison J. . 2007. “Performing Security: The Imaginative Geographies of Current US Strategy.” Political Geography 26(4):405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice. 2011. “A Practice Theory of Emotion for International Relations.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 63–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James. 1997. “Do Practices Explain Anything? Turner’s Critique of the Theory of Social Practices.” History and Theory 36(1):93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2011. “Interactional International Law and the Practice of Legality.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 108–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1790. Reflections on the Revolution in France: And on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to That Event. London: J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin. 1996. The Myth of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter. 1992. “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 36(3):245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cetina, Karin Knorr, Schatzki, Theodore R., and von Savigny, Eike, eds. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Churchill, Winston. 1939. BBC Radio Broadcast. London: BBC.Google Scholar
Coll, Alberto R. 1991. “Normative Prudence as a Tradition of Statecraft.” Ethics & International Affairs 5:33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. Experience and Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1997. “Aporia: A Critical Examination of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 3(3):365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1990. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duvall, Raymond D., and Chowdhury, Arjun. 2011. “Practices of Theory.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 335–354. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1997. The Search for the Perfect Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford—— 1985. Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibson, James Jerome. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony—— 1986. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gribbin, John. 2002. Q Is for Quantum: An Encyclopedia of Particle Physics. London: Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M., and Haas, Ernst B. 2002. “Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions.” Millennium 31(3):573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Lene. 2011. “Performing Practices: A Poststructuralist Analysis of the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 280–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hariman, Robert, and Beer, Francis A. 1998. “What Would Be Prudent?: Forms of Reasoning in World Politics.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 1(3):299–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin—— 1993. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In Basic Writings, edited by David Krell, 149–187. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin, and Smith, Steve. 1990. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2011. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
James, William. 1996. A Pluralistic Universe: Hibbert Lectures at Manchester College on the Present Situation in Philosophy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 2008. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Sils, Robert. 2008. “Eclectic Theorizing in the Study and Practice of International Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal, 109–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1995. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2011. “Making Sense of ‘International Practices’.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 36–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. “Second Thoughts on Paradigms.” In The Structure of Scientific Theories, edited by Frederick Suppe, 459–482. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.—— 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed.Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Richard. 2011. “Britain’s Response to the Spanish Civil War: Investigating the Implications of Foregrounding Practice for English School Thinking.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 174–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Catherine, and Labrosse, Diane, eds. 2011. “Roundtable Discussion of Vincent Pouliot’s ‘International Security in Practice’.” H-Diplo | ISSF Roundtable 2(5):2–53.Google Scholar
Morgan, Patrick M. 2011. “The Practice of Deterrence.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 139–173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. 2002. “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy.” Millennium 31(3):627–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1936. International Picture Language: The First Rules of Isotype. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto, and Carnap, Rudolf, eds. 1944. International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1991a. “On the Theoretical Understanding of Human Conduct.” In On Human Conduct, 1–107. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael—— 1991b. “Rationalism in Politics.” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, 61–70. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael—— 1991c. “The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind.” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, 488–541. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1959.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1974. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2007. “Sobjectivism: Toward a Constructivist Methodology.” International Studies Quarterly 51(2):359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent—— 2008. “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.” International Organization 62(2):257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent—— 2010. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5(2):243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisch, George A. 1994. “Planning Science: Otto Neurath and the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science.” The British Journal for the History of Science 27(2):153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2009. The Mechanics of Modernity in Europe and East Asia: The Institutional Origins of Social Change and Stagnation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik—— 2012. “Performing International Systems: Two East Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order.” International Organization 66(2):1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik—— 2013. Liberal Barbarism: The European Destruction of the Palace of the Emperor of China. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin M. 2011. “Domestic Practices and Balancing: Integrating Practice into Neoclassical Realism.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 200–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1981. “Kuhn, Heidegger, and Scientific Realism.” Man and World 14:269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph—— 2006. “Practice Theory.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 15: Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology, edited by Stephen P. Turner and Mark W. Risjord, 499–540. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. 1997. “Practices and Actions: A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27(3):283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R.—— 2008. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published in 1996.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, and Neumann, Iver B. 2011. “Banking on Power: How Some Practices in an International Organization Anchor Others.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 231–254. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2009. The Corporeal Turn: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice Gross. 2011. “Background Knowledge in the Foreground: Conversations About Competent Practice in ‘Sacred Space’.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 87–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51(2):273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swidler, Ann—— 2001. “What Anchors Cultural Practices?” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Karin Knorr Cetina, Theodore R. Schatzki and Eike von Savigny, 83–101. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1985. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.” In Philosophical Papers: Philosophy and the Human Sciences 2:15–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Stephen P. 1994. The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P.—— 2007. “Practice Then and Now.” Human Affairs 17(2):110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor. 2001. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2011. “The Practice of Political Manipulation.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 255–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Cynthia. 1998. “Performative States.” Millennium 27(1):77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. “Basic Sociological Terms.” In Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41(3):335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E.—— 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2):391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar