Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:29:58.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reason, emotion, and the problem of world poverty: moral sentiment theory and international ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2011

Renee Jeffery
Renee Jeffery*
Affiliation:
Centre for Governance and Public Policy, Griffith Asia Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article defends a sentimentalist cosmopolitan approach to international ethics against the rationalist cosmopolitan claim that emotions ought to be subjugated by their master, reason, and in processes of ethical deliberation. It argues that emotions play an indispensable role in making moral judgements and help to motivate ethical actions. Drawing on elements of 18th century moral sentiment theory and recent advances in neuroscience and psychology, the article demonstrates that reason and emotion are intimately linked forms of reflective thought, that emotion is central to reason and, far from disrupting processes of ethical deliberation, may actually enhance our ability to make moral judgements. Focusing on the problem of global poverty, the article shows that a sentimentalist cosmopolitan ethic provides a holistic approach to moral dilemmas in world politics that is capable of identifying injustices, prescribing how we ought to respond to them, and motivating ethical action in response to the injustices we observe.

Keywords

international ethicsglobal povertyemotionmoral sentiment theorymoral judgementinjustice
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , 18 February 2011 , pp. 143 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atack, I. (2005), The Ethics of War and Peace, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, A.C. (1992), Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, J. (1998), Judgment Misguided: Intuition and Error in Public Decision Making, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B.M. (1996), Justice as Impartiality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D.Shaw, L.L. (1991), ‘Evidence for altruism: toward a pluralism of prosocial motives’, Psychological Inquiry 2(2): 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechara, A. (2004), ‘The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage’, Brain and Cognition 55(1): 30–40.Google Scholar
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D.Damasio, A.R. (1997), ‘Deciding advantageously before knowing the advance strategy’, Science, 28: 1293–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C. (1979), Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bittner, R. (2001), ‘Morality and world hunger’, in T. Pogge (ed.), Global Justice, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., Strack, F. (1990), ‘Mood and persuasion: a cognitive response analysis’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16: 331–345.Google Scholar
Brassett, J. (2010), ‘Cosmopolitan sentiments after 9–11? trauma and the politics of vulnerability’, Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies 2: 12–29.Google Scholar
Brown, C. (2002), ‘The construction of a “realistic utopia”: John Rawls and international political theory’, Review of International Studies 28(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S. (2008), ‘Global distributive justice and the state’, Political Studies 56: 487–518.Google Scholar
Carver, C.S., Sutton, S.K.Scheier, M.F. (2000), ‘Action, emotion and personality: emerging conceptual integration’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(6): 741–751.Google Scholar
Cassino, D.Lodge, M. (2007), ‘The primacy of affect in political evaluations’, in W.R. Neuman, G.E. Marcus, A.N. Crigler and M. MacKuen (eds), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charvet, J. (1998), ‘The possibility of a cosmopolitan ethical order based on the idea of universal human rights’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27(3): 128–160.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B. (1991), ‘Altruism or egoism? That is (still) the question’, Psychological Inquiry 2(2): 124–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleckly, H. (1941/1976), The Mask of Sanity, 5th edn., St. Louis, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar
Clopton, N.Sorrell, G. (2006), ‘Gender differences in moral reasoning: stable or situational?’, Psychology of Women Quarterly 17(1): 85–101.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. (1983), ‘Ethics and impartiality’, Philosophical Studies 43(1): 83–99.Google Scholar
Crawford, N. (2000), ‘The passion of world politics: propositions on emotion and emotional relationships’, International Security 24(4): 116–156.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994), Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain, New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1999), The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion, and the Making of Consciousness, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2003), Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2005), Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dees, R.H. (1992), ‘Hume and the contexts of politics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 30(2): 219–242.Google Scholar
Edkins, J. (2000), Whose Hunger? Concepts of Famine, Practices of Aid, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1996), ‘Rationality and the emotions’, Economic Journal 106(438): 1386–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinburg, J. (1982), ‘Sentiment and sentimentality in practical ethics’, American Philosophical Association Proceedings 56(1): 19–46.Google Scholar
Finnemore, M.Sikkink, K. (1998), ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization 52(4): 887–917.Google Scholar
Frazer, M.L. (2007), ‘John Rawls: between two enlightenments’, Political Theory 35(6): 756–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N.H. (1986), The Emotions, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. (2002), ‘ “Introduction” to Francis Hutcheson’, in, A. Garret (ed.), An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. ix–xxiv.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982), In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gluck, A. (2007), Damasio's Error and Descartes’ Truth: An Inquiry into Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Consciousness, Scranton: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J., Brian Sommerville, R., Nystrom, L.E., Darby, J.M.Cohen, J.D. (2001), ‘An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment’, Science 293(5537): 2105–2108.Google Scholar
Greene, J. (2008), ‘The secret joke of Kant's soul’, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 35–80.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P.E. (1997), What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K. (2002), ‘Introduction’, in A. Smith (ed.), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. vii–xxiv.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001), ‘The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment’, Psychological Review 108(4): 814–834.Google Scholar
Hayden, P. (2005), Cosmopolitan Global Politics, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Held, D. (2003), ‘Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed?’, Review of International Studies 29(4): 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1998), An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, T.L. Beauchamp (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (2000), A Treatise on Human Nature, D.F. Norton and M.J. Norton (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, F. (2002), An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, A. Garrett (ed.), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Isen, A.M. (2008), ‘Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving’, in M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones and L.F. Barrett (eds), Handbook of Emotion, 3rd edn., New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 548–573.Google Scholar
Izard, C.E. (1971), The Face of Emotion, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Izard, C.E. (1977), Human Emotions, New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Izard, C.E.Ackerman, B.P. (2000), ‘Motivational, organizational, and regulatory functions of discrete emotions’, in M. Lewis and J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds), Handbook of Emotion, II, New York: Guilford, pp. 253–264.Google Scholar
James, W. (1884), ‘What is an emotion?’, Mind 9: 188–205.Google Scholar
James, W. (1950), Principles of Psychology, Vol. II. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Jones, P. (2010), ‘The ethics of international society’, in D. Bell (ed.), Ethics and World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–129.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1948), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, (translated by H.J. Paton), London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1988), ‘International institutions: two approaches’, International Studies Quarterly 32: 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, S.R. (2008), Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (2002), ‘More than charity: cosmopolitan alternatives to the “singer solution” ’, Ethics and International Affairs 16(2): 107–120.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R.S. (1991a), ‘Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion’, American Psychologist 46(8): 819–834.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R.S. (1991b), Emotion and Adaptation, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, R.N. (2005), ‘Reason, emotion and cooperation’, International Politics 42: 283–313.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1995), ‘Emotions: clues from the brain’, Annual Review of Psychology 46: 209–235.Google Scholar
Lutz, C.A. (1995), ‘Engendered emotion: gender, power, and the rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse’, in R. Harré and W. Gerrod Parrott (eds), The Emotions: Social, Cultural, and Biological Dimensions, London: Sage, pp. 151–170.Google Scholar
Mackie, D.M.Worth, L.T. (1989), ‘Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackie, D.M.Worth, L.T. (1991), ‘Feeling good, but not thinking straight: the impact of positive mood on persuasion’, in J. Forgas (ed.), Emotion and Social Judgement, Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 201–220.Google Scholar
Macmillan, M.M. (2000), An Odd Kind of Fame: Stories of Phineas Gage, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marchetti, R. (2008), Global Democracy: For and Against, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. (2000), ‘Emotions in political science’, Annual Review of Political Science 3: 221–250.Google Scholar
Marcus, G.E., Neuman, W.R.MacKuen, M. (2000), Affective Intelligence and Political Judgement, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, J. (2010), ‘Emotional beliefs’, International Organization 64: 1–31.Google Scholar
Mercer, J. (2006), ‘Human nature and the first image: emotion in international politics’, Journal of International Relations and Development 9(3): 288–303.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. (2008), ‘Moral cognition and computational theory’, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P.J., Bramati, I.E., Mourão-Miranda, J., Andreiuelo, P.A.Pessoa, L. (2002), ‘The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions’, Journal of Neuroscience 22(7): 2730–2736.Google Scholar
Monin, B., Pizarro, D.A.Beer, J.S. (2007), ‘Reason and emotion in moral judgement: different prototypes lead to different theories’, in K.D. Vohs, R.F. Baumeister and G. Loewenstein (eds), Do Emotions Help or Hurt Decision Making?, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 219–244.Google Scholar
Moisi, D. (2009), The Geopolitics of Emotion: How Cultures of Fear, Humiliation, and Hope are Reshaping the World, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, E. (1990), ‘Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society’, International Organization 44(4): 479–526.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1978), The Possibility of Altruism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Neblo, M.A. (2007), ‘Philosophical psychology with political intent’, in W.R. Neuman, G.E. Marcus, A.N. Crigler and M. MacKuen (eds), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Neuman, W.R., Marcus, G.E., Crigler, A.N.MacKuen, M. (eds) (2007), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974), Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1990), Love's Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1997), ‘Kant and cosmopolitanism’, in J. Bohman and M. Lutz-Backman (eds), Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant's Cosmopolitan Ideal, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 25–58.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001), Upheavals of Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, O. (1986a), Faces of Hunger: An Essay on Poverty, Development and Hunger, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
O'Neill, O. (1986b), ‘The power of example’, Philosophy 61(235): 5–29.Google Scholar
O'Neill, O. (2001), ‘A simplified version of Kant's ethics: perplexities of famine and world hunger’, in H. Gersson and M.R. Holmgren (eds), Ethical Theory: A concise anthology, Peterborough: Broadview, pp. 131–141.Google Scholar
O'Neill, S. (1997), Impartiality in Context: Grounding Justice in a Pluralist World, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Okin, S.M. (1989), ‘Reason and feeling in thinking about justice’, Ethics 99(2): 229–249.Google Scholar
Phan, K.L., Wager, T., Taylor, S.F.Liberzon, I. (2002), ‘Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI’, Neuroimage 16(2): 331–348.Google Scholar
Philo, G. (1993), ‘From Buerk to band aid: the media and the 1984 Ethiopian Famine’, in J.E.T. Eldridge (ed.), Getting the Message: News, Truth, and Power, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2002), World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2005), ‘World poverty and human rights’, Ethics and International Affairs 19(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2008), World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J.J. (2004), Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pupavac, V. (2004), ‘War on the couch: the emotionology of the new international security paradigm’, European Journal of Social Theory 7(2): 149–170.Google Scholar
Raine, A. (1997), ‘Antisocial behavior and psychophysiology: a biosocial perspective and a prefrontal dysfunction hypothesis’, in D.M. Stoff, J. Breiling and J.D. Maser (eds), Handbook of Antisocial Behavior, New York: Wiley, pp. 289–304.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999), The Law of Peoples, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2005), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reeder, J. (1997), On Moral Sentiments: Contemporary Responses to Adam Smith, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2005), ‘Do we owe the global poor assistance or rectification?’, Ethics and International Affairs 19(1): 9–24.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1998), ‘Human rights, rationality and sentimentality’, Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–185.Google Scholar
Rosen, S.P. (2005), War and Human Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, A.A.G. (2006), ‘Coming in from the cold: constructivism and emotions’, European Journal of International Relations 12(2): 197–222.Google Scholar
Satz, D. (2005), ‘What do we owe the global poor?’, Ethics and International Affairs 19(1): 47–54.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (2001), ‘Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 3 Sen and consequentialism’, Economics and Philosophy 17(1): 39–50.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2002), ‘Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: cognitive tuning’, in L.F. Barret and P. Salovey (eds), The Wisdom in Feelings, New York: Guilford, pp. 144–166.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2002), Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2009), The Idea of Justice, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, A.A.C. (1897), ‘An inquiry concerning virtue or merit’, in L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), British Moralists, being Selections from Writers Principally of the Eighteenth Century, Vol. 1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
Shue, H. (1996), Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and US Foreign Policy, 2nd edn., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1979), ‘Information processing models of cognition’, Annual Review of Psychology 30: 365–396.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1972), ‘Famine, affluence, and morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–243.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1993), Practical Ethics, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2002a), One World: The Ethics of Globalization, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2002b), ‘Poverty, facts, and political philosophies: response to “more than charity” ’, Ethics and International Affairs 16(2): 121–124.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2002c), ‘Achieving the best outcome’, Ethics and International Affairs 16(2): 127–128.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2009), The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1984), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, D.D. Raphael and A.L. Macfie (eds), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Snare, F. (1991), Morals, Motivation, and Convention: Hume's Influential Doctrines, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, R.C. (1995), A Passion for Justice: Emotions and the Origins of the Social Contract, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Spezio, M.I.Adolphs, R. (2007), ‘Emotional processing and political judgment: toward integrating political psychology and decision neuroscience’, in W.R. Neuman, G.E. Marcus, A.N. Crigler and M. MacKuen (eds), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 71–95.Google Scholar
Sprague, E. (1954), ‘Francis Hutcheson and the Moral Sense’, Journal of Philosophy 51(24): 794–800.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. (2010), ‘Poverty and global distributive justice’, in D. Bell (ed.), Ethics and World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 256–273.Google Scholar
Timmons, M. (2008), ‘Toward a sentimentalist deontology’, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S.S. (1962), Affect, Imagery, Consciousness, Vol. 1, The positive affects, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (1993), Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
United Nations Millennium Development Goals (2008), ‘Fact sheet’. Retrieved 10 May 2010 from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2008highlevel/pdf/newsroom/Goal%201%20FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wager, T.D., Barrett, L.F., Bliss-Moreau, E., Lindquist, K.A., Duncan, S., Kober, H., Joseph, J., Davidson, M.Mize, J. (2008), ‘The neuroimaging of emotion’, in M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones and L.F. Barrett (eds), Handbook of Emotion, 3rd edn., New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 249–271.Google Scholar
Wertz, S.K. (1970), ‘Hume, history, and human nature’, Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 481–496.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2004), ‘Against utilitarianism’, in H.J. Gensler, E.W. Spurgin and J. Swindal (eds), Ethics: Contemporary Readings, New York: Routledge, pp. 210–214.Google Scholar
Wolin, S.S. (1954), ‘Hume and conservatism’, American Political Science Review 48(4): 1001–1016.Google Scholar
Young, J.T. (1986), ‘The impartial spectator and natural jurisprudence: an interpretation of Adam Smith's theory of the natural price’, History of Political Economy 18(3): 365–382.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. (1980), ‘Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences’, American Psychologist 35: 151–175.Google Scholar