Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:15:40.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The promise of foundational prudence: a response to our critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

Nuno P. Monteiro  and
Keven G. Ruby
Nuno P. Monteiro*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Keven G. Ruby*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
*
E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
International Theory , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 2009 , pp. 499 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohman, J. (2009), ‘What is to be done? The science question in International Relations’, International Theory 1(3): 488–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernoff, F. (2009), ‘Defending foundations for International Relations theory’, International Theory 1(3): 466–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichs, J.Kratochwil, F. (2009), ‘On acting and knowing: how pragmatism can advance international relations research and methodology’, International Organization 63(4): 701–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, P.T. (2009a), ‘Situated creativity, or, the cash value of a pragmatist wager for IR’, International Studies Review 11(3): 656–659.Google Scholar
Jackson, P.T. (2009b), ‘A faulty solution to a False(ly characterized) problem: a comment on Monteiro and Ruby’, International Theory 1(3): 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurki, M. (2009), ‘The politics of the philosophy of science’, International Theory 1(3): 440–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercado, R. (2009), ‘Keep muddling through’, International Theory 1(3): 478–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, C. (2007), ‘Inside the epistemological cave all bets are off’, Journal of International Relations and Development 10(1): 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar