Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:02:11.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the limits of new foundations: a commentary on R. Harrison Wagner, War and the State1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Tarak Barkawi
Tarak Barkawi*
Affiliation:
Centre of International Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on War and the State
Information
International Theory , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 317 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Thanks to Shane Brighton, Devon Curtis and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References

Agnew, J. (1994), ‘The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory’, Review of International Political Economy 1(1): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, H.Biersteker, T. (1984), ‘The dialectics of world order’, International Studies Quarterly 28(2): 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amadae, S.M. (2003), Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barkawi, T. (1998), ‘Strategy as a vocation: weber, morgenthau, and modern strategic studies’, Review of International Studies 24(2): 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkawi, T. (2010), ‘Empire and order in international relations and security studies’, in Denemark, Robert A. (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, Blackwell Publishing. Blackwell reference online.Google Scholar
Barkawi, T.Laffey, M. (2006), ‘The postcolonial moment in security studies’, Review of International Studies 32(4): 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, R. (1988), The Overthrow of Colonial Slavery 1776–1848, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R. (1997), The Making of New World Slavery, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Cain, P.J.Hopkins, A.G. (2002), British Imperialism 1688–2000, London: Longman.Google Scholar
von Clausewitz, C. (1976), On War, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, F.Stoler, A.L. (eds) (1997), Tensions of Empire, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumings, B. (1999), ‘Boundary displacement: the state, the foundations, and the international and area studies during and after the cold war’, in B. Comings, (ed.), Parallax Visions: Making Sense of American-East Asian Relations at the End of the Century, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 173–204.Google Scholar
Delbrück, H. (1990), Medieval Warfare, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Drayton, R. (2002), ‘The collaboration of labour: slaves, empires and globalizations in the Atlantic world, c.1600–1850’, in A.G. Hopkins (ed.), Globalization in World History, London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2003), Society Must Be Defended, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fussell, P. (1975), The Great War and Modern Memory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, N. (2003), Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Heraclitus (2003), Fragments, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Herbig, K. (1989), ‘Chance and uncertainty in On War’, in M. Handel (ed.), Clausewitz and Modern Strategy, London: Frank Cass, pp. 95–116.Google Scholar
Hoffman, S. (1977), ‘An American social science’, Daedalus 106(3): 41–60.Google Scholar
Keane, J. (1996), Reflections on Violence, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeil, W. (1982), The Pursuit of Power, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nexon, D.Wright, T. (2007), ‘What’s at stake in the American empire debate’, American Political Science Review 101(2): 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oren, I. (2003), Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Said, E. (1979), Orientalism, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Strachan, H. (2007), Clausewitz’s on War, New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R.H. (2007), War and the State: The Theory of International Politics, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, K. (1959), Man, the State, and War, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, K. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, E.R. (1997) [1982], Europe and the People without History, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarPubMed