Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:25:13.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The legacies of raison d’etat: a brief commentary on R. Harrison Wagner’s War and the State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Michael C. Williams
Michael C. Williams*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on War and the State
Information
International Theory , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 306 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blits, H. (1989), ‘Hobbesian fear’, Political Theory 17(3): 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1999), ‘Rethinking the state: genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field’, in G. Steinmetz (ed.), State/culture: State-Formation After the Cultural Turn, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1969), Behemoth, New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1993), Leviathan, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Howard, M. (1976), War in European History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, D. (1986), The Rhetoric of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Cultural Transformation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, R.N. (2003), The Tragic Vision of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, J.A. (1996), Bayonets of the Republic: Motivation and Tactics in the Army of Revolutionary France, 1791–1794, Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Meinecke, F. (1998), Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’Etat and Its Place in Modern History, New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. (1946), Scientific Man Versus Power Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. (1951), In Defense of the National Interest, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, M. (1975), ‘Leviathan: a myth’, in M. Oakeshott (ed.), Hobbes on Civil Association, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 150–154.Google Scholar
Reno, W. (1999), Warlord Politics and African States, Boulder: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. (2009), Morgenthau, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2007), The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strack, A. (2010), ‘A post-cold war reading of Thomas Hobbes’. Paper presented at the New England Political Science Association Meetings, April 23–24, Newport, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1996), Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkov, V. (2002), Violent Entrepeneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R.H. (2007), War and the State: The Theory of International Politics, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.C. (2005), The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.C. (forthcoming), ‘Recasting the Hobbesian legacy in international political theory’, in G. Slomp and R. Prokhovnic (eds), International Political Theory After Hobbes, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar