Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:55:05.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International legal structuralism: a primer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2016

Justin Desautels-Stein
Justin Desautels-Stein*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Law School, University of Colorado, Boulder CO, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International legal structuralism arrived on the shores of international thought in the 1980s. The arrival was not well received, perhaps in part, because it was not well understood. This essay aims to reintroduce legal structuralism and hopefully pave the way for new, and more positive, receptions and understandings. This reintroduction is organized around two claims regarding the broader encounter between international lawyers and critical theory in the 1980s. The first was a jurisprudential claim about how the critics sought to show how international law was nothing more than a continuation of international politics by other means. The second was a historical claim about how the critics wanted to show that international law had never been anything but politics, and that it always would be. In the view of this essay, both of these claims about international legal structuralism were wrong, and they are still wrong today. For despite the tendency to think of it as a cover for postmodern nihilism or relentless deconstruction or both, legal structuralism offers international theorists an enriching and edifying method for rethinking the relation between law and politics on the one hand, and law and history on the other. It is in the effort to carry a brief for a reawakened legal structuralism that the essay brings focus to some of the early works of Koskenniemi and Kennedy, identifies the semiotic foundations of that work, and ultimately suggests the possibility of a second generation of international legal structuralism.

Keywords

international lawlegal theorylegal historiographystructuralism
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , July 2016 , pp. 201 - 235
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, Kenneth. 1989. “Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers.” Yale Journal of International Law 14:335.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose. 1994. “Positivism Regained, Nihilism Postponed.” Michigan Journal of International Law 15:747.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E. 1996. “Judging the Security Council.” American Journal of International Law 90:1.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E. 1998. “Why Nations Behave.” Michigan Journal of International Law 19:303.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose. 2004. “Commemorating Oscar Schachter, the Teacher.” Columbia Law Review 104:556.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. 2013. Foundations of Modern International Thought.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 2006. “The Structuralist Activity.” In Structuralism: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies, edited by Jonathan Culler.Google Scholar
Becket, Jason. 2006. “Rebel Without a Cause: Martti Koskenniemi and the Critical Legal Project’.” German Law Journal 7:1045.Google Scholar
Bederman, David. 1990. “Book Review.” New York Journal of International Law & Politics 23:217.Google Scholar
Bederman, David 2007. “Foreign Office International Legal History.” In Time, History, and International Law, edited by Matthew Craven, et al.Google Scholar
Beer, Francis A., and Robert, Hariman, eds. 1996. Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Luckman, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. 2010. A Search for Sovereignty.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold, et al. 1979. Deconstruction and Criticism.Google Scholar
Bobbitt, Philip. 2003. The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel. 2004. “What is Intellectual History?.” In What is History Now?, edited by David Cannadine.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel 2011. Changes of State.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel 2013. “Francisco de Vitoria and Francisco Suarez.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Bardo Fassbender, and Anne Peters, 1086.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel, and Tully, James, eds. 2007. Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought.Google Scholar
Brierly, J.L. 1958. The Basis of Obligation in International Law.Google Scholar
Brilmayer, Lea. 1991. “Book Review.” American Political Science Review 85:688.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael. 2008. “International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Christian Reus-Smit, and Duncan Snidal, 612–631.Google Scholar
Carty, Anthony. 1991. “Liberalism’s Dangerous Supplements: Medieval Ghosts of International Law’.” Michigan Journal of International Law 13:161.Google Scholar
Coward, Rosalind, and Ellis, John. 1977. Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew. 2007. “Introduction: International Law and its Histories.” In Time, History, and International Law, edited by Matthew Craven, et al.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kathleen. 2008. Periodization and Sovereignty.Google Scholar
DeLuna, D.N., ed. 2006. The Political Imagination in History: Essays Concerning J.G.A. Pocock.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2007. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” In The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, edited by Richard Mackey, and Eugenio Donato.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 2011. Course in General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin. 2012a. Race as a Legal Concept.” Columbia Journal of Race & Law 2:1.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2012b. The Market as a Legal Concept.” Buffalo Law Review 60:565.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014a. Back in Style.” Law & Critique 25:141.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014b. Pragmatic Liberalism: The Outlook of the Dead’.” Boston College Law Review 55:1041.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014c. The Judge and the Drone.” Arizona Law Review 56:117.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2015. “Structuralist Legal Histories.” Law & Contemporary Problems 78:37.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas, et al. 1991. Postmodern Jurisprudence: The Law of Texts in the Texts of Law.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey. 2013. “From Interdisciplinarity to Counterdisciplinarity: Is there Madness in Martti’s Method?” Temple Journal of International & Comparative Law 27:309.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Trachtman, Joel, eds. 2009. Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Pollack, Mark. 2013. “International Law and International Relations: Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue’.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff, and Mark A. Pollock.Google Scholar
Fernandez Sebastian, Javier, ed. 2011. Political Concepts and Time: New Approaches to Conceptual History.Google Scholar
Frug, Gerald. 1980. “The City as a Legal Concept.” Harvard Law Review 93:1057.Google Scholar
Gabel, Peter, and Kennedy, Duncan. 1984. “Roll Over Beethoven.” Stanford Law Review 36:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galindo, George Rodrigo Bandeira. 2005. “Martti Koskenniemi and the Historiographical Turn in International Law.” European Journal of International Law 16:539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Ranjan, and Kleinberg, Ethan, eds. 2013. Presence: Philosophy, History, and Cultural Theory for the Twenty First Century.Google Scholar
Grewe, Wilhelm. 2000. The Epochs of International Law.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, et al., eds. 2001. Legalization and World Politics.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter. 2014. “Contextualism and Criticism in the History of Ideas.” In Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, edited by Darrin Mcmahon, and Samuel Moyn.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. 1997. “The Arrival of Critical Historicism’.” Stanford Law Review 49:1023.Google Scholar
Harootunian, Harry. 2007. “Remembering the Historical Present.” Critical Inquiry 33:471.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terrence. 2003. Structuralism, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Florian. 2006. “An Epilogue on an Epilogue.” German Law Journal 7:1095.Google Scholar
Hongju Koh, Harold. 1997. “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?” Yale Law Journal 106:2599.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, and Teitel, Ruti. 2013. “Does Humanity-Law Require (or Imply) a Progressive Theory of History? (And Other Questions for Martti Koskenniemi).” Temple Journal of International & Comparative Law 27:377.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. 2008. Measuring Time, Making History.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian. 2007. “The History of Philosophy and the Persona of the Philosopher.” Modern Intellectual History 4:583.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian 2008. “Talking About My Generation.” Critical Inquiry 34:589.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian 2010. “Global Justice and Regional Metaphysics: On the Critical History of the Law of Nature and Nations.” In Law and Politics in British Colonial Thought, edited by Shaunnagh Dorsett, and Ian Hunter.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian 2012. “The Figure of Man and the Territorialisation of Justice in Enlightenment Natural Law: Pufendorf and Vattel.” Intellectual History Review 1.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. 2014. “Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy.” History of European Ideas 40:925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Douglas. 2009. The Historical Foundations of World Order: The Tower and the Arena.Google Scholar
Jordheim, Helge. 2012. “Against Periodization: Koselleck’s Theory of Multiple Temporalities.” History & Theory 51:151.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991. Political Writings, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald. 1996. “On The Margins of Begriffsgeschichte.” In The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts, edited by Hartmut Lehman, and Melvin Richter.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, Alexandra. 2008. “The Turning Aside: On International Law and its History.” In Progress in International Law, edited by Russell Miller, and Rebecca Bratspies, 75.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 1980. “Theses About International Law Discourse.” German Yearbook of International Law 23:353.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David 1986. “Primitive Legal Scholarship.” Harvard International Law Journal 27:1.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David 1987. International Legal Structures.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David 2000a. Putting the Politics Back in International Politics.” Finnish Yearbook of International Law 9:17.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David 2000b. The Disciplines of International Law and Policy.” Leiden Journal of International Law 12:9.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David 2003. “Tom Franck and the Manhattan School.” New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 35:397.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 89:1685.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1979. The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries.” Buffalo Law Review 28:205.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1991. “A Semiotics of Legal Argument.” Syracuse Law Review 42:75.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1998. A Critique of Adjudication.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2001. “A Semiotics of Critique.” Cardozo Law Review 22:1148.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, Ethan. 2007. “Haunting History: Deconstruction and the Spirit of Revision.” History and Theory 46:113.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1985. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart 1988. Critique and Crisis.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2002. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2006. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument, 2nd ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2013. “Histories of International Law: Significance and Problems for a Critical View.” Temple Journal of International & Comparative Law 27:215.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2010. “International Law and International Sociology.” International Political Sociology 4:311–314.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich 2014. “Inter-Disciplinarity, the Epistemological Ideal of Incontrovertible Foundations, and the Problem of Praxis’.” In The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law, edited by Friedrich Kratochwil, 26–49.Google Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick, and Kaplan, Steven, eds. 1982. Modern European Intellectual History.Google Scholar
Landauer, Carl. 1989. “Book Review.” Harvard International Law Journal 30:287.Google Scholar
Lang, Andrew, and Marks, Susan. 2013. “People with Projects: Writing the Lives of International Lawyers.” Temple Journal of International & Comparative Law 27:437.Google Scholar
Lewis, Philip. 1982. “The Post-Structuralist Condition.” Diacritics 12:2.Google Scholar
Lorca, Arnulf Becker. 2015. Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History 1842–1933.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughn. 1990. “Book Review.” Journal of Law & Society 17:384.Google Scholar
Mackey, Richard, and Donato, Eugenio, eds. 2007. The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man.Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres. 1952. “Law and Power’.” American Journal of International Law 46:102.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. 1976. “Stevens’ Rock and Criticism as Cure, II.” Georgia Review 30:330.Google Scholar
Mollers, Christoph. 2006. “It’s About Legal Practice, Stupid.” German Law Journal 7:1011.Google Scholar
Morgan, Edward M. 1995. “Act of Blindness, State of Insight’.” Boston University International Law Journal 13:1.Google Scholar
Mullerson, Rein. 2002. “Review.” European Journal of International Law 13:725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Arthur. 1947. A Concise History of the Law of Nations.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 1989. World of Our Making.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. 1908. “The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method.” American Journal of International Law 2:313.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne. 2006. “A Journal of the Voyage from Apology to Utopia.” German Law Journal 7:993.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne 2013. “On International Legal Method.” London Review of International Law 1:166.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. 1999. “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 3:41.Google Scholar
Palti, Elias Jose. 2010. “From Ideas to Concepts to Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual History and the Complex Fabric of Language.” History & Theory 49:194.Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. 1996. “Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? Comment on a Paper by Melvin Richter.” In The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts, edited by Hartmut Lehman, and Melvin Richter.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark. 2013. “Is International Relations Corrosive of International Law? A Reply to Martti Koskenniemi.” Temple Journal of International & Comparative Law 27:339.Google Scholar
Purvis, Nigel. 1991. “Critical Legal Studies in Public International Law’.” Harvard Journal of International Law 32:81.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. 1986. “Conceptual History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory.” Political Theory 14:604.Google Scholar
Root, Elihu. 1915. “The Outlook for International Law.” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 9:2.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ed. 1967. The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar. 1978. “The Invisible College of International Lawyers.” Northwestern University Law Review 72:217.Google Scholar
Scobbie, Ian. 1991. “Towards the Elimination of International Law: Some Radical Skepticism about Skeptical Radicalism.” British Yearbook of International Law 61:339.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. 2014. The Catholic Conception of International Law.Google Scholar
Sewell, William. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8:3.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin 1999. “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 3:60.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995. “International Law in a World of Liberal States.” European Journal of International Law 6:503.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne Marie. 2000. “A Liberal Theory of International Law.” Proceedings of the 94th Meeting of the American Society of International Law.Google Scholar
Smith, Fiona. 2013. “Power, Rules, and the WTO.” Boston College Law Review 54:1063.Google Scholar
Surkis, Judith. 2012. “When was the Linguistic Turn? A Genealogy.” American Historical Review 117:700.Google Scholar
Tallack, Douglas. 1995. “Introduction.” In Critical Theory: A Reader, edited by Douglas Tallack, 11.Google Scholar
Toews, John. 1987. “Intellectual History After the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience’.” American Historical Review 92:879.Google Scholar
Toews, John 2009. “Manifesting, Producing, and Mobilizing Historical Consciousness in the Postmodern Condition.” History and Theory 48:257.Google Scholar
Tully, James, and Skinner, Quentin, eds. 1988. Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto. 1975. Knowledge and Politics.Google Scholar
Verzjil, J.H.W. 1970. International Law in Historical Perspective.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics.Google Scholar
Werner, Wouter G. 2010. “The Use of Law in International Political Sociology.” International Political Sociology 4:304–307.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1986. The Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism.Google Scholar
Williams, Joan. 1987. “Critical Legal Studies: The Death of Transcendence and the Rise of the New Langdells.” New York University Law Review 62:429.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1750. Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 2004. “Koselleck’s Philosophy of Historical Time(s) and the Practice of History.” History & Theory 43:126.Google Scholar