Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fr72s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-18T17:38:54.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating anxiety into international relations theory: Hobbes, existentialism, and ontological security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2020

Bahar Rumelili Open the ORCID record for Bahar Rumelili [Opens in a new window]
Bahar Rumelili*
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article draws on Hobbes and existentialist philosophy to contend that anxiety needs to be integrated into international relations (IR) theory as a constitutive condition, and proposes theoretical avenues for doing so. While IR scholars routinely base their assumptions regarding the centrality of fear and self-help behavior on the Hobbesian state of nature, they overlook the Hobbesian emphasis on anxiety as the human condition that gives rise to the state of nature. The first section of the article turns to existentialist philosophy to explicate anxiety's relation to fear, multiple forms, and link to agency. The second section draws on some recent interpretations to outline the role that anxiety plays in Hobbesian thought. Finally, I argue that an ontological security (OS) perspective that is enriched by insights from existentialism provides the most appropriate theoretical venue for integrating anxiety into IR theory and discuss the contributions of this approach to OS studies and IR theory.

Keywords

fear/anxiety distinctionuncertaintystate of naturesecuritizationradical agency
Type
Symposium: Anxiety, Fear, and Ontological Security in World Politics: Edited by Catarina Kinnvall and Jennifer Mitzen
Information
International Theory , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 257 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abizadeh, Arash. 2011. “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 298–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrensdorf, Peter J. 2000. “The Fear of Death and the Longing for Immortality: Hobbes and Thucydides on Human Nature and the Problem of Anarchy.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 579–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arfi, Badredine. 2020. “Existential Security qua Surviving (while Always Becoming Otherwise) through Performative Leaps of Faith.” International Theory 12 (2): 291–305.Google Scholar
Berenskoetter, Felix. 2020. “Anxiety, Time, and Agency.” International Theory 12 (2): 273–90.Google Scholar
Blits, Jan H. 1989. “Hobbesian Fear.” Political Theory 17 (3): 417–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulting, Noel. 2011. “An Architecture of Fear: The Relevance of Hobbes's Tri-Partite Contribution.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 12 (2): 135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Christopher, and Joenniemi, Pertti. 2013. “From Fratricide to Security Community: Retheorizing Difference in the Constitution of Nordic Peace.” Journal of International Relations and Development 16 (4): 483–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Christopher, and Joenniemi, Pertti. 2017. “Ontological Security, Self-Articulation, and Securitization of Identity.” Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. Peter. 2017. “For Want or Not: Lacan's Conception of Anxiety.” In The Politics of Anxiety, edited by Eklundh, Emmy, Zevnik, Andreja, and Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre, 17–35. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cash, John. 2020. “Psychoanalysis, Cultures of Anxiety and Ontological Insecurity.” International Theory 12 (2): 306–21.Google Scholar
Duff, Alexander S. 2015. Heidegger and Politics: The Ontology of Radical Discontent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elpidorou, Andreas, and Freeman, Lauren. 2015. “Affectivity in Heidegger I: Moods and Emotions in Being and Time.” Philosophy Compass 10 (10): 661–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte. 2013. “Theorizing Agency in Hobbes's Wake: The Rational Actor, the Self, or the Speaking Subject?” International Organization 67 (2): 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flockhart, Trine. 2016. “The Problem of Change in Constructivist Theory: Ontological Security-Seeking and Agent Motivation.” Review of International Studies 42 (5): 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, Jeffrey. 2015. “Anxiety's Ambiguity: Via Kierkegaard and Heidegger.” Unpublished PhD diss., University of Essex.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time, Translated by J. Stambaugh. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Mark A. 1980. “The Use and Abuse of Hobbes: The State of Nature in International Relations.” Polity 13 (1): 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1985. Leviathan, edited by Macpherson, C. B.. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hom, Andrew, and Steele, Brent J.. 2020. “Anxiety, Time, and Ontological Security Theory's Third-Image Potential.” International Theory 12 (2): 322–36.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Allan V. 2013. Anxiety: A Short History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1980. The Concept of Anxiety: A Simple Psychologically Orienting Deliberation on the Dogmatic Issue of Hereditary Sin, Translated by R. Thomte. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2004. “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security.” Political Psychology 25 (5): 741–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2017. “Feeling Ontologically (In)secure: States, Traumas, and the Governing of Gendered Space.” Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina, and Mitzen, Jennifer. 2017. “An Introduction to the Special Issue: Ontological Securities in World Politics.” Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina, and Mitzen, Jennifer. 2020. “Anxiety, Fear, and Ontological Security in World Politics: Thinking With and Beyond Giddens.” International Theory 12 (2): 240–56.Google Scholar
Laing, Ronald D. 1990. The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lupovici, Amir. 2016. The Power of Deterrence: Emotions, Identity and American and Israeli Wars of Resolve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlow, Jim. 2002. “Governmentality, Ontological Security, and Ideational Stability.” Journal of Political Ideologies 7 (2): 241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Loralea. 2007. “Hobbes's Modern Prometheus: A Political Philosophy for an Uncertain Future.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer, and Schweller, Randall. 2011. “Knowing the Unknown Unknowns: Misplaced Certainty and the Onset of War.” Security Studies 20 (1): 2–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neocleus, Mark. 2012. “‘Don't Be Scared, Be Prepared’: Trauma-Anxiety-Resilience.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 37 (3): 188–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odysseos, Louiza. 2002. “Radical Phenomenology, Ontology, and International Political Theory.” Alternatives: Global, Political, Local 27 (3): 373–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Jack. 2014. Understanding Existentialism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robin, Corey. 2004. Fear: The History of a Political Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rossdale, Chris. 2015. “Enclosing Critique: The Limits of Ontological Security.” International Political Sociology 9 (4): 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelili, Bahar. 2012. “Liminal Identities and Processes of Domestication and Subversion in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 38 (2): 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelili, Bahar. 2015a. “Identity and Desecuritization: The Pitfalls of Conflating Ontological and Physical Security.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (1): 52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelili, Bahar. 2015b. “Ontological (In)Security and Peace Anxieties: A Framework for Conflict Resolution.” In Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties, edited by Rumelili, Bahar, 10–29. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rumelili, Bahar, and Çelik, Ayşe Betül. 2017. “Ontological Insecurity in Asymmetric Conflicts: Reflections on Agonistic Peace in Turkey's Kurdish Issue.” Security Dialogue 48 (4): 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, William W. 2001. “Politics and Anxiety in Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan.” Theory & Event 5 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2005. “Ontological Security and the Power of Self-Identity: British Neutrality and the American Civil War.” Review of International Studies 31 (3): 519–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2013. “The Politics and Limits of the Self: Kierkegaard, Neoconservatism and International Political Theory.” Journal of International Political Theory 9 (2): 158–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillich, Paul. 2000. The Courage to Be. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Van Rythonen, Erik. 2015. “Learning to Feel, Learning to Fear? Emotions, Imaginaries, and Limits in the Politics of Securitization.” Security Dialogue 46 (5): 458–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassalle, Annamaria. 2010. “Prometheus Bound: Curiosity and Anxiety for the Future Time in Hobbes’ Leviathan.” Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 4 (12): 23–42.Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole. 1995. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In On Security, edited by Lipschutz, R. D., 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 2011. “Hobbes, Origins, Limits.” In International Political Theory after Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation, Observation, edited by Prokhovnik, Raia, and Slomp, Gabriela, 168–88. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael. 2018 “Martin Heidegger”, In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/heidegger/.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 1996. “Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration.” International Organization 50 (2): 213–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar