Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:28:00.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethics and international law: integrating the global justice project(s)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

Steven Ratner
Steven Ratner*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Academic discourse on global justice is at an all-time high. Within ethics and international law, scholars are undertaking new inquiries into age-old questions of building a just world order. Ethics – within political and moral philosophy – poses fundamental questions about responsibilities at the global level and produces a tightly reasoned set of frameworks regarding world order. International law, with its focus on legal norms and institutional arrangements, provides a path, as well as illuminates the obstacles, to implementing theories of the right or of the good. Yet despite the complementarity of these two projects, neither is drawing what it should from the other. The result is ethical scholarship that often avoids, or even misinterprets, the law; and law that marginalizes ethics even as it recognizes the importance of justice. The cost of this avoidance is a set of missed opportunities for both fields. This article seeks to help transform the limited dialogue between philosophers and international lawyers into a meaningful collaboration. Through a critical stocktaking of the contributions of the two disciplines, examining where they do and do not engage with the other, it offers an appraisal of the causes and costs of separation and an argument for an interdisciplinary approach.

Keywords

global justiceinternational lawethicsinstitutionspolitical and moral philosophy
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ratner & Slaughter, ‘Appraising the Methods of International Law: A Prospectus for Readers’, in S. Ratner and A. Slaughter (eds), The Methods of International Law (2004) 1Google Scholar

2 Cf. Daniel Bodansky, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law (2010), at 202–203.

3 See Koskenniemi, ‘Methodology of International Law’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, available at www.mpepil.com.

4 Shapiro, S., ‘The “Hart-Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’, in A. Ripstein (ed), Ronald Dworkin (2007) 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 See, e.g., Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, ICJ Reports (2007) 43, at paras. 161–62.

6 Cf. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (1961), at 199–200Google Scholar

7 Goodin and Ratner, ‘Democratizing International Law’, 2 Global Policy (2011) 241Google Scholar

8 Tams, ‘Individual States as Guardians of Community Interests’, in U. Fasternath et al. (eds), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honor of Judge Bruno Simma (2011) 379Google Scholar

9 Miller, ‘Distributing Responsibilities’, 9 J. Pol. Phil. (2001) 453Google Scholar

10 Simma, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’, 250 Recueil des Cours de l'Academie de Droit International (1994) 217, at 229Google Scholar

11 MacCormick, ‘Natural Law and the Separation of Law and Morals’, in R.P. George (ed), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays (1992) 105, at 113Google Scholar

12 Simma, supra note 10, at 233–234Google Scholar

13 Ibid.

14 Peters, ‘Humanity as the A and Ω of Sovereignty’, 20 EJIL (2009) 513Google Scholar

15 McDougal and Reisman, ‘The Prescribing Function in the World Constitutive Process: How International Law is Made’, in M.S. McDougal and W.M. Reisman (eds), International Law Essays (1981) 355, at 368–369Google Scholar

16 Wiessner and Willard, ‘Policy-Oriented Jurisprudence and Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflict: Toward a World Public Order of Human Dignity’, in S. Ratner and A. Slaughter, Methods, supra note 1, at 47, 61.

17 See Arts. 2(4), 42, and 51 of the United Nations Charter.

18 These are respect, power, wealth, skill, enlightenment, rectitude, affection, and well-being.

19 M. McDougal, H. Lasswell and L. Chen, Human Rights and World Public Order (1980) at 454 n.9, 459–460Google Scholar

20 Gallie, ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, 56 Proc. Aristotelian Soc'y (1955) 167Google Scholar

21 Reisman, Compare, ‘Humanitarian Intervention to Protect the Ibos’, in R.B. Lillich (ed), Humanitarian Intervention and the United Nations (1973) 167Google Scholar

W. Michael Reisman, 87 ASIL Proc. (1993), at 258–259Google Scholar

22 See generally M. Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia (1989).

23 Kennedy, ‘When Renewal Repeats: Thinking Against the Box’, 32 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. (2000) 355Google Scholar

24 H. Charlesworth and C. Chinkin, The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis (2000)Google Scholar

25 Gathii, ‘TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network, and a Tentative Bibliography’, 3 Trade, Law, and Development (2011) 26Google Scholar

S. Pahuja, Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality (2011)Google Scholar

26 Kingsbury, ‘Sovereignty and Inequality’, 9 EJIL (1998) 599Google Scholar

G. Simpson, Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (2004)Google Scholar

Alvarez, ‘Hegemonic International Law Revisited’, 97 AJIL (2003) 873Google Scholar

M. Byers and G. Nolte (eds), United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (2003)Google Scholar

27 Koskenniemi, ‘Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations’, in M. Byers (ed), The Role of Law in International Politics (2000) 17Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, ‘Global Governance and Public International Law’, 37 Kritische Justiz (2004) 241Google Scholar

D. Kennedy, The Dark Side of Virtue (2004)Google Scholar

28 M. Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (2001), at 489–494Google Scholar

29 Stone, ‘Approaches to the Notion of International Justice’, in R.A. Falk and C.E. Black (eds), The Future of the International Legal Order, vol. 1, (1969) 372Google Scholar

30 T. Franck, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (1995)Google Scholar

31 Tasioulas, ‘International Law and the Limits of Fairness’, 13 EJIL (2002) 993, at 1008Google Scholar

32 Simpson, ‘Is International Law Fair?’, 17 Mich. J. Int'l L. (1996) 615Google Scholar

33 Garcia, ‘Global Justice and the Bretton Woods Institutions’, 10 J. Int'l Econ. L. (2007) 461Google Scholar

C. Carmody, F.J. Garcia and J. Linarelli (eds), Global Justice and International Economic Law: Opportunities and Prospects (2012)Google Scholar

34 P. Allott, Eunomia: A New Order for a New World (1990).

35 Tesón, ‘The Kantian Theory of International Law’, 92 Colum. L. Rev. (1992) 53Google Scholar

F.R. Tesón, A Philosophy of International Law (1998)Google Scholar

36 F.R. Tesón, Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality (2005), at 144–167Google Scholar

Tesón, ‘Ending Tyranny in Iraq’, 19 Ethics and Int'l Aff. no. 3 (2005) 1Google Scholar

37 B.R. Roth, Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement: Premises of a Pluralist International Legal Order (2010)Google Scholar

38 J. Donnelly, Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (2d ed, 2003)Google Scholar

39 Stone, ‘Ethics and International Environmental Law’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (2007) 291Google Scholar

40 On the latter, see, e.g., the works cited in Anghie and Chimni, ‘Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflict’, in S. Ratner and A. Slaughter, Methods, supra note 1, at 185, 187.

41 Continental Shelf, ICJ Reports (1985) 13, at para. 46.

42 Nardin, ‘International Ethics’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (2009), at 594Google Scholar

43 S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds), The Philosophy of International Law (2010)Google Scholar

44 M. Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (2d ed, 1992), at 45Google Scholar

45 Luban, ‘A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity’, 29 Yale J. Int'l L. (2004) 85Google Scholar

J. McMahan, Killing in War (2009)Google Scholar

L. May, Aggression and Crimes Against Peace (2008)Google Scholar

D. Rodin, War and Self-Defense (2002)Google Scholar

Shue and Wippman, ‘Limiting Attacks on Dual-Use Facilities Performing Indispensable Civilian Functions’, 35 Cornell Int'l. L.J. (2002) 559Google Scholar

46 J. Nickel, Making Sense of Human Rights (2d ed, 2006)Google Scholar

C. Beitz, The Idea of Human Rights (2009)Google Scholar

H. Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy (1980)Google Scholar

W. Talbot, Which Rights Should be Universal? (2005)Google Scholar

47 C. Beitz, Political Theory and International Relations (1979), at 92–105Google Scholar

48 M. Frost, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (1996), at chs. 4–5Google Scholar

49 D. Held, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (1995), at 267–283Google Scholar

Held, ‘Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty’, 8 Legal Theory (2002) 1Google Scholar

D. Archibugi, D. Held and M. Köhler (eds), Re-imagining Political Community: Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy (1998)Google Scholar

50 J. Habermas, The Divided West (2006), at 115–193Google Scholar

51 Held, Democracy, supra note 49, at 279; Archibugi, ‘Principles of Cosmopolitan Democracy’, in Re-imagining Political Community, supra note 49, at 198, 221.

52 Ratner, ‘Do International Organizations Play Favorites?: An Impartialist Account’, in L.H. Meyer (ed), Legitimacy, Justice, and Public International Law (2009), at 123Google Scholar

Bienen, Rittberger and Wagner, ‘Democracy in the United Nations System: Cosmopolitan and Communitarian Principles’, in Re-imagining Political Community, supra note 49, at 287Google Scholar

53 Beetham, ‘Human Rights and Cosmopolitan Democracy’, in Re-imagining Political Community, supra note 49, at 58Google Scholar

Hassner, ‘Refugees: a Special Case for Cosmopolitan Citizenship?’, in Re-imagining Political Community, supra note 49, at 273Google Scholar

R. Pierek and W. Werner (eds), Cosmopolitanism in Context: Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory (2010)Google Scholar

C. Barry and T.W. Pogge (eds), Global Institutions and Responsibilities: Achieving Global Justice (2005)Google Scholar

54 A. Buchanan, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (2004), at 331–400Google Scholar

55 T.W. Pogge, Realizing Rawls (1989)Google Scholar

T.W. Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (2002)Google Scholar

Pogge, ‘Recognized and Violated by International Law: The Human Rights of the Global Poor’, 18 Leiden J. Int'l L. (2005) 717Google Scholar

56 Nardin, ‘Legal Positivism as a Theory of International Society,’ in D.R. Mapel and T. Nardin (eds), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives (1998), at 17Google Scholar

57 Held, Democracy, supra note 49, at 101–11.

58 D. Miller, National Responsibility and Global Justice (2007), at 224–230Google Scholar

59 Mertens, ‘Defending the Rawlsian League of Peoples: A Critical Comment on Tan’, 18 Leiden J. Int'l L. (2005) 711, at 713–714Google Scholar

60 P. Singer, One World: The Ethics of Globalization (2002), at 127–135Google Scholar

61 Goodin, ‘What is So Special About our Fellow Countrymen?’, 98 Ethics (1988) 663Google Scholar

62 K. Tan, Justice Without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism (2004), at 175–177Google Scholar

63 Nagel, ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, 33 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (2005) 113Google Scholar

Cohen and Sabel, ‘Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?’, 34 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (2006) 147Google Scholar

64 Cohen, ‘Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For?’, 12 J. Pol. Phil. (2004) 190, at 194–199Google Scholar

C. Beitz, The Idea of Human Rights (2009)Google Scholar

Raz, ‘Human Rights Without Foundations’, in The Philosophy of International Law, supra note 43, at 321Google Scholar

65 J.L. Brierly, The Law of Nations (6th ed, 1963)Google Scholar

66 J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (1999), at 37Google Scholar

67 Buchanan, ‘Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World’, 110 Ethics (2000) 697Google Scholar

68 Meckled-Garcia, ‘On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency’, 16 J. Pol. Phil. (2008) 245, at 261Google Scholar

Blake, ‘Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy’, 30 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (2001) 257, at 280Google Scholar

69 Cohen and Sabel, supra note 63Google Scholar

70 S. Caney, Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (2005), at 162Google Scholar

Copp, ‘International Law and Morality in the Theory of Secession’, 2 J. Ethics (1998) 219, at 238Google Scholar

71 Pogge, ‘Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty’, 103 Ethics (1992) 48, at 50–52Google Scholar

72 Singer, ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, 1 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (1972) 229Google Scholar

R. McKim and J. McMahan (eds), The Morality of Nationalism (1997)Google Scholar

Mason, ‘Special Obligations to Compatriots’, 107 Ethics (1997) 427Google Scholar

S. Scheffler, Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought (2001)Google Scholar

73 G.A. Cohen, Rescuing Justice and Equality (2008), at 229–273Google Scholar

74 Copp, supra note 70, at 222Google Scholar

75 Buchanan, supra note 54, at 22–23Google Scholar

76 Buchanan and Golove, ‘Philosophy of International Law’, in J. Coleman and S. Shapiro (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (2002), at 868, 870Google Scholar

Hurrell, ‘Norms and Ethics in International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations (2002), at 137, 139–141Google Scholar

77 Buchanan and Golove, supra note 76, at 872–881Google Scholar

78 Ratner, ‘Persuading to Comply: On the Deployment and Avoidance of Legal Argumentation’, in J. Dunoff and M. Pollack (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (2012)Google Scholar

79 Beitz, ‘Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment’, 80 J. Phil. (1983) 591Google Scholar

Cohen and Sabel, supra note 63Google Scholar

Sangiovanni, ‘Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State’, 35 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (2007) 3Google Scholar

80 Barry, ‘Do Countries Have Moral Obligations? The Case of World Poverty’, in 2 The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (1981) 25, at 36Google Scholar

81 G. Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons (1968)Google Scholar

82 Ratner, supra note 52, at 144–149Google Scholar

83 Ratner, ‘Is International Law Impartial?’, 11 Legal Theory (2005) 39Google Scholar

84 Hurrell, ‘International Law and the Making and Unmaking of Boundaries’, in A. Buchanan and M. Moore (eds), States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries (2003), at 275, 277–278Google Scholar

R. Jackson, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (2000), at 416–417Google Scholar

85 J. Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law (2d ed, 2006) at 417–418Google Scholar

T. Franck, Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (2002), at 135–173Google Scholar

86 Luban, ‘Just War and Human Rights’, 9 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (1980) 161Google Scholar

Beitz, C., ‘The Moral Standing of States Revisited’, 23 Ethics and Int'l Aff. (2010) 325, at 333–345Google Scholar

A. Altman and C.H. Wellman, A Liberal Theory of International Justice (2009), at 96–117Google Scholar

T. Nardin and M.S. Williams (eds), Humanitarian Intervention: Nomos XLVII (2006)Google Scholar

Altman and Wellman, supra, at 43–68Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, ‘Statism and Nationalism: A Cosmopolitan Critique’, in I. Shapiro and L. Brilmayer (eds), Nomos XLI: Global Justice (1999) 12Google Scholar

Copp, supra note 70Google Scholar

87 Tan, ‘International Toleration: Rawlsian versus Cosmopolitan’, 18 Leiden J. Int'l L. (2005) 685, at 703–704Google Scholar

88 This seems to be the basis for Beitz's focus on this in Beitz, supra note 86.

89 O. O'Neill, Bounds of Justice (2000), at 186–202Google Scholar

90 Ratner, ‘Drawing a Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States’, 90 AJIL (1996) 590Google Scholar

91 Erskine, ‘ “Citizen of nowhere” or “the point where circles intersect”? Impartialist and Embedded Cosmopolitanisms’, 28 Rev. Int'l Stud. (2002) 457Google Scholar

T. Erskine, Embedded Cosmopolitanism: Duties to Strangers and Enemies in a World of ‘Dislocated Communities’ (2008)Google Scholar

92 Spiro, ‘A New International Law of Citizenship’, 105 AJIL (2011) 694Google Scholar

93 See, e.g., Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council, 19 September 1996, available at www.arctic-council.org (participation by indigenous peoples).

94 Wellman, ‘Immigration and Freedom of Association’, 119 Ethics (2008) 109Google Scholar

95 Stilz, ‘Nations, States, and Territory’, 121 Ethics (2011) 572Google Scholar

96 Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, GA Res. 2625 (XXV), 25 October 1970; Frontier Dispute, ICJ Reports (1986) 554.

97 Philpott, ‘In Defense of Self-Determination’, 105 Ethics (1995) 352, at 382Google Scholar

Philpott, ‘Should Self-Determination be Legalized?’, 12 Terrorism & Pol. Violence, no. 3–4 (2000), 106, at 118–119Google Scholar

98 See sources, supra note 96.

99 H.J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (K.W. Thompson and W.D. Clinton eds., 7th ed 2006), at 240–269Google Scholar

E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (rev. ed 2001), at 135–155Google Scholar

100 For a fuller account of the ethical approaches within international relations, see The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, supra note 42.

101 For a review of the state of play, see Interdisciplinary Perspectives, supra note 78.

102 Buchanan and Keohane, ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions,’ in 10 Ethics & Int'l Aff. no. 4 (2006) 405Google Scholar

Buchanan and Keohane, ‘Precommitment Regimes for Intervention: Supplementing the Security Council’, 25 Ethics and Int'l Aff. no. 1 (2011) 41Google Scholar

103 Lutz and Sikkink, ‘International Human Rights Law in Practice: The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America’, 2 Chicago J. International Law (2001) 1Google Scholar

104 See Price, ‘The Ethics of Constructivism’, in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, supra note 42, at 317.

105 Bull, ‘The Anarchical Society: The Grotian Conception of International Society’, in K. Alderson and A. Hurrell (eds), Hedley Bull on International Society (2000)Google Scholar

106 Compare R. Jackson, The Global Covenant (2000)Google Scholar

R.J. Vincent, Human Rights and International Relations (1986)Google Scholar

107 From a very different direction, Terry Nardin makes the same contribution. See supra note 56.

108 Hurrell, supra note 84Google Scholar

109 Hurrell, supra note 106, at 84–86Google Scholar

Jackson, supra note 106, at 16–22Google Scholar

110 Cochrane, ‘The Ethics of the English School’, in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, supra note 42, at 286Google Scholar

111 Reus-Smit, ‘Imagining society: constructivism and the English School’, 4 British J. Pol. & Int'l Rel. (2002) 487Google Scholar

112 H. Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy (2d ed., 1996), at 52Google Scholar

113 Habermas, supra note 50, at 144Google Scholar

114 Koskenniemi, ‘Legitimacy, Rights, and Ideology: Notes Towards a Critique of the New Moral Internationalism’, 7 Associations: Journal for Legal and Social Theory (2003) 349, at 371Google Scholar

115 Lauterpacht, ‘Professor Carr on International Morality’, in E. Lauterpacht (ed), International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, vol. 2, (1975), at 67, 84–92Google Scholar

Brierly, J.L., ‘The Rule of Law in International Society’, in H. Lauterpacht and C.H.M. Waldock (eds), The Basis of Obligation in International Law and Other Papers by the Late James Leslie Brierly (1958), at 250Google Scholar

C. de Visscher, Théories et Réalités en Droit International Public (3d ed., 1960), at 116–130Google Scholar

116 Simma, supra note 10, at 234Google Scholar

117 McDougal, Lasswell and Chen, supra note 19, at 88Google Scholar

118 Franck, supra note 30, at 11Google Scholar

119 Ibid. at 13.

120 Kritsiotis, ‘Imagining the International Community’, 13 EJIL (2002) 961Google Scholar

121 Beitz, supra note 79Google Scholar

Vincent, supra note 106, at 118–119Google Scholar

122 Habermas, supra note 50, at 135Google Scholar

123 Cassese, ‘Soliloquy’, in P. Gaeta and S. Zappalà (eds), The Human Dimension of International Law: Selected Papers (2008)Google Scholar

124 Lachs, ‘Quelques Réflexions sur la Communauté Internationale’, in M. Virally (ed), Le Droit International au Service de la Paix, de la Justice et du Développement (1991), at 349Google Scholar

125 Paulus, ‘The influence of the United States on the concept of the ‘international community’, in United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, supra note 26, at 57Google Scholar

126 J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (E. Kelly ed., 2001), at 192–195Google Scholar

127 P. Cane, Responsibility in Law and Morality (2002), at 29–43Google Scholar

Miller, supra note 58, at 81–109Google Scholar

R.E. Goodin, Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of our Social Responsibilities (1985), at 113–114Google Scholar

128 GA Res. 60/1, 24 October 2005, paras. 138–39.

129 Singer, supra note 72Google Scholar

130 Barry, supra note 80Google Scholar

O'Neill, ‘Who Can Endeavour Peace?’, in D. Copp (ed), Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Disarmament (1986), at 41Google Scholar

Erskine, ‘Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral Agents: The Case of States and Quasi-States’, 15 Ethics & Int'l Aff. (2001) 67Google Scholar

131 Goodin, supra note 127, at 134–167Google Scholar

Shue, ‘Mediating Duties’, 98 Ethics (1998) 687Google Scholar

132 See, e.g., the essays in S.M. Gardiner et al. (eds), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (2010).

133 Miller, supra note 9Google Scholar

Miller, supra note 58Google Scholar

134 Rawls, supra note 66, at 70Google Scholar

135 Buchanan and Keohane, ‘Legitimacy’, supra note 102Google Scholar

136 See sources, supra note 53.

137 Anderson, ‘What is the Point of Equality?’, 109 Ethics (1999) 287Google Scholar

138 Compare Beitz, ‘International Liberalism and Distributive Justice’, 51 World Politics (1999) 269 (distinguishing between international political justice and distributive justice), and Blake, ‘International Justice’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, para. 1, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/international-justice (focusing on distributive justice).