Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:23:59.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Daniel Bar-Tal ,
Lily Chernyak-Hai ,
Noa Schori  and
Ayelet Gundar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood emerges as a major theme in the ethos of conflict of societies involved in intractable conflict and is a fundamental part of the collective memory of the conflict. This sense is defined as a mindset shared by group members that results from a perceived intentional harm with severe consequences, inflicted on the collective by another group. This harm is viewed as undeserved, unjust and immoral, and one that the group could not prevent. The article analyses the nature of the self-perceived collective sense of victimhood in the conflict, its antecedents, the functions that it fulfils for the society and the consequences that result from this view.

Type
War victims
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 91 , Issue 874: War victims , June 2009 , pp. 229 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors would like to thank Johanna Vollhardt, Sabina Čehajić-Clancy, Dinka Corkalo Biruski, Yechiel Klar and Dario Spini for their helpful comments on the earlier draft of the present paper.

References

1 Intractable conflicts, in which the parties involved invest substantial material and non-material resources and which last at least 25 years, are characterized as being total, protracted, violent, central, and perceived as being unsolvable and of zero-sum nature. See Bar-Tal, D., ‘Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts’, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 50, 2007, pp. 1430–1453-a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 We recognize that in almost every intergroup conflict at least one side experiences a sense of collective victimhood and that in many of them both sides have this sense. The present paper focuses on intractable conflicts, in which both sides always experience a sense of collective victimhood.

3 A. Karmen, Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology (2nd edn), Wadsworth: Belmont, CA, 1990; N. Ronel, K. Jaishankar and M. Bensimon, M. (eds), 2009, Trends and Issues in Victimology. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; O. Zur, ‘The psychology of victimhood’, in R.H. Wright and N.A. Cummings (eds), Destructive Trends in Mental Health, Routledge: New York, 2005, pp. 45–64.

4 D. Corkalo Biruski and S. Penic (in preparation), ‘Facing trauma, facing the enemy: War trauma, group identity, collective guilt and outgroup attitudes’, in D. Spini, D. Corkalo Biruski, G. Elcheroth and M. Vasovic (eds), Facing Massive Violence and Social Change: Collective Experiences in the Former Yugoslavia; J.D. Frank, Sanity and Survival: Psychological Aspects of War and Peace, Vintage: New York, 1967; H.C. Kelman, ‘Social-psychological dimensions of international conflict’, in I.W. Zartman (ed), Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques (revised edition), United States Institute of Peace Press: Washington, DC, 2007, pp. 61–107; J. Mack, ‘The Enemy System’, 1990, in V. Volkan, J. Demtrios and J. Montville (eds), The Psychodynamics of International Relationships, Vol. I: Concepts and Theories, pp. 83–95, Lexington, MA; V. Volkan, Blood Lines: From Ethnic Pride to Ethnic Terrorism. Westview Press: Boulder, Colorado, 1997.

5 J. Herman, Trauma and Recovery, Basic Books: New York, 1992.

6 Aquino, K. and Byron, K., ‘Dominating interpersonal behavior and perceived victimization in groups: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship’, Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2002, p. 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 M. Bard and D. Sangrey, The Crime Victims' Book (2nd edn). Brunner/Mazel Publishers: New York, 1986; see also O. Zur, above note 3.

8 In addition, it was found that personal victimization manifests itself in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), symptoms of depression or substance abuse (Resick, P.A., ‘The psychological impact of rape’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 8, 1993, pp. 223–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar; J. Wolfe and R. Kimerling, Gender issues in the assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder, in J.P. Wilson and T.M. Keane (eds), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD, Guilford: New York, 1997, pp. 192–238), of fear and anxiety (S.E. Taylor, J.V. Wood and R.R. Lichtman, ‘It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization’, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 39, 1983, pp. 19–40) and of physical health problems (Golding, J.M., ‘Sexual assault history and physical health in randomly selected Los Angeles women’, Health Psychology, 13, 1994, pp. 130–138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Resnick, H.S., Acierno, R.E. and Kilpatrick, D., ‘Health impact of interpersonal violence 1: Prevalence rates, case identification, and risk factors for sexual assault, physical assault, and domestic violence in men and women’. Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 23, 1997, pp. 65–78).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 R.J. Bies, T.M. Tripp and R.M. Kramer, ‘At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations’, in R. Giacalone and J. Greenberg (eds), Antisocial Behavior in Organizations, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1997, pp. 18–36; Skarlicki, D.P. and Folger, R., ‘Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, 1997, pp. 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 C.J. Sykes, A nation of victims: The decay of the American character, St. Martin's Press: New York, 1992.

11 Confino, A., ‘Remembering the Second World War, 1945–1965: Narratives of victimhood and genocide’. Cultural Analysis, Vol. 4, 2005, pp. 46–75.Google Scholar

12 Garkawe, S., ‘Revisiting the scope of victimology – How broad a discipline should it be?’ International Review of Victimology, 11, 2004, pp. 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes and L. Huyse (eds), Reconciliation after violent conflict: A handbook, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, 2003; Strobl, R., ‘Constructing the victim: Theoretical reflections and empirical examples’, International Review of Victimology, Vol. 11, 2004, pp. 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 See K. Aquino and K. Byron, above note 6.

15 J.E. Bayley, The concept of victimhood, in D. Sank and D.I. Caplan (eds), To be a victim: Encounters with crime and justice, Insight Books: New York, 1991, pp. 53–67.

16 See C.J. Sykes, above note 10.

17 Holstein, J.A. and Miller, G., Rethinking victimization: An interactional approach to victimology, Symbolic Interaction, 13, 1990, pp. 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 See J.E. Bayley, above note 15; D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes and L. Huyse, above note 13.

19 See O. Zur, above note 3.

20 See D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes and L. Huyse, above note 13; R. Strobl, above note 13.

21 M.M. Lanier and S. Henry, Essential Criminology, Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 1998.

22 E.C. Viano, ‘Victimology today: Major issues in research and public policy’, in E.C. Viano (ed), Crime and its victims: International research and public policy issues, Hemisphere: New York, 1989, pp. 3–14.

23 See Strobl, above note 13.

24 In this conception we focus only on a sense of self-perceived collective victimhood that results from behaviour of another group or groups.

25 Wohl, M.J.A. and Branscombe, N., ‘Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 94, No. 6, 2008, pp. 988–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

26 O. David and D. Bar-Tal, Collective identity and nations: A Socio-psychological conception, 2008, manuscript submitted.

27 J.C. Turner, ‘Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories’, in N. Ellemers, R. Spears and B. Dosje (eds), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content. Blackwell: Oxford, 1999, pp. 6–34; J.C. Turner, M.A. Hogg, P.J. Oakes, S.D. Reicher and M. Wetherell, Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorizing Theory. Blackwell: Oxford, 1987.

28 D. Bar-Tal, Shared Beliefs in a Society: Social Psychological Analysis, Sage: Thousands Oaks, CA, 2000; D.M. Mackie, T. Devos and E.R. Smith, From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions: Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups, Psychology Press: New York, 2002.

29 M.H. Davis, Empathy: A social psychological approach, Hawthorne: New York, 1994.

30 E. Cairns, J. Mallet, C. Lewis and R. Wilson, Who are the victims? Self-assessed victimhood and the Northern Irish conflict, NIO Research and Statistical Series, Report No. 7, Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, Belfast, 2003.

31 Societal beliefs are defined as shared cognitions by the society members that address themes and issues with which the society members are particularly preoccupied, and which contribute to their sense of uniqueness, see D. Bar-Tal, above note 28.

32 J.W.D. Dougherty (ed), Directions in Cognitive Anthropology, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1985; K. Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia, Harcourt, Brace and Company: NY, 1952; R.K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press: NY, 1957; T. Parsons, The Social System, Glencoe, IL, The Free Press, 1951; R.A. Shweder and R.A. LeVine (eds), Culture Theory, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1984.

33 A. Robben and M. Suarez-Orozco, Cultures under siege: Collective violence and trauma, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2000, p. 23.

34 E. Staub and D. Bar-Tal, ‘Genocide, mass killing, and intractable conflict: Roots, evolution, prevention, and reconciliation’, in D.O. Sears, L. Huddy and R. Jervis (eds), Handbook of Political Psychology, 2003, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 722.

35 J.H. Liu and S.H. Liu, ‘The role of the social psychologist in the benevolent authority and plurality of powers systems of historical affordance for authority’, in K.S. Yang, K.K. Hwang, P.B. Pedersen and I. Daibo (eds), Progress in Asian social psychology: Conceptual and empirical contributions, Praeger: Westport, CT, 2003, pp. 43–46.

36 Collective memory is defined as representations of the past which are remembered by society members as the history of the group (see Kansteiner, W., ‘Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies’, History and Theory, Vol. 41, 2002, pp. 179–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar). Collective memory contains the narratives, the symbols, the models, the myths, and the events that mould the culture of the group. It does not intend to provide an objective history of the past, but tells about the past that is functional and relevant to the society's present existence and future aspirations. Thus it creates a socially constructed narrative that has some basis in actual events, but is biased, selective and distorted in ways that meet societal present needs (see E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger (eds), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1983; Liu, J.H. and Hilton, D.J., ‘How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their role in identity politics’, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2005, pp. 537–556CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; B. Southgate, What is History For? New York, Rutledge, 2005). Moreover, Corkalo et al talk about the ‘ethnization of memory’, where ‘memory itself and interpretation of the past become ethnically exclusive, creating subjective, psychological realities and different symbolic meanings of common events in people who belong to different ethnic groups’. D. Corkalo, D. Ajdukovic, H. Weinstein, E. Stover, D. Djipa and M. Biro, ‘Neighbors again? Inter-Community relations after ethnic violence’, in E. Stover and H. Weinstein (eds), My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity, 2004, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 143–161.

37 P. Connerton, How Societies Remember, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989, p. 2.

38 Kanan, M., ‘On victim and victimhood: The Iraqi case’, Current History, Vol. 98, 1999, pp. 96–106.Google Scholar

39 Anzulovic, Heavenly Serbia: From myth to genocide, Hurst: London, 1999, p. 124.

40 Jasińska-Kania, A., ‘Bloody revenge in “God's Playground”: Poles' collective memory of relations with Germans, Russians, and Jews’, International Journal of Sociology, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2007, p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 See V. Volkan, above note 4, p. 47.

42 See V. Volkan, above note 4; H. Krystal, Massive Psychic Trauma, International Universities Press: New York, 1968.

43 See B. Anzulovic, above note 39.

44 J. Leatherman, W. DeMars, P.D. Gaffney and R. Vayrynen, Breaking cycles of violence: Conflict prevention in intrastate cries, Kumarian Press: West Hartford, CT, 1999; G. Ross, The trauma vortex in action again in the Middle East, 2001, available at http://www.traumainstitute.org/articles.php (last viewed on 24 April 2009).

45 Staub, E., ‘Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing and intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory’, Political Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2006, pp. 867–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46 We do not claim that this mindset has to be shared by all the group members. We assume that at the height of an intractable conflict it is shared by the great majority of group members, but over time, when the peace process begins and continues, the sharing may be significantly diminished.

47 Sewell Chan, ‘Iranian Leader, Calling Introductory Remarks Insulting, Addresses Columbia’, New York Times, 25 September 2007.

48 Ethos of conflict, defined as the configuration of central societal beliefs that provide a particular dominant orientation to a society experiencing prolonged intractable conflict (see D. Bar-Tal, above note 28). It has been proposed that in the context of intractable conflict, such an ethos evolves with eight themes (see D. Bar-Tal, Societal beliefs in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case, International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 1998, pp. 22–50; and D. Bar-Tal, above note 1), as follows: societal beliefs about the justness of one's own goals first of all outline the goals in conflict, indicate their crucial importance and provide explanations and rationales for them. Societal beliefs about security stress the importance of personal safety and national survival, and outline the conditions for their achievement. Societal beliefs of a positive collective self-image concern the ethnocentric tendency to attribute positive traits, values and behaviour to one's own society. Societal beliefs about one's own victimization concern self-presentation as a victim, especially in the context of the intractable conflict. Societal beliefs about the delegitimization of the opponent are beliefs that deny the adversary's humanity. Societal beliefs about patriotism generate attachment to the country and society by propagating loyalty, love, care and sacrifice. Societal beliefs about unity refer to the importance of ignoring internal conflicts and disagreements during intractable conflict in order to join forces in the face of the external threat. Finally, societal beliefs about peace refer to peace as the ultimate desire of the society.

49 See D. Bar-Tal, above note 1.

50 D. Bar-Tal, Collective memory of physical violence: Its contribution to the culture of violence, in E. Cairns and M. D. Roe (eds), The Role of Memory in Ethnic Conflict, Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, UK, 2003, pp. 77–93; see also H.C. Kelman, above note 4; J. Mack, above note 4; J.V. Montville, Conflict and Peacemaking in Multiethnic Societies, New York: Lexington Books, 1991; see also V. Volkan, above note 4.

51 I. Zertal, Israel's Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 9.

52 See D. Bar-Tal, above note 1; J.D. Frank, above note 4; H.C. Kelman, above note 4; R.K. White, Nobody Wanted War: Misperception in Vietnam and Other Wars, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1970.

53 Sahdra, B. and Ross, M., ‘Group identification and historical memory’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 33, 2007, pp. 384–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

54 U. Gopher, Antecedents to the ethos of conflict in Israeli-Jewish society, Master Thesis submitted to Tel Aviv University (in Hebrew), 2006.

55 See E. Cairns, J. Mallet, C. Lewis and R. Wilson, above note 30; Hunter, J.A., Stringer, M. and Watson, R.P., ‘Intergroup violence and intergroup attributions’, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 30, 1991, pp. 261–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

56 D. Bar-Tal, Living with the conflict: Socio-psychological analysis of the Israeli-Jewish society, Jerusalem: Carmel (in Hebrew), 2007; N. Caplan, ‘Victimhood and identity: Psychological obstacles to Israeli reconciliation with the Palestinians’, in K. Abdel-Malek and D.C. Jacobson (eds), Israeli and Palestinian Identities in History and Literature, St Martin's Press: New York, 1999, pp. 63–86; L. Khalili, Heroes and Martyrs of Palestine – The politics of national commemoration, Cambridge University Press: New York, 2007; Rouhana, N. and Bar-Tal, D., ‘Psychological dynamics of intractable conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian case’, American Psychologist, Vol. 53, 1998, pp. 761–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vollhardt, J., ‘The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace?’, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology (in press).Google Scholar

57 See V. Volkan, above note 4, p. 54.

58 Hadjipavlou, M., ‘The Cyprus conflict: Root causes and implications for peacebuilding’, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2007, pp. 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 Ramanathapillai, R., ‘The politicizing of trauma: A case study of Sri Lanka’, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, Vol. 12, 2006, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60 J. Holmwood, ‘Functionalism and its critics’, in A. Harrington (ed), Modern Social Theory: an introduction, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2005, pp. 87–109.

61 J.W. Burton (ed), Conflict: Human Needs Theory, St Martin's Press: New York, 1990.

62 A. Antonovsky, Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1987; V.E. Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, Washington Square Press: New York, 1963; R. Janoff-Bulman, Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma, The Free Press: New York, 1992; Taylor, S.E., ‘Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation’, American Psychologist, Vol. 38, 1983, pp. 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63 D.E. Apter (ed), Legitimization of Violence, New York University Press: New York, 1997; J.T. Jost and B. Major (eds), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001.

64 J. Sidanius and F. Pratto, Social Dominance, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999.

65 See A. Antonovsky, above note 62; R.S. Lazarus and S. Folkman, Stress, Appraisal and Coping, Springer Publishing Company: New York, 1984.

66 S. Rosenberg, Victimhood, Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project, Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, 2003, available at http://www.intractableconflict.org/m/victimhood.jsp (last visited 27 April 2009).

67 See V. Volkan, above note 4.

68 See J.H. Liu and D.J. Hilton, above note 36, p. 546.

69 D. Bar-Tal and E. Staub, Patriotism in the Life of Individuals and Nations. Nelson-Hall: Chicago, 1997.

70 See R. Ramanathapillai, above note 59.

71 Ibid, p. 1.

72 M. Smyth, ‘Putting the past in its place: Issues of victimhood and reconciliation in Northern Ireland's peace process’, in N. Biggar (ed), Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice after Civil Conflict, Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, 2001, p. 126,

73 Noor, M., Brown, R.J. and Prentice, G., ‘Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model’, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 47, 2008, pp. 481–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

74 A. Nadler and N. Shnabel, ‘Instrumental and socio-emotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the need-based model of socio-emotional reconciliation’, in A. Nadler, T. Malloy and J. Fisher (eds), Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation, Oxford University Press: New York, 2006, pp. 37–56.

75 Oren, N. and Bar-Tal, D., ‘The detrimental dynamics of delegitimization in intractable conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian case’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31 (1), 2006, pp. 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76 See D. Bar-Tal, above note 56.

77 See M. Noor, R.J. Brown and G. Prentice, above note 73.

78 See D. Bar-Tal, above note 1.

79 L. Adar and H. Adler, Values Education for Immigrant School Children, Hebrew University and Ministry of Culture and Education Press: Jerusalem, 1965, (in Hebrew); R. Arviv-Abbramovich, State ceremonies as mechanism for inculcating ethos of conflict in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case, 2004, Master Thesis submitted to Tel Aviv University (in Hebrew); D. Bar-Tal, above note 48; Bar-Tal, D., ‘The rocky road towards peace: Societal beliefs functional to intractable conflict in Israeli school textbooks’, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 35, 1998, pp. 723–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar; D. Bar-Tal, above note 56; Bar-Tal, D. and Antebi, D., ‘Siege mentality in Israel’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 1992, pp. 251–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar; N. Ben-Shaul, A violent world: TV news images of Middle Eastern terror and war, Rowman and Littlefield: Boulder, CO, 2006; O. David, The crystallization and transformations of the Jewish-Israeli identity: A study of identity reflection in Hebrew readers of the 20th century, Doctoral dissertation, 2007, Tel-Aviv University (in Hebrew); R. Firer, The Agents of Zionist Education, Hakibutz Hameuhad Tel-Aviv, 1985, (in Hebrew); C.S. Liebman and E. Don-Yehiya, Civil religion in Israel: Traditional Judaism and political culture in the Jewish state, University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, 1983; D. Ofer, ‘History, memory and identity: Perceptions of Holocaust in Israel’, in U. Rebhun and C.I. Waxman (eds), Jews in Israel. Contemporary social and cultural patterns, Brandeis University Press: Hanover NH, 2004, pp. 394–417; E. Podeh, The Arab-Israeli conflict in Israeli history textbooks, 1948–2000, Bergin and Garvey: Westport, CT, 2002; Porat, D.A., ‘From the scandal to the Holocaust in Israeli education’, Journal in Contemporary History, Vol. 39, 2004, pp. 636–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar; T. Segev, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, Henry Holt and Co: New York, 2000; E. Shohat, Israeli Cinema: East/west and the Politics of Representation., University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, 1989; H. Yaoz, The Holocaust in Hebrew Literature – As historical and trans-historical fiction, 1980, Tel-Aviv: Eked (in Hebrew); J. Yedger, Our Story: The National Narrative and the Israeli Press, Haifa University Press: Haifa, 2004, (in Hebrew); A. Yurman, Victimization of the holocaust as a component of the cultural-political discourse in Israeli society between the years 1948–1998, Doctoral dissertation, 2001, Bar-Ilan University (in Hebrew); I. Zertal, above note 51; M. Zuckermann, Shoah in the sealed room – The Holocaust in the Israeli press during the Gulf war, Hubermann: Tel-Aviv, 1993 (in Hebrew).

80 See B. Anzulovic, above note 39; Jansen, S., ‘Why do they hate us? Everyday Serbian nationalist knowledge of Muslim hatred’, Journal of Mediterranean Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2003, pp. 215–237Google Scholar; D.B. MacDonald, Balkan holocaust? Serbian and Croatian victim-centered propaganda and the war in Yugoslavia, Manchester University Press: Manchester, 2002; N. Malcolm, Bosnia: A Short History, New York University Press: New York, 1994; T. Pavasovic, The political dynamics of ethnicity change: A case-study of Serbian textbooks 1970–2002, paper presented at the Harvard-Oxford-Stockholm Conference in Stockholm, 14–16 April 2006; V. Volkan, above note 4.

81 E. Staub, ‘Breaking the cycle of genocidal violence: Healing and reconciliation’, in J. Harvey (ed), Perspectives on Loss, Taylor and Francis, Washington DC, 1982, pp. 231–241; E. Staub and L.A. Pearlman, ‘Healing, reconciliation and forgiving after genocide and other collective violence’, in S.J. Helmick and R.L. Petersen (eds), Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Religion, Public Policy and Conflict Transformation, Templeton Foundation Press, Randor, PA, 2001, pp. 205–229.

82 See J. Herman, above note 5; J. Mack, above note 4; E. Staub and D. Bar-Tal, above note 34; Zur, O., ‘Rethinking “Don‘t blame the victim”: The psychology of victimhood’, Journal of Couples Therapy, Vol. 4, 1994, pp. 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

83 See J.V. Montville, above note 50.

84 Chaitin, J. and Steinberg, S., ‘You should know better: Expressions of empathy and disregard among victims of massive social trauma’, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2008, pp. 197–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lindner, E.G., ‘Humiliation and human condition: Mapping a minefield’, Human Rights Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2001, pp. 46–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; E. Staub and L.A. Pearlman, above note 81; V. Volkan, above note 4, and also ‘Transgenerational transmission and Chosen Traumas: An aspect of large-group identity’, Group Analysis, Vol. 34, 2001, pp. 79–97.

85 Elcheroth, G., ‘Individual-level and community-level effects of war trauma on social representations related to humanitarian law’, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 36, 2006, pp. 907–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

86 Spini, D., Elcheroth, G. and Fasel, R., ‘The impact of groups norms and generalization of risks on judgments of war behavior’, Political Psychology, Vol. 29, 2008, pp. 919–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

87 D. Bar-Tal and E. Halperin (in preparation), ‘Socio-psychological barriers to conflict resolution’, in D. Bar-Tal (ed), Intergroup Conflicts and their Resolution: Social Psychological Perspective, Psychology Press: New York.

88 See D. Corkalo Biruski and S. Penic (in preparation), above note 4.

89 See E. Halperin and D. Bar-Tal (in preparation) Collective beliefs about victimhood in the Israeli Jewish society and their effects on the view of the Israeli-Arab conflict.

90 See D. Bar-Tal, above note 28; D. Bar-Tal and D. Antebi, above note 79.

91 See V. Volkan, above note 4.

92 S. Adwan and D. Bar-On, Victimhood and Beyond: The Bethlehem Encounter, Newton Center, Boston, 2001.

93 See A. Jasińska-Kania, above note 40.

94 See D. Bar-Tal and D. Antebi, above note 79; Hareven, A., ‘Victimization: Some comments by an Israeli’, Political Psychology, Vol. 4, 1983, pp. 145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Liebman, C., ‘Myth, tradition and values in Israeli society’, Midstream, Vol. 24, 1978, pp. 44–53Google Scholar; Stein, H.F., ‘Judaism and the group-fantasy of martyrdom: The psycho-dynamic paradox of survival through persecution’, Journal of Psychohistory, Vol. 6, 1978, pp. 151–210.Google Scholar

95 See D. Bar-Tal, above note 56.

96 See J. Mack, above note 4.

97 Čehajić, S. and Brown, R., ‘Not in my name: A social psychological study of antecedents and consequences of acknowledgment of ingroup atrocities’, Genocide Studies and Prevention, Vol. 3, 2008, pp. 195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar; J. Chaitin and S. Steinberg, above note 84; E. Staub, above note 45.

98 Schalow, P.G., ‘Japan's war responsibility and the Pan-Asian movement for redress and compensation: An overview’, East Asia, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2000, p. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

99 R.F. Baumeister and S. Hastings, ‘Distortions of collective memory: How groups flatter and deceive themselves’, in J.W. Pennebaker, D. Paez and B. Rimé (eds), Collective Memory of Political Events: Social Psychological Perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 1997, pp. 277–293.

100 See G. Ross, above note 44.

101 D.E. Broadbent, ‘Decision and Stress’, Academic Press: London, 1971; R.R. Mackie, Vigilance: Theory, Operational Performance and Physiological Correlates, Plenum: NY, 1977.

102 See H.C. Kelman, above note 4.

103 See M.J.A. Wohl and N. Branscombe, above note 25.

104 N.R. Branscombe, ‘A social psychological process perspective on collective guilt’, in N.R. Branscombe and B. Doosje (eds), Collective Guilt: International Perspectives, Cambridge University Press: New York, 2004, pp. 320–334; N.R. Branscombe, N. Ellemers, R. Spears and B. Doosje, ‘The context and content of social identity threat’, in N. Ellemers, R. Spears and B. Doosje (eds), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content, Blackwell Publishers: Oxford, England, 1999, pp. 35–58; Branscombe, N.R., Schmitt, M.T. and Schiffhauer, K., ‘Racial attitudes in response to thoughts of White privilege’, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 37, 2007, pp. 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

105 See M. Wohl and N. Branscombe, above note 25.

106 Y. Klar, N. Schori and S. Roccas, The shadow of the past: perpetual victimhood in intergroup conflicts, unpublished data, Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, 2009.

107 S. Čehajić and R. Brown (in preparation), Victimhood and acknowledgment of ingroup atrocities, unpublished manuscript.

108 See N. Schori, Y. Klar and S. Roccas, When past is present: reminders of historical victimhood and their effect on intergroup conflicts, unpublished data, Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, 2009.

109 Ha'aretz, 29 April 1973.

110 See D. Bar-Tal, above note 1.

111 See S. Čehajić and R. Brown, above note 97.

112 D.L. Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot, University of California Press: Berkeley, 2001.

113 R.G. Petersen, Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002.

114 D. Enns, Identity and Victimhood, Berghof Occasional Paper No. 28, Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management: Berlin, 2007; E. Staub and D. Bar-Tal, above note 34.

115 Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D.M., Denson, T. and Schmader, T., ‘Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 10, 2006, pp. 372–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

116 O. Botcharova, ‘Implementation of track two diplomacy: Developing a model for forgiveness’, in G. Raymond, S.J. Helmick and R.L. Peterson (ed), Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Religion, Public Policy, and Conflict Transformation, Temple Foundation Press: Philadelphia, 2001, pp. 279–304.

117 See E. Staub, above note 45.

118 Bandura, A., ‘Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanity’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1999, pp. 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

119 See R. Ramanathapillai, above note 59.

120 M. Mamdani, When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda, Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2001, p. 34.

121 See J. Chaitin and S. Steinberg, above note 84; J. Vollhardt, above note 56.

122 See V. Vollhardt, above note 56.