Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:32:13.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Law and Armed Conflict: Fundamental Principles and Contemporary Challenges in the Law of WarLaurie R. Blank and Gregory P. Noone *

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2015

Anne Quintin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Books and Articles
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 97 , Issue 897-898: Principles guiding humanitarian action , June 2015 , pp. 477 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © icrc 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jean Pictet (ed.), Commentary on the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Vol. 1: Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Geneva, 1952, p. 348.

2 Indeed, the book is structured as follows: Part I, “Why” (looks at the basic principles and the history of IHL); Part II, “What and When” (includes chapters on the definition of armed conflict, the classification of conflicts, and occupation); Part III, “Who” (with clear chapters on combatants and civilians, followed by a chapter on battlefield status in NIAC); Part IV, “How” (mainly split into three chapters dealing with conduct of hostilities); Part V, “Implementation and Enforcement”.

3 International Law and Armed Conflict, Preface, p. xxiv.

4 ICTY, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1, Decision on Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, 2 October 1995, reproduced in International Law and Armed Conflict, pp. 93–96, 137–138, 155–156, 593–598; ICTY, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, Judgment, 7 May 1997, reproduced in International Law and Armed Conflict, pp. 107–110; ICTY, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-A, Appeals Judgment, 15 July 1999, reproduced in International Law and Armed Conflict, pp. 139–143, 286–288.

5 ICJ, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports, 9 July 2004, pp. 136, 215, reproduced in International Law and Armed Conflict, pp. 30–31.

6 US Supreme Court, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 US 557, 2006, reproduced in International Law and Armed Conflict, pp. 162–164.

7 Tribunal Militaire (Belgium Military Court), Ministre Public et Centre pour l'égalité des chances et la lutte contre le racisme c. C. et B., Journal des Tribunaux, 4 April 1998, p. 286, reproduced in International Law and Armed Conflict, p. 119–121.

8 Colombian Constitutional Court, Constitutional Review of Additional Protocol II, Ruling C-225/95, Re: File No. LAT-040, reproduced in International Law and Armed Conflict, pp. 48–49.

9 International Law and Armed Conflict, Preface, p. xxiv.

10 Ibid., p. 350, para. 8.

11 Ibid., Chapter 9, “Battlefield Status in Non-International Armed Conflict”, Part C, “Standards for Detention in NIAC”, pp. 386–392.

12 Ibid., Chapter 7, “Combatants”, pp. 235–240.

13 Ibid., Chapter 7, “Combatants”, Part C, “Prisoners of War: Purposes and Protection”, pp. 255–276.

14 Ibid., Chapter 6, “The Law of Belligerent Occupation”, pp. 196–198.

15 Ibid., Preface, p. xxxix.