Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:05:50.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Humanitarian Law and Internationalized Internal Armed Conflicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1982

Dietrich Schindler
Dietrich Schindler*
Affiliation:
Professor at Zürich University Member of the ICRC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Internationalized internal armed conflicts have become a common feature of the past decades. In numerous civil wars foreign armed forces have intervened in favour of one or the other party and thereby attempted to influence the outcome of the conflict. Various causes have led to this development. One of them is the increased interdependence of States, as a consequence of which every civil war will affect other States and, conversely, the attitudes of other States may have an impact on the outcome of the civil war, even without any intervention. Another cause can be found in the world's ideological cleavage which divides nations and results in the overlapping of internal and international conflicts. Among further causes we can mention the existence of military blocs and of regional groupings which have an interest in preventing the overthrow of régimes within the bloc and tend to encourage alterations in other blocs. Another factor to be taken into consideration is the prohibition of the use of force in international relations. Whereas in earlier times States waged open wars in order to increase their power, today, due to the prohibition of the use of force, they rather endeavour to achieve the same result by interfering in the internal affairs of other States. Interference in internal conflicts is often a substitute for an international war. The instability of many contemporary régimes, mainly of the Third World, further favours the internationalization of internal conflicts.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of the Red Cross (1961 - 1997) , Volume 22 , Issue 230 , October 1982 , pp. 255 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 International Review of the Red Cross, 1965, p. 417.Google Scholar

2 Meyrowitz, H., Le droit de la guerre dans le conflit vietnamien, Annuaire français de droit international, 1967, p. 153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar and especially pp. 167–169. English translation: “The Law of War in the Vietnamese Conflict”, in Falk, R. A. (ed.), The Vietnam War and International Law, vol. 2, Princeton, 1969, p. 516, esp. pp. 521–533.Google Scholar

3 See Bindschedler-Robert, D., The Law of Armed Conflict, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York, 1971, p. 52–53 Google Scholar; Bothe, M., Völkerrechtliche Aspekte des Angola-Konflikts Google Scholar, in Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 37 (1977) 590–592 Google Scholar; Frowein, J. A., Völkerrechtliche Aspekte des Vietnam-Konfliktes Google Scholar, ibid. 27 (1967) 15–19; Meyrowitz, H. (note 2), Annuaire français 162 Google Scholar, Falk (ed.) 525; Rosas, A., The Legal Status of Prisoners of War, Helsinki, 1976, 283 ff.Google Scholar; Schindler, D., Die Anwendung der Genfer Rotkreuzabkommen seit 1949 Google Scholar, in Annuaire suisse de droit international XXII (1965) 93–98 Google Scholar; Schindler, D., The different Types of Armed Conflicts according to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols Google Scholar in Recueil des cows de l'Académie de Droit international, 163 (1979) 150–151 Google Scholar; Wilhelm, R.-J., Problèmes relatifs à la protection de la personne humaine par le droit international dans les conflits armés ne présentant pas un caractère international Google Scholar in Recueil des cours de l'Académie de droit international, 137 (1972) 356–359.Google Scholar

4 International Committee of the Red Cross, Report on the Work of the Conference of Government Experts, 1971, para. 284.

5 Ibid. para. 301.

6 International Committee of the Red Cross, Report on the Work of the Conference of Government Experts, 1972, vol. I, para. 2.332 ff.

7 Ibid. 1971, para. 133; 1972, vol. I, para. 0.14 ff. and 2.71. Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977, p. 203, 217.

8 In the Vietnam war the relationship between the United States and North Vietnam was considered as falling into this category.

9 In the Vietnam war the relationship between North and South Vietnam was considered as falling into this category.

10 In the Vietnam war the relationship between the government of South Vietnam and the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam (NLF, Vietcong) was considered as falling into this category.

11 See Schindler, D., State of War, Belligerency, Armed Conflict Google Scholar, in Cassese, A. (ed.), The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, Naples, 1979, 3, 5–6 Google Scholar; Wilhelm, (note 3) 326–331 Google Scholar; Ch. Zorgbibe, , La guerre civile, Paris, 1975, 36 iff.Google Scholar, 71 ff.; Zorgbibe, , Sources of the Recognition of belligerent status Google Scholar in International Review of the Red Cross, 03, 1977, p. 111.Google Scholar

12 See Reaffirmation and Development of the Laws and Customs Applicable in Armed Conflicts, a report submitted by the ICRC to the Twenty-first International Red Cross Conference at Istanbul, 1969, p. 116; and Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, ICRC, Geneva, 1971 Google Scholar, Documentation submitted by the ICRC, V pp. 19–21.Google Scholar

13 This would, however, not prevent the established government from trying such prisoners of war for high treason or similar crimes (Article 85 of the Third Geneva Convention).

14 Meyrowitz (note 2), Annuaire français 173, Falk (ed.) p. 538.Google Scholar

15 Meyrowitz (note 2), Annuaire français 167, Falk (ed.) p. 531.Google Scholar

16 In the Vietnam war the relationship between the Vietcong and the United States was considered as falling into this category.

17 It has been argued that such has been the case in Cambodia since 1978.

18 It has been argued that this has been the case in Afghanistan since 1979.