Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:19:32.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade-Union Policy Between the Wars

The Case of Holidays With Pay in Britain*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Stephen G. Jones
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most standard histories of Britain between the wars refer to the development of holidays with pay, albeit briefly. It is widely acknowledged that by the end of the 1930's the majority of the British working population benefited from a paid holiday. The crucial initiative, so it is claimed, was the Holidays with Pay Act of 1938, which gave Parliamentary approval to the principle of payment of wages during holidays. Clearly the growth of paid holidays is seen as yet another instance of a more affluent Britain, an integral element of the growth of leisure. However, there has been very little detailed discussion of the paid-holiday-policy option and the precise reasons for the formulation and implementation of that policy. This neglect is rather surprising given the popular support for this “fringe benefit”, which was perceived as providing a certain degree of financial security during the annual break from the rigours of work. It is true that there has been more specialised treatment, but even this is of a general nature, with little reference to the industrial and political struggle for holidays with pay.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , April 1986 , pp. 40 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1986

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Dr M. E. Rose, Professor A. E. Musson and members of the Editorial Board for their helpful comments.

References

2 See Mowat, C. L., Britain Between the Wars 1918–1940 (London, 1955), p. 501;Google Scholar Aldcroft, D. H., The Inter-War Economy: Britain, 1919–1939 (London, 1970), p. 366;Google Scholar Branson, N. and Heinemann, M., Britain in the Nineteen Thirties (St Albans, 1973), pp. 93–94;Google Scholar Taylor, A. J. P., English History 1914−1945 (London, 1977), p. 305;Google Scholar Stevenson, J., British Society 1914−45 (Harmondsworth, 1984), p. 193. This paper will argue that the Holidays with Pay Act was insignificant as compared with the growth of appropriate collective agreements.Google Scholar

3 Stevenson, J. and Cook, Ch., The Slump: Society and Politics during the Depression (London, 1977), pp. 25–26.Google Scholar For the growth of leisure, see Jones, S. G., “The Leisure Industry in Britain, 1918–1939”, in: The Service Industries Journal, V (1985);Google Scholar Ibid.

4 Pimlott, J. A. R., The Englishman's Holiday: A Social History (London, 1947), pp. 211–37;Google Scholar Cameron, G. C., “The Growth of Holidays with Pay in Britain”, in: Fringe Benefits, Labour Costs and Social Security, ed. by Reid, G. L. and Robertson, D. J. (London, 1965);Google Scholar Martin, G. C., “Some Aspects of the Provision of Annual Holidays for the English Working Classes down to 1947” (M.A., Leicester University, 1968), pp. 61–67, 83–89.Google Scholar

5 Pimlott, , The Englishman's Holiday, p. 154.Google Scholar

6 Royal Commission on Labour: Minutes of Evidence, Group C, III (1893). q. 26710.

7 Brown, E. H. Ph., The Growth of British Industrial Relations: A Study from the standpoint of 1906−14 (London, 1959), pp. 77–78;Google Scholar Pimlott, , The Englishman's Holiday, pp. 155–56.Google Scholar

8 Royal Commission on Labour: Minutes of Evidence, Group A, III (1893), q. 23769.

9 Ibid., q. 23930.

10 Civil War Workers' Committee, Third Interim Report: Holidays for Munition Workers After the War (1918), pp. 12–15.Google Scholar

11 Johnson, P. B., Land Fit For Heroes: The Planning of British Reconstruction 1916–1919 (Chicago, 1968), pp. 187, 215.Google Scholar

12 Ministry of Labour, Industrial Reports, No 4 (Revised): “Industrial Councils” (London, 1920), p. 22.Google Scholar

13 Charles, R., The Development of Industrial Relations in Britain 1911–1939 (London, 1973), pp. 166, 171, 176.Google Scholar

14 Cabinet Papers 24/74 (GT 6712), Public Record Office, London.

15 Gazette, Labour, 08 1920, p. 421.Google Scholar

16 Aldcroft, , The Inter-War Economy, op. cit., pp. 36–37Google Scholar.

17 Bundock, C. J., The Story of the National Union of Printing, Bookbinding and Paper Workers (Oxford, 1959), p. 418.Google Scholar

18 Report on the Establishment and Progress of Joint Industrial Councils 1917–1922 (London, 1925), p. 96.Google Scholar Seymour, Cf. J. B., The Whitley Councils Scheme (London, 1932), p. 59.Google Scholar

19 Ministry of Labour Gazette, 12 1922, pp. 474–75.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., March 1925, August 1929, July 1932, July 1934, April 1936.

21 Report of the Committee on Holidays with Pay (1938), p. 54.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., p. 60.

23 Ibid., pp. 61–63. For further details, see Ministry of Labour Papers 31/1–4, Public Record Office.

24 Hansard (Commons), Fifth Series, CCCXXXVI, cc. 2204−05, 2 06 1938.Google Scholar

25 Ibid.

26 Holidays with Pay Memorandum, 23 April 1937, Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry (hereafter MRC), Mss 126/EB/HP/1/27.

27 Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Committee on Holidays with Pay (1937–1938), p. 2; Ministry of Labour Gazette, 03 1938, p. 86.Google Scholar

28 Report of the Committee on Holidays with Pay, p. 21.Google Scholar

29 Mowat, , Britain Between the Wars, op. cit., p. 501. See also Ministry of Labour, Holidays with Pay: Collective Agreements Between Organisations of Employers and Workpeople (London, 1939).Google Scholar

30 International Labour Review, LI (1945), p. 741.Google Scholar

31 Walton, J. K., “Holidays and the Discipline of Industrial Labour: A Historian's View”, in: Leisure and Urban Society, ed. by Smith, M. A. (Salford, 1978);Google Scholar id., “The Demand for Working-Class Seaside Holidays in Victorian England”, in: Economic History Review, Second Series, XXXIV (1981);Google Scholar id.

32 Brunner, E., Holiday Making and the Holiday Trades (Oxford, 1945), p. 3.Google Scholar

33 The Economist, 4 06 1938, p. 528.Google Scholar

34 Chronicle, Oldham, 30 08 1929, 25 08 1939.Google Scholar

35 Cotton Factory Times, 12 08 1932.Google Scholar

36 Tebbutt, M., Making Ends Meet: Pawnbroking and Working-Class Credit (Leicester,1983), p. 32;Google Scholar Humphries, S., Hooligans or Rebels? An Oral History of Working-Class Childhood and Youth 1889–1939 (Oxford, 1981), p. 166.Google Scholar

37 See Daily Herald, 27 07 1920.Google Scholar

38 Lansbury's Labour Weekly, 17 04 1926, 11 06 and 9 07 1927.Google Scholar

39 The London Citizen, 08 1926, p. 2.Google Scholar

40 The Workers' Union Record, 05 1926, p. 15; The Amalgamated Engineers' Monthly Journal and Report, 11 1919, p. 58.Google Scholar

41 See generally Mensch, J., “The Urban Workers' Need For Holidays”, in: The Labour Magazine, 03 1932, pp. 502-3.Google Scholar

42 Minutes of Evidence, op. cit., p. 309.Google Scholar For the development of holidays with pay on the Continent, see Jones, S. G., “Work, Leisure and Unemployment in Western Europe between the Wars”, in: British Journal of Sports History (forthcoming, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Id., “The Trade Union Movement and Work-Sharing Policies in Interwar Btain”, in: Industrial Relations Journal, XVI (1985).Google Scholar

44 For further elaboration, see Minutes of Evidence, passim.

45 Unity, 02 1928, p. 137.Google Scholar Seebohm Rowntree refused to give evidence to the Committee on holidays with pay, as he thought the case needed no bolstering: “I should have thought it was pretty generally accepted that a holiday of some kind is desirable, and that if a holiday is given it must be with pay.” Quoted in Briggs, A., Social Thought and Social Action: A Study of the Work of Seebohm Rowntree 1871–1954 (London, 1961), p. 299.Google Scholar

46 Quoted in Williams, J. E., The Derbyshire Miners (London, 1962), p. 788.Google Scholar

47 Minutes of Evidence, p. 310.Google Scholar

48 Ibid., p. 129; Cotton Spinners' and Manufacturers' Association Minute Books, 1937−40, passim, Greater Manchester County Record Office, Manchester.

49 Minutes of Evidence, pp. 180–81; The National Builder. 12 1936, pp. 163–64; 04 1937, p. 298; 11 1937, pp. 110–12.Google Scholar

50 Minutes of the Lancashire and Cheshire Joint Committee and Joint Wages Board in the Mining Industry, 16 November 1936, Working Class Movement Library, Manchester; Minutes of Evidence, pp. 285−86.

51 Lochhead, R. V., 24 02 1937;Google Scholar Worker, Daily, 2 03.Google Scholar

52 Report of the Committee on Holidays with Pay, pp. 28–33.

53 Bagwell, Ph. S., The Railwaymen: The History of the National Union of Railwaymen (London, 1963), p. 180;Google Scholar Musson, A. E., The Typographical Association: Origins and History up to 1949 (London, 1954), p. 191.Google Scholar

54 TUC, Annual Report, 1911, pp. 235–36.Google Scholar

55 TUC Parliamentary Committee, Quarterly Report, 03 1912, pp. 20–22, 27.Google Scholar

56 Clinton, A., The Trade Union Rank and File; Trades Councils in Britain, 1900−40 (Manchester, 1977), p. 102; General Federation of Trade Unions, Annual Report, 1919, p. 33.Google Scholar

57 Typographical Association, Quinquennial Delegate Report, 06 1918, pp. 78–81; The Typographical Circular, 04 1919, p. 7.Google Scholar

58 Temple, H. S., “Trade Unionism in the Printing Industry”, in: Cole, G. D. H. et al., British Trade Unionism To-Day (London, 1939), p. 373. See also The Typographical Circular, 07 1930, p. 146.Google Scholar

59 National Union of Railwaymen, Decisions of the Special Conference on “After War”Google Scholar Matters, , 11 1917, MRC Mss 127/NU/4; The Workers' Union Record, 12 1919, p. 7; Miners' Federation of Great Britain, Annual Conference Report, 1920, p. 120; The Railway Gazette, 6 02 1920; Cotton Factory Times, 27 August.Google Scholar

60 TUC Parliamentary Committee, 29th Quarterly Report, 03 1918, p. 11; TUC, Annual Report, 1919, pp. 375–76; Scottish TUC, Annual Report, 1919, pp. 104–05;Google Scholar Bagwell, , The Railwaymen, op. cit., p. 379;, 408–09.Google Scholar

61 File on holidays with pay, MRC Mss 70/3/15/3–2.

62 Herald, Daily, 26 05 1923.Google Scholar

63 Memorandum dated 19 03 1924, MRC Mss 70/3/15/14. See also National Union of Distributive and Allied Workers, Annual Report, 1923, p. 7; 1924, p. 7; The New Dawn, 1923–1924, passim.Google Scholar

64 The New Dawn, 12 April 1924.

65 Hallsworth, J. to Mr Parlett, 18 02, MRC Mss 70/3/15/17.Google Scholar See also id., Protective Legislation for Shop and Office Employees (London, 1935), pp. 212–15.Google Scholar

66 NFBTO Circular Letter, 20 12 1923, Circular Letters, Vol. 2(1923), p. 251,Google Scholar Cf. NFBTO Emergency Committee Minutes, 15 and 16 01 1924, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology Library.Google Scholar

67 Times, , 11 07 1924; AEU, National Committee Report, 05 1924, pp. 78–79.Google Scholar

68 Annual Holidays with Pay (Joint Research and Information Department of the Labour Party and the TUC, May 1924), MRC Mss 70/3/15/63.

69 TUC, Annual Report, 1925, p. 529.Google Scholar

70 Epitome of the Proceedings of the Workmen's Special Committee of the Manchester City Council, 28 May and 24 December 1925; Manchester Labour Party, 22nd Annual Report, 1925, pp. 21–22.

71 Manchester City News, 9 01 1926; Sunday Worker, 14 March; Minutes and Record of the Meeting of the General Executive Council of the TGWU, 22 June, MRC Mss 1261TG/1/1/4.Google Scholar

72 Herald, Daily, 19 03 1924.Google Scholar

73 Holidays-with-pay file, MRC Mss 70/3/15/179−84.

74 Interestingly, even the Coal Commission was in support. See Report of the Royal Commission on the Coal Industry (1926), p. 235.Google Scholar

75 The Worker, 27 February 1926.

76 Minutes and Record of the General Executive Council of the TGWU, 27 05 1927, MRC Mss 126/TG/l/l/5.Google Scholar

77 The Workers' Union Record, 11 1927, pp. 16–17. See also Minutes of a joint meeting of the TUC General Council and Labour Party Executive, 27 03 1929, TUC Archives, London.Google Scholar

78 Industrial News, 19 11 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

79 TUC, Annual Report, 1930, pp. 410–11; Scottish TUC, Annual Report, 1930, p. 171; General Federation of Trade Unions, Annual Report, 1930, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar

80 AEU, Monthly Journal, 05 1927, p. 11; November, p. 8.Google Scholar

81 AEU, National Committee Report, 05 1927, pp. 74, 99.Google Scholar

82 AEU, Monthly Journal, April 1928, p. 15; June, p. 11.

83 AEU, National Committee Report. 05 1929, p. 103; AEU, The Engineers' Charter (London, 1932), p. 7.Google Scholar

84 The Mineworker, 13 07 1928.Google Scholar

85 Textile Workers' Minority Movement, The Struggle of the Lancashire Textile Workers (London, 1929), p. 15; The Distributive Worker, 01 1928, p. 1; The Chisel, , 01 1929, p. 2; The Fur Worker, 03 1930, p. 3.Google Scholar

86 The Worker, 13 December 1929; National Union of Railwaymen, Agenda and Decisions of the Special General Meeting, 24 October 1930, MRC Mss 127/NU/4.

87 Conley, A., “Clothing Trade Agreements and Holiday Payments”, in: The London Trade Union Handbook (London, 1930), pp. 35–37.Google Scholar

88 Burton's, Red Leader, 9 09 1932.Google Scholar

89 The Garment Workers' Voice, July 1933, p. 2; Boroughs of Poplar and Stepney and East End Advertiser, 5 August.

90 Burton's Red Leader, 27 September. In demanding holiday pay, militants failed to acknowledge that the Montague Burton, Hudson Road factory had one of the largest holiday-savings clubs in the world. See the Montague Burton Archives, newscuttings books, Leeds Archives Department, Acc. 1951/36, 128.

91 Hansard, (Commons), Fifth Series, CCXXXI, cc. 2421−506, 15 11 1929; CCXL, c. 594, 19 06 1930.Google Scholar

92 National Left Wing Provisional Committee, The Left Wing: Its Programme and Activities (London, n.d. [1927?]), p. 18; Times, 9 January 1928; Labour Party Executive Committee Minutes, 7 February, Labour Party Archives, London.Google Scholar

93 Herald, Daily, 28 08 1929.Google Scholar

94 NFBTO Emergency Committee Minutes, 12 and 13 05 1930; NFBTO, Annual Conference Report, 1930, p. 151.Google Scholar

95 Labour Party Executive Committee Minutes, 28 September 1929; Minutes of a joint meeting of the TUC General Council and Labour Party Executive, 23 October; Report of a Conference of Unions affiliated to the National Co-operative Conciliation Board, 7 October, MRC Mss 703/15/47.

96 See Salford City Labour Party Executive Committee Minutes, 20 12; Salford City Labour Party Delegate Committee Minutes, 8 01 1930, Working Class Movement Library; Minutes of the Salford City Council, 22 January; Salford City Reporter. 24 January.Google Scholar

97 General Federation of Trade Unions, Quarterly Report, 30 June 1933, pp. 8–12; TUC, Annual Report, 1933, pp. 277−79.

98 Times, 15 July 1933; TGWU, Minutes and Record of the Proceedings of the Biennial Delegate Conference, 1933, p. 32; The Record, August 1933, p. 14.

99 The Record, 06 1936, p. 263.Google Scholar

100 AEU, National Committee Report, 1934, p. 106; 1935, pp. 13–14; 1936, p. 155; NFBTO, Annual Conference Report, 1934, pp. 95–98; 1935, p. 109; 1936, p. 109; P. B. Long, “The Economic and Social History of the Scottish Coal Industry 1925–1939, With Particular Reference to Industrial Relations” (Ph.D., Strathclyde University, 1978), p. 237.Google Scholar

101 National Amalgamated Union of Life Assurance Workers, holidays-with-pay file, MRC Mss 141/10; The Labour Woman, February 1935, p. 25; Summarised Report of the 5th Annual Conference (1934−5) of Representatives of Unions Catering for Women Workers, 1935, p. 21; National Conference of Labour Women, 1935, p. 11; there are numerous examples of district unions seeking paid holidays, for example, Rochdale Labour News, November 1936, p. 7.

102 See TUC General Council Minutes, 27 February 1935; London Trades Council, 76th Annual Report, 1935, p. 17; [Pugh, A.,] Men of Steel, by One of Them: A Chronicle ot Eighty-Eight Years of Trade Unionism in the British Iron and Steel Industry (London, 1951), p. 509.Google Scholar

103 Hansard, (Commons), Fifth Series, CCCXVIII, c. 759, 27 11 1936.Google Scholar

104 International Labour Office, Holidays with Pay Report (Geneva, 1935).Google Scholar

105 Hansard, (Commons), Fifth Series, CCCXVIII, c. 759.Google Scholar

106 The British employers were represented by Thomas Ashurst (Cotton Spinners' and Manufacturers' Association), William Henry Barritt (Allied Association of Bleachers, Dyers, Printers and Finishers) and John Smith (Shipbuilding Employers' Federation). It must be added, however, that the stance of the British Government was not simply a mere reflection of the opposition waged by the employers. After all, governments act as a broker of all sectional interests, and for political and electoral reasons cannot afford to ignore totally the voice of organised labour. Even so, the Government was broadly sympathetic to the employers and, as suggested, delayed legislative and other initiatives.

107 International Labour Conference Report, 22nd Sitting, 23 06 1936, p. 433.Google Scholar

108 For the debate, see Hansard, (Commons), Fifth Series, CCCXVIII, cc. 725–808, 27 November.Google Scholar

109 TUC General Council Minutes, 23 December.

110 Note of a Deputation from the TUC received by the Prime Minister, 15 February 1937, Prime Minister's Office Papers 1/218. See also Memorandum headed deputation, 15 February, MRC Mss 126/EB/HP/1/3; TUC General Council Minutes, 24 February.

111 Rowson, G., “Holidays with Pay”, in: New Fabian Research Bureau Quarterly, Summer 1937, pp. 26–31. See also Ministry of Labour Papers 10/53/1R/280.Google Scholar

112 Aircraft Shop Stewards' National Council, The Aircraft Workers' Case (London, n.d. [1936?]), p. 15.

113 See The Journal of the Siemens Shop Stewards' Committee, 10 1934, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

114 Ibid., June 1935, p. 4; The Tribune, 2 July 1937.

115 The Journal of the Siemens Shop Stewards' Committee, No 26 (08 1936?), p. 7.Google Scholar

116 Conveyor, , 02 1937, p. 4.Google Scholar

117 It is interesting to note that the MP, Sir George Hume, must have been in a very ambiguous position, as he was also a director of Siemens.

118 The Tribune, , 25 06 1937.Google Scholar

119 In the film Advance Democracy (a co-operative film produced in 1938) the scene about the 1937 May Day clearly shows the paid-holiday banner and contingent.

120 New Propellor, 03 1937, p. 10; 04–05, p. 3.Google Scholar

121 AEU, National Committee Report, 1937, pp. 149–50, 190.Google Scholar

122 New Propellor, 08 1937, p. 2; Wigham, E., The Power to Manage: A History of the Engineering Employers' Federation (London, 1973), pp. 143–44.Google Scholar

123 AEU, Monthly Journal, 06 1937, p. 223.Google Scholar

124 Ibid., August, p. 300; AEU, National Committee Report, 1938. pp. 43–46.

125 For further details of these two strikes, see The Leicester Mercury, 17 August 1935; Leicester Evening Mail, 17 and 20 August; Evening Sentinel (Stoke on Trent), August 1937, passim.

126 The Swindon Advertiser, 5 March 1937. The railway shopmen were awarded one week's leave with pay in August 1937, see The Railway Review, 27 August.

127 Johnson, & Shop, Phillips Stewards' Journal, No 10 (04 1937?), p. 11.Google Scholar

128 Minutes of the Labour Party Campaign Committee, 19 05 1937.Google Scholar

129 Holidays with Pay [Labour Party Leaflet No 54] (1937); Minutes of the Labour Party Publicity, Research and Local Government Committee, 22 07; Minutes of the Labour Party Campaign Committee, 26 07.Google Scholar

130 Labour, 08, p. 279; The Record, 08, p. 5.Google Scholar

131 Labour Party, Annual Conference Report, 1937, pp. 23, 59.Google Scholar

132 Party, Labour, Labour's Immediate Programme (London, 1937), p. 6;Google Scholar Minutes of the First Joint Sessional Meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party and National Executive Committee, 26 October 1937. Significantly, as Elizabeth Durbin's excellent study of the Labour Party's economic thought in the 1930's has shown, party intellectuals like Evan Durbin were “very keen” on a universal statutory period of holiday with pay each year”. Durbin, E., New Jerusalems: The Labour Party and the Economics of Democratic Socialism (London, 1985), p. 247.Google Scholar

133 See National Unity Campaign Committee, The Unity Campaign (London, n.d. [1937]), p. 4; Homer, A., Trade Unions and Unity (London, 1937), p. 6. Minutes of a delegate meeting of the London Trades Council, 11 March and 8 April 1937; Minutes of the South Shields Trades Council, 20 July and 31 August; Bolton and District United Trades Council, Annual Report, 1937, p. 3; Leicester and District Trades Council, Year Book, 1938, p. 10. Trades councils, such as the one at Leigh, also held meetings with the local Labour Party over this issue. Minutes of the Leigh branch of the Bolton Operative Cotton Spinners' Provincial Association, 1 July 1937, Manchester University Library.Google Scholar

134 Bevin, E. to National Officers, Transport House, 13 04 1937, MRC Mss 126/EB/HP/1/13; TUC General Council Minutes, 28 April. The evidence of the TUC was published in two pamphlets, Holidays with Pay: The T.U.C. Policy (London, 1937) and Holidays For All (London, 1938).Google Scholar

135 TUC General Council Minutes, 23 November 1938. For the textile operatives, see Jones, S. G., “The Lancashire Cotton Industry and the Development of Paid Holidays in the Nineteen-Thirties”, in: Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire (forthcoming, 1986).Google Scholar

136 National Amalgamated Furnishing Trades Association, Monthly Report, August 1938, P. 25. See also Herald, Daily, 14 07; Daily Worker, 18 July; Challenge, 21 July.Google Scholar

137 See Fenley, A., “Labour and the Trade Unions”, in: The Labour Party: An Introduction to its History, Structure and Politics, ed. by Cook, Ch. and Taylor, I. (London, 1980), p. 52.Google Scholar

138 See Jones, S. G., “The British Labour Movement and Working Class Leisure, 1918–1939” (Ph.D., Manchester University, 1983), pp. 151–53.Google Scholar

139 Daily Express, 5 and 29 April 1938. For liberal supporters of the campaign, see Welfare Work in Industry, by Members of the Institute of Industrial Welfare, ed. by Kelly, E. T. (London, 1925), p. 114;Google Scholar Conference on Christian Politics, Economics and Citizenship, Leisure (London, 1924), pp. 18, 109.Google Scholar

140 Gloucester Labour News, February 1939, P. 1. One survey undertaken by the Scottish TUC found that 49 out of 59 unions appreciated the importance of the question, Scottish TUC, Annual Report, 1938, p. 60.

141 Shaw, S., “The Attitude of the Trades Union Congress Towards Unemployment in the Inter-War Period” (Ph.D., Kent University, 1979), especially pp. 67–107.Google Scholar

142 Daily Worker, 1 April 1937.

143 Brown, E. H. Ph. and Browne, M. H., A Century of Pay (London, 1968), P. 208.Google Scholar

144 National Union of Foundry Workers, Journal and Report, July 1933, p. 4; The Post, 2 March 1935, p. 190; The Typographical Circular, January 1937, p. 1; National Society of Painters, Monthly Journal. February. pp. 36–37.

145 Jones, , “The British Labour Movement and Working Class Leisure”, op. cit., pp. 382–94.Google Scholar

146 The New Leader, 6 August 1937. See also Herald, Daily, 16 04 1927;Google Scholar Cotton Factory Times, 9 August 1935; Bullock, A., The Life and Times of Ernest Bevin, I: Trade Union Leader 1881–1940 (London, 1960), p. 601.Google Scholar

147 Labour Monthly, September 1937, p. 560.

148 General Federation of Trade Unions, Annual Report, 1937, p. 18; Manchester Guardian, 19 January 1938; R. Coppock, circular letter, December 1942, NFBTO Circular Letters, Vol. 21(1942), p. 177.

149 Minutes and Record of the Proceedings of the Biennial Delegate Conference of the Transport and General Workers' Union, 1937, pp. 41–42; Gloucester Labour News, April 1939, p. 8.

150 Co-operative Union, Annual Congress Report, 1938, p. 39.

151 The Record, June 1937, p. 282; The Journal (Organ of the Post Office Engineering Union), 13 August; National Union of Foundry Workers, Journal and Report, April 1938, p. 5; The Labour Woman, June, p. 84.

152 The Shop Assistant, 19 October 1929, 4 July 1931, 21 May 1932, 21 August 1937, 23 April and 7 May 1938; Wigan and District Weavers, Winders, Reelers and Beamers' Association, Holiday Pay Card, Lancashire Record Office DDX 1123/446.

153 Robertson, A., The Trade Unions (London, 1965), p. 11.Google Scholar