Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:29:44.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irish Politics in Manchester 1890–1914*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Steve Fielding
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article questions the prevalent assumption that prior to 1914 the Irish in Britain were unquestioningly attached to the Liberal party. It suggests that Home Rule forced the Irish into wider political sympathies which embraced both radical Liberalism and Labour. The Irish in Manchester are highlighted and the “progressive” nature of local Nationalism described. It is also denied that the transfer of Irish loyalties to Labour was proof of the emergence of a class politics or of their integration into the unskilled working-class. It is suggested that this was, in fact, evidence of their continued cultural and political distinctiveness.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , December 1988 , pp. 261 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1988

References

1 Manchester Guardian [hereafter MG], 11th 05 1912.Google Scholar

2 For this debate see Clarke, P.F., Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971);CrossRefGoogle ScholarWald, K.D., Crosses on the Ballots (Princeton, 1983);CrossRefGoogle ScholarKeith, Burgess, The Challenge of Labour: Shaping British Society 1850–1930 (Beckenham, 1980);Google ScholarAlun, Howkins, “Edwardian Liberalism and industrial unrest: a class view of the decline of Liberalism”, History Workshop Journal, no 4 (1977).Google Scholar

3 Walker, M.W., “Irish immigrants in Scotland: their priests, politics and parochial life”, Historical Journal, vol. XV, no 4 (1972), p. 663;Google ScholarSheridan, Gilley, “English attitudes to the Irish in England 1789–1900,” in Holmes, C. (ed.), immigrants and Minorities in British Society (London, 1978), pp. 104–106.Google Scholar

4 Hamer, D.A., Liberal Politics in rheAge of Gladstone and Rosebery (Oxford, 1972), p. 153.Google Scholar

5 Hutchison, I.G.C., “Glasgow working-class politics” in Cage, R.A. (ed.), The Working Class in Glasgow, 1750–1914 (Beckenham, 1987), p. 133.Google Scholar

6 As pointed out in Steele, E.D., “The Irish presence in the north of England 1850–1914,” Northern History, vol. XII (1976), p. 241.Google Scholar

7 Moody, T.W., “Michael Davilt and the British labour movement 1882–1906,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, vol. 3 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 See Philip, Snowden's comments in Labour Leader [hereafter LL], 31st 09 1918.Google Scholar

9 For the latest example of this type of study, Alan, O'Day, “The Irish Influence on Parliamentary Elections,” in Roger, Swift and Sheridan, Gilley (eds), The Irish in the Victorian City (Beckenham, 1986).Google Scholar

10 Howard, C.H.D., “The Parnell Manifesto of 21 November 1885 and the Schools Question“, English Historical Review, vol. LXII (1947), p. 49;CrossRefGoogle ScholarIan, Wood, “Irish immigrants and Scottish Radicalism, 1880–1906”, in Ian, MacDougall (ed.), Essays in Scottish Labour History (Edinburgh, 1978), p. 72.Google Scholar

11 Chris, Wrigley, “Labour and the trade unions”, in Brown, K.D. (ed.), The First Labour Party 1906–1914 (Beckenham, 1985), p. 152.Google Scholar

12 Paul, Thompson, Socialists, Liberals and Labour. The Struggle for London, 1885–1914 (London, 1967), pp. 25–27;Google ScholarAlan, O'Day, The English Face of irish Nationalism (Dublin, 1977), pp. 118–125.Google Scholar

13 1851 Census. For further background for the Irish experience in Manchester during this earlier period see Frederick, Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England (London, 1979), pp. 87–88, 93–98, 100;Google ScholarWerly, J.M., “The Irish in Manchester 1832–1849”, Irish Historical Studies, vol. XVIII, no 71 (1973).Google Scholar

14 1901 Census.

15 John, Denvir, The Life Story of an Old Rebel (Dublin, 1910), P. 2.Google Scholar

16 In 1900 there were 1.6 million Irish-born in the U.S. and 1.8 million of their offspring (figure includes the American-born spouses of the Irish-born). Stephan, Thernstrom (ed.), The Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups (Cambridge, Mass, 1980), p. 528, Table 2.Google Scholar

17 John, Denvir, The Irish in Britain from the Earliest Times to the Fall and Death of Parnell (London, 1892), p. 430.Google Scholar

18 “The Irish in Manchester (By One of Them)” (1887), “Manchester” cuttings collection, Local History Department, Manchester Public Library.

19 Figure based upon estimates of parish population contained in the Salford Diocesan Handbook (Manchester, 1900).Google Scholar

20 Irene, Boocock, “Angel Meadow: A Study of a Migrant Community in Victorian Manchester” (B.A. dissertation, Manchester Polytechnic, 1980), p.59; Census of households in St. Michael's (Church of England) parish, c. late nineteenth century, M330/216, Manchester Archives Department, Manchester Public Library; Salford Diocesan Census, 1900, available Bishop's House, Wardley Hall [hereafter Salford Census].Google Scholar

21 Salford Census.

22 Salford Census; Religious creed registers for New Bridge St. workhouse, M4/11/1–31, Archives Department, Manchester Public Library.

23 Manchester Studies Oral History Collection, Manchester Polytechnic [hereafter Manchester Studies], tapes 122(1), 266, 823(1), 1024.

24 Manchester Faces and Places [hereafter MFP], vol. X (1899).

25 Manchester City News [hereafter MCNI], 22nd 04 1899; Manchester Catholic Herald [hereafter MCH], 26th 01, 2nd 02 1906, 22nd 02 1908.Google Scholar

26 Mick, Burke, Ancoats Lad (Swinton, 1985), pp. 4, 43.Google Scholar

27 This conclusion is based upon estimates contained in various local newspapers. Herbert Gladstone considered these divisions to be “dominated” by the Irish, cited in Clarke, Lancashire and the New Liberalism, Appendix C.

28 MCH, 7th 05 1910.Google Scholar

29 MG, 18th, 23rd 03; MCH, 30th 03, 20th 04, 11th 05 1906.Google Scholar

30 For the way Manchester's Conservatives used the pub for their own purposes, Geoffrey, Seuss Law, “Manchester's Politics, 1885–1906” (Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, 1975), pp. 210–211 [hereafter “Manchester's Politics”].Google Scholar

31 MCH, 26th 07, 12th 08 1892. The National League was a precursor of the UIL.Google Scholar

32 MCH, 9th 11 1907.Google Scholar

33 Arthur, G. Symonds, “Unfashionable Manchester”, East Lancashire Review, vol. 3, no XVIII (1899).Google Scholar

34 MG, 9th 11 1890.Google Scholar

35 MG, 17th 03 1913.Google Scholar

36 At least according to the Chairman of the INL's O'Connell branch, Ancoats, , MG, 9th 04 1892.Google Scholar

37 Lyons, F.S.L., “The revolutionary generation”, in Lyons, Culture and Anarchy in Ireland, 1890–1939 (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar

38 MCH, 26th 02 1904.Google Scholar

39 MG, 18th 03 1898.Google Scholar

40 MG, 20th 03 1900.Google Scholar

41 MG, 2nd 02 1892.Google Scholar

42 MG, 9th 07 1894, 19th 03 1895, 17th 03 1911 02 1913.Google Scholar

43 MG, 20th 03 1900.Google Scholar

44 MG, 7th 06 1897.Google Scholar

45 For the example of 1903, a very bleak year indeed for the prospects of Home Rule, see MG, 18th 03 1903.Google Scholar

46 For example see MG, 19th 03 1895, 20th 03 1899, 18th 03 1904.Google Scholar

47 For the description of such a rally, Daily Dispatch, 18th 03 1901.Google Scholar

48 MG, 18th 03 1890, 20th 03 1899, 18th 03 1901 and 19th 03 1906;Google ScholarSheehy-Skeffington, F., Michael Davitt: Revolutionary Agitator and Labour Leader (London, 1908), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

49 Denvir, , Life Story of an Old Rebel, p. 253.Google Scholar

50 MCH, 13th 06 1908.Google Scholar

51 MCH, 5th, 12th 03 1910.Google Scholar

52 MCH, 1st 11 1910.Google Scholar

53 MCH, 28th 09 1905.Google Scholar

54 This point was made by the Preston Catholic Herald during a by-election in 1903. Cited in Bealy, F., Peffing, H., Labour and Politics, 1900–1906 (London, 1958), P. 149.Google Scholar

55 MCH, 7th 09 1907.Google Scholar On Wheatly see David, Howell, A Lost Left. Three Studies in Socialism and Nationalism (Manchester, 1986), pp. 229–280.Google Scholar

56 MG, 18th 02 1895.Google Scholar

57 MG, 28th 06 1892.Google Scholar

58 Salford City Reporter, 18th 02 1955.Google Scholar

59 MG, 1st 11 1906.Google Scholar

60 MCH, 25th 01 1908; MG, 7th 09 1909.Google Scholar

61 For the details of this arrangement see MG, 24th 10 1890, 21st 10 1891, 8th 12 1910; MCN, 28th 10 1905.Google Scholar

62 MG, 31st 10 1894.Google Scholar

63 Denvir, , Irish in Britain, pp. 376–378.Google Scholar

64 MG, 9th 03 1891.Google Scholar

65 MG, 18th 03 1891.Google Scholar

66 Denvir, , Irish in Britain, p. 381.Google Scholar

67 Manchester Courier, 19th 03 1894; MG, 25th 03 1893, 20th 03 1899.Google Scholar

68 MG, 28th 01 1890, 1st 09 1891.Google Scholar

69 MG, 13th 10 1909.Google Scholar

70 Joan, Smith, “Labour tradition in Glasgow and Liverpool”, History Workshop Journal, no 17 (1984), p. 46.Google Scholar

71 MG, 8th 02 1897.Google Scholar

72 MG, 17th 02 1897.Google Scholar

73 MG, 17th 05 1899.Google Scholar

74 Mary, McCarthy, Generation in Revolt (London, 1953), PP. 4, 13, 22–26.Google Scholar

75 MG, 14th, 15th 10 1891.Google Scholar

76 North-west Manchester Liberal Association minutes, 13th May 1912 and attached letter from Kemp explaining his conduct, M283/411/1, Archives Department, Manchester Public Library.

77 MG, 23rd 10 1907.Google Scholar

78 Thomas Freeman Kelly thought it was the only difference separating Irish and English Liberals, MG, 31st 01 1891.Google Scholar

79 MG 9th 10 1897.Google Scholar

80 When McCabe was elected Mayor in 1913 an Irish tramguard excitedly telegraphed the news to his wife on holiday in Ireland, Manchester Studies, tape 794.

81 This account is based upon MFP, vol. VIII (1897); Manchester Evening Chronicle [hereafter MEC], 12th 11 1906; MCN, 22nd 08 1925;Google ScholarStevenson, M. and Lees, S. (eds), Who's Who of British Members Of Parliament, vol. II (London, 1978).Google Scholar

82 This account is based upon MFP, vol. VIII (1987); MEC, 28th 01 1907; MCN, 13th 01 1912; Catholic Federationist, 11 1913; Harvest, 03 1895, 11 1919, 05 1922;Google ScholarPatrick', St.Silver Jublilee Souvenir (Manchester, 1961).Google Scholar

83 Philip, Whitaker, “The Growth of Liberal Organisation in Manchester From the 1860s to 1903” (Ph.D., University of Manchester, 1956), p. 221.Google Scholar

84 MG, 27th 10 1893, 21st and 25th 10 1895.Google Scholar

85 MCN, 22nd 10 1904.Google Scholar

86 MG, 19th 10 1895.Google Scholar

87 MG, 21st 10 1897.Google Scholar

88 Leslie, Bather, “A History of Manchester and Salford Trades Council” (Ph.D., University of Manchester, 1956), p. 167.Google Scholar

89 Law, , “Manchester's Politics”, p. 67.Google Scholar

90 Edward, M. Levine, The Irish and Irish Politicians (Notre Dame, 1966), pp. 112–113;Google ScholarDennis, Clark, The Irish in Philadelphia (Philadelphia, 1973), pp. 136–42.Google Scholar

91 MG, 25th 10 1895.Google Scholar

92 MG, 25th 10 1907.Google Scholar

93 MG, 25th 12 1917.Google Scholar

94 MG, 25th 03 1906; letter dated 27th 07 1906, LAB/101/CLS/L96/1906, Public Record Office.Google Scholar

95 MG, 1st 11 1906.Google Scholar

96 MG, 19th 10 1900.Google Scholar

97 MG, 1st 11 1906.Google Scholar

98 MG, 24th 10 1896;Google ScholarRowe, H.C., The Boggart Hole Contest (Manchester, 1896);Google ScholarFred, Reid, “Keir Hardie and the ‘Labour Leader’, 1893–1903”, in Jay, Winter (ed.), The Working Class in Modern British History (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 24–28.Google Scholar

99 Clarion, 30th 06 1894.Google Scholar

100 MG, 11th 07 1895. My emphasis.Google Scholar

101 In 1898 there were only a reported 500 members in the District ILP, ILP News, 12 1898.Google Scholar

102 LL, 20th 07 1894.Google Scholar

103 Clarion, 31st 03, 21st 04 1894.Google Scholar

104 Joe, Toole, Fighting Through Life (London, 1935), p. 100.Google Scholar

105 Justice, 30th 08 1902;Google ScholarDesmond Greaves, C., The Life and Times of James Connolly (London, 1961), pp. 107–108.Google Scholar

106 Jeffry, Hill, “Manchester and Salford politics and the early development of the Independent Labour Party”, International Review of Social History, vol. XXVI (1981), pp. 191–196;Google ScholarReid, N., “The Manchester and Salford ILP”, North West Labour History Bulletin, no 5 (1978–1979).Google Scholar

107 The formation of the LRC in London also marked an improvement in London. Benjamin, H.W., “The London Irish: A Study in Political Activism, 1870–1910” (Ph.D., University of Princeton, 1976), pp. 323–326.Google Scholar

108 MCH, 5th 01 1906.Google Scholar

109 MG, 2nd, 3rd 01 1906.Google Scholar

110 MG, 19th 03 1906.Google Scholar

111 MG 25th 11 1910;Google ScholarNeal, Blewett, The Peers, the Parties and the People (London, 1972), pp. 90–91.Google Scholar

112 MG, 8th 01 1910.Google Scholar

113 MG, 25th 10 1909.Google Scholar

114 Heyk, T.W., “Home Rule, Radicalism and the Liberal party, 1885–1895,” Journal of British Studies, vol. XIII (1974), pp. 68–69.Google Scholar

115 David, Howell, British Workers and the ILP, 1888–1906 (Manchester, 1983), p. 210.Google Scholar

116 MG, 24th 11 1910. My emphasis.Google Scholar

117 MG, 23rd 11 1910.Google Scholar

118 MG, 19th 08 1900, 2nd, 9th 01 1906; LL, 23rd 11 1910.Google Scholar

119 Clarke, P.F., “The Progressive movement in England,” Royal Historical Society Transacdons, 5th series, vol. 24 (1974), pp. 175–177.Google Scholar

120 MG, 31st 10 1903, 1st 10 1904, 1st 10 1910, 31st 10 1912.Google Scholar

121 MG, 10th 01 1910.Google Scholar

122 MG, 5th, 6th 01 1910.Google Scholar

123 MG, 24th, 25th, 28th, 30th 12 1910.Google Scholar

124 MG, 23rd November; Blewett, , Peers, p. 351.Google Scholar

125 Blewett, , Peers, p. 324.Google Scholar

126 Blewett, , Peers, p. 352.Google Scholar

127 lain, MacLean, The Legend of the Red Clydeside (Edinburgh, 1983), pp. 193–194.Google Scholar

128 For more detailed background see Blewett, , Peers, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar

129 MCH, 15th 01 1910. My emphasis.Google Scholar

130 MG, 14th 01 1910; LL, 21st 01 1910.Google Scholar

131 For Edinburgh see Bernard Aspinall and John F. McCaffrey, “A comparative view of the Irish in Edinburgh in the nineteenth century”, in Swift, and Gilley, , Victorian City, p. 146;Google Scholar for Glasgow see MacLean, , Clydeside, pp. 193–194, 200.Google Scholar

132 Dan, McDermott, “Labour and Ireland” in Brown, , The First Labour Party, pp. 260, 265.Google Scholar

133 Whilst North Manchester remained the possession of a radical Liberal, North-east went Labour in 1906 and thereafter, East went to Labour in January 1910 and South-west was held by Labour in 1906 only.

134 Manchester Liberal Federation, General Committee, minutes 7th July 1911, 6th June 1913, M283/1/4/1, Archives Department, Manchester Public Library.

135 MCH, 10th 12 1910.Google Scholar

136 Father Sheehey UIL branch supported Labour in St. George's ward, Hulme, . MCH, 29th 08 1910.Google Scholar

137 This is David Howell's general interpretation of the transition from Liberalism to Labour, , “Was the Labour party inevitable?”, North West Labour Hfrtory Society Bulletin, no 10 (1984–1985).Google Scholar

138 LL, 2nd 12 1910.Google Scholar

139 Evening Chronicle, 20th 12 1946.Google Scholar

140 Manchester Studies, tape 87.

141 On the general effect of “trauma” on post-war political allegiances, Wald, , Crosses on the Ballots, pp. 252–254.Google Scholar

142 Gareth, Stedman Jones, Outcast London (London, 1984), pp. 341–344;Google ScholarRobert, Roberts, Classic Slum (London, 1983), PP. 30–31, 167–168;Google ScholarJerry, White, The Worst Street in North London (London, 1986), pp. 105–112.Google Scholar

143 MG, 3rd 12 1923.Google Scholar

144 Ramsay MacDonald, J., The Socialist Movement (London, 1912), p. 93.Google Scholar

145 LL, 21st 01 1910.Google Scholar

146 Neil, Richardson, The Old Pubs of Ancoats (Swinton, 1987), p. 3.Google Scholar

147 Tom Regan, “Labour members of Manchester City Council, 1894–1965”, BRF/352/04273/ RE1, Archives Department, Manchester Public Library. This was also the case in Glasgow, , MacLean, , Clydeside, pp. 183–184.Google Scholar

148 This was similar to the voting pattern found in Liverpool. Davies, R.S.W., “The Liverpool Labour Party and the Liverpool working-class,” North West Labour History Society Bulletin, no 6 (1979–1980).Google Scholar