No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2008
The 1820's constituted a watershed in United States life. By the end of that decade, about ten years after the last of the English Luddite risings had been suppressed, industrialism secured its decisive American victory; by the end of the 1830's all of its cardinal features were definitively present. The many overt threats to the coherence of emerging industrial capitalism, the ensemble of forms of resistance to its hegemony, were blunted at this time and forced into the current of that participation so vital to modern domination. In terms of technology, work, politics, sexuality, culture, and the whole fabric of ordinary life, the struggles of an earlier, relative autonomy, which threatened both old and new forms of authority, fell short, and a dialectic of domestication, so familiar to us today, broke through. The reactions engendered in the face of the new dynamic in this epoch of its arrival seem, by the way, to offer some implicit parallels to present trends as technological civilization likely enters its terminal crisis: the answers of progress, now anything but new or promising, encounter a renewed legitimation challenge that can be informed, even inspired, by understanding the past.
1 Samuel, Rezneck, Business Depressions and Financial Panics (New York, 1968), p. 24.Google Scholar
2 Merle, Curti, The Social Ideas of American Educators (New York, 1935), p. 98.Google Scholar
3 David, A. Hounshell, From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932 (Baltimore, 1984), pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
4 Thomas, C. Cochran, Frontiers of Change: Early Industrialism in America (New York, 1981), p. 53.Google Scholar
5 Rezneck, , Business Depressions, op. cit., p. 38.Google Scholar
6 Hounshell, , From the American System to Mass Production, op. cit.. p. 43.Google Scholar
7 Cochran, , Frontiers of Change, op. cit., p. 74.Google Scholar
8 Norman, Ware, The Industrial Worker, 1840–1860 (New York, 1964), p. x.Google Scholar
9 Victor, S. Clark, History of Manufactures in the United States, 1607–1860 (Washington, D.C., 1916), p. 264.Google Scholar
10 Edward, Everett, “Fourth of July at Lowell (1830)”, in: The Philosophy of Manufactures: Early Debates over Industrialization in the United States, ed. by Michael, B. Folsom and Steve, D. Lubar (Cambridge, Mass., 1982), p. 292.Google Scholar
11 Marvin, Fisher, Workshops in the Wilderness: The European Response to American Industrialization, 1830–1860 (New York, 1967), p. 38.Google Scholar
12 Thomas, C. Cochran, Business in American Life: A History (New York, 1972), p. 38.Google Scholar
13 For example, Brooke, Hindle, “The Exhilaration of Early American Technology: An Essay”, in Technology in Early America (Chapel Hill, 1966), p. 3.Google Scholar
14 Merritt, Roe Smith, Harpers Ferry Armory and the New Technology (Ithaca, 1977).Google Scholar
15 Ibid., p. 2.
16 Page, Smith, The Nation Comes of Age (New York, 1981), p. 795.Google Scholar
17 Philip, Taft and Philip, Ross, “American Labor Violence: Its Causes, Character, and Outcome”, in: The History of Violence in America, ed. by Hugh, Davis Graham and Ted, Robert Gurr (New York, 1969), p. 281.Google Scholar
18 William, Faux, “Memorable Days in America”, in: Early Western Travels, 1748–1846, ed. by Reuben, Gold Thwaites, XI (Cleveland, 1905), p. 141.Google Scholar
19 ibid., pp. 227, 215 (November 6 and 3, 1819).
20 Jane, Louise Mesick, The English Traveller in America, 1785–1835 (New York, 1922), p. 306.Google Scholar
21 ibid., p. 152.
22 Bruce, Laurie, Working People of Philadelphia, 1800–1850 (Philadelphia, 1980), p. 33.Google Scholar
23 Daniel, J. Boorstin, The Americans: The National Experience (New York, 1965), p. 26.Google Scholar
24 Carl, Russell Fish, The Rise of the Common Man (New York, 1927), p. 91.Google Scholar
25 Clark, , History of Manufactures, op. cit., p. 401.Google Scholar
26 For example, Robert, S. Woodbury, “The ‘American System’ of Manufacture”, in: Technology and Social Change in America, ed. by Edwin, T. Layton Jr, (New York, 1973), p. 54.Google Scholar
27 Cochran, , Frontiers of Change, p. 135.Google Scholar
28 Habakkuk, H. J., American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century: The Search for Labour-Saving Inventions (Cambridge, 1962), p. 128.Google Scholar
29 “The business proprietor's desire to substitute machinery was in large part dictated by the impatience of the knowledgeable artisan with working for somebody else. A lathe or drilling machine stayed put while a fine gunsmith might not.” Cochran, , Frontiers of Change, p. 55.Google Scholar
30 Hugo, A. Meier, “The Ideology of Technology”, in: Technology and Social Change, op. cit., p. 94.Google Scholar
31 Foster, Rhea Dulles, Labor in America (New York, 1949), p. 32;Google ScholarPhilip, S. Foner, History of the Labor Movement in the United States, I (New York, 1947), p. 101.Google Scholar
32 Foner, , History of the Labor Movement, I, p. 108;Google ScholarThomas, C. Cochran and Wm., Miller, The Age of Enterprise (New York, 1961), p. 26.Google Scholar
33 Gary, Kulik, “Pawtucket Village and the Strike of 1824: The Origins of Class Conflict in Rhode Island”, in: Radical History Review, No 17 (1978), p. 24.Google Scholar
34 Jonathan, Prude, “The Social System of Early New England Textile Mills: A Case Study, 1812−40”, in: Working-Class America: Essays on Labor, Community, and American Society, ed. by Michael, H. Frisch and Daniel, J. Walkowitz (Urbana, Ill., 1983), p. 15.Google Scholar
35 Philip, Scranton, Proprietary Capitalism: The Textile Manufacture at Philadelphia, 1800–1885 (Cambridge, 1983), p. 79.Google Scholar
36 Meier, , “The Ideology of Technology”, loc. cit., p. 88.Google Scholar
37 Edward, Pessen, Jacksonian America (Homewood, Ill., 1969), p. 119.Google Scholar
38 Dulles, , Labor in America, op. cit., p. 29.Google Scholar
39 This primary government armory was authorized by Congress in 1798 and conveniently situated on land belonging to George Washington's Potomac Company. “For more than a generation it was impossible to impose proper industrial discipline on workers from the surrounding area.” Cochran, , Frontiers of Change, p. 74.Google Scholar
40 Smith, , Harpers Ferry Armory, op. cit., p. 256.Google Scholar
41 Herbert, G. Gutman, Work, Culture, and Society in Industrializing America (New York, 1976), p. 58.Google Scholar
42 Smith, , The Nation Comes of Age, op. cit., p. 273.Google Scholar
43 Michael, Feldberg, “The Crowd in Philadelphia History”, in: Riot, Rout, and Tumult, ed. by Roger, Lane and John, J. Turner Jr (Westwood, Conn., 1978), pp. 136–37.Google Scholar
44 Jonathan, Prude, The Coming of Industrial Order: Town and Factory Life in Rural Massachusetts, 1810–1860 (Cambridge, 1983), p. 225.Google Scholar
45 Gary, B. Nash, “The Failure of Female Factory Labor in Colonial Boston”, in: Labor History, XX (1979).Google Scholar
46 Alexis, de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (2 vols; New York, 1966), II, p. 529.Google Scholar
47 Walton, Felch, “The Manufacturer's Pocket-Piece”, in: The New England Mill Village, 1790–1860, ed. by Gary, Kulik et al. (Cambridge, Mass., 1982), p. 326.Google Scholar
48 Quoted in Introduction, ibid., pp. xxix–xxx.
49 Harriet, Martineau, Society in America (New York, 1966), II, pp. 354–55.Google Scholar
50 Merritt, Roe Smith, “Eli Whitney and the American System of Manufacturing”, in: Technology in America, ed. by Carroll, W. Pursell Jr (Cambridge, Mass., 1980), pp. 51–53.Google Scholar
51 Andrew Ure, English ideologue of early industrial capitalism, summed up the control intentionality behind the new technology by typifying the factory as “a creation destined to restore order”, while declaring that “when capital enlists science into her service, the refractory hand of labour will always be taught docility”. Andrew, Ure, The Philosophy of Manufactures (London, 1835), pp. 367–68.Google Scholar
52 The Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, I (Boston, 1904), p. 455.Google Scholar
53 “Factory Work”, in: The Simone Weil Reader (New York, 1977), pp. 66.Google Scholar
54 Cochran, , Frontiers of Change, p. 136.Google Scholar
55 George, S. White, Memoir of Samuel Slater, the Father of American Manufactures [1836] (New York, 1967), p. 122.Google Scholar
56 ibid., p. 117, also in The New England Mill Village, op. cit., p. 351.
57 Rex, Burns, Success in America: The Yeoman Dream and the Industrial Revolution (Amherst, 1976), p. 91.Google Scholar Also, William, A. Sullivan, The Industrial Worker in Pennsylvania 1800–1840 (Harrisburg, 1955), p. 50: “that overpowering sense of degradation which was beginning to be felt [by the 'thirties] by large masses of these working people”.Google Scholar
58 From The National Laborer, April 23, 1836.
59 Arthur, H. Calhoun, A Social History of the Family, II (Cleveland, 1918), p. 179;Google ScholarJean, V. Matthew, Rufus Choate (Philadelphia, 1980), p. 74.Google Scholar
60 Habakkuk, , American and British Technology, op. cit., pp. 54–55;Google ScholarCarolyn, Ware, The Early New England Cotton Manufacture (Boston, 1931), p. 8;Google ScholarBarbara, M. Tucker, “The Merchant, the Manufacturer, and the Factory Manager: The Case of Samuel Slater”, in: Business History Review, LV (1981), pp. 310–11;Google ScholarJohn, F. Kasson, Civilizing the Machine (New York, 1976), p. 102.Google Scholar
61 Quoted in Peter, N. Carroll and David, W. Noble, The Free and the Unfree (New York, 1977), p. 153.Google Scholar
62 The New England Mill Village, p. 463.
63 Smith, , Harpers Ferry Armory, pp. 65, 271.Google Scholar
64 The New England Mill Village, p. 265.
65 Leo, Marx, The Machine in the Garden (New York, 1964), p. 248.Google Scholar
66 Smith, , The Nation Comes of Age, p. 821.Google Scholar See Tamara, K. Hareven, Family Time and Industrial Time (Cambridge, 1982),Google Scholar for a New England case-study of the “timing” of all aspects of life in the new framework. Paralleling the heightened time-consciousness was “a pre-occupation with punctuality, measurement, and calculation”, according to an English traveller of the early 'thirties, Thomas, Hamilton. Patricia Cline Cohen, A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America (Chicago, 1982), p. 175.Google Scholar
67 Clark, , History of Manufactures, p. 540.Google Scholar
68 Prude, , The Coming of Industrial Order, op. cit., p. 47.Google Scholar
69 Cochran, and Miller, , The Age of Enterprise, op. cit., p. 19.Google Scholar
70 Quoted by Steve, Dunwell, The Run of the Mill (Boston, 1978), p. 15.Google Scholar
71 Quoted by Rowland, Berthoff, An Unsettled People: Social Order and Disorder in American History (New York, 1971), p. 167.Google Scholar
72 James, Michael Cudd, The Chicopee Manufacturing Company, 1823–1915 (Wilmington, 1974), p. 10.Google Scholar
73 Prude, , The Coming of Industrial Order, p. 138.Google Scholar
74 Alex, Inkeles and David, H. Smith, Becoming Modern (Cambridge, Mass., 1974).Google Scholar
75 Cochran, , Frontiers of Change, p. 77.Google Scholar
76 Fisher, , Workshops in the Wilderness, op. cit., p. 33.Google Scholar
77 Cochran, , Frontiers of Change, p. 123.Google Scholar
78 Peter, Dobkin Hall, the Organization of American Culture, 1700–1900 (New York, 1982), p. 89.Google Scholar
79 Smith, , The Nation Comes of Age, p. 114.Google Scholar
80 David, Grimsted, “Rioting in Its Jacksonian Setting”, in: American Historical Review, LXXVII (1972), p. 370.Google Scholar
81 ibid., pp. 372–74.
82 Paula, , “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society, 1780–1920”, in: American Historical Review, LXXXIX (1984), pp. 625–26;Google ScholarSmith, , The Nation Comes of Age, p. 13.Google Scholar
83 Gary, Lawson Browne, Baltimore in the Nation, 1789–1861 (Chapel Hill, 1980), p. 97.Google Scholar
84 John, Mayfield, The New Nation, 1800–1845 (New York, 1982), p. 99.Google Scholar
85 Quoted by Pessen, , Jacksonian America, op. cit., p. 50.Google Scholar
86 Curti, , The Social Ideas of American Educators, op. cit., p. 51.Google Scholar
87 Marvin, Meyers, The Jacksonian Persuasion (Stanford, 1957), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
88 Sydney, Nathans, Daniel Webster and Jacksonian Democracy (Baltimore, 1973), p. 48.Google Scholar
89 Peter, Temin, The Jacksonian Economy (New York, 1969), p. 18.Google Scholar
90 Charles, D. Lowery, James, Barbour, a Jeffersonian Republican (University, Alabama, 1984), pp. 217–18.Google Scholar
91 The Diary of Philip, Hone, 1828–1851 (New York, 1851), p. 142.Google Scholar
92 Fish, , The Rise of the Common Man, op. cit., p. 54.Google Scholar
93 Glyndon, Van Deusen, The Jackson Era, 1828–1848 (New York, 1959), pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
94 Bray, Hammond, Banks and Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War (Princeton, 1957), p. 238.Google Scholar
95 Howard, Zinn, A People's History of the United States (New York, 1980), p. 59.Google Scholar
96 Paul, A. Gilje, “The Baltimore Riots of 1812 and the Breakdown of the Anglo-American Mob Tradition”, in: Journal of Social History, XIII (1979-1980).Google Scholar
97 James, B. Agnew, Egg Nog Riot: The Christmas Mutiny at West Point (San Rafael, 1979), p. ix.Google Scholar
98 John, J. Duffy and Nicholas Muller, H., III, An Anxious Democracy: Aspects of the1830's (Westport, Conn., 1982), p. 4.Google Scholar
99 Sean, Wilentz, “Artisan Republican Festivals and the Rise of Class Conflict in New York City, 1788–1837”, in: Working-Class America, op. cit., p. 54.Google Scholar
100 Theodore, M. Hammett, “Two Mobs of Jacksonian Boston: Ideology and Interest”, in: Journal of American History. LXII (1975-1976), p. 867.Google Scholar
101 Smith, , The Nation Comes of Age, p. 746.Google Scholar
102 Gilje, , “The Baltimore Riots”, loc. cit., p. 564.Google Scholar
103 Paul, Owen Weinbaum, Mobs and Demagogues: The Response to Collective Violence in New York City in the Early Nineteenth Century (Ann Arbor, 1977), p. iv.Google Scholar
104 Michael, Chavalier, Society, Manners, and Politics in the United States (Garden City, N.Y., 1961), pp. 371ff.Google Scholar
105 Michael, Kammen, People of Paradox (New York, 1972), p. 253.Google Scholar
106 Lee, Benson, The Concept of Jacksonian Democracy (Princeton, 1970), pp. 151–52Google Scholar
107 Walter, Hugins, Jacksonian Democracy and the Working Class (Stanford, 1960), pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
108 Rorabaugh, W. J., The Alcoholic Republic (New York, 1979), p. 25.Google Scholar
109 Ian, R. Tyrrell, Sobering Up: From Temperance to Prohibition in Antebellum America, 1800–1860 (Westport, 1979), p. 107.Google Scholar
110 Richard, D. Brown, Modernization: The Transformation of American Life, 1600–1865 (New York, 1976), p. 155.Google Scholar
111 Foster, Rhea Dulles, America Learns To Play: A History of Recreation (New York, 1965), p. 90.Google Scholar
112 Rorabaugh, , The Alcoholic Republic, op. cit., p. 169.Google Scholar
113 Bruce, Laurie, “Nothing on Compulsion: Life Styles of Philadelphia Artisans, 1820–1850”, in: American Working Class Culture, ed. by Milton, Cantor (Westport, 1979), p. 106.Google Scholar
114 Tyrrell, , Sobering up, op. cit., p. 127.Google Scholar
115 Rorabaugh, , The Alcoholic Republic, p. 15.Google Scholar
116 ibid., p. 8.
117 Joseph, R. Gusfield, Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement (Urbana, 1963), p. 43.Google Scholar
118 Rorabaugh, , The Alcoholic Republic, p. 187.Google Scholar
118 This generalizatinn does not mean to imply an easy or complete end of the issue. Concerning the severity and persistence of this phenomenon see Jed, Dannenbaum'sstudy of nineteenth-century Cincinnati, Drink and Disorder (Urbana, 1984).Google Scholar
120 Ronald, G. Waters, American Reformers, 1815–1860 (New York, 1978), p. 209.Google Scholar
121 Michael, B. Katz, Michael, J. Doucet, Mark, J. Stern, The Social Organization of Early Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, Mass., 1982), p. 349.Google Scholar
122 Michael, B. Katz, Irony of Early School Reform (Cambridge, Mass., 1968), p. xvii.Google Scholar
123 Faux, , “Memorable Days in American”, loc. cit., pp. 130–31 (08 5, 1819).Google Scholar
124 Frederick, Marryat, A Diary in America (New York, 1962), p. 352.Google Scholar
125 Curti, , The Social Ideas of American Educators, p. 80.Google Scholar
126 Carl, F. Kaestle, Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780–1860 (New York, 1983), pp. 96–97.Google Scholar
127 Katz, et al., Early Industrial Capitalism, op. cit., p. 378.Google Scholar
128 Clifford, S. Griffin, “Religious Benevolence as Social Control, 1815–1860”, in: Mississippi Valley Historical Review, XLIV (1957–1958), p. 436.Google Scholar
129 Kasson, , Civilizing the Machine, op. cit., p. 73.Google Scholar Also the important David, J. Rothman, The Discovery of the Asylum (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
130 Rorabaugh, , The Alcoholic Republic, p. 213.Google Scholar
131 Page, Smith, Daughters of the Promised Land: Women in American History (Boston, 1970), p. 64.Google Scholar
132 Quoted by Cochran, , Business in American Life, op. cit., p. 91.Google Scholar
133 Stephen, Nissenbaum, Sex, Diet and Debility in Jacksonian America (Westport, 1980), p. 26.Google Scholar
134 Carl, Degler, At Odds: Women and the Family in America from the Revolution to the Present (New York, 1980), p. 251.Google Scholar
135 Nissenbaum, , Sex, Diet and Debility, op. cit., p. 28.Google Scholar
136 Jayne, A. Sokolow, Eros and Modernization (Cranbury, N.Y., 1983), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
137 Degler, , At Odds, op. cit., p. 250.Google Scholar
138 Smith, , The Nation Comes of Age, p. 714.Google Scholar
139 Gerda, Lerner, “The Lady and the Mill Girl: Changes in the Status of Women in the Age of Jackson”, in: Midcontinental American Studies Journal, X (1969), p. 11–12.Google Scholar
140 Richard, Drinnon, Facing West: Metaphysics of Indian-Hating and Empire-Building (Minneapolis, 1980), p. 107.Google Scholar
141 Michael, Paul Rogin, Fathers and Children: Andrew Jackson and the Subjugation of the American Indian (New York, 1975), p. 165.Google Scholar
142 ibid., p. 13.
143 Quoted by Major, L. Wilson, Space, Time and Freedom (Westport, 1974), p. 12.Google Scholar
144 Lee Clark, Mitchell, Witnesses to a Vanishing America (Princeton, 1980).Google Scholar
You have
Access