Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:00:21.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suggested instruments for General Practitioners in countries with low schooling to screen for cognitive impairment in the elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2014

Alessandro Ferrari Jacinto ,
Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki ,
Claudia Sellitto Porto ,
Milton de Arruda Martins ,
Vanessa de Albuquerque Citero  and
Ricardo Nitrini
Alessandro Ferrari Jacinto*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Brazil
Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil
Claudia Sellitto Porto
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil
Milton de Arruda Martins
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil
Vanessa de Albuquerque Citero
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Brazil
Ricardo Nitrini
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Alessandro Ferrari Jacinto, Department of Psychiatry, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Rua São Carlos do Pinhal, 508/121, São Paulo 01333-000, Brazil. Phone: +5511982622970; Fax: +551138072970. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

General Practitioners (GPs) from underdeveloped countries apply cognitive impairment (CI) assessment tools translated and adapted to cultural setting from other idioms, mainly English. As schooling in elderly from underdeveloped countries tends to be relatively heterogeneous, it is necessary to establish normative and cut-off scores for these CI instruments that are based on studies conducted locally. Some CI screening instruments frequently used by Brazilian specialists in dementia were analyzed to determine which could be most useful to GPs in their working sets.

Method:

Two hundred forty-eight patients aged 65 years or older that had been assisted by GPs in a tertiary hospital in Brazil were evaluated. Based on the MMSE and/or Short-IQCODE scores, 52 probable cases were identified on the basis of clinical data, performances on the neuropsychological tests and questionnaires (Functional Assessment Questionnaire/FAQ, Category Verbal Fluency/CVF, Clock Drawing Test/CDT) and blood tests and brain CT.

Results:

The combination of a functional questionnaire with a cognitive instrument had higher sensitivity and specificity than using the instruments alone. A FAQ cut-off of 3 in conjunction with a CDT cut-off of 6 proved optimal (93% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity). A higher specificity (93.5%) was attained using a combination of the FAQ (cut-off of 3) with the CVF (cut-off of 10).

Conclusions:

For low schooling elderly, the combination of the FAQ and CVF represented a very simple method of increasing the chances of correct screening. For those with higher schooling, the combination of the FAQ and CDT was more suitable.

Keywords

cognitive impairmentscreeningcognitive testingdeveloping countryaging
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 26 , Issue 7 , July 2014 , pp. 1121 - 1125
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aprahamian, I., Martinelli, J. E., Neri, A. L. and Yassuda, M. S. (2009). The Clock Drawing Test: a review of its accuracy in screening for dementia. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 3, 74–81.Google Scholar
Barret, J. J., Haley, W. E., Harrel, L. E. and Powers, R. E. (1997). Knowledge about Alzheimer disease among primary care physicians. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 11, 99–106.Google Scholar
Boustani, M., Peterson, B., Hanson, L., Harris, H. and Lohr, K. N. (2003). Screening for dementia in the primary care: a summary of the evidence for the US preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138, 927–937.Google Scholar
Brucki, S. M. D. and Rocha, M. S. (2004). Category fluency test: effects of age, gender and education on total scores, clustering and switching in Brazilian Portuguese-speaking subjects. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 37, 1771–1777.Google Scholar
Brucki, S. M. D., Nitrini, R., Caramelli, P., Bertolucci, P. H. F. and Okamoto, I. H. (2003). Suggestions for use of the Mini Mental State Exam in Brazil. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 61, 777–781.Google Scholar
Bustamante, S. E. Z. et al. (2003). Combined instruments on the evaluation of dementia in the elderly: preliminary results. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 61, 601–606.Google Scholar
Caramelli, P., Carthery-Goulart, M. T., Porto, C. S., Charchat-Fichman, H. and Nitrini, R. (2007). Category fluency as a screening test for Alzheimer disease in illiterate and literate patients. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 21, 65–67.Google Scholar
Caramelli, P. et al. (2011) Diagnóstico de doença de Alzheimer no Brasil. Exames complementares. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 5, 11–20.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Fox, C., Lafortune, L., Boustani, M. and Brayne, C. (2013). The pros and cons of early diagnosis in dementia. British Journal of General Practice, 63, 510–512.Google Scholar
Jacinto, A. F., Brucki, S. M. D., Porto, C. S., Martins, M. A. and Nitrini, R. (2011). Detection of cognitive impairment in the elderly by general internists in Brazil. Clinics, 66, 1379–1384.Google Scholar
Jacinto, A. F., Brucki, S. M. D., Porto, C. S., Martins, M. A. and Nitrini, R. (2012). Screening of cognitive impairment by general internists using two simple instruments. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 6, 42–47.Google Scholar
Jacinto, A. F., Nitrini, R., Brucki, S. M., Porto, C. S., de Mello Franco, F. G. and de Albuquerque Citero, V. (2013). The pros and cons of early diagnosis of dementia. British Journal of General Practice, 63, 463.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. F. (1994). A short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): development and cross-validation. Psychological Medicine, 24, 145–153.Google Scholar
Mathew, R. and Mathuranath, P. S. (2008). Issues in evaluation of cognition in the elderly in developing countries. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 11, 82–88.Google Scholar
Morris, J. C. (1993). The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology, 43, 2412–2414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nitrini, R., Caramelli, P., Porto, C. S., Fichman, H. C. and Formigoni, A. P. (2007). Brief cognitive battery in the diagnosis of mild Alzheimer's disease in subjects with medium and high levels of education. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 1, 32–36.Google Scholar
Nitrini, R. et al. (1994). Brief and easy-to-administer neuropsychological tests in the diagnosis of dementia. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 52, 457–465.Google Scholar
Nitrini, R. et al. (2004). Performance of illiterate and literate nondemented elderly subjects in two tests of long-term memory. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 634–638.Google Scholar
Perroco, T. R. et al. (2009). Performance of Brazilian long and short IQCODE on the screening of dementia in elderly people with low education. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 531–538.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, R. I., Kurosaki, T. T., Harrah, C. H. Jr., Chance, J. M. and Filos, S. (1982) Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 323–329.Google Scholar
Portal Brasil (Internet). (2013) Brasilia: Unified Health System (Primary Care Units). Available from: http://www.brasil.gov.br/sobre/health/service/primary-care-units.Google Scholar
Porto, C. S., Charchat-Fichman, H., Caramelli, P., Bahia, V. S. and Nitrini, R. (2003). Brazilian version of the Mattis dementia rating scale: diagnosis of mild dementia in Alzheimer's disease. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 61, 339–345.Google Scholar
Prince, M. (2000). Methodological issues for population-based research into dementia in developing countries: a position paper from the 10–66 Dementia Research Group. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 21–30.Google Scholar
Radanovic, M. et al. (2009). Verbal fluency in the detection of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease among Brazilian Portuguese speakers: the influence of education. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 1081–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renshaw, J., Scurfield, L. C. and Orrel, M. (2000). General practitioner's views on the early diagnosis of dementia. British Journal of General Practice, 51, 37–38.Google Scholar
Takada, L. T. et al. (2006). Comparison between two tests of delayed recall for the diagnosis of dementia. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 64, 35–40.Google Scholar
Valcour, V. G., Masaki, H., Curb, J. D. and Blanchette, P. L. (2000). The detection of dementia in the primary care setting. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 2964–2968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed