Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T10:29:43.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjective memory complaints, depressive symptoms and instrumental activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2015

Seon Young Ryu ,
Sang Bong Lee ,
Tae Woo Kim  and
Taek Jun Lee
Seon Young Ryu*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, South Korea
Sang Bong Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, South Korea
Tae Woo Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, South Korea
Taek Jun Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, South Korea
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Seon Young Ryu, MD, Department of Neurology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 64 Daeheung-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 34943, South Korea. Phone: +82-42-220-9010; Fax: +82-42-257-4485. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background:

The diagnostic relevance of subjective memory complaints (SMCs) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains to be unresolved. The aim of this study is to determine clinical correlates of SMCs in MCI. Furthermore, we examined whether there are the differences due to different aspects of complaints (i.e. prospective memory (PM) versus retrospective memory (RM) complaints).

Methods:

We examined the cross-sectional associations between SMCs and depressive symptoms, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and cognitive measures in sixty-six individuals with MCI (mean age: 65.7 ± 8.01 years). The criteria for MCI included SMCs, objective cognitive impairment, normal general cognitive function, largely intact functional activities, and absence of dementia. SMCs were assessed using the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ), which contains 16 items describing everyday memory failure of both PM and RM.

Results:

SMC severity (i.e. PRMQ total score) was associated with stronger depressive symptoms and worse IADL performance. SMCs were not related to cognitive measures. For PM and RM subscores, both depressive symptoms and IADL were related to the PRMQ-PM and -RM scores. The main contributors to these PM and RM scores were depressive symptoms and IADL impairment, respectively.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that SMCs are more associated with depressive symptoms and IADL problems than with cognitive performance in individuals with MCI. Furthermore, while PM and RM complaints are related to both depressive symptoms and IADL, the differences between these main contributors suggest that RM complaints based on IADL could be more associated with the organically driven pathological features of MCI.

Keywords

subjective memory complaintsmild cognitive impairmentdepressioninstrumental activities of daily living
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , March 2016 , pp. 487 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulrab, K. and Heun, R. (2008). Subjective memory impairment. A review of its definitions indicates the need for a comprehensive set of standardised and validated criteria. European Psychiatry, 23, 321–330.Google Scholar
Ahn, H. J. et al. (2010). Seoul neuropsychological screening battery-dementia version (SNSB-D): a useful tool for assessing and monitoring cognitive impairments in dementia patients. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 25, 1071–1076. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.7.1071.Google Scholar
Bae, J. N. and Cho, M. J. (2004). Development of the Korean version of the geriatric depression scale and its short form among elderly psychiatric patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 297–305.Google Scholar
Buckley, R. et al. (2013). Factors affecting subjective memory complaints in the AIBL aging study: Biomarkers, memory, affect, and age. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 1307–1315. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, R. F. et al. (2015). Phenomenological characterization of memory complaints in preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology, 29, 571–581. doi: 10.1037/neu0000156.Google Scholar
Byun, E. H. and Kim, K. K. (2009). Prospective and retrospective memory failures in persons with memory complaints: a questionnaire study. Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders, 8, 45–52.Google Scholar
Clarnette, R. M., Almeida, O. P., Forstl, H., Paton, A. and Martins, R. N. (2001). Clinical characteristics of individuals with subjective memory loss in Western Australia: results from a cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 168–174.Google Scholar
Cook, S. and Marsiske, M. (2006). Subjective memory beliefs and cognitive performance in normal and mildly impaired older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 10, 413–423.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. R., Smith, G., Maylor, E. A., Della Sala, S. and Logie, R. H. (2003). The prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory, 11, 261–275.Google Scholar
Gifford, K. A. et al. (2015). Subjective memory complaint only relates to verbal episodic memory performance in mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 44, 309–318. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140636.Google Scholar
Glodzik-Sobanska, L. et al. (2007). Subjective memory complaints: presence, severity and future outcome in normal older subjects. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 24, 177–184.Google Scholar
Jessen, F. et al. (2010). Prediction of dementia by subjective memory impairment: effects of severity and temporal association with cognitive impairment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 414–422. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.30.Google Scholar
Jonker, C., Geerlings, M. I. and Schmand, B. (2000). Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A review of clinical and population-based studies. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 983–991.Google Scholar
Kang, S. J., Choi, S. H., Lee, B. H., Kwon, J. C., Na, D. L. and Han, S. H. (2002). The reliability and validity of the Korean instrumental activities of daily living (K-IADL). Journal of the Korean Neurological Association, 20, 8–14.Google Scholar
Kang, Y., Chin, J. H., Na, D. L., Lee, J. H. and Park, J. S. (2000). A normative study of the Korean version of controlled oral word association test (COWAT) in the elderly. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, 385–392.Google Scholar
Kang, Y. W. and Na, D. L. (2003). Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery. Incheon: Human Brain Research and Consulting Co. Google Scholar
Kang, Y. W., Na, D. L. and Hahn, S. H. (1997). A validity study on the Korean mini-mental state examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. Journal of the Korean Neurological Association, 15, 300–308.Google Scholar
Kim, H. and Na, D. L. (1999). Normative data on the Korean version of the Boston naming test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 127–133.Google Scholar
Koehler, M. et al. (2011). Malperformance in verbal fluency and delayed recall as cognitive risk factors for impairment in instrumental activities of daily living. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 31, 81–88. doi: 10.1159/000323315.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Kang, Y. and Na, D. L. (2000). Efficiencies of stroop interference indexes in healthy older adults and dementia patients. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, 807–818.Google Scholar
Lenehan, M. E., Klekociuk, S. Z. and Summers, M. J. (2012). Absence of a relationship between subjective memory complaint and objective memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment (MCI): is it time to abandon subjective memory complaint as an MCI diagnostic criterion? International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 1505–1514. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000695.Google Scholar
Mahoney, F. I. and Bathel, D. W. (1965). Function evaluation: the Bathel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. J. (2008). The clinical significance of subjective memory complaints in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 1191–1202. doi: 10.1002/gps.2053.Google Scholar
Morris, J. C. (1993). The clinical dementia rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology, 43, 2412–2414.Google Scholar
Petersen, R. C. et al. (2001). Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology, 58, 1985–1992.Google Scholar
Ronnlund, M., Vestergren, P., Mantyla, T. and Nilsson, L. G. (2011). Predictors of self-reported prospective and retrospective memory in a population-based sample of older adults. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 172, 266–284.Google Scholar
Smith, G., Della Sala, S., Logie, R. H. and Maylor, E. A. (2000). Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: a questionnaire study. Memory, 8, 311–321.Google Scholar
Winblad, B. et al. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment: beyond controversies, towards a consensus—-report of the international working group on mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240–246.Google Scholar
Woods, S. P., Weinborn, M., Velnoweth, A., Rooney, A. and Bucks, R. S. (2012). Memory for intentions is uniquely associated with instrumental activities of daily living in healthy older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 134–138. doi:10.1017/S1355617711001263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yesavage, J. A. et al. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 37–49.Google Scholar