Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T11:23:08.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recognition of elder abuse by home care workers and older people in Romania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2010

Ioana Caciula ,
Gill Livingston ,
Rodica Caciula  and
Claudia Cooper
Ioana Caciula*
Affiliation:
“Equilibre” Humanitarian Association, Bucharest, Romania
Gill Livingston
Affiliation:
University College London and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Rodica Caciula
Affiliation:
“Equilibre” Humanitarian Association, Bucharest, Romania
Claudia Cooper
Affiliation:
University College London and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Ioana Caciula, “Equilibre” Humanitarian Association, Al. Valea Rosie nr. 4, Bl. M4, Sc. A, Et. 5, Ap. 24, sector 6, Bucharest, Romania. Phone: +40 723545940; Fax: +40 217461052. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: No previous studies have considered elder abuse in Eastern Europe. We aimed to determine the proportion of home care workers and older people receiving care in a Romanian home care service who correctly identified elder abuse in a vignette, and who had detected elder abuse at work.

Methods: In 2009, care workers and clients of a non-government home care organization serving four areas in Romania completed the Caregiver Scenario Questionnaire to measure ability to identify abuse. We asked the professionals whether they had detected a case of abuse.

Results: 35 (100%) professionals and 79 (65.8%) older people took part. Four (11.4%) professionals had encountered a case of elder abuse, two (5.7%) in the last year. No staff and only one older person correctly identified all four abusive strategies in a vignette. Staff with more professional caregiving experience recognized fewer abusive strategies (r = −0.46, p = 0.007).

Conclusion: Rates of identification were worryingly low among all professionals, and this was more marked if they had worked longer, suggesting their experiences may have reduced their ability to detect it. Mandatory abuse training for care professionals, and strategies to support reporters of suspected abuse, could help improve the management of elder abuse in all countries.

Keywords

elder abusehome careknowledge
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 403 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Compton, S. A., Flanagan, P. and Gregg, W. (1997). Elder abuse in people with dementia in Northern Ireland: prevalence and predictors in cases referred to a psychiatry of old age service. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 632–635.Google Scholar
Consiliul National de Formare Profesionala a Adultilor (2000). Standarde Ocupationale – Ingrijitor Batrani la Domiciliu. Bucharest: CNFPA.Google Scholar
Cooper, C., Selwood, A. and Livingston, G. (2008). The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review. Age and Ageing, 37, 151–160.Google Scholar
Cooper, C., Selwood, A. and Livingston, G. (2009). Knowledge, detection and reporting of abuse by health and social care professionals: a systematic review. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 826–838.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Home Office (2000). No Secrets: Guidance on Developing and Implementing Multi-agency Policies and Procedures to Protect Vulnerable Adults from Abuse. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2005). The Mental Capacity Act. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Edvardsson, D., Sandman, P., Nay, R. and Karlsson, S. (2009). Predictors of job strain in residential dementia care nursing staff. Journal of Nursing Management, 17, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Europa (2009). Population Projections 2008–2060. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=STAT/08/119; last accessed 11 November 2009.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Hempton, C. et al. (2010). Perceptions of elder abuse in Australia. Unpublished work, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
House of Commons Health Committee (2004). Elder Abuse. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministerul Muncii SSSF (2006). Privind aprobarea Standardelor minime specifice de calitate pentru serviciile de îngrijire la domiciliu pentru persoanele vârstnice si pentru centrele rezidentiale pentru persoanelevârstnice. Bucharest: Monitorul Oficial.Google Scholar
Selwood, A., Cooper, C. and Livingston, G. (2007). What is elder abuse – who decides? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 1009–1012.Google Scholar
Skills for Care (2005). Common Induction Standards: Social Care (Adults). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Thompson-McCormick, J., Jones, L., Cooper, C. and Livingston, G. (2009). Medical students’ recognition of elder abuse. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 770–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2002). Abuse of Older Persons: Recognizing and Responding to Abuse of Older Persons in a Global Context. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, S. et al. (2005). Attitudes, stress, and satisfaction of staff who care for residents with dementia. Gerontologist, 45, 96–105.Google Scholar