Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:26:42.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuropsychological characteristics of people living in squalor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2014

Sook Meng Lee ,
Matthew Lewis ,
Deborah Leighton ,
Ben Harris ,
Brian Long  and
Stephen Macfarlane
Sook Meng Lee
Affiliation:
Aged Psychiatry Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Victoria, Australia Department of Geriatric Medicine, Western Health, Sunshine, Victoria, Australia
Matthew Lewis
Affiliation:
Aged Psychiatry Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Victoria, Australia
Deborah Leighton
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Ben Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychology, Kingston Centre, Monash Health, Cheltenham, Victoria, Australia
Brian Long
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropsychology, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Stephen Macfarlane*
Affiliation:
Aged Psychiatry Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Victoria, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Stephen Macfarlane, Associate Professor, Aged Psychiatry Services, Caulfield Hospital, 260 Kooyong Road, Caulfield 3162, Victoria, Australia. Phone: +613-9076-6600; Fax: +613-9076-6180. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background:

Squalor is an epiphenomenon associated with a range of medical and psychiatric conditions. People living in squalor are not well described in the literature, and prior work has indicated that up to 50% do not have a psychiatric diagnosis. Squalor appears to be linked with neuropsychological deficits suggestive of the presence of impaired executive function. We present a case series of people living in squalor that examines their neuropsychological assessment and diagnosis.

Methods:

Clinicians from local health networks were invited to submit neuropsychological reports of patients living in squalor. These selected reports were screened to ensure the presence of squalor and a comprehensive examination of a set of core neuropsychological domains. Assessments were included if basic attention, visuospatial reasoning, information processing speed, memory function, and executive function were assessed.

Results:

Sixty-nine neuropsychological reports were included. Sixty-eight per cent of the group underwent neuropsychological assessments during an inpatient admission. For participants where it was available (52/69), the mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 25.29 (SD = 3.96). Neuropsychological assessment showed a range of cognitive impairment with nearly all the participants (92.75%) found to have frontal executive dysfunction. One person had an unimpaired neuropsychological assessment. Results indicated that dorsolateral prefrontal rather than orbitofrontal functions were more likely to be impaired. Vascular etiology was the most common cause implicated by neuropsychologists.

Conclusions:

Frontal executive dysfunction was a prominent finding in the neuropsychological profiles of our sample of squalor patients, regardless of their underlying medical or psychiatric diagnoses. Our study highlights the importance of considering executive dysfunction when assessing patients who live in squalor.

Keywords

squalorhoardingneuropsychologyfrontalexecutive function
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , May 2014 , pp. 837 - 844
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Beauchet, O. et al. (2002). Diogenes syndrome in the elderly: clinical form of frontal dysfunction? Report of 4 cases. Revue de Medecine Interne, 23, 122–131.Google Scholar
Berlin, H. A., Rolls, E. T. and Iversen, S. D. (2005). Borderline personality disorder, impulsivity, and the orbitofrontal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 2360–2373.Google Scholar
Clark, A. N., Mankikar, G. D. and Gray, I. (1975). Diogenes syndrome. A clinical study of gross neglect in old age. Lancet, 1, 366–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cybulska, E. and Rucinski, J. (1986). Gross self-neglect in old age. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 36, 21–25.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, F. E. et al. (2001). Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 70, 9–14.Google Scholar
Drummond, L. M., Turner, J. and Reid, S. (1997). Diogenes’ syndrome: a load of old rubbish? Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 14, 99–102.Google Scholar
Faustman, W. O., Moses, J. A. Jr. and Csernansky, J. G. (1990). Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in predicting neuropsychological functioning in a psychiatric sample. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 81, 126–131.Google Scholar
Funahashi, S. (2001). Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience Research, 39, 147–165.Google Scholar
Gregory, C., Halliday, G., Hodges, J. and Snowdon, J. (2011). Living in squalor: neuropsychological function, emotional processing and squalor perception in patients found living in squalor. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 724–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, G., Banerjee, S., Philpot, M. and Macdonald, A. (2000). Community study of people who live in squalor. Lancet, 355, 882–886.Google Scholar
Hanon, C., Pinquier, C., Gaddour, N., Said, S., Mathis, D. and Pellerin, J. (2004). Diogenes syndrome: a transnosographic approach. Encephale, 30, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopelman, M. D. (2002). Disorders of memory. Brain, 125, 2152–2190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebert, F. (2005). Diogene syndrome, a clinical presentation of fronto-temporal dementia or not? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 1203–1204.Google Scholar
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B. and Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1973). The Working Brain. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Macmillan, D. and Shaw, P. (1966). Senile breakdown in standards of personal and environmental cleanliness. British Medical Journal, 2, 1032–1037.Google Scholar
Malloy, P. F. et al. (1997). Cognitive screening instruments in neuropsychiatry: a report of the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 9, 189–197.Google Scholar
Moye, J. and Marson, D. C. (2007). Assessment of decision-making capacity in older adults: an emerging area of practice and research. Journals of Gerontology Series B –Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 62, P3–11.Google Scholar
Orrell, M. W., Sahakian, B. J. and Bergmann, K. (1989). Self-neglect and frontal lobe dysfunction. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reifler, B. V. (1996). Diogenes syndrome: of omelettes and souffles. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44, 1484–1485.Google Scholar
Snowdon, J. (1997). Squalor syndrome. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 1539–1540.Google Scholar
Snowdon, J. and Halliday, G. (2011). A study of severe domestic squalor: 173 cases referred to an old age psychiatry service. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 308–314.Google Scholar
Snowdon, J., Halliday, G. and Banerjee, S. (2012). Severe Domestic Squalor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stuss, D. T. (1992). Biological and psychological development of executive functions. Brain and Cognition, 20, 8–23.Google Scholar
Stuss, D. T. and Benson, D. F. (1984). Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 3–28.Google Scholar
Williams, H., Clarke, R., Fashola, Y. and Holt, G. (1998). Diogenes’ syndrome in patients with intellectual disability: ‘a rose by any other name’? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 316–320.Google Scholar
Wrigley, M. and Cooney, C. (1992). Diogenes syndrome: an Irish series. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 9, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar