Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:51:56.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The meaning and experience of well-being in dementia for psychiatrists involved in diagnostic disclosure: a qualitative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

A. Vince ,
C. Clarke  and
E. L. Wolverson
A. Vince*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Health and Well-being, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-Upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
C. Clarke
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Health and Well-being, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-Upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
E. L. Wolverson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Health and Well-being, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-Upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Vince, Department of Psychological Health and Well-being, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-Upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. Phone: +44 (0) 01482 464101. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Literature indicates that people's experiences of receiving a diagnosis of dementia can have a lasting impact on well-being. Psychiatrists frequently lead in communicating a diagnosis but little is known about the factors that could contribute to potential disparities between actual and best practice with regard to diagnostic disclosure. A clearer understanding of psychiatrists’ subjective experiences of disclosure is therefore needed to improve adherence to best practice guidelines and ensure that diagnostic disclosure facilitates living well with dementia.

Methods:

This study utilized qualitative methodology. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 11 psychiatrists were analyzed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).

Results:

Three superordinate and nine subordinate themes emerged from the data analysis. These included the following: (i) “The levels of well-being” (Continuing with life, Keeping a sense of who they are, Acceptance of the self), (ii) “Living well is a process” (Disclosure can set the scene for well-being, Positive but realistic messages, Whose role it is to support well-being?), and (iii) Ideal care versus real care (Supporting well-being is not prioritized, There isn't time, The fragmentation of care).

Conclusions:

Findings indicate that psychiatrists frame well-being in dementia as a multi-faceted biopsychosocial construct but that certain nihilistic attitudes may affect how well-being is integrated into diagnostic communication. Such attitudes were linked with the perceived threat of dementia and limitations of post-diagnostic care. Behaviors used to manage the negative affect associated with ethical and clinical tensions triggered by attempts to facilitate well-being at the point of diagnosis, and their impact on adherence to best practice disclosure, are discussed.

Keywords

dementiaquality of life (QoL)qualitative researchAlzheimer's disease (AD)clinical assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 93 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aminzadeh, F., Byszewski, A., Molnar, F. J. and Eisner, M. (2007). Emotional impact of dementia diagnosis: exploring persons with dementia and caregivers’ perspectives. Aging and Mental Health, 11, 281–290.Google Scholar
Bamford, C., Lamont, S., Eccles, M., Robinson, L., May, C. and Bond, J. (2004). Disclosing a diagnosis of dementia: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Psychological Society (2014). Clinical Psychology in the Early Stage Dementia Pathway. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Carpenter, B. and Dave, J. (2004). Disclosing a dementia diagnosis: a review of opinion and practice, and a proposed research agenda. The Gerontologist, 44, 149–158.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, S. K. and Chandra, P. S. (2010). Breaking bad news-Issues important for psychiatrists. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 3, 87–89.Google Scholar
Cornett, P. F. and Hall, J. R. (2008). Issues in disclosing a diagnosis of dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 251–256.Google Scholar
de Boer, M. E., Hertogh, C. M., Dröes, R. M., Riphagen, I. I., Jonker, C. and Eefsting, J. A. (2007). Suffering from dementia-the patient's perspective: a review of the literature. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 1021–1039.Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2009). Living Well With Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Doncaster, E., Hodge, S. and Orrell, M. (Published Online; June 2012). Memory Service Accreditation Programme (MSNAP): Standards for Memory Services, 3rd edn. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists Centre for Quality Improvement.Google Scholar
Dwyer, S. C. and Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, J. D., Beattie, L., Donnelly, M., Byszewski, A. and Molnar, F. J. (2007). Disclosure of the diagnosis of dementia. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 3, 404–410.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. C., Hughes, C., Routley, G. and Robinson, A. L. (2008). General practitioners’ experiences and understandings of diagnosing dementia: factors impacting on early diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 1776–1783.Google Scholar
Husband, H. J. (1999). The psychological consequences of learning a diagnosis of dementia: three case examples. Aging and Mental Health, 3, 179–183.Google Scholar
Husband, H. J. (2009). What do we tell people with dementia about their diagnosis and how do we tell them. In Moniz-Cook, E. D. and Manthorpe, J. (eds.), Early Psychosocial Interventions in Dementia: Evidence-based Practice (pp. 39–49). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Keightley, J. and Mitchell, A. (2004). What factors influence mental health professionals when deciding whether or not to share a diagnosis of dementia with the person? Aging & Mental Health, 8, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia Reconsidered. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lecouturier, J. et al. (2008). Appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: identifying the key behaviours of ‘best practice’. BMC Health Services Research, 8, 1.Google Scholar
Mate, K. E., Pond, C. D., Magin, P. J., Goode, S. M., McElduff, P. and Stocks, N. P. (2012). Diagnosis and disclosure of a memory problem is associated with quality of life in community based older Australians with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 1962–1971.Google Scholar
Moore, V. and Cahill, S. (2013). Diagnosis and disclosure of dementia–A comparative qualitative study of Irish and Swedish general practitioners. Aging & Mental Health, 17, 77–84.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2012). Dementia: supporting people with dementia and their carers in health and social care (update). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence/CG42.Google Scholar
Shaw, J., Brown, R. D. and Dunn, S. M. (2013). A qualitative study of stress and coping responses in doctors breaking bad news. Patient Education and Counselling, 91, 234–248.Google Scholar
Shaw, J., Dunn, S. and Heinrich, P. (2012). Managing the delivery of bad news: an in-depth analysis of doctors’ delivery style. Patient Education and Counseling, 87, 186–192.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P. and Larking, M. (2009). Interpretive phenomenological analysis: theory method and research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Steeman, E., Casterlé, D., Dierckx, B., Godderis, J. and Grypdonck, M. (2006). Living with early-stage dementia: a review of qualitative studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54, 722–738.Google Scholar
Vernooij Dassen, M., Derksen, E., Scheltens, P. and Moniz-Cook, E. (2006) Receiving a diagnosis of dementia: the experience over time, Dementia 5, 397–410 Google Scholar
Werner, P., Karnieli-Miller, O. and Eidelman, S. (2013). Current Knowledge and future directions about the disclosure of dementia: a systematic review of the first decade of the 21st century. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 9, 74–88.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, P., Frisoni, G. B. and Post, S. (2004). Breaking the diagnosis of dementia. The Lancet Neurology, 3, 124–128.Google Scholar
Wolverson, E. L., Clarke, C. and Moniz-Cook, E. D. (2016). Living positively with dementia: a systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature. Aging & Mental Health, 20, 676–699.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2011). Mental health: a state of well-being. Available at http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/mental_health/en/; last accessed on 01 July 2013.Google Scholar