Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:25:10.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is the GDS-30 better than the GHQ-12 for screening depression in elderly people in the community? The Bambui Health Aging Study (BHAS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2006

Erico Costa
Affiliation:
Public Health and Aging Research Group, Federal University of Minas Gerais Medical School and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, René Rachou Research Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil Institute of Psychiatry and King's College London, London, U.K.
Sandhi M. Barreto
Affiliation:
Public Health and Aging Research Group, Federal University of Minas Gerais Medical School and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, René Rachou Research Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Elizabeth Uchoa
Affiliation:
Public Health and Aging Research Group, Federal University of Minas Gerais Medical School and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, René Rachou Research Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Joselia O. A. Firmo
Affiliation:
Public Health and Aging Research Group, Federal University of Minas Gerais Medical School and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, René Rachou Research Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa
Affiliation:
Public Health and Aging Research Group, Federal University of Minas Gerais Medical School and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, René Rachou Research Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Martin Prince
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry and King's College London, London, U.K.

Abstract

Background: Two-phase diagnostic surveys are popular in psychiatric epidemiology. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) are commonly used to screen in older and younger populations, respectively.

Method: In Phase I, in this Brazilian population-based study, we screened 392 participants aged ≥ 75 years. In Phase II, half of those scoring ≥ 11 in the GDS and ≥ 4 in the GHQ and 20% of others were selected for detailed evaluation with ICD-10 diagnoses assessed by the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) (n = 126).

Results: Internal consistencies were good for all scales. At the optimal cut-off points GDS-30 (14/15) yielded 73% sensitivity and 65% specificity, while classical GHQ (4/5), Likert (15/16) and c-GHQ (5/6) yielded 66–75% sensitivity and 57–62% specificity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis against SCAN indicated only moderate screening potential [area under the ROC curve (AUROC): GDS = 0.76; classical GHQ = 0.74; Likert = 0.76; c-GHQ = 0.73], with no statistically significant differences. All measures were biased by disability and self-reported health.

Conclusions: In this study, neither screen was sufficiently predictive of SCAN ICD-10 diagnosis to recommend their use in two-phase surveys. Despite its theoretical advantages, the GDS-30 performed no better than the GHQ-12, and was biased in similar ways.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
International Psychogeriatric Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Supplementary material: File

Costa Supplementary Material

Table.word

Download Costa Supplementary Material(File)
File 55.8 KB