Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:58:06.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of socioeconomic status on the prevalence of dementia in an inner city memory disorders clinic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2009

C. Fischer ,
E. Yeung ,
T. Hansen ,
S. Gibbons ,
L. Fornazzari ,
L. Ringer  and
T. A. Schweizer
C. Fischer*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
E. Yeung
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
T. Hansen
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
S. Gibbons
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Ireland
L. Fornazzari
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Behavioural Neurology, Division of Neurology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
L. Ringer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
T. A. Schweizer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Corinne Fischer, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Department of Psychiatry, 17 Cardinal Carter Wing, 17044, Toronto, Ontario, M5B1W8. Phone: +1 416-864-5320; Fax: +1 416-864-5480. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) has been identified as a possible risk factor for the development of dementia, with low SES shown to be associated with a higher prevalence of dementia, increased psychiatric comorbidity and worse baseline cognitive functioning. Few studies have actually looked at the impact of SES within a clinical population using multiple measures of SES and cognition.

Methods: Data on 217 patients seen in an Inner City Memory Disorders Clinic were analyzed with respect to demographic status, clinical status and SES. Correlations were then examined looking at the relationship of SES to clinical variables and neurocognitive status. Regression analysis was undertaken to examine the relative contribution of individual sociodemographic factors to a diagnosis of dementia.

Results: In general, there was wide variation in the sample examined with respect to most measures of SES. Approximately one third (36%) of the sample had a diagnosis of dementia, the mean age was 66.1 years and the mean Mini-mental State Examination score was relatively high (25.4). There was a strong association between age, individual annual income range, education, medical comorbidity and a diagnosis of dementia, with increased age and medical comorbidity being the strongest predictors.

Conclusion: Increased age, low education, high medical comorbidity and low annual income are all associated with a diagnosis of dementia in an inner city setting. Age and medical comorbidity appear to be more strongly associated with a diagnosis of dementia than SES in an inner city setting.

Keywords

Canadasocial classagedincomeriskcognitive function
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 1096 - 1104
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, O. P., Hill, K., Howard, R., O'Brien, J. and Levy, R. (1993). Demographic and clinical features of patients attending a memory clinic. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, D. A. et al. (2006). Socioeconomic status and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144, 82–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, A., Carter, C. and Jones, R. (1994). Memory performance, self-reported memory loss and depressive symptoms in attenders at a GP-referral and self-referral memory clinic. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 9, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, A. M., McKevitt, C, Rudd, A. G. and Wolfe, C. D. A. (2006). Socioeconomic status and stroke. Lancet Neurology, 5, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darvesh, S., Leach, L., Black, S., Kaplan, E. and Freedman, M. (1994). Behavioural Neurology Assessment—Behavioural Neurology Program, Toronto: Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care.Google Scholar
Darvesh, S., Leach, L., Black, S., Kaplan, M. and Freedman, M. (2005). The Behavioural Neurology Assessment. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 32, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, D. A. et al. (1997). Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons. Archives of Neurology, 11, 1399–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C. et al. (2008). Neurocognitive profiles in older adults with and without major depression. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 851–856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M, Folstein, S. and McHugh, P. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, M., Leach, L. and Kaplan, E. (1994). Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldbourt, U., Schnaider-Beeri, M. and Davidson, M. (2007). Socioeconomic status in relationship to death of vascular disease and late-life dementia. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 1–2, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, D. G. et al. (1999). Factors associated with depressive symptoms in non-demented community-dwelling elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 331–337.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hejl, A., Hording, M., Hasselbalch, E., Dam, H., Hemmingsen, R. and Waldemar, G. (2003). Psychiatric morbidity in a neurology-based memory clinic: the effect of systematic psychiatric evaluation. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 1773–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapral, M. K., Wang, H., Mamdani, M. and Tu, J. Y. (2002). Effect of socioeconomic status on treatment and mortality after stroke. Stroke, 33, 268–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karp, A. et al. (2004). Relation of education and occupation-based socioeconomic status to incident Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, A., et al. (2005). Socioeconomic differences in cognitive decline and the role of biomedical factors. Annals of Epidemiology, 8, 564–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, I. A. et al. (2008). Neighborhood deprivation, individual socioeconomic status, and cognitive function in older people: analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LoGiudice, D., Hassett, A., Cook, R., Flicker, L. and Ames, D. (2001). Equity of access to a memory clinic in Melbourne? Non-English speaking background attenders are more severely demented and have increased rates of psychiatric disorders. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luce, A., McKeith, I., Swann, A., Daniel, S. and O'Brien, J. (2001). How do memory clinics compare with traditional old age psychiatry services? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 837–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melzer, D., McWilliams, B., Brayne, C., Johnson, T. and Bond, J. (2002). Socioeconomic status and the expectation of disability in old age: estimates for England. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 286–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz, D. G., Ganapathy, G. R., Eliasziw, M. and Hachinski, V. (2000). Educational attainment and socioeconomic status of patients with autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology, 1, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitrini, R. et al. (1995). Evaluation of 100 patients with dementia in São Paulo, Brazil: correlation with socioeconomic status and education. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 3, 146–151.Google Scholar
Rochon, P. A. et al. (1996). Comorbid illness is associated with survival and length of hospital stay in patients with chronic disability: a prospective comparison of three comorbidity indices. Med Care, 34, 1093–1101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scazufca, M. et al. (2008). High prevalence of dementia among older adults from poor socioeconomic backgrounds in São Paulo, Brazil. International Psychogeriatrics, 2, 394–405.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. et al. (2001). Depression, APOE genotype and subjective memory impairment: a cross-sectional study in an African-Caribbean population. Psychological Medicine, 31, 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratford, J., LoGiudice, D., Flicker, L., Cook, R., Waltrowicz, W. and Ames, D. (2003). A memory clinical at a geriatric hospital: a report on 577 patients assessed with the CAMDEX over 9 years. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P., Inglis, F., Findlay, D., Gilchrist, J. and McMurdo, M. E. T. (1997). Memory clinic attenders: a review of 150 consecutive patients. Aging and Mental Health, 2, 181–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turrell, G. et al. (2002). Socioeconomic position across the lifecourse and cognitive function in late middle age. Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 1, S43–S51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. S. et al. (2005). Early life socioeconomic status and late life risk of Alzheimer's disease. Neuroepidemiology, 1, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J. H. et al. (2005). APOE polymorphism, socioeconomic status and cognitive function in mid-life: the Whitehall II longitudinal study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 7, 557–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar