Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:00:35.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of socioeconomic status on initial clinical presentation to a memory disorders clinic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2013

Winnie Qian ,
Tom A. Schweizer  and
Corinne E. Fischer
Winnie Qian
Affiliation:
Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
Tom A. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Corinne E. Fischer*
Affiliation:
Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Corinne E. Fischer, St. Michael's Hospital, room #17044 cc wing, #30 Bond St., Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8. Phone: +416-864-5320; Fax number: +416-864-5480. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Dementia affects 15% of Canadians 65 and older, and the prevalence is expected to double over the next two decades. Low socioeconomic status (SES) can increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the precursor mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but it is unknown what the relationship of SES is on initial clinical presentation to a memory disorders clinic.

Methods:

Data from 127 AD and 135 MCI patients who presented to our Memory Disorders Clinic from 2004 to 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. We examined the relationship between SES (measured using Hollingshead two-factor index) and (1) diagnosis of either AD or MCI; (2) age when first presented to clinic; (3) objective cognitive tests to indicate clinical severity; and (4) the use of cognitive enhancers, medication for treating mild-to-moderate AD patients.

Results:

AD patients had lower SES than MCI patients (p < 0.001, r = 0.232). Lower SES was associated with a greater age at initial time of diagnosis (χ2 = 11.5, p = 0.001). In MCI patients, higher SES individuals outperformed lower SES individuals on the BNA after correcting for the effect of age (p = 0.004). Lower SES was also associated with decreased use of cognitive enhancers in AD patients (p < 0.001, r = 0.842).

Conclusion:

Individuals with lower SES come into memory clinic later when the disease has progressed to dementia, while higher SES individuals present earlier when the disease is still in its MCI stage. There were more higher SES individuals who presented to our memory clinic. Higher SES is associated with better cognitive functioning and increased use of cognitive enhancers. The health policy implication is that we need to better engage economically disadvantaged individuals, perhaps at the primary care level.

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease (AD)mild cognitive impairment (MCI)socioeconomic status (SES)memory clinicinitial clinical presentationcognitive functioncognitive enhancers
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , April 2014 , pp. 597 - 603
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, C. L., Behrman, S. and Ebmeier, K. P. (2013). Early diagnosis beneficial in Alzheimer's disease. Practitioner, 257, 15–18, 12.Google Scholar
Alzheimer Society (2012). A new way of looking at the impact of dementia in Canada [pdf]. Available at: http://www.alzheimer.ca/~/media/Files/national/Media-releases/asc_release_09272012_newdatarelease_en.ashx (accessed 4 June 2013).Google Scholar
Darvesh, S., Leach, L., Black, S. E., Kaplan, E. and Freedman, M. (2005). The behavioural neurology assessment. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 32, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawe, B., Procter, A. and Philpot, M. (1992). Concepts of mild memory impairment in the elderly and their relationship to dementia: a review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 7, 473–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doraiswamy, P. M. (2003). Interventions for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 120–130.Google Scholar
Droomers, M. and Westert, G. P. (2004). Do lower socioeconomic groups use more health services, because they suffer from more illnesses? European Journal of Public Health, 14, 311–313.Google Scholar
EClipSE (2010). Education, the brain reserve and dementia: neuroprotective or compensation? Brain, 133, 2210–2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D. A. et al. (1997). Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons. Archives of Neurology, 54, 1399–1405.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Fratiglioni, L. and Wang, H. X. (2007). Brain reserve hypothesis in dementia. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 12, 11–22.Google Scholar
Goldbourt, U., Schnaider-Beeri, M. and Davidson, M. (2007). Socioeconomic status in relationship to death of vascular disease and late-life dementia. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 257, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollingshead, A. B. and Redlich, F. C. (1957). Two Factor Index of Social Position. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. J., Lin, C. H., Lane, H. Y. and Tsai, G. E. (2012). NMDA neurotransmission dysfunction in behavioral and psychological symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Current Neuropharmacology, 10, 272–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karp, A., Kareholt, I., Qiu, C., Bellander, T., Winblad, B. and Fratiglioni, L. (2004). Relation of education and occupation-based socioeconomic status to incident Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159, 175–183.Google Scholar
Koster, A. et al. (2005). Socioeconomic differences in cognitive decline and the role of biomedical factors. Annals of Epidemiology, 15, 564–571.Google Scholar
Krishnadas, R. et al. (2013). Socioeconomic deprivation and cortical morphology: psychological, social, and biological determinants of ill health study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 75, 616–623.Google Scholar
Leung, K. K., Bartlett, J. W., Barnes, J., Manning, E. N., Ourselin, S. and Fox, N. C. (2013). Cerebral atrophy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: rates and acceleration. Neurology, 80, 648–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marioni, R. E., van den Hout, A., Valenzuela, M. J., Brayne, C. and Matthews, F. E. (2012). Active cognitive lifestyle associates with cognitive recovery and a reduced risk of cognitive decline. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 28, 223–230.Google Scholar
Moritz, D. J. and Petitti, D. B. (1993). Association of education with reported age of onset and severity of Alzheimer's disease at presentation: implications for the use of clinical samples. American Journal of Epidemiology, 137, 456–462.Google ScholarPubMed
Munoz, D. G., Ganapathy, G. R., Eliasziw, M. and Hachinski, V. (2000). Educational attainment and socioeconomic status of patients with autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology, 57, 85–89.Google Scholar
Ngandu, T. et al. (2007). Education and dementia: what lies behind the association? Neurology, 69, 1442–1450.Google Scholar
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Kokmen, E. and Tangelos, E. G. (1997). Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics, 9, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, M. et al. (2012). Dementia incidence and mortality in middle-income countries, and associations with indicators of cognitive reserve: a 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based cohort study. Lancet, 380, 50–58.Google Scholar
Sattler, C., Toro, P., Schonknecht, P. and Schroder, J. (2012). Cognitive activity, education and socioeconomic status as preventive factors for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry Research, 196, 90–95.Google Scholar
Scazufca, M. et al. (2008). High prevalence of dementia among older adults from poor socioeconomic backgrounds in Sao Paulo, Brazil. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 394–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroder, J., Kratz, B., Pantel, J., Minnemann, E., Lehr, U. and Sauer, H. (1998). Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in an elderly community sample. Journal of Neural Transmission: Supplementum, 54, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Y., Albert, S., Tang, M. X. and Tsai, W. Y. (1999). Rate of memory decline in AD is related to education and occupation: cognitive reserve? Neurology, 53, 1942–1947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, Y., Gurland, B., Tatemichi, T. K., Tang, M. X., Wilder, D. and Mayeux, R. (1994). Influence of education and occupation on the incidence of Alzheimer's disease. JAMA, 271, 1004–1010.Google Scholar
Teel, C. S. (2004). Rural practitioners’ experiences in dementia diagnosis and treatment. Aging and Mental Health, 8, 422–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tervo, S. et al. (2004). Incidence and risk factors for mild cognitive impairment: a population-based three-year follow-up study of cognitively healthy elderly subjects. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 17, 196–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, A. M. and Stern, Y. (2011). Cognitive reserve in aging. Current Alzheimer Research, 8, 354–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zec, R. F. et al. (1992). Alzheimer disease assessment scale: useful for both early detection and staging of dementia of the Alzheimer type. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 6, 89–102.Google Scholar