FC47: To use or not to use? Multiple perspectives on residents’ alcohol and tobacco use in residential care facilities

Abstract

Objectives:

Residential care facilities (RCFs) provide 24/7 care to older adults with cognitive and/or physical disabilities. RCFs aim to provide person-centred care (PCC) to enhance the quality of life (QoL) of residents. Residents are dependent on their environment to fulfil their needs and wishes, such as drinking alcohol or smoking tobacco. Although alcohol and tobacco use can be experienced as a part of QoL in the final phase of life and the motivation to quit these substances is low, it can cause severe health problems in older adults. In RCFs this may cause a dilemma between the QoL of individual residents and the health and safety problems of all residents. This study aims to explore multiple perspectives on alcohol and tobacco use within the RCF.

Methods:

A qualitative research design was chosen, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. A various sample was purposively selected in two organizations on two types of units (psychogeriatric units and units providing care for residents with mainly physical disabilities): residents who use alcohol and/or tobacco and those who do not. Subsequently, four of these 16 residents were invited to participate in an in-depth case study. To explore the dynamics of the social environment, both formal and informal caregivers were invited to participate.

Results:

Residents are satisfied with their current use and value their autonomy regarding alcohol and tobacco use. Residents acknowledge that their use could cause a nuisance to others. Multiple caregivers are involved in their use and residents experience dependency on these caregivers to smoke tobacco or drink alcohol. There was limited interaction between the residents and their (in)formal caregivers and amongst the caregivers on this topic. Moreover, caregivers tended to act from their own perspectives, based on their professional expertise, knowledge, and attitudes towards residents’ alcohol and tobacco use.

Conclusion:

A dilemma arises between protecting residents from the adverse (health) outcomes of alcohol and tobacco use and sustaining their QoL by optimizing their autonomy. Future research could assess how to integrate providing PCC to residents by offering choices and autonomy, while considering the addictive component of these substances, health, and safety risks for all.